Application of the Person-Centered Care to Manage Responsive Behaviors in Clients with Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Qualitative Single Case Study.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to describe "how" and "why" the person-centered care (PCC) approach was applied within a long-term care (LTC) community to manage responsive behaviors (RBs) in individuals with major neurocognitive disorders. METHODS: A descriptive holistic single case study design was employed in the context of an LTC community in Quebec, using semi-structured interviews and non-participatory observations of experienced care providers working with clients with RBs, photographing the physical environment, and accessing documents available on the LTC community's public website. A thematic content analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The findings generated insight into the importance of considering multiple components of the LTC community to apply the PCC approach for managing RBs, including a) creating a homelike environment, b) developing a therapeutic relationship with clients, c) engaging clients in meaningful activities, and d) empowering care providers by offering essential resources. CONCLUSIONS: Applying and implementing the PCC approach within an LTC community to manage clients' RBs is a long-term multi-dimensional process that requires a solid foundation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings highlight the importance of considering multiple factors relevant to persons, environments, and meaningful activities to apply the PCC approach within LTC communities to manage RBs.

Cognitive and Motor Recovery and Predictors of Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the patterns of cognitive and motor recovery at 4 time points from admission to 9 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation (IR) and to investigate the association of therapeutic factors and conditions before and after discharge with long-term outcomes. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and practice-based evidence dataset. SETTING: IR in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TBI consecutively admitted for IR between 2008 and 2011 who had data available from admission to 9 months after discharge (N=85). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: FIM-Rasch cognitive and motor scores at admission, discharge, 3 months after discharge, and 9 months after discharge. RESULTS: Cognitive and motor recovery showed similar patterns of improvement with recovery up to 3 months but no significant change from 3 to 9 months. Having fewer postdischarge health conditions was associated with better long-term cognitive scores (95% confidence interval, -13.06 to -1.2) and added 9.9% to the explanatory power of the model. More therapy time in complex occupational therapy activities (95% confidence interval, .02 to .09) and fewer postdischarge health conditions (95% confidence interval, -19.5 to -3.8) were significant predictors of better long-term motor function and added 14.3% and 7.2% to the explanatory power of the model, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of this study inform health care providers about the influence of the timing of IR on cognitive and motor recovery. In addition, it underlines the importance of making patients and families aware of residual health conditions following discharge from IR.

Predictors of Discharge Destination From Acute Care in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review studies on clinical and nonclinical predictors of discharge destination from acute care in patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: The search was conducted using 7 databases up to December 2016. A systematic review and in-depth quality synthesis were conducted on eligible articles that met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The search yielded 8503 articles of which 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. This study demonstrated that a larger proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury were discharged home. The main predictors of discharge to a setting with rehabilitation services versus home included increasing age, white and non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, having insurance coverage, greater severity of the injury, and longer acute care length of stay. Age was the only consistent factor that was negatively associated with discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities versus other institutions. CONCLUSION: Results of this study support healthcare providers in providing consultation to patients about the expected next level of cares while considering barriers that may helpful in effective discharge planning, decreasing length of stay and saving resources. These findings also suggest the need for further studies with a stronger methodology on the contribution of patients and families/caregivers to distinguish the predictors of discharge to dedicated rehabilitation facilities.

Content of inpatient rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury: A comparison of Canadian and American facilities.

Objective: To compare components of inpatient rehabilitation (IR) for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) between Canada and the US facilities. Design: Secondary analysis of the TBI-practice-based evidence dataset. Participants: Patients with TBI who had a higher Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) cognitive function score (≥21) that were admitted to 1 IR facility in Canada (n = 103) and 9 IR facilities in the US (n = 401). Main measures: demographic and clinical characteristics, type and intensity of activities by discipline, discharge location, FIM-Rasch score, social participation and quality of life. Results: Time from injury to rehabilitation admission was significantly longer in the Canadian cohort and they experienced a longer rehabilitation length of stay (p < .001, Cohen's d > .8). Patients in Canada received a greater total time of individual therapy and lower intensity of interventions per week from all disciplines. They also showed a higher score at discharge in FIM components, while US patients had better cognitive recovery and community participation long-term post-discharge. Conclusions: This study informs stakeholders of the large variation in service provision for patients who were treated in these two countries. These findings suggest the need for robust analyzes to investigate predictors of short and long-term outcomes considering the variation in health-care delivery. List of abbreviations: TBI: traumatic brain injury, CSI: comprehensive severity index, LoS: length of stay, OT: occupational therapy, PT: physical therapy, SLP: speech language pathology, IR: inpatient rehabilitation.

Association between cognitive ability and functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury- using a computer-based neurocognitive battery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contribution of the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB TM) in the explanation of variation of functional outcomes. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the practice-based evidence data set. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation setting. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (≥ 18 years of age) with traumatic brain injury who were consecutively admitted to the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute between 2008 and 2011 (n = 65). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable Main outcome measure: Cognitive and motor components of the Functional Independence Measure. RESULTS: The addition of the CBB TM components resulted in a significantly better model for predicting outcomes than a basic model using demographics and clinical factors. Among all CBB TM components, speed and variation in the identification task and accuracy in the one card learning task were significantly associated with cognitive functional outcomes after controlling for demographic and clinical factors. Rehabilitation length of stay was the only significant clinical factor that was correlated with both cognitive and motor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study suggest the importance of considering visual attention and visual memory in predication of cognitive outcome and provide valuable information for researchers to consider the specific cognitive abilities in functional outcome model in future studies in addition to more traditional factors.

Understanding the Early Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Brain Injury Associations Across Canada: A Qualitative Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased challenges for people living with brain injury and community associations to support this vulnerable population. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of the challenges faced by brain injury survivors during the first year of the pandemic and how community brain injury associations adapted their services to respond to these needs. Findings from seven focus-group with 31 representatives of Canadian brain injury associations revealed 4 main themes: (1) Addressing evolving client needs; (2) Keeping clients safe; (3) Challenges and opportunities navigating the digital world; and (4) Sustaining brain injury associations in the face of uncertainties and disruptions. To comply with public health measures, associations reported pivoting their service delivery online, despite recognizing the difficulties this could create for many brain injury survivors in accessing and using technology. Our findings also highlight concrete directions for not-profit organizations providing instrumental help with activities, acting as a liaison and interpreter of public health guidelines, and in connecting with clients using technology while handling potential cognitive and technological challenges. Addressing these issues has the potential to protect people living with brain injury and community associations from external threats, like pandemics, in the future.

COOK technology to support meal preparation following a severe traumatic brain injury: a usability mixed-methods single-case study in a real-world environment.

INTRODUCTION: Following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), meal preparation may become challenging as it involves multiple cognitive abilities and sub-tasks. To support this population, the Cognitive Orthosis for coOKing (COOK) was developed in partnership with an alternative residential resource for people with severe TBI. However, little is known about the usability of this technology to support people with TBI living in their own homes. METHODS: A usability study was conducted using a mixed-methods single-case design with a 35-year-old man with severe TBI living alone at home. The number of assistances provided, time taken and the percentage of unnecessary actions during a meal preparation task were documented nine times to explore the usability of COOK. Interviews were also conducted with the participant to document his satisfaction with COOK. Potential benefits were explored via the number of meals prepared per week. RESULTS: The usability of COOK was shown to be promising as the technology helped the participant prepare complex meals, while also reducing the number of assistances needed and the percentage of unnecessary actions. However, several technical issues and contextual factors influenced the efficiency and the participant's satisfaction with COOK. Despite improving his self-confidence, COOK did not help the participant prepare more meals over time. CONCLUSION: This study showed that COOK was easy to use and promising, despite technical and configuration issues. Results suggest the importance of further technological developments to improve COOK's usability and fit with the needs of people with TBI living in their own homes.

Cognitive Orthosis for coOKing (COOK) is a promising technology to support people with TBI when preparing meals within their homes, though usability issues need to be corrected.Factors such as current meal-preparation related habits, expectations and availability of technical support were found to influence the usability of COOK.Various questions to consider in future studies involving an assistive technology for cognition to support meal preparation were identified.

Potential of using an assistive technology to address meal preparation difficulties following acquired brain injury: clients' and caregivers' perspectives.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored difficulties in meal preparation experienced by adults with moderate to severe acquired brain injury (ABI) and available compensatory strategies from both ABI individuals' and caregivers' perspectives. Further, this study investigated their opinions on potential benefits, barriers and facilitators to the use of the Cognitive Orthosis for coOKing (COOK) in their living environment. METHODS: Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups were carried out with adults with moderate to severe ABI (n = 20) and formal and informal caregivers (n = 13) in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. A qualitative analysis based on Miles et al.'s approach was used. RESULTS: According to participants, cognitive, physical, psychosocial dysfunctions and lack of availability of supportive caregivers were the main difficulties that impede persons with ABI from engaging effectively in meal preparation tasks. Memory aids on smartphones, and caregivers' direct support were reported as the most commonly used compensatory strategies, though the latter do not provide adequate support. COOK was identified as a technology with great potential to improve independence and increase safety in meal preparation for these clients while decreasing caregiver burden. However, psychosocial issues and limited access to funding were considered as the main barriers to the use of COOK. Providing training and the availability of financial support were mentioned as the main facilitators to the use of this technology. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study on difficulties of meal preparation following ABI and potential benefits and barriers of COOK will help improve this technology and customize it to the needs of clients with ABI and their caregivers.Implications for RehabilitationCurrent compensatory strategies are not tailored to the specific needs of clients with ABI and cannot provide sufficient support for caregivers.COOK shows a high potential for increasing independence and safety during meal preparation in a living environment for clients with ABI via a sensor-based autonomous safety system and a cognitive assistance application.COOK has the potential to decrease caregivers' burden by proving remote access to a stove/oven.

Potential social marketing applications for knowledge translation in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge translation has emerged as a practice and a science to bridge the gap between evidence and practice in healthcare. While the field has appropriately borrowed from other related fields to advance its science, there remain fields less mined. One such field with potential relevance to knowledge translation, but limited application to date, is social marketing. This review aims to determine elements of social marketing interventions that could be applied to knowledge translation science. Our objectives are to: (1) summarise the types of studies that have tested social marketing interventions in controlled intervention study designs; (2) describe the social marketing interventions and their effects; and (3) propose strategies for the integration of social marketing interventions into knowledge translation science. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodological Guidance. For the first and second objectives, all English-language studies published from 1971 onwards will be included if they (1) used a randomised or non-randomised controlled intervention design, and (2) tested a social marketing intervention as defined by five essential social marketing criteria. The research team will address the third objective through discussion and consensus. All screening and extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Variables extracted will include intervention details using essential and desirable social marketing criteria and the context, mechanism and outcomes of the interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project is a secondary analysis of published papers and does not require ethics approval. We will disseminate our review outputs in knowledge translation journals and present at relevant conferences across the spectrum of the field. We will produce a short and long version of a plain language summary that will be tailored to various groups including implementation scientists and quality improvement researchers. REGISTRATION DETAILS: Open Science Framework Registration link: osf.io/6q834.

Recommended characteristics and processes for writing lay summaries of healthcare evidence: a co-created scoping review and consultation exercise.

BACKGROUND: Lay summaries (LSs) of scientific evidence are critical to sharing research with non-specialist audiences. This scoping review with a consultation exercise aimed to (1) Describe features of the available LS resources; (2) Summarize recommended LS characteristics and content; (3) Outline recommended processes to write a LS; and (4) Obtain stakeholder perspectives on LS characteristics and writing processes. METHODS: This project was a patient and public partner (PPP)-initiated topic co-led by a PPP and a researcher. The team was supported by three additional PPPs and four researchers. A search of peer-reviewed (Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane libraries, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC and PubMed data bases) and grey literature was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodological Guidance for Scoping Reviews to include any resource that described LS characteristics and writing processes. Two reviewers screened and extracted all resources. Resource descriptions and characteristics were organized by frequency, and processes were inductively analyzed. Nine patient and public partners and researchers participated in three consultation exercise sessions to contextualize the review findings. RESULTS: Of the identified 80 resources, 99% described characteristics of a LS and 13% described processes for writing a LS. About half (51%) of the resources were published in the last two years. The most recommended characteristics were to avoid jargon (78%) and long or complex sentences (60%). The most frequently suggested LS content to include was study findings (79%). The key steps in writing a LS were doing pre-work, preparing for the target audience, writing, reviewing, finalizing, and disseminating knowledge. Consultation exercise participants prioritized some LS characteristics differently compared to the literature and found many characteristics oversimplistic. Consultation exercise participants generally supported the writing processes found in the literature but suggested some refinements. CONCLUSIONS: Writing LSs is potentially a growing area, however, efforts are needed to enhance our understanding of important LS characteristics, create resources with and for PPPs, and develop optimal writing processes.

This study was suggested by a patient partner to place attention on the role patient and public partners (PPPs) could play in developing lay summaries. A lay summary (LS) is a summary of a research project written for members of the public, including patients. A lot of information is written about recommendations for LSs, but none of it has been summarized. This study: (1) Pulled together and summarized all existing resources that made recommendations on features of LSs and/or the steps for writing them; and (2) Conducted meetings with people interested in LSs (PPPs and researchers) to gather their perspectives on this summary of resources. The study engaged PPPs in all aspects, including co-leadership. We found 80 resources on LSs. Almost all (95%) of the resources were written by researchers for researchers, with only 18% involving PPPs. The most common recommendations were to avoid jargon (78%) and remove unnecessary and complex words (60%). Only 13% of the resources had information about the steps for writing a LS. People in our meetings did not always agree with the recommended LS characteristics and found them overly simplistic. They felt that identifying and writing for the intended audience of the LS was important, every study should have a LS, PPPs should have the opportunity to be involved, and greater attention should be paid to the steps involved in writing a LS. Lay summary development is a complex, multistep process requiring the inclusion of PPPs for their irreplaceable perspectives and contributions.

Implementation of an assistive technology for meal preparation within a supported residence for adults with acquired brain injury: a mixed-methods single case study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing an assistive technology for meal preparation called COOK within a supported community residence for a person with an acquired brain injury. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, a multiple baseline single-case experimental design and a descriptive qualitative study were conducted. The participant was a 47-year-old woman with cognitive impairments following a severe stroke. She received 21 sessions of training on using COOK within a shared kitchen space. During meal preparation, independence and safety were evaluated using three target behaviours: required assistance, task performance errors, and appropriate responses to safety issues, which were compared with an untrained control task, making a budget. Benefits, barriers, and facilitators were assessed via three individual interviews with the client and three focus groups with the care team. RESULTS: Both quantitative and qualitative analyses showed that COOK significantly increased independence and safety during meal preparation but not in the control task. Stakeholders suggested that the availability of a training toolkit to a greater number of therapists at the residence and installation of COOK within the client's apartment would help with successful adoption of this technology. CONCLUSION: COOK is a promising assistive technology for individuals with cognitive deficits who live in supported community residences.Implication For RehabilitationCOOK is a promising assistive technology for cognition to increase independence and safety in meal preparation for clients with ABI within their supported living contexts.Receiving training from an expert and the availability of technical support are imperative to the successful adoption of COOK.

Is research on 'smart living environments' based on unobtrusive technologies for older adults going in circles? Evidence from an umbrella review.

CONTEXT AND AIMS: To enable ageing in place, innovative and integrative technologies such as smart living environments may be part of the solution. Despite extensive published literature reviews on this topic, the effectiveness of smart living environments in supporting ageing in place, and in particular involving unobtrusive technologies, remains unclear. The main objective of our umbrella review was to synthesize evidence on this topic. METHODS: According to the PRIOR process, we included reviews from multiple databases that focused on unobtrusive technologies used to analyze and share information about older adults' behaviors and assessed the effectiveness of unobtrusive technologies to support ageing in place. Selection, extraction and quality appraisal were done independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: By synthesizing 17 published reviews that covered 191 distinct primary studies, we found that smart living environments based on unobtrusive technologies had low to moderate effectiveness to support older adults to age in place. Effectiveness appears to be strongest in the recognition of activities of daily living. The results must, however, be interpreted in light of the low overall level of evidence, i.e., low methodological value of the primary studies and poor methodological quality of the literature reviews. Most reviews concluded that unobtrusive technologies are not mature enough for widespread adoption. CONCLUSION: There is a necessity to support primary studies that can move beyond the proof-of-concept or pilot stages and expand scientific knowledge significantly on the topic. There is also an urgent need to publish high quality literature reviews to better support policy makers and funding agencies in the field of smart living environments.

Supporting patient and public partners in writing lay summaries of scientific evidence in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Despite growing interest among patient and public partners to engage in writing lay summaries, evidence is scarce regarding the availability of resources to support them. This protocol describes the process of conducting a scoping review to: (1) summarise the source, criteria and characteristics, content, format, intended target audience, patient and public involvement in preparing guidance and development processes in the available guidance for writing lay summaries; (2) contextualise the available guidance to the needs/preferences of patient and public partners and (3) create a patient and public partner-informed output to support their engagement in writing lay summaries. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review with an integrated knowledge translation approach will be used to ensure the collaboration between patient/public partners and researchers in all steps of the review. To meet objective 1, the English language evidence within a healthcare context that provides guidance for writing lay summaries will be searched in peer-reviewed publications and grey literature. All screening and extraction steps will be performed independently by two reviewers. Extracted data will be organised by adapting the European Union's principles for summaries of clinical trials for laypersons. For objectives 2 and 3, a consultation exercise will be held with patient and public partners to review and contextualise the findings from objective 1. A directed content analysis will be used to organise the data to the needs of the public audience. Output development will follow based on the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval will be obtained for the consultation exercise. Our target audience will be stakeholders who engage or are interested in writing lay summaries. Our dissemination products will include a manuscript, a lay summary and an output to support patient and public partners with writing lay summaries. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK REGISTRATION: osf.io/2dvfg.

Potential advantages, barriers, and facilitators of implementing a cognitive orthosis for cooking for individuals with traumatic brain injury: the healthcare providers' perspective.

PURPOSE: Considering the key role of health care providers in integrating assistive technologies into clinical settings (e.g., in/outpatient rehabilitation) and home, this study explored the care providers' perspectives on benefits, barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Cognitive Orthosis for coOking (COOK) for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) within clinical contexts and homes. METHODS: Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups were carried out with experienced care providers of adults with TBI (n = 30) in Ontario-Canada. Qualitative analysis based on the Miles et al approach was used. RESULTS: According to the participants, COOK could potentially be used with individuals with cognitive impairments (TBI and non-TBI) to increase safety and independence in meal preparation and support healthcare providers. However, limited access to funding, clients' lack of motivation/knowledge, and the severity of their cognitive and motor impairments were perceived as potential barriers. Facilitators to the use of COOK include training sessions, availability of private/provincial financing, and comprehensive assessments by a clinical team prior to use. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers' perspectives will help develop implementation strategies to facilitate the adoption of COOK within homes and clinical contexts for individuals with TBI and improve the next version of this technology.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONCOOK shows a high potential for increasing independence and safety during meal preparation with its sensor-based monitoring of the environment and cognitive-based assistance, for adults with TBI.Comprehensive clinical assessments to identify individuals' therapeutic goals, clinical characteristics, and living environments are necessary to facilitate the deployment of COOK.

Occupational and Physical Therapy Activities and Level of Effort in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Association With Functional Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although some attention has been given to the association of functional outcomes with rehabilitation intensity, the evidence is still sparse in this field. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of inpatient rehabilitation (IR) on discharge cognitive and motor function and the association of time spent in occupational and physical therapy and level of effort with cognitive and motor function in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of TBI-Practice Based Evidence dataset. SETTINGS: Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-nine patients with TBI who were consecutively admitted for IR between 2008 and 2011 in Ontario, Canada. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Admission and discharge Functional Independence Measure-Rasch Cognitive and Motor Scores. RESULTS: Patients showed significant improvement in cognitive and motor function from admission to discharge (P < .0001). After controlling for confounding factors, discharge FIM-Rasch cognitive and motor scores were not associated with either level of effort or time spent in physical therapy activities. Discharge motor, but not cognitive function, was associated with more time spent in the complex (ß = 0.20, confidence interval [CI] 0.005, 0.05) and less time spent in simple OT activities (ß = -0.13, CI -0.13, -0.01). CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable information for clinicians about the effectiveness of IR on the improvement of motor and cognitive outcomes and the importance of considering the amount of time spent in activities based on their level of complexity rather than the total time of therapy to improve motor outcomes in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Long-Term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes After Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury: A Case-Controlled Comparison to Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing rate of survival from hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI), there is a paucity of evidence on the long-term functional outcomes after inpatient rehabilitation among these nontrauma patients compared to patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVES: To compare functional and psychosocial outcomes of patients with HIBI to those of case-matched patients with TBI 4-11 years after brain insult. DESIGN: Retrospective, matched case-controlled study. METHODS: Data at the time of rehabilitation admission and discharge were collected as part of a larger acquired brain injury (ABI) database at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (TRI) between 1999 and 2009. This study consisted of 11 patients with HIBI and 11 patients with TBI that attended the neuro-rehabilitation day program at TRI during a similar time frame and were matched on age, admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, and acute care length of stay (ALOS). At 4-11 years following brain insult, patients were reassessed using the FIM, Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9), and the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory 4 (MPAI-4). RESULTS: At follow-up, patients with HIBI had significantly lower FIM motor and cognitive scores than patients with TBI (75.3 ± 20.6 versus 88.1 ± 4.78, P < .05, and 25.5 ± 5.80 versus 32.7 ± 2.54, P <.05, respectively) despite having a similar time frame postinsult (ie, 4-11 years). In addition, there were significant differences in motor and total FIM change from admission to follow-up between HIBI and TBI patients (P < .05). Patients with HIBI also had significantly lower scores on the DRS, PHQ-9, and total MPAI-4 at follow-up (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that patients with HIBI achieve less long-term functional improvements compared to patients with TBI. Further research is warranted to compare the components of inpatient rehabilitation while adjusting for demographics and clinical characteristics between these 2 groups of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Predictors of discharge destination from acute care in patients with traumatic brain injury.

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have assessed the predictors of morbidity/mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in acute care. However, with the increasing rate of survival after TBI, more attention has been given to discharge destinations from acute care as an important measure of clinical priorities. This study describes the design of a systematic review compiling and synthesising studies on the prognostic factors of discharge settings from acute care in patients with TBI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will be conducted on peer-reviewed studies using seven databases including Medline/Medline in-Process, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Supplemental PubMed. The reference list of selected articles and Google Scholar will also be reviewed to determine other relevant articles. This study will include all English language observational studies that focus on adult patients with TBI in acute care settings. The quality of articles will be assessed by the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this review will provide evidence that may guide healthcare providers in making more informed and timely discharge decisions to the next level of care for patient with TBI. Also, this study will provide valuable information to address the gaps in knowledge for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Trial registration number (PROSPERO) is CRD42016033046.

The effect of short-term aerobic exercise on depression and body image in Iranian women.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of short-term aerobic exercise on depression symptoms and body image attitudes among Iranian women. In this quasiexperimental study, 82 females were assigned to experimental group (aerobic exercise group, n = 41) or control group (waiting list, n = 41) and evaluated by Beck Depression Inventory-second edition (BDI-II) and Multidimensional Body Self-Relation Questionnaire (MBSRQ), respectively. The experimental group received four-week aerobic exercise program, and control group had been asked to wait for the next four weeks. Results of this study confirmed the significant decrease in depression symptoms at the experimental group compared to control group (P < 0.5). For the body image dependent variables, significant improvement was also found in appearance evaluation, appearance orientation, health orientation, and illness orientation in aerobic exercise group (P < 0.5).