Disruption of the interaction between caveolae and Piezo1 promotes pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling.

Piezo1 channels are activated by mechanical stress and play a significant role in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying Piezo1 activation on the cell membrane following pressure overload remain unclear. Caveolae are known to mitigate mechanical forces and regulate Piezo1 function. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the interaction between caveolae and Piezo1 in the development of pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling. We observed reduced colocalization between Piezo1 and Caveolin-3 in hypertrophic cardiomyocytes following abdominal aortic constriction and Angiotensin-II treatment, accompanied by increased Piezo1 function and expression. Furthermore, enhanced Piezo1 function was also noted upon caveolae disruption using methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (mßCD). Thus, our findings suggested that pressure overload led to Piezo1 translocation from caveolae, thereby augmenting its function and expression, which may contribute to cardiac remodeling.

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus versus Cyclosporine A for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy:A Network Meta-analysis.

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with those of cyclosporine in treating idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) via network meta-analysis. Methods Databases including PubMed,Embase,CENTRAL (Cochrane),Wanfang Database,CNKI,and VIP citation database were searched for relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Package Meta 4.5.0 and Gemtc 0.8.1 in R 3.3.1 were used to analyze the included studies. Results In this network meta-analysis,the complete remission rate (RR=0.98,95% CI:0.70-1.40)and the total remission rate (RR=1.00,95% CI:0.90-1.20)of idiopathic membranous nephropathy did not differ significantly between IMN patients treated with cyclosporine A or tacrolimusand,nor did the incidences of hepatic dysfunction(RR=1.40,95% CI:0.52-4.00),infection(RR=0.75,95% CI:0.18-3.10),or gastrointestinal syndrome(RR=2.1,95% CI:0.36-28.00). Conclusion Cyclosporine A seems to have similar effectiveness and safety to tacrolimus in treating IMN.

Association Between Cannabis Use and Brain Structures: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Background  Observational studies suggested that cannabis use was associated with alternation of brain structures; however, as subjected to confounding factors, they were difficult to make causal inferences and direction determinations. In this study, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to examine the potential causal association between cannabis use and brain structures. Methods The genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data for lifetime cannabis use (LCU), cannabis use disorder (CUD), and brain cortical and subcortical structures were utilized in this study. Cortical structures were divided into 34 distinct gyral-defined regions with surface area (SA) and thickness (TH) measured. Subcortical structures encompassed volumes from seven specified regions. The primary estimator used in our analysis was inverse-variance weighted (IVW), complemented by MR-Egger and weighted median methods to enhance the robustness of the results. The Cochran's Q test, funnel plots, and MR-Egger intercept tests were used to detect heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Results  No causal relationship was detected between LCU and global cortical SA or TH. However, at the regional cortex level, LCU was associated with decreased TH in the fusiform (ß = -0.0168 mm, SE = 0.00581, P = 0.0039) and lateral occipital (ß = -0.0141 mm, SE = 0.00531, P = 0.0079) regions, while increasing TH in the postcentral region (ß = 0.0093 mm, SE = 0.00445, P = 0.0374). At the subcortical level, LCU was found to increase the brainstem volume (ß = 0.224 mm3, SE = 0.09, P = 0.0128). CUD did not show any causal association with brain structure at either cortical or subcortical levels. Nonetheless, after applying multiple comparison corrections, the P values for the MR analysis of causal relationships between cannabis use and these brain structures did not meet the significance threshold. Conclusion  The evidence for cannabis use causally influencing brain structures is insufficient.