Estimating intracranial volume using intracranial area in healthy children and those with childhood status epilepticus.

BACKGROUND: Correcting volumetric measurements of brain structures for intracranial volume (ICV) is important in comparing volumes across subjects with different ICV. The aim of this study was to investigate whether intracranial area (ICA) reliably predicts actual ICV in a healthy pediatric cohort and in children with convulsive status epilepticus (CSE). METHODS: T1-weighted volumetric MRI was performed on 20 healthy children (control group), 10 with CSE with structurally normal MRI (CSE/MR-), and 12 with CSE with structurally abnormal MRI (CSE/MR+). ICA, using a mid-sagittal slice, and the actual ICV were measured. RESULTS: A high Spearman correlation was found between the ICA and ICV measurements in the control (r = 0.96; P < 0.0001), CSE/MR- (r = 0.93; P = 0.0003), and CSE/MR+ (r = 0.94; P < 0.0001) groups. On comparison of predicted and actual ICV, there was no significant difference in the CSE/MR- group (P = 0.77). However, the comparison between predicted and actual ICV was significantly different in the CSE/MR+ (P = 0.001) group. Our Bland-Altman plot showed that the ICA method consistently overestimated ICV in children in the CSE/MR+ group, especially in those with small ICV or widespread structural abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: After further validation, ICA measurement may be a reliable alternative to measuring actual ICV when correcting volume measurements for ICV, even in children with localized MRI abnormalities. Caution should be applied when the method is used in children with small ICV and those with multilobar brain pathology.

Application of diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the optic radiation in anterior temporal lobe resection for epilepsy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50-100% of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing anterior temporal lobe resection (ATLR) will suffer a postoperative visual field defect (VFD) due to disruption of the optic radiation (OpR). OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the role of DTI and tractography in ATLR and its potential in reducing the incidence of postoperative VFD. METHODS: We conducted an electronic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and BMJ case report databases. Eligibility for study inclusion was determined on abstract screening using the following criteria: the study must have been (1) an original investigation or case report in humans; (2) investigating the OpR with DTI in cases of ATLR in temporal lobe epilepsy; (3) investigating postoperative VFD. All forms of ATLR and ways of assessing VFD were included to reflect clinical practice. RESULTS: 13 studies (four case reports, eight prospective observational studies, one prospective comparative trial) were included in the review, 179 (mean±SD, 13.8±12.6; range, 1-48) subjects were investigated using DTI. The time of postoperative VFD measurement differed between the detected studies, ranging from two weeks to nine years following ATLR. A modest number of studies and insufficient statistical homogeneity precluded meta-analysis. However, DTI methods were consistently accurate at quantifying and predicting postoperative damage to the OpR. These methods revealed a correlation between the extent of OpR damage and the severity of postoperative VFD. The first and only trial with 15 subjects compared to 23 controls reported that using intraoperative tractography in ATLR significantly reduces the occurrence of postoperative VFD on comparison to conventional surgical planning. CONCLUSIONS: DTI shows potential to be an effective method used in planning ATLR. Findings from a single modest sized study suggest that tractography may be employed as part of intraoperative navigation techniques in order to avoid injury to the OpR. Further research needs to be conducted to ensure the applicability and effectiveness of this technology before implementation in routine clinical practice.