Intraoperative Methadone Use Is Associated With Reduced Postoperative Pain and More Rapid Opioid Weaning After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between intraoperative methadone use, postoperative pain, and opioid consumption after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing isolated CABG over a 5-year period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic data, comorbidities, and intraoperative anesthetic medications were recorded. Primary study outcomes were average and maximum pain scores and morphine milligram equivalent consumption on the first 2 postoperative days (PODs). Linear mixed-effects regression models were used to examine the effect of intraoperative methadone use on study outcomes. Among 1,338 patients, 78.6% received intraoperative methadone (0.2 mg/kg). Patients who did not receive methadone had higher average (estimated [Est], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.73; p < 0.001) and maximum postoperative (Est, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.23-0.75; p < 0.001) pain scores over PODs 0 to 2. For postoperative opioid consumption, there was a significant intraoperative methadone use-time interaction effect on postoperative opioid use (odds ratio [OR], 2.21; 95% CI, 1.74-2.80; p < 0.001). Across PODs 0 to 2, patients who received intraoperative methadone had a faster decline in postoperative opioid use than those who did not receive intraoperative methadone. Patients who did not receive intraoperative methadone were extubated slightly faster (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.93; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the use of intraoperative methadone is safe, reduces postoperative pain, and expedites weaning from postoperative opioids after CABG surgery.

Preemptive alcohol septal ablation prior to transcatheter mitral valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been shown to increase the neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area before transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) but there is little literature on its success and use with dedicated devices. AIMS: To describe our experience with preemptive ASA to increase the predicted neo-LVOT area and its utility with both dedicated TMVR devices and balloon-expandable valves. METHODS: All patients who underwent ASA for TMVR candidacy in our center between May 2018 and October 2022 and had computed tomography (CT) scans done before and after ASA were included. Each CT was assessed for the minimum predicted neo-LVOT area at end-systole, using a virtual valve of the desired TMVR device for each patient. The primary outcome was an increase in the predicted neo-LVOT area after ASA that was deemed sufficient for safe implantation of the desired TMVR device. The secondary outcome was the absence of acute LVOT obstruction after TMVR. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients underwent ASA and all but 1 (n = 11, 91.6%) achieved the primary outcome of having sufficient predicted neo-LVOT area to proceed with TMVR. The mean increase in neo-LVOT area after ASA was 126 ± 64 mm2 (median 119.5, interquartile range: 65.0-163.5 mm2 ). Two patients (16.7%) required a permanent pacemaker after ASA. Nine patients went on and underwent TMVR with their respective devices and none had LVOT obstruction after the procedure. Among the remaining three patients, one had insufficient neo-LVOT clearance after ASA, one had unrelated mortality before TMVR, and one had advanced heart failure before TMVR. CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients and at centers experienced with ASA, preemptive ASA can achieve sufficient neo-LVOT clearance for TMVR with a variety of devices in approximately 90% of patients.

Variation in Hospitalization Costs, Charges, and Lengths of Hospital Stay for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Treated With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the United States: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to characterize hospitalization costs, charges, and lengths of hospital stay for COVID-19 patients treated with venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the United States during 2020. Secondarily, differences in hospitalization costs, charges, and lengths of hospital stay were explored based on hospital-level factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multiple hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with COVID-19 who were on VV ECMO in 2020 and had data in the national inpatient sample. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographics and baseline comorbidities were recorded for patients. Primary study outcomes were hospitalization costs, charges, and lengths of hospital stay. Study outcomes were compared after stratification by hospital region, bed size, and for-profit status. The median hospitalization cost for the 3,315-patient weighted cohort was $200,300 ($99,623, $338,062). Median hospitalization charges were $870,513 ($438,228, $1,553,157), and the median length of hospital stay was 30 days (17, 46). Survival to discharge was 54.4% for all patients in the cohort. Median hospitalization cost differed by region (p = 0.01), bed size (p < 0.001), and for-profit status (p = 0.02). Median hospitalization charges also differed by region (p = 0.04), bed size (p = 0.002), and for-profit status (p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay differed by region (p = 0.03) and bed size (p < 0.001), but not for-profit status (p = 0.40). Hospitalization costs were the lowest, and charges were highest in private-for-profit hospitals. Large hospitals also had higher costs, charges, and hospital stay lengths than small hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study, hospitalization costs and charges for patients with COVID-19 on VV ECMO were found to be substantial but similar to what has been reported previously for patients without COVID-19 on VV ECMO. Significant variation was observed in costs, charges, and lengths of hospital stay based on hospital-level factors.

Patching an aortic tear using the side-arm and surrounding skirt of a physician-modified ascending aortic graft.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF STUDY: Aortic complications during cannulation must be managed urgently and often require hypothermic circulatory arrest. We report a unique management strategy to repair an aortic tear without dissection by modifying a Dacron ascending aortic graft with side-arm. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old female patient undergoing reoperative cardiac surgery suffered an unexpected aortic tear during cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. The tear was repaired by utilizing a physician-modified ascending aortic graft with side-arm, in which the surrounding skirt of the side-arm was cut from the circumferential graft to patch the defect. The patient was rewarmed with the side-arm serving as arterial inflow for the bypass circuit, and the remainder of the operation proceeded without complication. CONCLUSION: This type of aortic repair for aortic tears without dissection can offer the patient the benefit of avoiding multiple aortotomies in a weakened aorta, reducing circulatory arrest time, and re-establishing a central cannulation strategy for cardiopulmonary bypass.

Aortic valve biologic protheses: A cohort comparison of premature valve failure.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest an increased rate of early structural valve degeneration (SVD) in the Trifecta bioprosthesis (Abbott Cardiovascular). We sought to compare the intermediate-term outcomes of the Magna (Edwards Life Sciences) and Trifecta valves. METHODS: All surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) with Trifecta or Magna/Magna Ease bioprostheses at an academic medical center were extracted from an institutional database. Patients who survived until after discharge (2011-2019) were included. The primary outcome was valve failure for any reason requiring reintervention or contributing to death, identified by reintervention or review of cause of death. Time to failure was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox Proportional Hazards Modeling. RESULTS: Out of 1444 patients, 521 (36%) underwent Trifecta and 923 (64%) underwent Magna implantation with a median follow-up of 27.6 months. Trifecta patients had larger median valve size (25 vs. 23 mm, p < .001) and lower median gradient (8.0 vs. 10.9 mmHg, p < .001). Trifecta patients had higher 48-month estimated failure rates (20.2 ± 7.6% vs. 2.6 ± 0.7%, p < .0001), with failure rates of 21.4 versus 9.2 failures per 1000 person-years (p < .001). After risk-adjustment, Trifecta patients had a 5.3 times hazard of failure (95% confidence interval: 2.78-12.34, p < .001) compared to Magna patients. Only Trifecta valves failed due to sudden aortic regurgitation, 8 out of 521 (1.5%). CONCLUSION: Despite lower postoperative mean gradients, the Trifecta bioprosthesis may have an increased risk of intermediate-term SVD. Further research is warranted to confirm the potential for sudden valve failure.

Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost?

BACKGROUND: Robotic technology is increasingly being utilized by general surgeons. However, the impact of introducing robotics to surgical residency has not been examined. This study aims to assess the financial costs and training impact of introducing robotics at an academic general surgery residency program. METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair (VHR), and inguinal hernia repair (IHR) at our institution from 2011-2015 were identified. The effect of robotic surgery on laparoscopic case volume was assessed with linear regression analysis. Resident participation, operative time, hospital costs, and patient charges were also evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 2260 laparoscopic and 139 robotic operations. As the volume of robotic cases increased, the number of laparoscopic cases steadily decreased. Residents participated in all laparoscopic cases and 70% of robotic cases but operated from the robot console in only 21% of cases. Mean operative time was increased for robotic cholecystectomy (+22%), IHR (+55%), and VHR (+61%). Financial analysis revealed higher median hospital costs per case for robotic cholecystectomy (+$411), IHR (+$887), and VHR (+$1124) as well as substantial associated fixed costs. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of robotic surgery had considerable negative impact on laparoscopic case volume and significantly decreased resident participation. Increased operative time and hospital costs are substantial. An institution must be cognizant of these effects when considering implementing robotics in departments with a general surgery residency program.

Cost analysis of endovascular versus open repair in the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: For descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs), it is generally considered that thoracic endovascular aortic repairs (TEVARs) reduce operative morbidity and mortality compared with open surgical repair. However, long-term differences in survival of patients have not been demonstrated, and an increased need for aortic reintervention has been observed. Many assume that TEVAR becomes less cost-effective through time because of higher rates of reintervention and surveillance imaging. This study investigated midterm outcomes and hospital costs of TEVAR compared with open TAA repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-institution review of elective TAA repairs between 2005 and 2012. Patient demographics, operative outcomes, reintervention rates, and hospital costs were assessed. The literature was also reviewed to determine commonly observed complication and reintervention rates for TEVAR and open repair. Monte Carlo simulation was used to model and to forecast hospital costs for TEVAR and open TAA repair up to 3 years after intervention. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 131 TEVARs and 27 open repairs. TEVAR patients were significantly older (67.2 vs 58.7 years old; P = .02) and trended toward a more severe comorbidity profile. Operative mortality for TEVAR and open repair was 5.3% and 3.7%, respectively (P = 1.0). There was a trend toward more complications in the TEVAR group, although not statistically significant (all P > .05). In-hospital costs were significantly greater in the TEVAR group ($52,008 vs $37,172; P = .001). However, cost modeling by use of reported complication and reintervention rates from the literature overlaid with our cost data produced a higher cost for the open group in-hospital ($55,109 vs $48,006) and at 3 years ($58,426 vs $52,825). Interestingly, TEVAR hospital costs, not reintervention rates, were the most significant driver of cost in the TEVAR group. CONCLUSIONS: Our institutional data showed a trend toward lower mortality and complication rates with open TAA repair, with significantly lower costs within this cohort compared with TEVAR. These findings were likely, at least in part, to be due to the milder comorbidity profile of these patients. In contrast, cost modeling by Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated lower costs with TEVAR compared with open repair at all time points up to 3 years after intervention. Our institutional data show that with appropriate selection of patients, open repair can be performed safely with low complication rates comparable to those of TEVAR. The cost model argues that despite the costs associated with more frequent surveillance imaging and reinterventions, TEVAR remains the more cost-effective option even years after TAA repair.

Mitral valve repair in a regional quality collaborative: Respect or resect?

Objective: Mitral valve repair is the gold standard for treatment of mitral regurgitation, but the optimal technique remains debated. By using a regional collaborative, we sought to determine the change in repair technique over time. Methods: We identified all patients undergoing isolated mitral valve repair from 2012 to 2022 for degenerative mitral disease. Those with endocarditis, transcatheter repair, or tricuspid intervention were excluded. Continuous variables were analyzed via Wilcoxon rank sum, and categorical variables were analyzed via chi-square testing. Results: We identified 1653 patients who underwent mitral valve repair, with 875 (59.2%) undergoing a no resection repair. Over the last decade, there was no significant trend in the proportion of repair techniques across the region (P = .96). Those undergoing no resection repairs were more likely to have undergone prior cardiac surgery (5.0% vs 2.2%, P = .002) or minimally invasive approaches (61.4% vs 24.7%, P < .001) with similar predicted risk of mortality (median 0.6% vs 0.6%, P = .75). Intraoperatively, no resection repairs were associated with longer bypass times (140 [117-167] minutes vs 122 [91-159] minutes, P < .001). Operative mortality was similar between both groups (1.1% vs 1.0%, P = .82), as were other postoperative outcomes. Anterior leaflet prolapse (odds ratio, 11.16 [6.34-19.65], P < .001) and minimally invasive approach (odds ratio, 6.40 [5.06-8.10], P < .001) were most predictive of no resection repair. Conclusions: Despite minor differences in operative times, statewide over the past decade there remains a diverse mix of both classic "resect" and newer "respect" strategies with comparable short-term outcomes and no major timewise trends. These data may suggest that both approaches are equivocal.

