Delayed Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Identified by Remote Monitoring With Tibial Extension Sensors.

Remote monitoring of patient activity following total knee arthroplasty has grown in popularity over the past decade. Recent technological advances have allowed for implantation of accelerometry devices within the tibial stem for remote monitoring of mobility postoperatively. Remote monitoring is suggested to allow for intervention in the case of events that may occur outside of regular follow-up appointments or traditional patient questionnaires. This report details the ability of an implanted tibial sensor to continuously collect objective mobility data allowing the orthopaedic surgeon to intervene beyond the standard 90-day episode of care.

Altered biomechanics in bilateral total knee replacement patients during stair negotiation.

BACKGROUND: Many total knee replacement (TKR) patients need to have a contralateral knee replacement. Biomechanical differences between first and second replaced limbs of bilateral TKR have not been examined during stair negotiation. Additionally, it is unknown whether hip and ankle biomechanics of bilateral patients are altered. We examined hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics of first and second replaced limbs bilateral patients, as well as replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients, during stair ascent and descent. METHODS: Eleven bilateral TKR patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and 15 unilateral TKR patients (64.93 ± 5.11 years, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 89.18 ± 17.55 kg) were recruited. Patients performed three to five trials of stair ascent and descent. The second step, during ascent, was the step of interest when analyzing each limb. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) analysis of variance was performed to determine differences between limbs and groups. RESULTS: During ascent, bilateral patients exhibited decreased peak loading-response knee extension (KEM) and push-off plantarflexion moments. Unilateral replaced limb KEM was lower than non-replaced limbs. During descent, bilateral patients descended the staircase significantly slower, had lower peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force and KEM, and push-off KEM. Bilateral patients had higher peak loading-response hip extension and push-off plantarflexion moments, and increased knee adduction ROM, compared with unilateral TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral patients exhibited similar hip, knee, and ankle joint moments between first and second replaced limbs. Substantial differences in hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics during stair negotiation in bilateral patients compared with unilateral patients may indicate a more complex adaptation strategy present in these patients.