Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: A KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Controversies Conference.

The diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) is complex and controversial. Despite evidence from the ASTRAL (2009) and CORAL (2013) randomized controlled trials showing that percutaneous renal artery revascularization did not improve major outcomes compared with best medical therapy alone over 3-5 years, several areas of uncertainty remain. Medical therapy, including statin and antihypertensive medications, has evolved in recent years, and the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers is now considered the primary means to treat hypertension in the setting of ARVD. However, the criteria to identify kidneys with renal artery stenosis that have potentially salvageable function are evolving. There are also data suggesting that certain high-risk populations with specific clinical manifestations may benefit from revascularization. Here, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ARVD based on consensus recommendations from a panel of physician experts who attended the recent KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Controversies Conference on central and peripheral arterial diseases in chronic kidney disease. Most focus is provided for contentious issues, and we also outline aspects of investigation and management of ARVD that require further research.

Cancer survival in kidney transplant recipients in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Transplantation is a well-known risk factor for malignancy. However, outcomes of cancer in transplant recipients compared with non-transplant recipients are less well studied. We aim to study the survival in kidney transplant recipients who develop cancer and compare this with cancer outcomes in the general population. METHODS: We linked data from the National Cancer Registry Ireland with the National Kidney Transplant Database. The period of observation was from 1 January 1994 until 31 December 2014. Transplant recipients were considered at risk from the time of diagnosing cancer. We administratively censored data at 10 years post-cancer diagnosis. Survival was compared with all patients in the general population that had a recorded diagnosis of cancer. RESULTS: There were 907 renal transplant recipients and 426679 individuals in the general population diagnosed with cancer between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 2014. In those with non-melanoma skin cancer, the hazard ratio (HR) for 10-year, all-cause mortality [HR = 3.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.66-3.52] and cancer-specific mortality (HR = 3.91, 95% CI 2.57-5.96) was significantly higher among transplant recipients than the general population. Patients who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.96-4.25) and prostate cancer (HR = 4.32, 95% CI 2.39-7.82) had increased all-cause but not cancer-specific mortality. Colorectal, lung, breast and renal cell cancer did not show an increased risk of death in transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: Cancer-attributable mortality is higher in kidney transplant recipients with non-melanoma skin cancer compared with non-transplant patients. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging should reflect the increased hazard of death in these immunosuppressed patients.

Improving outcomes in atherosclerotic renovascular disease: importance of clinical presentation and multi-disciplinary review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis may cause hypertension, chronic kidney disease and heart failure, but large randomized control trials to date have shown no major additional benefit of renal revascularization over optimal medical management. However, these trials did not consider outcomes specifically in relation to clinical presentations. Given that atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is a heterogenous condition, measures of success likely differ according to the clinical presentation. Our retrospective study objectives were to determine the effects of revascularization when applied to specific clinical presentations and after careful multi-disciplinary team review. METHODS: All patients presenting to our centre and its referring hospitals with radiological findings of at least one renal artery stenosis > 50% between January 2015 and January 2020 were reviewed at the renovascular multi-disciplinary team meeting with revascularization considered in accordance with international guidelines, notably for patients with anatomically significant renal artery stenosis, adequately sized kidney and presentations with any of; deteriorating kidney function, heart failure syndrome, or uncontrollable hypertension. Optimal medical management was recommended for all patients which included lipid lowering agents, anti-platelets and anti-hypertensives targeting blood pressure ≤ 130/80 mmHg. The effect of revascularization was assessed according to the clinical presentation; blood pressure and number of agents in those with renovascular hypertension, delta glomerular filtration rate in those with ischaemic nephropathy and heart failure re-admissions in those with heart failure syndromes. RESULTS: During this 5-year period, 127 patients with stenosis ≥ 50% were considered by the multidisciplinary team, with 57 undergoing revascularization (17 primarily for severe hypertension, 25 deteriorating kidney function, 6 heart failure syndrome and 9 for very severe anatomical stenosis). Seventy-nine percent of all revascularized patients had a positive outcome specific to their clinical presentation, with 82% of those with severe hypertension improving blood pressure control, 72% with progressive ischaemic nephropathy having attenuated GFR decline, and no further heart failure admissions in those with heart failure. Seventy-eight percent of patients revascularized for high grade stenosis alone had better blood pressure control with 55% also manifesting renal functional benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-disciplinary team discussion successfully identified a group of patients more likely to benefit from revascularization based on 3 key factors: clinical presentation, severity of the renal artery lesion and the state of the kidney beyond the stenotic lesion. In this way, a large proportion of patients can clinically improve after revascularization if their outcomes are considered according to the nature of their clinical presentation.

Hypertension and the kidneys.

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality globally. Hypertension and chronic kidney disease are closely intertwined conditions as hypertension can lead to deteriorating renal function and progressive chronic kidney disease can contribute to worsening hypertension. In the setting of chronic kidney disease, the pathophysiology of hypertension is complex and involves the interplay of many factors including a reduced number of functioning nephrons, sodium retention and volume expansion, upregulation of the sympathetic nervous system, hormonal factors such as upregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and endothelial dysfunction. Poorly controlled hypertension can accelerate the progression to end-stage kidney disease. This review discusses the pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to hypertension, including sympathetic nervous system activity, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the role of sodium. In the setting of chronic kidney disease, the relationship with hypertension and renovascular disease as a potential cause and target for therapeutic intervention is briefly reviewed. Finally, treatment options, targets and the long-term cardiovascular benefits of optimal blood pressure control are discussed.

Diabetic kidney disease: update on clinical management and non-glycaemic effects of newer medications for type 2 diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease worldwide and continues to increase in prevalence. This in turn has significant implications for healthcare provision and the economy. In recent years there have been multiple advances in the glucose-lowering agents available for the treatment of diabetes, which not only modify the disease itself but also have important benefits in terms of the associated cardiovascular outcomes. The cardiovascular outcome trials of agents such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-RAs) and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2) have demonstrated significant benefits in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, admissions for heart failure and in some cases mortality. Secondary analysis of these trials has also indicated significant renoprotective benefit. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Nephropathy (CREDENCE) a renal-specific trial, has shown major benefits with canagliflozin for renal outcomes in diabetic kidney disease, and similar trials with other SGLT-2 inhibitors are either underway or awaiting analysis. In this article we review current goals of treatment of diabetes and the implications of advancing renal impairment on choice of treatments. Areas discussed include the diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease and current treatment strategies for diabetic kidney disease ranging from lifestyle modifications to glycaemic control. This review focuses on the role of GLP-RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors in treating those with diabetes and chronic kidney disease with some illustrative cases. It is clear that these agents should now be considered first choice in combination with metformin in those with diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk and/or reduced renal function, and in preference to other classes such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or sulphonylureas.

Inflammation and Oxidative Damage in Ischaemic Renal Disease.

Ischaemic renal disease as result of atherosclerotic renovascular disease activates a complex biological response that ultimately leads to fibrosis and chronic kidney disease. Large randomised control trials have shown that renal revascularisation in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery disease does not confer any additional benefit to medical therapy alone. This is likely related to the activation of complex pathways of oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines and fibrosis due to atherosclerotic disease and hypoxic injury due to reduced renal blood flow. New evidence from pre-clinical trials now indicates a role for specific targeted therapeutic interventions to counteract this complex pathogenesis. This evidence now suggests that the focus for those with atherosclerotic renovascular disease should be a combination of revascularisation and renoprotective therapies that target the renal tissue response to ischaemia, reduce the inflammatory infiltrate and prevent or reduce the fibrosis.