Bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with multiple myeloma, bendamustine monotherapy is effective as 1st and 2nd line therapy. However, data for patients with advanced multiple myeloma is rare. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis we have identified 39 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by means of case research, who have been treated at our institution with bendamustine as salvage therapy. After in median 2 lines of prior therapy (range: 1-5) patients received in median 3 (range: 1-10) cycles of bendamustine. Bendamustine dosage was 80-150 mg on day 1+2 of a monthly cycle. Bendamustine was administered as monotherapy in 39% of patients, whereas 61% received concomitant steroids. RESULTS: Toxicity was mild to moderate. Response rates were as follows: 3% vgPR, 33% PR, 18% MR, 26% SD and 20% PD. The median event-free and overall survival were 7 and 17 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in patients with advanced multiple myeloma bendamustine is effective and associated with mild toxicity. Therefore, the role of bendamustine in patients with multiple myeloma should be investigated in further clinical trials.

Induction of complete remission in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia refractory to high-dose chemotherapy through treatment with 5-azacytidine.

For patients with acute myeloid leukemia refractory to intensive chemotherapy prognosis is very poor and treatment options are limited. 5-Azacytidine, a demethylating drug, is effective in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes when administered at a low-dose, subcutaneously. We report a case of a patient with AML refractory to induction chemotherapy as well as to two high-dose salvage regimens. The patient achieved CR through monotherapy with low-dose azacytidine.

TAK-228 (formerly MLN0128), an investigational dual TORC1/2 inhibitor plus paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: This phase I trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of investigational oral TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 plus paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients received TAK-228 6-40 mg via three dosing schedules; once daily for 3 days (QDx3d QW) or 5 days per week (QDx5d QW), and once weekly (QW) plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (dose-escalation phase, n = 47) and with/without trastuzumab 2 mg/kg (expansion phase, n = 20). Doses were escalated using a modified 3 + 3 design, based upon dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1. RESULTS: TAK-228 pharmacokinetics exhibited dose-dependent increase in exposure when dosed with paclitaxel and no apparent differences when administered with or 24 h after paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, stomatitis, fatigue, rash, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and nausea. The maximum tolerated dose of TAK-228 was determined as 10-mg QDx3d QW; the expansion phase proceeded with 8-mg QDx3d QW. Overall, the most common grade ≥3 drug-related toxicities were neutropenia (21%), diarrhea (12%), and hyperglycemia (12%). Of 54 response-evaluable patients, eight achieved partial response and six had stable disease lasting ≥6 months. CONCLUSION: TAK-228 demonstrated a safety profile consistent with other TORC inhibitors and promising preliminary antitumor activity in a range of tumor types; no meaningful difference was noted in the pharmacokinetics of TAK-228 when administered with or 24 h after paclitaxel. These findings support further investigation of TAK-228 in combination with other agents including paclitaxel, with/without trastuzumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01351350.

Azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions as first salvage therapy for relapse of AML or MDS after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The combination of azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) as first salvage therapy for relapse after allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT) was studied in 30 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n=28) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n=2) within a prospective single-arm multicenter phase-II trial. Treatment schedule contained up to eight cycles azacitidine (100 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5, every 28 days) followed by DLI (from 1-5 × 10(6) to 1-5 × 10(8) CD3(+)cells/kg) after every second azacitidine cycle. A median of three courses azacitidine (range 1-8) were administered, and 22 patients (73%) received DLI. Overall response rate was 30%, including seven complete remissions (CRs, 23%) and two partial remissions (7%). Five patients remain in CR for a median of 777 days (range 461-888). Patients with MDS or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes were more likely to respond (P=0.011), and a lower blast count (P=0.039) as well as high-risk cytogenetics (P=0.035) correlated with the likelihood to achieve CR. Incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was 37% and 17%, respectively. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia grade III/IV occurred during 65% and 63% of treatment cycles, while infections were the most common grade III/IV non-hematological toxicity. Azacitidine and DLI as salvage therapy is safe, induces long-term remissions and may become an alternative for patients with AML or MDS relapsing after allo-HSCT.

Tacrolimus and mycofenolate mofetil as GvHD prophylaxis following nonmyeloablative conditioning and unrelated hematopoietic SCT for adult patients with advanced hematologic diseases.

In the current study, we evaluated a combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GvHD prophylaxis in 50 patients undergoing truly nonmyeloablative (NM; 90 mg/m(2) fludarabine, 2 Gy TBI) hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) from unrelated donors. Median patient age was 51 years (range, 25-67 years). After a median follow-up of 1123 days (range, 47-2729 days), 20 patients (40%) are alive and free from disease. The probabilities of 1-, 2- and 3-year survival were 57, 47 and 39%, respectively. Patients who achieved a remission before HSCT had a significantly better OS compared with those who had active disease (P=0.01). The incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GvHD (aGvHD) were 54% (n=27) and 16% (n=8). Remarkably, using tacrolimus and MMF, the median onset of aGvHD occurred distinctly late on day +66 (range, 12-119 days). A total of 46 patients were evaluable for chronic GvHD (cGvHD). Out of these, 26 (56%) patients developed cGvHD, with 16 (34%) of them showing limited and 10 (21%) showing extensive disease. We conclude that the combination of tacrolimus and MMF as post transplant immunosuppression for patients receiving NM unrelated donor HSCT permits stable engraftment and effective prophylaxis for acute and cGvHD. In particular, the occurrence of severe early-onset aGvHD was attenuated.

5-Azacytidine for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who relapse after allo-SCT: a retrospective analysis.

Patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome who relapse after allo-SCT have a poor prognosis. In the search for novel treatment strategies for these patients, we conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis and identified 22 patients treated with the DNA-methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine (5-Aza). Patients received a median number of two cycles 5-Aza (range 1-8) at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) over 5 days following relapse. Eighteen patients (82%) also received a median number of two donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI, range 1-5). Sixteen patients (72%) responded to 5-Aza treatment and five patients (23%) achieved a CR. 5-Aza-induced CR lasted for 433 days (median, range 114-769). Median survival and the estimated 2-year survival rate were 144 days and 23%, respectively. Acute GVHD after DLI was seen in six patients (33%) and four of these patients developed chronic GVHD of the skin. There were no treatment-related deaths. Patients who achieved halving of leukocyte counts after the first 5-Aza cycle had a superior median survival of 802 days compared with 135 days (P=0.0025) in all other patients. On univariate analysis, the achievement of this halving of leukocyte counts was identified as a significant predictor of survival.

Fludarabine, amsacrine, high-dose cytarabine and 12 Gy total body irradiation followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

In this prospective study, we examined the toxicity and efficacy of an intensified conditioning regimen for treatment of patients with relapsed or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Fifteen patients received fludarabine 30 mg/m(2), cytarabine 2000 mg/m(2), amsacrine 100 mg/m(2) on days -10, -9, -8 and -7, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG-Fresenius) 20 mg/kg body weight on days -6, -5 and -4 and fractionated total body irradiation 2 x 2 Gy on days -3, -2 and -1 (FLAMSA-ATG-TBI) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. At the time of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 10 patients were in complete remission (8 CR1; 2 CR2), 3 with primary refractory and 2 suffered from refractory relapse. All patients achieved a complete remission after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; and after a median follow-up time of 1091 days (range, 334-1554 days), nine patients (60%) are alive and free from disease, including three patients with prior refractory disease. Three patients died due to treatment-related mortality. The most frequent and severe conditioning-related toxicities observed in 9 out of 15 patients were grade III/IV infections according to common toxicity criteria. Thus, conditioning with the FLAMSA-ATG-TBI regimen is a feasible and effective alternative for patients with relapsed or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia.