Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 Plus Surgery and Adjuvant S-1 for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer: Updated Overall Survival Outcomes From Phase III PRODIGY.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The phase III PRODIGY study demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy (CSC) improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (SC) for patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) with clinical T2-3N+ or T4Nany disease. The primary end point was PFS. Overall survival (OS) was the secondary end point. We herein report the long-term follow-up outcomes, including OS, from this trial. A total of 238 and 246 patients were randomly assigned to the CSC and SC arms, respectively, and were treated (full analysis set). As of the data cutoff (September 2022), the median follow-up duration of the surviving patients was 99.5 months. Compared with SC, CSC significantly increased the OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; stratified log-rank P = .027) with an 8-year OS rate of 63.0% and 55.1% for the CSC and SC arms, respectively. CSC also significantly improved the PFS (HR, 0.70; stratified log-rank P = .016). In conclusion, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy, as part of perioperative chemotherapy, prolonged the OS of Asian patients with LAGC relative to patients treated with surgery and adjuvant S-1. It should be considered one of the standard treatment options for patients with LAGC in Asia.

Prognostic significance of quantitative carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 20 mRNA detection in peritoneal washes of gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most common recurrence type in gastric cancer. Disseminated tumor cells derived from serosal invasion may be indicators of early peritoneal seeding and subsequent peritoneal dissemination. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques have been introduced to aid in detection of disseminated tumor cells in peritoneal washes, however, use of a single molecular marker lacks adequate sensitivity. We sought to improve both sensitivity and specificity in detecting disseminated tumor cells in peritoneal washes by using two markers; carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 mRNA (CK20 mRNA). METHODOLOGY: Between July 2007 and June 2010, peritoneal washing samples were collected from 131 patients who underwent surgery for histologically proven gastric cancer. CEA and CK20 mRNA levels were quantified using a Light Cycler. RESULTS: Analysis using of the two markers had higher sensitivity (93.9%) and specificity (87.7%) than single marker detection (p<0.01, p<0.001 respectively). These analyses also correlated with various clinicopathological factors, and aided in predicting survival and peritoneal recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Two-marker analysis has a significant correlation of survival or peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer, and this analysis may be more useful as a prognostic predictor of peritoneal recurrence compared with RT-PCR mediated detection of CEA or CK20 alone.

Prognostic factors associated with long-term survival and recurrence in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is very important to determine the prognostic factors for pancreatic adenocarcinoma when choosing surgical and conservative management strategies. In this study, we identified prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Between January 2003 and December 2009, 82 patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma were considered for this study. Follow-up consisted of personal contact with patients or review of electronic medical records at this center and was terminated on December 31, 2011 or upon the patient's death. RESULTS: Overall survival rates of all patients at 1, 3, and 5 years were 51.9, 21.6 and 16.0%. Preoperative jaundice was the only independent prognostic factor for total pancreatic cancer patients, while N stage and perineural invasion in pathological findings was identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival of patients with surgical resection. Chemotherapy was the only independent prognostic factor for survival of patients who underwent palliative surgical bypass. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative jaundice in any patients, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion in patients with surgical resection, and chemotherapy in patients undergoing palliative surgical bypass are important prognostic factors for survival of pancreatic cancer.

Mutant pattern of p53 predicts local recurrence and poor survival rate in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: TP53 mutation is a poor prognostic factor for various organ malignancies such as colorectal cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma and clinical pathologists previously evaluated it using immunohistochemistry for p53. The clinicopathologic significance of p53 expression in gastric cancer remains unclear due to inconsistent classification methods. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for p53 protein was performed using tissue microarray blocks generated from 725 cases of gastric cancer, and p53 expression was divided into three staining patterns using a semi-quantitative ternary classifier: heterogeneous (wild type), overexpression, and absence (mutant pattern). RESULTS: Mutant pattern of p53 expression had a male predominance, greater frequency in cardia/fundus, higher pT stage, frequent lymph node metastasis, local recurrence clinically, and more differentiated histology microscopically compared with wild type. In survival analysis, p53 mutant pattern was associated with worse recurrent-free survival and overall survival rates, and significance was maintained in subgroup analysis of early versus advanced gastric cancers. In Cox regression analysis, p53 mutant pattern was a significant predicting factor for local recurrence (relative risk (RR=4.882, p<0.001)) and overall survival (RR=2.040, p=0.007). The p53 mutant pattern remained significant for local recurrence (RR=2.934, p=0.018) in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Mutant p53 pattern on immunohistochemistry was a significant prognostic factor for local recurrence and poor overall survival in gastric cancer.

Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: In gastric cancer, the classification of lymph node status is still a controversial prognostic factor. Recent studies have proposed a new prognostic factor (metastatic lymph node ratio: MLR) for gastric cancer patients who undergo curative resection. The present study tested the hypothesis that MLR was better than the current pN staging system by analyzing the correlation between MLR and the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system, by analyzing the correlation between MLR and 5-year overall survival (OS), by comparing area under the curve (AUC), and by performing univariate and multivariate analyses for OS. METHODS: Of 409 patients who were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2003 and December 2006, 370 patients underwent curative resection and were included in this study. The prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the metastatic lymph node ratio were compared in AUC and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: MLR was significantly correlated with the depth of invasion and the number of lymph node metastases (p < 0.001). Increasing MLR also was statistically correlated with a lower 5-year OS rate (p < 0.001). The AUC of MLR and the number of lymph node metastases were not significantly different (p = 0.825). MLR was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis, but the number of metastatic lymph nodes was not. CONCLUSIONS: MLR can be a prognostic factor in patients who undergo radical resection for gastric cancer and can overcome the limitations of existing prognostic factors.

Venous Invasion and Perineural Invasion as Upstaging and Poor Prognostic Factors in N0 Gastric Cancers.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients. In node-negative (N0) gastric cancer patients, additional prognostic factors are needed to reinforce TNM staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We semi-quantitatively recorded the presence of lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion and evaluated the possibility that they could be used as upstaging factors in N0 gastric cancer by comparing N0 gastric cancer cases with N1 cases. RESULTS: Venous (p<0.001) and perineural (p<0.001) invasion were important factors in the relapse-free survival of N0 patients, but lymphatic invasion was not. N0 cases with venous or perineural invasion had survival curves similar to those of N1 patients. In addition, the number of invasive features (lymphatic, venous, or perineural) was an important factor in predicting poor patient survival. CONCLUSION: Venous and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors in N0 gastric cancer cases. It is necessary to record lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion separately in the pathology report, especially in cases of N0 gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with high progranulin expression.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Progranulin (PGRN) is known to promote tumorigenesis and proliferation of several types of cancer cells. However, little is known about the clinicopathological features of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with regard to PGRN expression. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with GISTs who underwent curative surgical resection between 2007 and 2017. PGRN expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and semi-quantitatively categorized (no expression, 0; weak, 1+; moderate, 2+; strong, 3+). Tumors with a staining intensity of 2+ or 3+ were considered high PGRN expression. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were analyzed; 31 patients (57%) were male. The median age at surgery was 60 years (range, 33-79), and the most common primary site was the stomach (67%). Thirty-five patients (65%) had spindle histology; 42 patients (78%) were separated as a high-risk group according to the modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) classification. High PGRN-expressing tumors were observed in 27 patients (50%), had more epithelioid/mixed histology (68% vs. 32%; p = 0.046), and KIT exon 11 mutations (76% vs. 24%; p = 0.037). Patients with high PGRN-expressing tumors had a worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (36% of 5-year RFS) compared to those with low PGRN-expressing tumors (96%; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that high PGRN expression and old age (>60 years) were independent prognostic factors for poor RFS. CONCLUSIONS: High PGRN-expressing GISTs showed more epithelioid/mixed histology and KIT exon 11 mutations. PGRN overexpression was significantly associated with poor RFS in patients with GISTs who underwent curative resection.

Prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing survival rates, quality of life and nutritional status between advanced gastric cancer patients with different follow-up intensities: study protocol for the STOFOLUP trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer are regularly followed-up for the early detection of recurrence and postoperative symptom management. However, there is a lack of evidence with regard to proper surveillance intervals and diagnostic tools. This study aims to evaluate whether frequent surveillance tests have a survival benefit or improve the quality of life in patients who underwent curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The STOFOLUP trial is an investigator-initiated, parallel-assigned, multicentre randomised controlled trial involving 16 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients (n=886) diagnosed with pathological stage II or III gastric adenocarcinoma will be randomised to either the 3-month or the 6-month group at a 1:1 ratio, stratified by trial site and tumour stage. Patients allocated to the 3-month group will undergo an abdominal CT scan every 3 months postoperatively and those allocated to the 6-month group will undergo CT every 6 months. The primary endpoint is 3-year overall survival and the secondary endpoints are quality of life, as assessed using KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group-40, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and the stomach cancer-specific module (STO22), and nutritional outcomes. Other survival data including data concerning 3-year disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival, gastric cancer-specific survival and postrecurrence survival will also be estimated. The first patient was enrolled on July 2021 and active patient enrolment is currently underway. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of eight of the participating hospitals (NCC 2021-0085, KBSMC2021-01-059, SMC 2021-01-140, KC21OEDE0082, 4-2021-0281, AJIRB-MED-INT-20-608, 2021-0515 and H-2102-093-1198). This study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, national or international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04740346.

PRODIGY: A Phase III Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 Plus Surgery and Adjuvant S-1 Versus Surgery and Adjuvant S-1 for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy is standard for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) in Asia. Based on positive findings for perioperative chemotherapy in European phase III studies, the phase III PRODIGY study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01515748) investigated whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 could improve outcomes versus standard treatment in Korean patients with resectable LAGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 20-75 years of age, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and with histologically confirmed primary gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (clinical TNM staging: T2-3N+ or T4Nany) were randomly assigned to D2 surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (40-60 mg orally twice a day, days 1-28 every 6 weeks for eight cycles; SC group) or neoadjuvant DOS (docetaxel 50 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 orally twice a day, days 1-14 every 3 weeks for three cycles) before D2 surgery, followed by adjuvant S-1 (CSC group). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) with CSC versus SC. Two sensitivity analyses were performed: intent-to-treat and landmark PFS analysis. RESULTS: Between January 18, 2012, and January 2, 2017, 266 patients were randomly assigned to CSC and 264 to SC at 18 Korean study sites; 238 and 246 patients, respectively, were treated (full analysis set). Follow-up was ongoing in 176 patients at data cutoff (January 21, 2019; median follow-up 38.6 months [interquartile range, 23.5-62.1]). CSC improved PFS versus SC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95; stratified log-rank P = .023). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. Treatments were well tolerated. Two grade 5 adverse events (febrile neutropenia and dyspnea) occurred during neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: PRODIGY showed that neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy, as part of perioperative chemotherapy, is effective and tolerable in Korean patients with LAGC.

Total length of positive resection margins can predict remnant gastric cancer following endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of remnant tumor is important in determining subsequent treatment options for gastric cancer patients with positive resection margin (RM) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: Based on the assumption that pathologic factors, including the length and type of involved RM, could potentially predict residual tumor, we evaluated 451 ESD specimens in patients with early gastric cancer. RESULTS: Of 408 cases, 37 (9.1 %) showed positive RMs. RM involvement in gastric cancer ESD specimens was associated with extended or beyond ESD criteria, greater tumor size, poor differentiation, submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and upper third location. Among the 37 positive RM cases, residual tumor was present in seven (18.9 %). The presence of residual tumor was not significantly associated with any clinicopathologic parameters except for tumor size and RM status. The total length of the involved RM was the most significant factor associated with the presence of residual tumor (P < 0.008). A total length cut-off value of 6 mm yielded a sensitivity of 85.7 % and negative predictive value of 94.7 % for predicting remnant tumor at gastrectomy following ESD. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, when the ESD specimen exhibits positive RM, a quantitative assessment of the involved RM should be included in the pathology report, as this can help the clinician predict remnant tumor and determine appropriate future treatment.

Preoperative colonoscopy for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA), the most common double primary cancer is colorectal cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the necessity of preoperative colonoscopy in patients with GA who have no symptoms of colorectal disease or any past/family history of colorectal cancer. MATERIALS: Colonoscopy was carried out in 205 patients before gastric surgery for treatment of GA. The prevalence of colorectal neoplasms (CRN, adenoma and adenocarcinoma) was evaluated according to age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and stage, location and differentiation of GA. RESULTS: The median age and BMI were 59 years (range 32-81) and 22.9 (range 17.0-42.3), respectively. There were 135 male patients (65.9%). Synchronous adenoma and adenocarcinoma were detected in 68 (33.2%) and four (2.0%) patients, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that patients 50 years and older, male or with multiple GA had a significantly higher incidence of CRN (P = 0.005, 0.019, and 0.023, respectively). All of the GA patients with synchronous colorectal adenocarcinoma were older than 50 years. The stage, location and differentiation of GA and BMI did not show a significant difference in the incidence of CRN. Multivariate analysis showed that age (50 years and older) was the only risk factor of CRN in GA patients (odds ratio 2.470; 95% confidence interval 1.058-5.767). CONCLUSION: Preoperative colonoscopy for screening of CRN should be considered in GA patients > or = 50 years because of a relatively high prevalence of CRN and the possibility of synchronous CRC.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a surgeon's learning curve period.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is gaining wider acceptance for treating early gastric cancer (EGC). However, many gastric surgeons are still reluctant to perform LADG, mainly because this procedure entails a considerable learning curve. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of performing LADG by a single experienced gastric surgeon who initially had no experience with laparoscopic surgery as compared with open distal gastrectomy (ODG). METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2007, 177 patients with preoperatively diagnosed EGC located at the middle or lower third of the stomach were enrolled; 102 patients underwent LADG, 4 patients had open conversion, and 71 patients underwent conventional ODG. The operative and early postoperative outcomes from a prospective database were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The clinicopathological characteristics were similar between the two groups. No operation-related deaths occurred. Although operation time was significantly longer for LADG than for ODG, time to first flatus was shorter and, consequently, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LADG group. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rates between the two groups. On comparing the early (n = 50) and late groups (n = 52) of LADG patients, operation time and postoperative hospital stay were shorter and number of retrieved lymph nodes was greater in the late group (p < 0.05). Major and minor complications were markedly reduced in the late group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although LADG was more time consuming than ODG, it was a feasible, safe procedure that accomplished the oncological requirements. Postoperative morbidity of LADG was similar to that of ODG, and LADG led to faster postoperative recovery. However, LADG should be performed carefully to prevent unexpected complications, especially during the early learning period.

Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted gastric surgery has become an option for the treatment of early gastric cancer. However, there are few reports of laparoscopic surgery in the management of advanced gastric cancer. In this study we describe our experience with laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: Between November 2004 and June 2007, 47 patients with AGC underwent LADG at our hospital, and 45 of those patients were enrolled in this study. These patients were compared with 83 patients who had AGC and underwent conventional open distal gastrectomy (ODG) during the same period. RESULTS: Operation time was significantly longer in the LADG group than in the ODG group. Estimated blood loss in the LADG group was significantly less than in the ODG group. Time to ambulation and first flatus and duration of analgesic medication were significantly shorter in the LADG group. The morbidity and mortality rate were also lower than in the ODG group, with no statistically significant difference. The distance of the proximal resection margin showed no significant difference compared with ODG (6.3 +/- 0.9 versus 6.5 +/- 0.9 cm; p = 0.228). The mean number of nodes resected with LADG was 35.6 +/- 14.2, and that with ODG was 38.3 +/- 11.4 (p = 0.269). The mean follow-up for the LADG group was 23.6 months (range 9-40 months). In the LADG group, recurrence was observed in six patients (13.3%). Three patients had recurrence and died after 10 (IIIB), 11 (IIIA), and 13 (IIIB) months. CONCLUSIONS: LADG with extended lymphadenectomy for AGC is a feasible and safe procedure and has several advantages. Moreover, this method can achieve a radical oncologic equivalent resection. Indications for LADG with extended lymphadenectomy could be expanded in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer.

Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation with or without tumorectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in locations difficult for a percutaneous approach.

BACKGROUND: Although hepatic resection is widely accepted as a proper modality for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a majority of patients are unable to undergo surgical resection due to various tumor and patient factors. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has mostly been used as a therapeutic alternative to resection for treating HCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of intraoperative RFA for HCCs in locations difficult for a percutaneous approach. METHODS: Eight patients (male, seven; age, 49-67 years) with 8 HCCs in difficult locations were treated by intraoperative RFA. Six of the patients had local tumor progression after initial transarterial chemoembolization or ultrasound (US) guided percutaneous RFA. The locations of the tumors were hepatic dome in six patients, posterior subcapsule in one, and caudate lobe in one. The tumor size was 2.0 to 6.4 cm (mean, 3.9 cm). Intraoperative RFA was performed at the tumor itself and an anticipated resection line under US guidance with 3 cm monopolar single or clustered internally cooled electrodes. Tumor resection was performed in six patients. One month later, treatment response was assessed by contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT). CT studies were performed every 2 or 3 months after RFA. RESULTS: RFA was technically successful in all tumors, and the contrast-enhanced CT images acquired one month later showed complete disappearance of tumor enhancement. One pneumothorax occurred. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 6-30 months), no tumors showed local progression. During the follow-up period, four new recurrent tumors were observed in three patients. Four patients were alive at the time of this report and the other four died of hepatorenal syndrome, liver failure, and progression of new recurrent tumors. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative RFA with tumor resection can be an alterative treatment option for HCC in locations difficult for a percutaneous approach.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Metal Stent Placement for Esophagojejunostomy Leakage After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Management of esophagojejunostomy leakage (EJL) has a high mortality rate and increases length of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of early postoperative gastroduodenoscopy and stent insertion to control EJL after total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 421 patients, 13 exhibited EJL. Of the 13 patients, 8 were treated with a covered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) inserted by endoscopy and 5 patients were treated with surgery or conservative treatment. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 0% in the SEMS-treated group. The median duration from primary surgery to discovery of leakage was 3.00 days overall [interquartile range (IQR), 2.00 to 5.50 d]. The time to enteral feeding after operation was 24.00 days (IQR, 18.00 to 31.00 d). Median postoperative hospital days was 35.0 days (IQR, 21.00 to 65.00 d). Median duration from leakage to gastroduodenoscopy was 7.00 days (IQR, 1.25 to 14.50 d). On endoscopic findings, most sizes of leakage site were 25% or smaller (8/9, 88.9%) within whole anastomosis size. Eight patients were treated by SEMS. No endoscopic procedure-related or leakage-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The promising results for endoscopic treatment in this study showed that early endoscopic treatment using a covered SEMS for EJL might be a feasible, safe, and effective method in selected patients.

[Is gastric cancer a new indication for surveillance colonoscopy? Colon cancer is increased in gastric cancer patients].

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It has been reported that the risk of gastric polyp is increased in various colonic polyposis syndromes or in series of patients with sporadic colonic polyps. However, there are only a few large case controlled studies of colon cancer incidence in gastric cancer patients who underwent colonoscopy. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of colorectal neoplasm and to evaluate the necessity of colonoscopic surveillance in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: We performed colonoscopy in 105 patients with gastric cancer who agreed to undergo colonoscopy before or after 6 months from gastric resection between January 2002 and December 2004 in Kangbuk Samsung hospital. As a control group, 269 consecutive, age and sex matched patients without gastric neoplasm on gastroscopy who underwent colonoscopy within 6 months for the evaluation of various gastrointestinal symptoms during the year 2004 were included. Endoscopic reports and pathological results were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: In the patient group, adenomatous polyps were diagnosed in 24/105 patients (22.9%) and colorectal adenocarcinoma in 10/105 patients (9.5%). In the control group, adenomatous polyps were diagnosed in 78/269 patients (29.0%) and colorectal adenocarcinoma in 2/269 patients (0.7%). The incidence of colorectal adenocarcinoma between the patient group and control group showed significant differences (odds ratio 11.04, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma increases significantly in patients with gastric cancer. We suggest that the patients with gastric cancer might carry a high risk for colorectal cancer whom require surveillance colonoscopy.

Determining the effect of transforming growth factor-ß1 on cdk4 and p27 in gastric cancer and cholangiocarcinoma.

Gastric cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are problematic throughout the world due to their destructive malignancy. In attempts to treat cholangiocarcinoma and gastric cancer, researchers often explore the effects of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1). TGF-ß1 plays a crucial role in causing cell cycle arrest and fibrosis in cancer cells. The present study aimed to identify whether TGF-ß1 is capable of functioning as an antitumor agent in two cancer cell lines; cholangiocarcinoma and gastric cancer. The downregulation of cyclin dependent kinase (cdk) 4 and the upregulation of p27 were investigated, in order to identify possible antitumor functions of TGF-ß1. A number of different methods were implemented, including cell proliferation assay, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay and western blot analysis with TGF-ß1, AGS (human gastric cancer cell line) and SUN-1196 (human cholangiocarcinoma cell line). In the AGS study, cdk4 values decreased from 1.000 to 0.670 and then to 0.664, with increasing TGF-ß1 concentrations of 0, 0.5 and 5 ng/ml, respectively. By contrast, p27 values increased from 1.000 to 1.391 and then to 1.505, with increasing TGF-ß1 concentrations of 0, 0.5 and 5 ng/ml, respectively. In the SUN-1196 study, p27 values increased from 0.548 to 0.807 and then to 0.844 with increasing TGF-ß1 concentrations of 5, 25 and 50 ng/ml, respectively. Certain concentrations of TGF-ß1 play antitumor roles in gastric cancer through the down-regulation of cdk4 and upregulation of p27. Certain TGF-ß1 concentrations also have antitumor roles in cholangiocarcinoma through the upregulation of p27. With these results, we came a step closer to finding a cure for cholangiocarcinoma and gastric cancer.

Impact of chronologic age in the elderly with gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Although the incidence of gastric cancer has declined in the general population, it is the second most frequent cause of death due to malignancy in the world with its incidence in the elderly increasing as a result of increased life expectancy. This present study tried to find the optimal treatment for patients aged 75 years or older with gastric cancer through comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, and identifying prognostic factors of survival. METHODS: Elderly patients who underwent gastric resection for gastric cancer from January, 1999 to February, 2009 (n = 470) were divided into two groups: very elderly patients, 75 years or older (n = 95), and younger elderly patients, between 65 and 74 years old (n = 365). RESULTS: Distinct characteristics of very elderly patients included more frequent underlying disease, deeper invasion, and more frequent lymph node metastasis. There were significant differences in overall survival between the two groups at stages III-B and IV. However, postoperative hospital stays, postoperative morbidity, mortality and early stage did not differ between curatively resected patients in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Due to improved postoperative care, gastrectomy of gastric cancer is the treatment of choice in very elderly patients. Therefore, early diagnosis through regular medical screening and curative gastrectomy with lymph node dissection should be performed in very elderly gastric cancer patients.

Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

PURPOSE: Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy is performed using three ports, and single-port appendectomy is an attractive alternative in order to improve cosmesis. The aim of this study was to compare pain after transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SA) with pain after conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TA). METHODS: From April to September 2011, 50 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for simple appendicitis without gangrene or perforation. Patients who had undergone appendectomy with a drainage procedure were excluded. The type of surgery was chosen based on patient preference after written informed consent was obtained. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain evaluated by the visual analogue scale score and postoperative analgesic use. Operative time, recovery of bowel function, and length of hospital stay were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: SA using a SILS port (Covidien) was performed in 17 patients. The other 33 patients underwent TA. Pain scores in the 24 hours after surgery were higher in patients who underwent SA (P = 0.009). The change in postoperative pain score over time was significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.021). SA patients received more total doses of analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) in the 24 hours following surgery, but the difference was not statistically significant. The median operative time was longer for SA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgeons should be concerned about longer operation times and higher immediate postoperative pain scores in patients who undergo SA.

Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and resection for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been mostly used as a therapeutic alternative to hepatic resection for treating liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there were differences in outcome between RFA and surgical resection in the treatment of colorectal cancer with liver metastases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 53 patients who underwent only hepatic resection or only RFA for colorectal liver metastases. Twenty-five patients who underwent hepatic resection were compared with 28 patients who underwent RFA for synchronous or metachronous liver metastases. RESULTS: The median CEA level at the time of diagnosis of liver metastases was significantly higher in the resection group (14.2 ng/mL vs. 2.8 ng/mL, p=0.002). The median size of main liver metastases was significantly larger in the resection group (4.0 cm vs. 2.05 cm, p=0.002). There was no difference in the percentage of patients experiencing major complication (one patient in each group). The marginal recurrence rate was significantly higher in the RFA group (p=0.004). Disease-free and overall survival were longer in the resection group (p=0.008 and 0.017, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only the type of treatment was a factor associated with disease-free and overall survival (p=0.004 and 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high marginal recurrence rate, RFA shows an inferior outcome in comparison with surgical resection. Therefore, RFA should be considered for only selected patients with unresectable (by any means) disease or with high operative risk.