Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(1): 242-249.e2, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37380142

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare causative bacteria and their antibiotic resistance profiles in patients developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimens in primary total hip (THA) and primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA/UKA). METHODS: We reviewed all cases of PJI occurring after primary THA and primary TKA/UKA, between 2011 and 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital. The standard preoperative prophylactic antibiotic for primary joint arthroplasty was cefuroxime and recommended second-line agent was clindamycin. Patients were divided by the replaced joint and analyzed independently. RESULTS: In the THA group, culture-positive PJI was detected in 61 of 3,123 (2.0%) cefuroxime-administered cases and 6 of 206 (2.9%) noncefuroxime-administered cases. In the TKA/UKA group, culture positive PJI was identified in 21 of 2,455 (0.9%) cefuroxime-administered cases and in 3 of 211 (1.4%) noncefuroxime administered cases. The most commonly isolated bacteria in both groups were coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS). There were no statistically significant differences of pathogen spectrum depending on the preoperative antibiotic regimen detected. Antibiotic resistance of isolated bacteria was significantly different in 4 of 27 (14.8%) analyzed antibiotics in THA and in 3 of 22 (13.6%) analyzed antibiotics in TKA/UKA. In all cohorts, a high occurrence of oxacillin-resistant CNS (50.0 to 100.0%) and clindamycin-resistant CNS (56.3 to 100.0%) has been observed. CONCLUSION: The use of the second-line antibiotic did not influence the pathogen spectrum or antibiotic resistance. However, an alarmingly high proportion of CNS strains was resistant to clindamycin.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Cefuroxima , Clindamicina , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Hipersensibilidade/complicações , Hipersensibilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Penicilinas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus
2.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 28(11): 2215-2224, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31630752

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The treatment of multifragment Mason type III fractures is challenging. Open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, and in some cases, even radial head resection are the current options; however, each of these treatment methods is associated with characteristic benefits and complications. We present our experience with a radial head salvage procedure in comminuted radial head fractures irrespective of concomitant injuries, which are not accompanied by typical ORIF-related complications. METHODS: The first group comprised 29 patients with multifragment Mason type III fractures treated surgically with biological radial head spacers (group S). The fragments were reduced and fixated in an extracorporeal manner, and the reconstructed radial head was placed in its anatomic position without fixation to the shaft. The second group comprised 12 patients treated with conventional ORIF using mini-fragment plates (group P). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled to undergo clinical and radiographic follow-up at an average of 76 months (range, 12-152 months). In group S, nonunion at the head-neck junction developed in 70% of the cases; however, the overall Mayo Elbow Performance Index averaged 94.8, which was superior to the average Mayo Elbow Performance Index of 83.1 in group P. Radiographic evaluation showed development of osteoarthritic changes in 75% of patients in group S and 62.5% in group P. None of the patients had wrist-joint pain. CONCLUSIONS: Preserving the native radial head in comminuted Mason type III fractures without fixation to the radial shaft is a reliable option. Excellent functional results can be expected; however, the development of osteoarthritis cannot be impeded.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Cominutivas/cirurgia , Redução Aberta/métodos , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Adulto , Placas Ósseas , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Articulação do Cotovelo/fisiopatologia , Articulação do Cotovelo/cirurgia , Epífises/lesões , Epífises/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas Cominutivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cominutivas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite/etiologia , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Rádio/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 11(10)2022 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36290003

RESUMO

Reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) requires a multi-pronged strategy including usage of a prophylactic antibiotic. A history of penicillin or cephalosporin allergy often leads to a change in prophylactic antibiotic regimen to avoid serious side effects. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to determine incidence of PJI based on perioperative antibiotic regimen in total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). A review of all primary THAs, primary TKAs and primary UKAs, undertaken between 2011 and 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital, was performed. The standard perioperative antibiotic for joint arthroplasty (JA) in the analyzed tertiary hospital is cefuroxime. There were no differences in prophylactic antibiotic regimen over time. In 7.9% (211 of 2666) of knee arthroplasties and in 6.0% (206 of 3419) of total hip arthroplasties, a second-line prophylactic antibiotic was used. There was no statistically significant higher occurrence of PJI between the first-line and second-line prophylactic antibiotic in knee arthroplasties (p = 0.403) as well as in total hip arthroplasties (p = 0.309). No relevant differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and body mass index (BMI) between the groups were observed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA