Tapering of biological antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients is achievable and cost-effective in daily clinical practice: data from the Brussels UCLouvain RA Cohort.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Studies have demonstrated that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who achieve low disease activity or remission are able to taper biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bDMARDs can be tapered in daily practice and to analyse the characteristics of these patients. Other objectives were to analyse which bDMARDs are more suitable for dose reduction and the cost savings. RESULTS: Data from 332 eligible RA patients from our Brussels UCLouvain cohort were retrospectively analysed; 140 patients (42.1%) received a tapered regimen, and 192 received stable doses of bDMARDs. The age at diagnosis (43.1 vs 38.7 years, p = 0.04), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score (1.3 vs 1.5, p = 0.048), RF positivity rate (83.3 vs 72.9%, p = 0.04) and disease duration at the time of bDMARD introduction (9.7 vs 12.1 years, p = 0.034) were significantly different between the reduced-dose and stable-dose groups. Interestingly, relatively more patients receiving a tapered dose were treated with a combination of bDMARDs and methotrexate (MTX) (86.7% vs 73.8%, p = 0.005). In our cohort, anti-TNF agents were the most commonly prescribed medications (68%). Only 15 patients experienced a flare during follow-up. Adalimumab, etanercept and rituximab were the most common bDMARDs in the reduced-dose group and were associated with the most important reductions in annual cost. CONCLUSION: In daily practice, tapering bDMARDs in RA patients who have achieved low disease activity or remission is an achievable goal in a large proportion of patients, thereby reducing potential side effects and annual drug-associated costs. The combination of bDMARDs with MTX could improve the success of dose reduction attempts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This retrospective non-interventional study was retrospectively registered with local ethics approval.

Correction to: Standardisation of synovial biopsy analyses in rheumatic diseases: a consensus of the EULAR Synovitis and OMERACT Synovial Tissue Biopsy Groups.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of the ninth author's name.

Cells from a vanished twin as a source of microchimerism 40 years later.

We report the case of a 40-year-old man diagnosed with a scleroderma-like disease. Clinical similarities with graft versus host disease prompted initial testing for chimerism employing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Female cells were observed within peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the patient.Because maternal cells have been detected in healthy immunologically competent adults and patients with autoimmune conditions, we hypothesized that these cells were of maternal origin. Contrary to our expectations, HLA-specific quantitative PCR (QPCR) ruled out maternal microchimerism. However, HLA-specific QPCR testing was positive for the paternal HLA haplotype that the patient did not inherit. We reasoned that the most likely origin of chimerism with non-inherited paternal HLA alleles was from an unrecognized "vanished" twin. The patient had never received a blood transfusion.This report suggests that cells from a vanished twin are a possible source of chimerism. The frequency of chimerism from this source is not yet known and whether the scleroderma-like disease observed in the patient is anecdotal or implies a potential association with autoimmune disease remains to be elucidated.