Electroconvulsive Therapy in Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: Case Series with a Defined Protocol.

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) represents a neurological emergency that is characterized by a lack of response to the third line of antiepileptic treatment, including intravenous general anesthetics. It is a medical challenge with high morbidity and mortality. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been recommended as a nonpharmacologic option of treatment after other alternatives are unsuccessful. Its effect on the cessation of SRSE has been minimally investigated. The objective of this article is to analyze the effect of ECT on SRSE. For this purpose, a multidisciplinary team created a protocol based on clinical guidelines similar to those described previously by Ray et al. (2017). ECT was applied to six patients with SRSE after the failure of antiepileptic treatment and pharmacologic coma.The objective of each ECT session was to elicit a motor seizure for at least 20 s. SRSE was resolved in all patients after several days of treatment, including ECT as a therapy, without relevant adverse effects. Thus, ECT is an effective and feasible option in the treatment of SRSE, and its place in the algorithm in treatment should be studied due to the uncommon adverse effects and the noninvasive character of the therapy.

[Catheter-related central venous thrombosis in the course of an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: diagnostic usefulness of echocardiography]. / Trombosis venosa central asociada a catéter en el curso de un infarto agudo de miocardio no complicado: utilidad diagnóstica de la ecocardiografía.

In certain cases such as cancer patients or patients with coagulopathies, the venous thrombosis is a frequent complication that is associated with the implantation of central venous catheters. However, it is uncommon in other contexts, such as acute myocardial infarction without complications in its fifth day of evolution, after being treated with platelet inhibitors in addition to the initial anticoagulant and fibrinolytic therapy. We present a case of thrombosis in the superior vena cava and in the right atrium related to a peripherally inserted central catheter in this clinical context. The utility of transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography in the differential diagnosis with other cardiac structures and in the evolutionary control is commented. Likewise, potential complications and the treatment of

A randomized trial of intravenous glutamine supplementation in trauma ICU patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the intravenous (i.v.) L-alanyl-L-glutamine dipeptide supplementation during 5 days on clinical outcome in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Glutamine was not given as a component of nutrition but as an extra infusion. The primary outcome variable was the number of new infections within the first 14 days. RESULTS: We included 142 patients. There were no differences between groups in baseline characteristics. Up to 62 % of the patients in the placebo group and 63 % in the treatment group presented confirmed infections (p = 0.86). ICU length of stay was 14 days in both groups (p = 0.54). Hospital length of stay was 27 days in the placebo group and 29 in the treatment group (p = 0.88). ICU mortality was 4.2 % in both groups (p = 1). Sixty percent of the patients presented low glutamine levels before randomization. At the end of the treatment (6th day), 48 % of the patients maintained low glutamine levels (39 % of treated patients vs. 57 % in the placebo group). Patients with low glutamine levels at day 6 had more number of infections (58.8 vs. 80.9 %; p = 0.032) and longer ICU (9 vs. 20 days; p < 0.01) and hospital length of stay (24 vs. 41 days; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There was no benefit with i.v. L-alanyl-L-glutamine dipeptide supplementation (0.5 g/kg body weight/day of the dipeptide) during 5 days in trauma patients admitted to the ICU. The i.v. glutamine supplementation was not enough to normalize the plasma glutamine levels in all patients. Low plasma glutamine levels at day 6 were associated with a worse outcome.