Serial dependence bias can predict the overall estimation error in visual perception.

Although visual feature estimations are accurate and precise, overall estimation errors (i.e., the difference between estimates and actual values) tend to show systematic patterns. For example, estimates of orientations are systematically biased away from horizontal and vertical orientations, showing an oblique illusion. Additionally, many recent studies have demonstrated that estimations of current visual features are systematically biased toward previously seen features, showing a serial dependence. However, no study examined whether the overall estimation errors were correlated with the serial dependence bias. To address this question, we enrolled three groups of participants to estimate orientation, motion speed, and point-light-walker direction. The results showed that the serial dependence bias explained over 20% of overall estimation errors in the three tasks, indicating that we could use the serial dependence bias to predict the overall estimation errors. The current study first demonstrated that the serial dependence bias was not independent from the overall estimation errors. This finding could inspire researchers to investigate the neural bases underlying the visual feature estimation and serial dependence.

Attention affects the perception of self-motion direction from optic flow.

Many studies have demonstrated that attention affects the perception of many visual features. However, previous studies show conflicting results regarding the effect of attention on the perception of self-motion direction (i.e., heading) from optic flow. To address this question, we conducted three behavioral experiments and found that estimation accuracies of large headings (>14°) decreased with attention load, discrimination thresholds of these headings increased with attention load, and heading estimates were systematically compressed toward the focus of attention. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that attention affected heading perception from optic flow, showing that the perception is both information-driven and cognitive.

Attention influences the effects of the previous form orientation on the current motion direction estimation.

Recent studies have found that the estimates of motion directions are biased toward the previous form orientations, showing serial dependence, and the serial dependence does not involve cognitive abilities. In the current study, we conducted two experiments to investigate whether and how attention-a cognitive ability-affected the serial dependence. The results showed that serial dependence was present in the current study, reproducing the previous findings. Importantly, when the attentional load reduced the reliability (i.e., estimation accuracy and precision) of previous form orientations (Experiment 1), the serial dependence decreased, meaning that the biases of motion direction estimates toward previous form orientations were reduced; in contrast, when the attentional load reduced the reliability of current motion directions (Experiment 2), the serial dependence increased, meaning that the biases of motion direction estimates toward previous form orientations were increased. These trends were well consistent with the prediction of the Bayesian inference theory. Therefore, the current study revealed the involvement of attention in the serial dependence of current motion direction estimation on the previous form orientation, demonstrating that the serial dependence was cognitive and the attentional effect can be a Bayesian inference process, initially revealing its computational mechanism.

Heading perception from optic flow occurs at both perceptual representation and working memory stages with EEG evidence.

Psychophysical studies have demonstrated that heading perception from optic flow occurs in perceptual and post-perceptual stages. The post-perception stage is a complex concept, containing working memory. The current study examined whether working memory was involved in heading perception from optic flow by asking participants to conduct a heading perception task and recording their scalp EEG. On each trial, an optic flow display was presented, followed by a blank display. Participants were then asked to report their perceived heading. We know that participants would tend to automatically forget previous headings when they learned that previously presented headings were unrelated to the current heading perception to save cognitive resources. As a result, we could not decode previous headings from the EEG data of current trials. More importantly, if we successfully decoded previous headings when the blank display (optic flow) was presented, then working memory (perceptual representation stage) was involved in heading perception. Our results showed that the decoding accuracy was significantly higher than the chance level when the optic flow and blank displays were presented. Therefore, the current study provided electrophysiological evidence that heading perception from optic flow occurred in the perceptual representation and working memory stages, against the previous perceptual claim.