Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 44(8): 1380-1386, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients with critical medical illness, data regarding new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is relatively sparse. This study examines the incidence, associated risk factors, and associated outcomes of NOAF in patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational cohort study included 2234 patients with MICU stays in 2018. An automated extraction process using ICD-10 codes, validated by a 196-patient manual chart review, was used for data collection. Demographics, medications, and risk factors were collected. Multiple risk scores were calculated for each patient, and AF recurrence was also manually extracted. Length of stay, mortality, and new stroke were primary recorded outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty one patients of the 2234 patient cohort (11.4%) developed NOAF during their MICU stay. NOAF was associated with greater length of stay in the MICU (5.84 vs. 3.52 days, p < .001) and in the hospital (15.7 vs. 10.9 days, p < .001). Patients with NOAF had greater odds of hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-2.71, p < .001) and 1-year mortality (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.82, p = .03). CHARGE-AF scores performed best in predicting NOAF (area under the curve (AUC) 0.691, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of NOAF in this MICU cohort was 11.4%, and NOAF was associated with a significant increase in hospital LOS and mortality. Furthermore, the CHARGE-AF score performed best in predicting NOAF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
Cureus ; 14(10): e30816, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36451633

RESUMO

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Patients who present with the metabolic emergency of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have similar symptoms of diaphoresis, nausea, emesis, and abdominal pain, which can conceal acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We present a unique case where computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast played an integral role in diagnosing an acute myocardial infarction in a patient with no typical ischemic symptoms. A 56-year-old female presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. She was suspected of having DKA. Aggressive management was started, including weight-based appropriate IV regular insulin. A CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast was performed due to persistent abdomen pain. This demonstrated severe hypoattenuation of the posteroinferior aspect of the left ventricular wall. An EKG was immediately performed and was consistent with an inferior STEMI. The patient was taken to the interventional cardiology suite where they found the culprit lesion to be mid-circumflex with 100% stenosis. This case highlights many important lessons in approaching diabetic patients who are presenting with DKA. DM is associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), a condition that greatly influences perceived chest pain. While little is known about this condition, some manifestations include resting tachycardia, exercise intolerance, orthostatic hypotension, and an increased risk of silent myocardial infarction. Critically, providers must maintain a low threshold to assess for cardiac ischemia in diabetic patients and more readily obtain EKGs in triage as well as during the patient's course in the ED to prevent complications from delayed ACS care.

4.
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med ; 4(2): 211-213, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32426675

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High-pressure injection injuries have been chronicled for decades.1 These injuries often affect distal extremities as they are most commonly involved in workplace accidents.1 However, we discuss a young male with a paint-gun injection injury to his face. CASE REPORT: We discuss the case of a young man presenting to the emergency department after high-pressure injection injury to the face. He eventually underwent extensive debridement of the face. We discuss differences in caring for an injection wound to an extremity versus the face, including time sensitivity of treatment, initial stabilizing measures, and critical steps. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrates a rare presentation of a high-pressure paint injection injury. This injury presented a unique surgical challenge where, despite compartment syndrome being less common, cosmetic outcome and infectious complication prevention remained critical priorities. CONCLUSION: While similarities exist in management of an injection injury to a limb, due to the rarity and deceptive appearance of this particular injury to the face, high suspicion along with urgent imaging and surgical consultation is warranted.

5.
Cardiovasc Pathol ; 48: 107232, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32454398

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed the practice medicine on a global scale during the year 2020. With fewer patients presenting to hospitals with the diagnosis of STEMI, healthcare workers are wondering what is causing this decline. This piece presents data from two medical centers and addresses several possible causes to explain this phenomenon. It was found that there was a statistically significant decrease from January to March 2020 in number of presenting STEMI diagnoses.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidência , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Med Sci Educ ; 30(3): 1267-1272, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32837785

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the canceling and rescheduling of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) examinations due to the nationwide closure of the Prometric testing centers, which poses a significant challenge to medical students. The rescheduling of a high-stakes board examination leads to significant stress and potential burnout. Students may need guidance to decrease anxiety and reframe their study plan while maintaining their knowledge. Here, we combined board examination coaching tips with specific worked examples to describe how to prevent burnout, give recommendations for scheduling, and suggest practical approaches to USMLE and other high-stakes examinations.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA