Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(3): 468-475, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352286

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Missouri passed an 8-week gestational age abortion in August 2019. The objective of this study was to compare distance and time from referral to evaluation between patients who continued their pregnancy and those who terminated in patients with severe and lethal fetal anomalies and estimate the impact of the Missouri gestational age abortion ban on distance to abortion care in this patient population. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients seen at the Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL) Fetal Care Center (FCC) with a severe or lethal fetal anomaly between July 2018 and June 2019. Patient characteristics including gestational age at referral and distance traveled to the FCC were compared between patients who underwent abortion and who continued their pregnancies. RESULTS: From July 2018 to June 2019, 463 patients were seen in the Fetal Care Center and 13% (60/463) were diagnosed with severe or lethal fetal anomalies comprising the study population for this analysis. Of these, 21 (35%) patients underwent an abortion, and 39 (65%) patients continued their pregnancy. Patients who underwent abortion were referred at a significantly earlier gestational age (median 19 weeks [IQR 17, 20 weeks] v. 20 weeks [IQR 18, 24 weeks]), p = 0.04. There was a statistically significant difference between the median latency time between patients who underwent an abortion and who continued their pregnancy (median 8 days [IQR 4,13 days] v. 14 days [IQR 9, 22 days], p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with severe or lethal fetal anomalies are often evaluated at later gestational ages, which may preclude their access to abortion services.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Lactente , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Missouri , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 40(1): 89-94, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934323

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There is wide variation in the management of pregnancies complicated by abnormal placental cord insertion (PCI), which includes velamentous cord insertion (VCI) and marginal cord insertion (MCI). We tested the hypothesis that abnormal PCI is associated with small for gestational age (SGA) infants. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of all pregnant patients undergoing anatomic ultrasound at a single institution from 2010 to 2017. Patients with abnormal PCI were matched in a 1:2 ratio by race, parity, gestational age at the time of ultrasound, and obesity to patients with normal PCIs. The primary outcome was SGA at delivery. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status, 5-minute Apgar score < 7, umbilical artery pH < 7.1, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. These outcomes were compared using univariate and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Abnormal PCI was associated with an increased risk of SGA (relative risk [RR]: 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-4.69), increased risk of preterm delivery <37 weeks (RR: 3.60; 95% CI: 1.74-7.46), and <34 weeks (RR: 3.50; 95% CI: 1.05-11.63) compared with patients with normal PCI. There was no difference in rates of cesarean delivery, Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes, acidemia, or neonatal intensive care unit admission between normal and abnormal PCI groups. In a stratified analysis, the association between abnormal PCI and SGA did not differ by the type of abnormal PCI (p for interaction = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Abnormal PCI is associated with an increased risk of SGA and preterm delivery. These results suggest that serial fetal growth assessments in this population may be warranted. KEY POINTS: · Abnormal PCI is associated with SGA infants and preterm birth.. · If an abnormal PCI is identified, the provider should consider serial growth ultrasounds.. · There is no difference in obstetric outcomes between VCI and MCI..


Assuntos
Nascimento Prematuro , Vasa Previa , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Feminino , Placenta , Resultado da Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cordão Umbilical , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Idade Gestacional
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 226(1): 114.e1-114.e7, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34331893

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The safest mode of delivery to use for very preterm infants is an ongoing topic of debate. There are many reasons to perform a cesarean delivery in cases of extremely preterm and very preterm infants, including indication for labor, fetal distress, maternal indications, and malpresentation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether cesarean delivery is associated with a considerable improvement in neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies, delivered from 22 to 29 weeks' gestation between 2010 and 2015, admitted for preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes and excluded neonates with a delivery weight ≤500 g, multiple gestations, cases with intrauterine fetal demise, and induced terminations. The primary outcome for the study was a neonatal morbidity composite (Apgar score of <5 at 5 minutes, prolonged ventilation (>28 days), intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, coagulopathy, discharged on home ventilator support, or discharged with enteric feeding tube). Cesarean deliveries were performed for standard obstetrical indications. Regression models were used and adjusted for nulliparity, delivery year, and presentation at the time of delivery to determine whether cesarean delivery is associated with neonatal morbidity or neonatal death. RESULTS: There were 271 eligible deliveries, which included 128 cesarean deliveries and 143 vaginal deliveries. The cesarean delivery group had fewer nulliparous patients and more fetuses presenting in breech position at the time of delivery. The overall composite neonatal morbidity occurred in 202 of the 271 (74.5%) deliveries and mortality occurred in 26 of the 271 (9.59%) deliveries. When adjusting for nulliparity, delivery year, and fetal presentation at the time of delivery, cesarean delivery was associated with a decreased risk for death in the delivery room or within 24 hours after delivery (adjusted risk ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.63; P=.03). Cesarean delivery was associated with an increased use of exogenous surfactant (adjusted risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.38; P=.01) and bag mask ventilation (adjusted risk ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.37; P=.03). In a secondary analysis that included only patients who received a complete course of steroids, there were no differences in the composite morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery performed for standard obstetrical indications in cases of very preterm neonates is associated with a decreased risk for death in the delivery room or within 24 hours of delivery but is not associated with an improvement in the overall morbidity or mortality.


Assuntos
Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Doenças do Prematuro/mortalidade , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro , Adulto , Cesárea , Estudos de Coortes , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Missouri , Paridade , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 2(3): 100126, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345872

RESUMO

In 2019, a total of 25 abortion bans were signed into law by states in the Southeast and Midwest. As of May 2019, 33 states have passed laws restricting or limiting abortion services, including "trigger laws" that make abortion illegal in the event that Roe v. Wade is overturned. In addition, 9 states have passed extreme abortion laws, such as making abortion illegal early in gestation (as early as 6-8 weeks' gestation), which are all currently enjoined and not in effect. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Society of Family Planning agree that access to abortion is essential to women's health and oppose legislation that directly affects the patient-physician relationship. It is time for maternal-fetal medicine physicians to play a more active role in the fight for abortion access. A 2012 study of maternal-fetal medicine physicians found only 31% of respondents performed dilation and evacuation for termination of pregnancies, predominantly based on whether the provider was trained in dilation and evacuation procedures during fellowship. We performed a 2018 survey of all maternal-fetal medicine fellows and program directors and found that more than two-thirds (62 of 90 [68.9%]) of fellows desire dilation and evacuation training; however, only 9 of 39 (23.1%) program directors believe dilation and evacuation training should be required. The maternal-fetal medicine community is well positioned to improve access to abortion services in the United States by prioritizing dilation and evacuation training for fellows and actively participating in reproductive health advocacy.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Médicos , Aborto Criminoso , Feminino , Humanos , Perinatologia , Gravidez , Estados Unidos , Saúde da Mulher
6.
Future Virol ; 11(8): 577-581, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28348636

RESUMO

Linkage and retention in care for many HIV-infected women in the postpartum period is suboptimal, which compromises long-term virologic suppression and the HIV Care Continuum. Efforts are needed to improve individual outcomes by addressing transitions in care. We summarize some successful strategies to engage and retain HIV-infected women in care during the postpartum period.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA