Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Emerg Med ; 60(2): 216-219, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33092972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a clinically important form of ectopic pregnancy that carries a high risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. As the rate of cesarean sections has risen, this diagnosis is becoming an increasingly important consideration for providers caring for patients in early pregnancy. CASE REPORT: We present three cases of CSPs in which point-of-care ultrasound expedited the diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Given the risks of an undiagnosed CSP, the increasing incidence of CSP, and the number of effective treatment options available in early gestation, the prompt and accurate diagnosis of CSP remains crucial to its successful management. As such, it is an important diagnosis for the emergency physician to consider when evaluating a patient in early pregnancy.


Assuntos
Cicatriz , Gravidez Ectópica , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Cicatriz/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Gravidez , Gravidez Ectópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
2.
J Emerg Med ; 59(6): 911-917, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32917440

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: More than 10 million arterial lines are placed annually worldwide, many of which happen in the emergency department. Before the introduction of point-of-care ultrasound, landmark-guided palpation (LMGP) was considered standard of care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare ultrasound-guided (USG) and LMGP of radial arterial line cannulation by novice emergency medicine interns. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial (NCT03326739) of a convenience sample of adult patients who presented to an urban, university hospital with 100,000 visits annually. There was no funding for this study. Patients who required an arterial line were blindly randomized into LMGP or USG groups. Only novice emergency medicine interns, defined as interns with <15 previous placements, who were not blinded, performed the cannulation. Statistical analyses included t and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled with 20 patients randomized to each group. USG had a first-pass success of 75% vs. 0% for LMGP (p < 0.00001) and an overall success of 100% vs. 15% for LMGP (p < 0.00001), a mean of 1.30 attempts vs. 2.95 attempts for LMGP (a difference of 1.65; p < 0.0001), and a mean time for placement of 264 s vs. 524 s for LMGP (a difference of 260; p = 0.0025). Of the failed LMGP, USG crossover was 100% successful with a mean of 1.37 attempts (95% confidence interval 0.58-2.16) and 180 s for placement (95% confidence interval 97.92-262.08). Five percent of LMGP had a complication vs. 0% for USG (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: USG improved first-pass and overall success of radial arterial line cannulation while reducing time to access and attempts when used by novice emergency medicine interns.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Medicina de Emergência , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Adulto , Humanos , Palpação , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
3.
J Emerg Med ; 55(1): e1-e4, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29753570

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) include a spectrum of pathologies from uncomplicated pyelonephritis to urosepsis, including xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP). Most febrile UTIs are treated with antibiotics alone, but studies indicate nearly 12% of cases of presumed simple pyelonephritis require emergent urologic intervention. How to identify these individuals, while limiting unnecessary advanced imaging and delays in diagnosis, challenges all emergency providers. We review the diagnosis and management of XGP, as well as the evidence regarding the role of renal ultrasound in the identification of complicated presentations of febrile UTIs. CASE REPORT: We present a case of XGP, a complicated febrile UTI requiring immediate urologic intervention, diagnosed by point-of-care ultrasound. A 40-year-old female presented in severe sepsis and complaining of flank pain. Prompt bedside ultrasound demonstrated hydronephrosis, expediting definitive urologic treatment via percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: With a mortality rate exceeding 40%, obstructed pyonephrosis requires prompt decompression. Given its exceptional sensitivity for identifying hydronephrosis and ability to detect abscesses and emphysematous changes, we advocate a point-of-care ultrasound-first approach to screen for cases of complicated febrile UTIs in order to expedite treatment and limit radiation in uncomplicated presentations.


Assuntos
Pielonefrite Xantogranulomatosa/diagnóstico , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Dor no Flanco/etiologia , Humanos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Pielonefrite Xantogranulomatosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Pielonefrite Xantogranulomatosa/mortalidade , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/etiologia
4.
Acad Emerg Med ; 29(2): 159-163, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34608713

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Arthrocentesis is commonly performed in the emergency department, but success rates vary based on location. Presently, there is a paucity of data assessing the utility of ultrasound-guided (USG) medium-sized joint arthrocentesis. The objective of this study was to compare the success of USG and landmark-guided (LMG) medium-sized joint arthrocentesis. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized clinical trial (NCT03327584) of a convenience sample of adult patients who presented to an urban, university hospital with > 105,000 visits annually. Patients with a suspected medium-sized joint effusion (defined as elbow, wrist, or ankle) undergoing arthrocentesis were randomized into LMG or USG using the GE Logiq e linear transducer (4-10 MHz). The following patients were excluded: on anticoagulation, with soft tissue infection overlying the joint, or involving an artificial joint. Statistical analysis included the Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney U-test, and t-test. RESULTS: Overall, 44 patients were enrolled with 23 patients randomized into the LMG group and 21 patients into the USG arm. USG was significantly better than LMG with an overall success of 94.1% versus 60% for LMG (difference = 34.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.90 to 58.83). USG first-pass success was 82.4% versus 46.7% for LMG (difference = 35.7%, 95% CI = 2.76 to 60.37) and a mean of 1.35 attempts versus 2.00 for LMG (difference = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.005 to 1.296). Of the 14 LMG failures, eight had no effusion present on USG crossover. Four patients in the USG group had no effusion present. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance improved first-pass and overall successful arthrocentesis of medium-sized joint effusions.


Assuntos
Artrocentese , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA