RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aims to elucidate any relationship between prior tonsillectomy and the presence of oropharyngeal HPV DNA found in screening mouth rinses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted using the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants between 40 and 69 were included in the study and medical, surgical, and sexual health history were recorded. Multivariable analyses were conducted to examine factors associated with HPV prevalence in oral rinse samples. RESULTS: A total of 4825 participants were recorded with 21.1 % having a history of tonsillectomy. In the no tonsillectomy group, 8.6 % of respondents had a positive oral rinse for HPV, while 7.2 % of those with a tonsillectomy had a positive rinse sample. There was no association between age and HPV prevalence (OR = 1.04, 95 % CI: [1.00-1.07]). When controlling for demographics, medical history, and sexual behaviors, tonsillectomy history was not shown to have an association with HPV (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI: [0.53-1.40]). However, men, Hispanics, smokers, and those with higher lifetime sexual partners had increased odds of having a positive HPV oral rinse sample which was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that a history of tonsillectomy was not significantly associated with the presence of HPV in an oral rinse. However, a significant relationship was seen between the presence of HPV in oral rinses and certain demographic factors such as male gender, Hispanic race, smoking history, and increased sexual partners.
Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Antissépticos Bucais , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco , PrevalênciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differences in oral HPV infection and sexual behaviors by race in the US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2011-2014 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey during which participants aged 18-69 years completed oral rinse exam for HPV detection (n = 8,229). Logistic regression was used to examine the associations of race with various types of oral HPV infection and sexual behaviors. RESULTS: The prevalence of overall oral HPV infection and HPV type16 infection was 7.5% [95% CI: 6.6-8.4] and 1.1% [95% CI: 0.7-1.3], respectively. Blacks were more likely to have any oral HPV infection [OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.47] and Asian Americans were less likely to have any oral HPV infection [OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.24-0.49] than Whites. In a multivariate model, Whites were less likely to have any oral HPV infections than Blacks while having higher order of impact by the number of lifetime sex partners. Overall, Asian Americans were less likely to have type16 infection [OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06-0.67] than Whites; however, that difference disappears when adjusting for sexual behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative sample of US adults, the prevalence of overall oral HPV infections was higher among Blacks and lower among Asians in comparison to Whites. Further analysis with sexual behavior data suggested that the racial differences in prevalence are likely due to different sexual behaviors.
Assuntos
Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Comportamento Sexual , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Asiático , População Negra , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Parceiros Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The association between dialysis facility size and mortality for patients undergoing hemodialysis remains largely unclear, and whether the relationship differs by race and ethnicity or among high-risk subgroups is not known. Using data from the USRDS, we analyzed mortality rates in 385,074 incident patients ages ≥ 18 years who received in-center hemodialysis at 4633 dialysis facilities between 2003 and 2009. Facilities were categorized by the number of hemodialysis stations (1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-45, 46-60, and ≥ 61 stations). We found significantly higher mortality associated with facilities comprising ≤ 15 stations, and within this group, mortality increased as the number of stations decreased. The association with increased mortality was weaker for facilities with 16-30 stations, but >30 stations offered no additional survival benefit. The association between increased mortality and facilities with ≤ 15 stations was stronger for racial minorities and patients with diabetes or cardiovascular diseases. After adjustments, blacks had a 78% greater 1-year mortality risk in facilities with one to five stations, whereas whites had only a 26% greater risk. Notably, other patient-related events remained comparable across the categories assessed. In summary, these data suggest that hemodialysis care at small facilities associates with a significant increase in mortality that is only partially explained by measured patient case mix, other well defined facility characteristics, and geographic region. Future studies should investigate differences in processes of care and practices among hemodialysis facilities of different sizes.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades Hospitalares de Hemodiálise/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Temperature-controlled radiofrequency neurolysis of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) has been approved for use since 2020. This review synthesized the published data to assess its efficacy for treatment of chronic rhinitis. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic search was conducted with no restrictions on publication years in April 2023. RCTs and prospective investigations that reported the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) outcome of radiofrequency neurolysis as a single procedure in chronic rhinitis patients were included. Pooled estimates for change in rTNSS from baseline at 3 months and responder rates (≥30% reduction in baseline rTNSS) at 3 and 6 months were obtained. Other outcomes, such as postnasal drip and cough scores, quality of life (QoL) measures, and adverse events were included for qualitative review. RESULTS: Five studies were included in the systematic review, of which four were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 284 participants underwent treatment. The pooled change in rTNSS score at 3 months was -4.28 (95% CI, -5.10 to -3.46). The pooled responder rate at 3 months was 77.11% (95% CI, 68.21%-86.01%) and at 6 months 80.80% (95% CI, 70.85%-90.76%). Postnasal drip and cough scores and QoL also improved significantly at follow up. A total of 36 adverse events were reported in 21 (7.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this review suggest that temperature-controlled radiofrequency neurolysis of the PNN is effective at treating chronic rhinitis symptoms and that it has an overall favorable safety profile. Laryngoscope, 134:507-516, 2024.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Rinite , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Rinite/cirurgia , Nariz , TosseRESUMO
Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is a common cause of orbital, intracranial, and osseous infectious extrasinus complications. Dental infections can spread to the orbital or intracranial spaces though the sinuses via thrombophlebitis or direct extension, or from the dentition or oral cavity via vascular channels in the maxillary alveolar bone. ODS typically presents with unilateral involvement both clinically and radiographically. Any suspicion for extrasinus spread based on history and physical examination should be followed by appropriate imaging, formal dental evaluation, and, when appropriate, ophthalmology and neurosurgery consultations. This multidisciplinary approach ensures appropriate management of both the acute orbital and intracranial complications.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the 30-day postoperative emergency room (ER) visit rate following ambulatory orbital fracture repair with same-day discharge, and the causes and risk factors associated with ER visit. STUDY DESIGN: Database study. SETTING: State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD) and State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) for California, New York, and Florida for 2011. METHODS: We identified orbital fracture repair procedures among adults from the SASD, which was linked to the SEDD to identify the incidence and causes of ER visits within 30 days. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the factors associated with ER visit. RESULTS: Among 762 patients, the 30-day postoperative ER visit rate was 4.5%. Most ER visits (58.9%) occurred during the first week after surgery. The most common reasons for ER visits were related to pain, swelling, headache, dizziness, and fatigue (29.4%), followed by ophthalmologic etiologies including visual disturbances and infection of the eye (14.7%). There was no case of retrobulbar hematoma. In the multivariate analysis, patients living in Florida were at a significantly higher risk for ER visit compared to those in California (odds ratio: 4.48 [1.43-14.10], p = .010). CONCLUSION: Ambulatory orbital fracture repair appears to be safe. Common reasons for ER visit included pain, swelling, and ophthalmic symptoms. An increased risk for ER visit was seen with certain geographic regions but not with medical comorbidities or concurrent facial fractures or procedures.
Assuntos
Fraturas Orbitárias , Adulto , Humanos , Fraturas Orbitárias/cirurgia , Fraturas Orbitárias/etiologia , New York/epidemiologia , Florida/epidemiologia , Dor/etiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency room (ER) visits after surgery can be inconvenient and costly to the patient and the healthcare system. Estimates of the 30-day ER visit rate following ambulatory sinus procedures and their risk factors are largely unknown in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To determine the 30-day postoperative ER visit rate following ambulatory sinus procedures and the causes and risk factors associated with ER visits. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cohort study using data from the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases (SASD) and the State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) for California, New York, and Florida in 2019. We identified adult (18 years old) patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent ambulatory sinus procedures from the SASD. Cases were linked to the SEDD to identify ER visits occurring within 30 days after the procedure. Logistic regression models were used to identify patient- and procedure-related risk factors associated with the 30-day postoperative ER visit. RESULTS: Among the 23 239 patients, the 30-day postoperative ER visit rate was 3.9%. The most common reason for ER visit was bleeding (32.7%). A total of 56.9% of the ER visits occurred within the first week. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with ER visits included Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 1.29 [1.09-1.52], P = .003), Medicaid (OR 2.06 [1.69-2.51], P < .001), self-pay/no insurance (OR 1.44 [1.03-2.00], P = .031), chronic kidney disease/end-stage renal disease (OR 1.63 [1.06-2.51], P = .027), chronic pain/opioid use (OR 2.70 [1.02-7.11], P = .045), and a disposition other than home (OR 12.61 [8.34-19.06], P < .001). CONCLUSION: The most common reason for ER visit after ambulatory sinus procedures was bleeding. An increased ER visit rate was associated with certain demographic factors and medical comorbidities but not with procedure characteristics. This information can help us identify the patient populations who are at higher risk for ER visits to improve their postoperative recovery.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Medicare , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Serviço Hospitalar de EmergênciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Although the benefits of expanding health insurance coverage are clear, there are limited studies comparing the different types of insurance. This study aims to determine the association between insurance type and outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing reconstructive surgery in the United States. METHODS: Population-based cross-sectional study of the 2012-2014 National Inpatient Sample. We identified 1,314 patients with head and neck cancers undergoing tumor ablative surgery followed by pedicled or free flap reconstruction of oncologic defects. Insurance type was classified as private, Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay, or other. The primary outcome was extended length of stay (LOS), defined as greater than 14 days, which represented the 75th percentile of the study sample. Secondary outcomes included acute medical complications, surgical complications, morbidities, and costs. Analyses were adjusted for gender, geographic location, and various medical comorbidities. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, insurance type was associated with extended LOS (P = .001), medical complications (P = <.001), and mortalities (P = .020). After controlling for other covariates in the multivariate analysis, compared to private insurance, Medicare and Medicaid were both associated with significantly higher odds of extended LOS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.73 [1.09-2.76] and 2.22 [1.38-3.58], respectively). Medicare was associated with significantly higher odds of medical complications, but Medicaid was not (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.53 [1.02-2.31] and 1.64 [0.97-2.78], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid and Medicare were independently associated with extended LOS after reconstructive head and neck cancer surgery. Medicare was associated with higher rates of medical complications. Efforts to address LOS should target care planning and coordination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 132:1946-1952, 2022.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Medicaid , Medicare , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: A previous study demonstrated low rates of high-frequency hearing loss and noise exposure among Asian Americans (AAs). This study examined the prevalence of tinnitus and associated factors among AAs using the first nationally representative sample of AAs. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a national health survey. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2011 to 2012 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, during which 3,669 participants aged 20 to 69 years completed questionnaires on tinnitus (AA participants, n = 530). Tinnitus was defined as bothersome ringing lasting 5 minutes or more in the past 12 months. Prevalence of any tinnitus in the past 12 months was calculated incorporating sampling weights. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations with relevant factors. RESULTS: The prevalence of any tinnitus was 6.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-8.6) among AAs, significantly lower than the prevalence among the overall population at 16.5% (95% CI: 14.3-18.8]. After adjusting for audiometric hearing loss and demographics, AAs were less likely to report any tinnitus than whites (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.24-0.75]), blacks (OR = 0.60 [95% CI: 0.37-0.95]), and Hispanics (OR = 0.60 [95% CI: 0.45-0.78]). Rates of tinnitus were not different from whites or blacks once comorbidities, noise exposure, and depression were taken into account. Among AAs, reporting exposure to work-related noise (OR = 2.92 [95% CI: 1.15-7.41]) and having a major depressive disorder (OR = 6.45 [95% CI: 1.15-36.12]) were significant factors associated with tinnitus in a multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of tinnitus is significantly lower among AAs in comparison to other racial groups. Noise exposure and depression were significant factors associated with tinnitus among AAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 2020.
Assuntos
Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Zumbido/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Survival differences in oral cancer between black and white patients have been reported, but the contributing factors, especially the role of stage, are incompletely understood. Furthermore, the outcomes for Hispanic and Asian patients have been scarcely examined. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based national study. SETTING: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 Custom database (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 7630 patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity were classified as non-Hispanic white (white), non-Hispanic black (black), Hispanic, or Asian. Cox regression was used to obtain unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 5-year mortality for race/ethnicity with sequential adjustments for stage and other covariates. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between race/ethnicity and stage with adjusted odds ratios (aORs). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 75.0% whites, 7.6% blacks, 9.1% Hispanics, and 8.3% Asians. Compared to whites, the unadjusted HR for all-cause mortality for blacks was 1.68 (P < .001), which attenuated to 1.15 (P = .039) after adjusting for stage and became insignificant after including insurance. The unadjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were not significant for Hispanics and Asians vs whites. Compared to whites, blacks and Hispanics were more likely to present at later stages (aORs of 2.63 and 1.42, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The greater mortality for blacks vs whites was largely attributable to the higher prevalence of later stages at presentation and being uninsured among blacks. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality for Hispanics vs whites or Asians vs whites.
RESUMO
The objective of this study was to determine the survival outcome associated with large-volume blood transfusion after trauma. This was a retrospective study at a Level I trauma center from January 2000 to December 2014 that included trauma patients who received ≥25 units packed red blood cell (pRBC) within the first 24 hours of hospital admission. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions identified risk factors for mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis evaluated the ability of pRBC volume to predict mortality. Among 74,065 adults (≥18 years old), 178 patients (0.24%) received ≥25 units of pRBC in the first 24 hours, of which 142 (79.8%) received 25 to 49 units, 28 (15.7%) received 50 to 74 units, and 8 (4.5%) received ≥75 units. Overall, 92.2 per cent were male, mean age 33.9 (±14.0), mean Injury Severity Score 28.9 (±14.3), and median Glasgow Coma Scale score 12 (3-15). The overall mortality was 65.2 per cent and 64.1 per cent for those receiving 25 to 49 units, 64.3 per cent for 50 to 74 units, and 87.5 per cent for ≥75 units. In univariate analysis, female gender was associated with lower mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.24, P = 0.025]. Decreasing Glasgow Coma Scale (OR 0.82, P < 0.001), increasing Injury Severity Score (OR 1.07, P < 0.001), and thoracotomy (OR 3.91, P < 0.001) were associated with higher mortality. There was no transfusion cutoff that was significantly associated with higher mortality.
Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Transfusão de Sangue/mortalidade , California/epidemiologia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/mortalidade , Feminino , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: While it has been well documented that in the U.S., black and Hispanic dialysis patients have overall lower risks of death than white dialysis patients, little is known whether their lower risks are observed in cause-specific deaths. Additionally, recent research reported that younger black patients have a higher risk of death, but the source is unclear. Therefore, this study examined cause-specific deaths among US dialysis patients by race/ethnicity and age. METHODS: This national study included 1,255,640 incident dialysis patients between 1995 and 2010 in the United States Renal Data System. Five cause-specific mortality rates, including cardiovascular (CVD), infection, malignancy, other known causes (miscellaneous), and unknown, were compared across blacks, Hispanics, and whites overall and stratified by age groups. FINDINGS: After multiple adjustments, Hispanic patients had the lowest risk of mortality for every major cause in almost all ages. Compared with whites, blacks had a lower risk of death from CVD, malignancy and miscellaneous causes in most age groups, but not from infection. In fact, blacks had a higher risk of infection death than whites in ages 18-30 years (HR [95% CI] 1.94 [1.69-2.23]; P < 0.001), 31-40 years (HR 1.51 [1.40-1.63]; P < 0.001) and 41-50 years (HR 1.07 [1.02-1.12]; P = 0.009), which were partially attributed to their higher prevalence of AIDS nephropathy. For each race/ethnicity, more than two-thirds of infection deaths were due to non-dialysis related infections. DISCUSSION: Hispanics had the lowest risk for each major cause of death. Blacks were less likely to die than whites from most causes, except infection. The previously reported higher overall mortality rate for younger blacks is attributed to their two-fold higher infection mortality, which is mostly non-dialysis related, suggesting a new direction to improve their overall health status. Research is greatly needed to determine social and biological factors that account for the survival gap in dialysis among different racial/ethnic groups.
Assuntos
Hidratação/métodos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although multiple factors influence access to nephrologist care in patients with CKD stages 4-5, the geographic determinants within the United States are incompletely understood. In this study, we examined interstate differences in nephrologist care among patients approaching ESRD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This national, population-based analysis included 373,986 adult patients from the US Renal Data System, who initiated maintenance dialysis between 2005 and 2009. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine interstate variation in nephrologist care (≥12 months before ESRD) for overall and four race-age subpopulations (black or white and older or younger than 65 years). RESULTS: The average state-level probability of having received nephrologist care in all states combined was 28.8% (95% confidence interval, 25.2% to 32.7%) overall and was lowest (24.3%) in the younger black subpopulation. Even at these lower levels, state-level probabilities varied considerably across states in overall and subpopulations (all P<0.001). Overall, excluding the states in the upper and lower five percentiles, the remaining states had a probability of receiving care that varied from 18.5% to 41.9%. The lower probability of receiving nephrologist care for blacks than whites among younger patients noted in most states was attenuated in older patients. Geographically, all New England states and most Midwest states had higher than average probability, whereas most Middle Atlantic and Southern states had lower than average probability. After controlling for patient factors, three state-characteristic categories, including general healthcare access measured by percentage of uninsured persons and Medicaid program performance scores, preventive care measured by percentage of receiving recommended preventive care, and socioeconomic status, contributed 55%-66% of interstate variation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients living in states with better health service and socioeconomic characteristics were more likely to receive predialysis nephrologist care. The reported national black-white difference in nephrologist care was primarily driven by younger black patients being the least likely to receive care.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrologia , Estados Unidos , População BrancaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis have exceptionally high hospitalization rates, the risk factors for hospitalizations are unclear. This study sought to examine hospitalization rates among hemodialysis patients in the United States according to both race/ethnicity and age. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: US Renal Data System data on 563,281 patients beginning maintenance hemodialysis between 1995 and 2009 were analyzed. Rates of hospital admission and number of hospital days for all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations during the first year of dialysis were compared among blacks, whites, and Hispanics in the entire cohort and subgroups stratified by age. RESULTS: After multiple adjustments, compared with whites, Hispanics overall had lower rates of both all-cause hospital days (adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.90 to 0.93; P<0.001) and hospital admissions (aRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.90; P<0.001), whereas blacks had a lower rate of all-cause admissions (aRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94 to 0.96; P<0.001). The racial/ethnic differences, however, varied by age. Hispanics exhibited the lowest rates of hospital days and admissions for all age groups≤70 years, but those >80 years had higher rates than their white counterparts. The adjusted black-to-white rate ratios exhibited a U-shaped pattern with age, with higher rates for blacks in the younger and older age groups. Hospitalization rates for dialysis-related infections were markedly higher in blacks and Hispanics than whites, which were consistent in all age groups for blacks (aRRs for hospital days ranged from 1.09 to 1.36) and all ages>60 years for Hispanics (aRRs ranged from 1.20 to 1.38). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant racial/ethnic differences in hospitalization rates within first year of dialysis, which are not consistent across the age groups and also differ by causes of hospitalization. Overall, blacks and Hispanics had lower rates of all-cause hospital admissions than whites. However, younger and older blacks and older Hispanics were at greatest risk.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Hispânico ou Latino , Falência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Diálise Renal/tendências , População Branca , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pre-ESRD care is an important predictor of outcomes in patients undergoing long-term dialysis. This study examined the extent of variation in receiving pre-ESRD care and black-white disparities across urban and rural counties. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Participants were 404,622 non-Hispanic white and black patients aged >18 years who began dialysis between 2005 and 2010 and resided in 3076 counties from the U.S. Renal Data System. The counties were grouped into large metropolitan, medium/small metropolitan, suburban, and rural counties. Pre-ESRD care indicators included receipt of nephrologist care at least 6 or 12 months before ESRD, dietitian care, use of arteriovenous fistula at first outpatient dialysis session, and use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with hemoglobin level < 10 g/dl. RESULTS: Large metropolitan and rural counties had lower percentages of patients who received pre-ESRD nephrologist care (25.7% and 26.9% for nephrologist care > 12 months), compared with the higher percentage in medium/small metropolitan counties (31.6%; both P<0.001). For both races, nonmetropolitan patients had poorer access to dietitian care and lower ESA use than metropolitan patients. Consistently in all four geographic areas, black patients received less care than their white counterparts. The unadjusted odds ratios of black versus white patients in receiving nephrologist care for >12 months before ESRD were 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.72) in large metropolitan counties and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69-0.90) in rural counties. The patterns remained, albeit attenuated, after adjustment for patient factors. CONCLUSIONS: The receipt of pre-ESRD care, with blacks receiving less care, varies among geographic areas defined by urban/rural characteristics.
Assuntos
População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Falência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrologia/normas , Nefrologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Reports on the racial and ethnic differences in dialysis patient survival rates have been inconsistent. The literature suggests that these survival differences may be modified by age as well as categorizing white race as inclusive of Hispanic ethnicity. The goal of this study was to better understand these associations by examining survival among US dialysis patients by age, ethnicity, and race. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Between 1995 and 2009, 1,282,201 incident dialysis patients ages 18 years or older were identified in the United States Renal Data System. Dialysis survival was compared among non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics overall and stratified by seven age groups. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 22.3 months. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, a lower mortality risk was seen in Hispanics in all age groups. Consequently, when Hispanic patients were excluded from the white race, the mortality rates in white race all increased. Using non-Hispanic whites as the reference, a significantly lower mortality risk for non-Hispanic blacks was consistently observed in all age groups above 30 years (unadjusted hazard ratios ranged from 0.70 to 0.87; all P<0.001). In the 18- to 30-years age group, there remained an increased mortality risk in blacks versus non-Hispanic whites after adjustment for case mix (adjusted hazard ratio=1.19, 95% confidence interval=1.13-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality risk was lowest in Hispanics, intermediate in non-Hispanic blacks, and highest in non-Hispanic whites. This pattern generally holds in all age groups except for the 18- to 30-years group, where the adjusted mortality rate for non-Hispanic blacks exceeds the adjusted mortality rate of non-Hispanic whites.