Undiagnosed Factor VII Deficiency in Cardiac Surgery Complicated by Bleeding: A Case Report.

Rare bleeding disorders in the perioperative period call for targeted resuscitation strategies. Factor VII deficiency, for instance, is often corrected with exogenous administration of recombinant factor VIIa. This activated clotting factor, initially designed for patients with hemophilia A or B with factor inhibitors, is gaining popularity as a salvage therapy for severe and persistent traumatic and surgical bleeding. This article describes the management of a cardiothoracic surgical patient with undiagnosed isolated factor VII deficiency who experienced significant postoperative bleeding which subsided after the administration of recombinant factor VIIa. In this case, EXTEM failed to detect a clotting factor deficiency.

Cardiac Enhanced Recovery Program Implementation and Its Effect on Opioid Administration in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

In light of the worsening opioid epidemic and nationwide parenteral opioid shortage, our institution created an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Our objective was to evaluate our initial experience transitioning to ERAS in cardiac surgery. An institutional cardiac ERAS protocol was implemented in April 2018, consisting of opioid-sparing analgesia, liberalization of fasting and activity restrictions, and goal-directed standardization of perioperative care. Clinical outcomes, opioid administration, and pain scores of patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery were reviewed from March 2017 to July 2018. Patients were propensity score matched into pre-ERAS and transition-to-ERAS (t-ERAS) cohorts and compared by univariate analysis. Of 467 patients, 236 patients were well-matched (118 per cohort). The transition to ERAS resulted in a 79% reduction in morphine equivalents through postoperative day 1 (359.3 mg pre-ERAS vs 75.4 mg ERAS, P < 0.0001). Despite less opioid utilization, t-ERAS patients reported lower pain scores (median 4.88 vs 4.14, P = 0.011). There was no difference in mortality (2% vs 0%, P = 0.498) or postoperative complications including initial hours ventilated (5.3 vs 5.2 hours, P = 0.380), prolonged ventilation (9.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.473), renal failure (3.4% vs 2.5%, P = 0.701), and ICU length of stay (58.3 vs 70.4 hours, P = 0.272). The transition to cardiac ERAS resulted in significantly reduced opioid administration and improved patient pain scores while maintaining excellent outcomes. Well-supported, multidisciplinary teams of cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists can dramatically reduce opioid use without sacrificing pain control or excellent clinical outcomes.

Delirium is associated with failure to rescue after cardiac surgery.

Objective: Postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery is associated with long-term cognitive decline and mortality. We investigated whether increased ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores were associated with greater 30-day mortality and failure to rescue after cardiac surgery. Methods: We studied 4030 patients who underwent a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation at the University of Virginia Health System from 2011 to 2021. We obtained all ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores recorded during patients' admission and summarized scores for the first 7 postoperative days. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association between ICU Confusion Assessment Method score/delirium presence and postoperative complications, operative mortality, and failure to rescue. Results: Any episode of ICU Confusion Assessment Method screen-positive delirium and nearly all components of the score were associated with increased 30-day mortality on univariate analysis. We found that a single episode of delirium was associated with increased mortality. Feature 2 (inattention) had the strongest association with poorer outcomes, including failure to rescue in our analysis, as were patients with higher peak Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores. Patients with higher mean Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores had an association with decreased failure to rescue. Conclusions: A single episode of delirium, as measured using ICU Confusion Assessment Method scores, is associated with increased mortality. Inattention and higher peak Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores were associated with failure to rescue. Screening may clarify diagnosing delirium and assessing its implications on mortality and failure to rescue. Our findings suggest the importance of identifying and managing risk factors for delirium to improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality and failure to rescue rates.

Off-Hours Intensive Care Unit Transfer Is Associated With Increased Mortality and Failure to Rescue.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) beds are a limited resource, and when a patient no longer requires this level of care they are quickly transferred out. We hypothesized that complications and ICU readmission increased when transfer occurred during off-hours compared with regular work hours. METHODS: From 2010 to 2021, patients who underwent a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation at a single center were assigned a group based on their ICU transfer time, defined as when they physically arrived on the acute care floor. Patients were stratified into off-hours vs regular hours by their transfer time. Off-hours was defined as 9 pm to 5 am. Risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association of ICU readmission, postoperative complications, operative mortality, and failure to rescue by group. RESULTS: The cohort included 5951 patients (off-hours n = 292 [4.9%], regular-hours n = 5659 [95.1%]). Patients in the off-hours group had significantly greater odds of risk-adjusted ICU readmission (odds ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.25-3.04, P < .002) and mortality (odds ratio 3.88, 95% CI 2.27-6.33, P < .001). In the major complications subgroup (Off-hours n = 55, Regular-hours n = 603), Off-hours transfer was associated with increased mortality (failure to rescue) (odds ratio 3.05, 95% CI 1.58-5.69, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Off-hours ICU to floor transfer was associated with increased postoperative complications, ICU readmission, and mortality, suggesting that the timing of ICU transfer may impact outcomes. This elucidates targets for quality and process improvement for our center and others facing the same resource constraints.

Renal recovery in cardiac surgery patients requiring postoperative renal-replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Renal failure after cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of data examining the rate of renal recovery after patients have started dialysis following cardiac surgery. We aimed to determine the frequency of and time to renal recovery of patients requiring dialysis after cardiac surgery. METHODS: All patients who developed new-onset renal failure requiring dialysis following cardiac surgery at our institution from 2011 to 2022 were included. Renal recovery, time to renal recovery, and mortality at 1 year were merged with patients' Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database files. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to predict time to renal recovery; we censored patients who died or were lost to follow up. Cox regression was used for risk-adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients were included in the final analysis. Mortality during index hospital admission was 33% (n = 105), and mortality at 1 year was 45% (n = 141). Of those surviving at 1 year, 69% (n = 118) remained renally recovered. Median renal recovery time was 56 (37-74) days. Accounting for mortality as a competing risk, 51% of patients were predicted to achieve renal recovery. Increasing age (hazard ratio, 0.98; 0.514-0.94, P < .026) and increasing total packed red blood cells (hazard ratio, 0.0958; 0.937-0.987, P < .001) received were found to be significant negative predictors of renal recovery in the Fine-Gray model for subhazard distribution. CONCLUSIONS: More than two-thirds of patients with renal failure who survived the perioperative period had renal recovery within 1 year after surgery. Recovery was driven primarily by postoperative complications rather than comorbidities and intraoperative factors, suggesting renal failure in the postoperative cardiac surgery patient surviving to discharge is unlikely to be permanent.

Minimally Invasive Approaches Are Safe for Concomitant Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The need for concomitant tricuspid surgery during mitral valve surgery is associated with higher operative risk. We hypothesized that concomitant tricuspid surgery through a minimally invasive thoracotomy (MICS) is associated with noninferior risk compared with a sternotomy. METHODS: All patients undergoing mitral valve surgery at a single institution (2010 to 2020) were evaluated. After excluding endocarditis, emergent operations, and concomitant aortic valve or coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, patients were stratified by MICS versus sternotomy. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the risk-adjusted association between concomitant tricuspid valve procedure and Society of Thoracic Surgeons major morbidity or mortality. An interaction term evaluated the impact of approach on concomitant tricuspid surgery. RESULTS: A total of 772 patients underwent mitral valve surgery, including 138 (17.9%) with concomitant tricuspid valve operation. Of the total cohort, 243 patients (31.5%) underwent the MICS approach. Concomitant tricuspid operation was performed in 104 sternotomy patients (19.7%) compared with 34 MICS patients (14.0%, P = 0.056). After risk adjustment, patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid valve surgery via sternotomy had nearly 2 times greater odds of morbidity and mortality relative to those undergoing isolated mitral surgery via sternotomy (adjOR = 1.86, P = 0.049), while patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid surgery via the MICS approach had no increased risk of the composite outcome (adjOR = 0.66, P = 0.543), relative to isolated mitral surgery via MICS approach. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant tricuspid surgery at the time of mitral valve surgery carries additional risk in a broad patient population. A minimally invasive approach appears to be safe for selected patients requiring concomitant tricuspid valve surgery.

Impact of preoperative versus postoperative dialysis on left ventricular assist device outcomes: An analysis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.

Objective: Chronic kidney disease and renal failure are common in patients being considered for left ventricular assist device support. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation with preoperative dialysis and those with new-onset postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis. Methods: All patients (n = 14,090) undergoing primary left ventricular assist device implantation who were listed in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database (2014-2019) were evaluated. Landmark analysis then stratified patients alive at 1 month by preoperative dialysis and at 1 month postoperatively, preoperative dialysis only, postoperative dialysis only, and no dialysis. Results: Of 14,090 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation, patients on dialysis (400%, 3%) preoperatively had significantly higher mortality at 1 month (18% vs 6%, P < .0001). However, of patients on preoperative dialysis, 131 (32.8%) no longer required dialysis at 1 month postoperatively and had long-term survival similar to patients who never required dialysis (no dialysis vs recovered, P = .13). Long-term survival was significantly worse in patients with persistent dialysis and new dialysis at 1 month postoperatively (P < .0001). Time to first stroke, major nondevice infection, any bleeding event, and gastrointestinal bleeding were all worse in patients on preoperative or postoperative dialysis (all P < .0001). Device infection, malfunction, or thrombosis was not associated with dialysis status (P > .05). Negative predictors of recovery include biventricular assist device (odds ratio, 0.20) and inotropes 1 week postimplant (odds ratio, 0.19). Conclusions: Preoperative renal failure is associated with 3 times higher mortality and worse morbidity in patients receiving a left ventricular assist device. However, one-third of patients with preoperative dialysis will recover renal function postimplant with similar long-term survival and quality of life as those without dialysis.

Operating Room Versus Intensive Care Unit Extubation Within 6 Hours After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: Early Results and Hospital Costs.

Time-directed extubation (fast-track) protocols may decrease length of stay and cost but data on operating room (OR) extubation is limited. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of extubation in the OR versus fast-track extubation within 6 hours of leaving the operating room. Patients undergoing nonemergent STS index cases (2011-2021) who were extubated within 6 hours were identified from a regional STS quality collaborative. Patients were stratified by extubation in the OR versus fast track. Propensity score matching (1:n) was performed to balance baseline differences. Of the 24,962 patients, 498 were extubated in the OR. After matching, 487 OR extubation cases and 899 fast track cases were well balanced. The rate of reintubation was higher for patients extubated in the OR [21/487 (4.3%) vs 16/899 (1.8%), P = 0.008] as was the incidence of reoperation for bleeding [12/487 (2.5%) vs 8/899 (0.9%), P = 0.03]. There was no significant difference in the rate of any reoperation [16/487 (3.3%) vs 15/899 (1.6%), P = 0.06] or operative mortality [4/487 (0.8%) vs 6/899 (0.6%), P = 0.7]. OR extubation was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (5.6 vs 6.2 days, P < 0.001) and lower total cost of admission ($29,602 vs $31,565 P < 0.001). OR extubation is associated with a higher postoperative risk of reintubation and reoperation due to bleeding, but lower resource utilization.Future research exploring predictors of extubation readiness may be required prior to widespread adoption of this practice.

Progression to Transplant Under the New Heart Allocation System: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database.

BACKGROUND: Under the new heart allocation policy patients needing durable left ventricular assist devices receive lower priority on the transplant list. We sought to identify predictors of successful heart transplant after durable device implant as a means to inform patient care in the current era. METHODS: All patients (N = 25,164) undergoing primary durable left ventricular device implant in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database (2010-2019) were evaluated. Patients identified as bridge to transplant (BTT; n = 5242) or bridge to candidacy (n = 6248) were analyzed with the endpoint of transplant before (n = 10,588) and after (n = 902) the change in the heart allocation system on October 18, 2018. Multivariable hazard modeling was used to assess risk-adjusted time to event associations. RESULTS: Of 11,490 patients, 45.5% progressed to transplant (BTT, 53.0%; bridge to candidacy, 36.6%), most by 14 months after left ventricular assist device implant. Under the new allocation system progression to transplant was significantly lower at 14 months (18.6% vs 34.8%, P < .001). Factors associated with successful BTT before the allocation change included BTT status, white race, and married. Under the new allocation system BTT status (hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.69; P < .0054) remained a positive predictor, whereas blood type O (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.65; P < .0001) remained a negative predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having priority in the previous allocation system, less than half of BTT and bridge to candidacy patients progressed to transplant. Under the current system these numbers are further reduced. Heart teams should consider the implications of longer wait times for a durable left ventricular assist device when determining the optimal bridging strategy.

History of Serious Mental Illness Is a Predictor of Morbidity and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Serious mental illness (SMI), defined as a mental disorder causing functional impairment, affects 9.8 million Americans. SMI correlates with earlier onset, more extensive cardiac disease, and reduced life expectancy by 25 years. The impact of SMI on patients undergoing cardiac surgery has not been extensively studied. We hypothesized that patients with SMI have worse cardiac surgery outcomes. METHODS: Using our institution's Society of Thoracic Surgeons database of 16,781 cardiac operations (2002-2017), a total of 1445 (8.7%) patients with SMI were identified and stratified into anxiety, mood disorders, and psychosis. The risk-adjusted impact on morbidity and mortality were evaluated using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Patients with SMI were more often female patients, were younger, and had more comorbid disease. SMI patients were more likely to have had previous cardiac surgery and require urgent or emergent procedures (both P < .05). Among specific SMI diagnoses, patients with psychosis had worse outcomes compared with the general population, with higher operative mortality (9.1% vs 4.2%; P = .001), major morbidity (30.4% vs 15.8%; P < .0001), and cost ($50,211 vs $38,820; P < .001). After multivariable risk adjustment, SMI and psychosis remained independently associated with composite mortality and major morbidity (odds ratio, 1.21; P = .012; and odds ratio, 1.68; P = .003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SMI is independently associated with morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. SMI patients, especially the subset with psychosis, are complicated, high-risk, and resource-consuming. Refined strategies to reduce postoperative complications and improve care coordination are necessary in this population.

Variability and Utilization of Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Ablation During Mitral Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) at the time of mitral valve surgery is a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Class IA recommendation with evidence from randomized trial data. We hypothesized that concomitant AF ablation rates have increased over time with implementation of this evidence-based practice. METHODS: All patients (N = 7261) undergoing mitral valve operations (2011-2018) were queried from a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Patients with preoperative AF were stratified by concomitant AF ablation. Trends in concomitant ablation were evaluated over time as well as by center and surgeon mitral surgical volume. The associations between patient and center factors on implementation of concomitant ablation were assessed with multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 1675 patients with preoperative AF underwent isolated mitral valve operations, with 1044 (64.6%) undergoing concomitant ablation. The utilization of concomitant ablation decreased over the study period (-2.82%/year), and was strongly associated with surgeon mitral valve volume (high 78.2% vs medium 62.5% vs low 59.0%; P < .001). Multivariate regression demonstrated age and comorbidities were strong predictors, but high volume mitral surgeons (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; P < .001) were twice as likely to perform concomitant AF ablation. Finally, patients with preoperative AF undergoing ablation were significantly less likely to be in AF at discharge (10.1% vs 53.8%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing evidence and societal recommendations, we demonstrate a persistent underutilization of concomitant AF ablation during isolated mitral surgery across a large number of low-volume and high-volume centers. These data suggest significant variability and may represent an opportunity for improvement.