Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi ; 46(5): 159-67, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15526771

RESUMO

In present day Japan, when a crisis like the Bhopal accident occurs, due to defects in the current of industrial health law, effective crisis management cannot be taken to minimize health damage in both workers and residents. The current law characterizes industrial health as a part of the welfare service provided by employers for employees. Nevertheless, the company should be liable for all failure and damage including health impairment as a primary party. Moreover, in an emergency crisis, unlike the case of reparations, it is not accepted to argue whether the company should take absolute liability or not. Accordingly, in such cases, we consider it more appropriate to apply the "Polluter Pays Principle" and the principle of "Liability without Fault" to the company's responsibility. By these rules, the company should mobilize their own professionals, who are experts of managing crises, such as occupational physicians and/or industrial health professionals to minimize health damages among citizens in general. The company should take such a social responsibility in a crisis when it is the primary responsible party to the crisis.


Assuntos
Saúde Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão de Riscos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Japão , Responsabilidade Legal , Responsabilidade Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA