RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cluster analysis has been utilized to explore phenotypic heterogeneity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To date, little is known about the longitudinal variability of clusters in COPD patients. We aimed to evaluate the 2-year cluster variability in stable COPD patients. METHODS: We evaluated the following variables in COPD patients at baseline and 2 years later: age, gender, pack-year history, body mass index (BMI), modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) scale, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), spirometry and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Patient classification was performed using cluster analysis at baseline and 2 years later. Each patient's cluster variability after 2 years and its parameters associated with cluster change were explored. RESULTS: A total of 521 smokers with COPD were evaluated at baseline and 2 years later. Three different clusters were consistently identified at both evaluation times: cluster A (of younger age, mild airway limitation, few symptoms), cluster B (intermediate) and cluster C (of older age, severe airway limitation and highly symptomatic). Two years later, 70% of patients were unchanged, whereas 30% changed from one cluster to another: 20% from A to B; 15% from B to A; 15% from B to C; 42% from C to B and 8% from C to A. 6MWD, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) % and CAT were the principal parameters responsible for this change. CONCLUSION: After 2 years of follow-up, most of the COPD patients maintained their cluster assignment. Exercise tolerance, lung function and quality of life were the main driving parameters in those who change their cluster assignment.
Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Análise por Conglomerados , Tolerância ao Exercício , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar , Avaliação de Sintomas , Teste de CaminhadaRESUMO
The impact of blood eosinophilia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial.To evaluate the prevalence and stability of a high level of blood eosinophils (≥300â cells·µL-1) and its relationship to outcomes, we determined blood eosinophils at baseline and over 2â years in 424 COPD patients (forced expiratory volume in 1â s (FEV1) 60% predicted) and 67 smokers without COPD from the CHAIN cohort, and in 308 COPD patients (FEV1 60% predicted) in the BODE cohort. We related eosinophil levels to exacerbations and survival using Cox hazard analysis.In COPD patients, 15.8% in the CHAIN cohort and 12.3% in the BODE cohort had persistently elevated blood eosinophils at all three visits. A significant proportion (43.8%) of patients had counts that oscillated above and below the cut-off points, while the rest had persistent eosinophil levels <300â cells·µL-1 A similar eosinophil blood pattern was observed in controls. Exacerbation rates did not differ in patients with and without eosinophilia. All-cause mortality was lower in patients with high eosinophils compared with those with values <300â cells·µL-1 (15.8% versus 33.7%; p=0.026).In patients with COPD, blood eosinophils ≥300â cells·µL-1 persisting over 2â years was not a risk factor for COPD exacerbations. High eosinophil count was associated with better survival.
Assuntos
Eosinofilia/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Eosinófilos/citologia , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The MPOWER strategy encourages suitable monitoring of the tobacco epidemic among health professionals in all countries. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the prevalence of and attitudes towards tobacco use among Spanish health professionals. METHODS: A study was conducted based on an online survey. The study population consisted of health professionals (primary care physicians, specialist physicians and nurses). The questionnaire used included questions about tobacco consumption, knowledge of and attitudes towards smoking. The sample size was calculated according to a database with 9,500 e-mail addresses and listings of health centres and hospitals all over Spain. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software programme. RESULTS: The study group comprised a total of 612 health professionals: 322 were women (52.6%), 196 were nurses and 416 were physicians. 11.7% of health professionals were smokers (9.6% regular smokers and 2.1% occasional smokers) and 41.3% were ex-smokers. Within the group of daily smokers, differences were observed between the nurses and the physicians: 11.2 versus 8.9% (p = 0.009). Smoking was recognized as a chronic disorder by 58.2% of health professionals, and 54.6% knew that the most effective intervention to help quit is a combination of psychological and pharmacological treatment. 56% of health professionals always asked their patients about their tobacco consumption. CONCLUSIONS: 11.7% of Spanish health professionals are smokers. We found that they have low knowledge about strategies to quit smoking and that there is a low level of therapeutic intervention on smokers.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
RATIONALE: Little is known about the longitudinal changes associated with using the 2013 update of the multidimensional GOLD strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the COPD patient distribution of the new GOLD proposal and evaluate how this classification changes over one year compared with the previous GOLD staging based on spirometry only. METHODS: We analyzed data from the CHAIN study, a multicenter observational Spanish cohort of COPD patients who are monitored annually. Categories were defined according to the proposed GOLD: FEV1%, mMRC dyspnea, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), and exacerbations-hospitalizations. One-year follow-up information was available for all variables except CCQ data. RESULTS: At baseline, 828 stable COPD patients were evaluated. On the basis of mMRC dyspnea versus CAT, the patients were distributed as follows: 38.2% vs. 27.2% in group A, 17.6% vs. 28.3% in group B, 15.8% vs. 12.9% in group C, and 28.4% vs. 31.6% in group D. Information was available for 526 patients at one year: 64.2% of patients remained in the same group but groups C and D show different degrees of variability. The annual progression by group was mainly associated with one-year changes in CAT scores (RR, 1.138; 95%CI: 1.074-1.206) and BODE index values (RR, 2.012; 95%CI: 1.487-2.722). CONCLUSIONS: In the new GOLD grading classification, the type of tool used to determine the level of symptoms can substantially alter the group assignment. A change in category after one year was associated with longitudinal changes in the CAT and BODE index.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/classificação , Saúde Global/classificação , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/classificação , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2005, the Spanish government approved Law 28/2005 on health measures against smoking; this was amended in 2010 by Law 42/2010. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of these laws on passive smoking. METHODS: Three epidemiological studies were conducted on a representative sample of the population via telephone surveys. The first was conducted prior to the first law coming into force, the second a year after its approval and the third a year after the approval of the second. RESULTS: Six thousand eight hundred people were surveyed in 2005, 3,289 in 2007 and 3,298 in 2011. The first survey showed that 49.5% of nonsmokers were exposed to second-hand smoke (SHS) while by 2007, following the introduction of Law 28/2005, this exposure had been reduced to 37.9% (results previously published in 2008). The 2011 survey, conducted following the introduction of Law 42/2010, showed that just 21% of people were exposed. These data indicate that overall exposure to SHS was reduced by 22% between 2005 and 2007 and by a further 16.9% between 2007 and 2011. The overall impact of Law 42/2010 is estimated to be around 44% and Law 28/2005 around 22%. CONCLUSION: Legislation introduced in Spain has markedly reduced the exposure of nonsmokers to SHS.
Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Antifumo/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/epidemiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Exposição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pharmacological non-adherence in chronic diseases is 40-65%. No predictive profile of non-adherence exists in patients with multiple chronic diseases. Our study aimed to quantify the prevalence of non-adherence to pharmacological treatment and its associated factors in patients who visit pharmacies in Spain. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study included patients with one or more chronic diseases. The variables analyzed were demographics, diseases involved, self-medication, information about disease, and lifestyle. The main variable was adherence using the Morisky-Green test. A total of 132 pharmacies collaborated, providing 6327 patients representing all Spain regions (April-December 2016). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated. RESULTS: Non-adherence was 48.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.2-49.7%). The variables that reached significance in the multivariate model were: difficulty in taking medication, self-medication, desire for more information, smoking, lower physical activity, younger age and number of chronic treatments. Discrimination was satisfactory (area under the ROC curve = 70%). Our study found that 50% patients was non-adherent and we obtained a profile of variables associated with therapeutic non-adherence. CONCLUSIONS: It is cause for concern that in patients with multiple diseases and taking multiple medications, there is an association between non-adherence, self-medication and worse lifestyle.
Assuntos
Preparações Farmacêuticas , Farmácias , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has classically been considered in terms of the rapid decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and no other measure apart from smoking cessation has been demonstrated to modify the speed of this decrease. The evidence available from studies performed with tiotropium, of up to 1 year's duration, have shown that this anticholinergic drug can modify the course of COPD by acting on lung function, air entrapment, exacerbations, dyspnea and exercise tolerance, thus improving health status. This evidence has served as the basis for the design of the UPLIFT study (Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium), the main aim of which is to determine the effect of tiotropium on disease progression. This multicenter and multinational study has lasted for 4 years and almost 6,000 patients with COPD have participated. Data from this study are currently being analyzed and the results will shortly be made known. If the results are positive, it will be the first time that a pharmacological intervention has been able to modify the rate of FEV(1) decline, which would imply that the underlying disease is truly being modified. Positive data from the UPLIFT study would indicate that, together with smoking cessation, early treatment with tiotropium should be initiated at any stage of COPD, since both measures would have been proven to be able to modify the natural course of the disease. The probability of demonstrating maintenance of bronchodilation, as well as maintenance of the decrease in the number and severity of exacerbations found in studies conducted over a 1-year period, would represent a real change in what has been known to date about the natural course of COPD.
Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Derivados da Escopolamina/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Previsões , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Brometo de TiotrópioRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease is a common cause of death in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is not clear whether the high cardiovascular comorbidity is due to an increase in traditional risk factors or whether, in contrast, COPD can be considered an independent risk factor. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of risk factors and cardiovascular comorbidity in a community-based population treated for COPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a concurrent multicenter, cross-sectional study that included 572 patients with confirmed diagnosis of COPD. Information on cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidity was collected by extracting data from the medical records of the participating center. RESULTS: The mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 53.7% (16.85%) of predicted and the ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity was 57.9% (10.9%). Hypertension was reported in 53%, obesity in 27%, dyslipidemia in 26%, and diabetes in 23% of the patients. The prevalence of risk factors was not related to disease severity, but there was a trend towards an association with age. In the study group, 16.4% had ischemic heart disease, 7% cerebrovascular disease, and 17% peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovascular disease was not associated with COPD severity, but such an association was reported for age and traditional risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk factors are highly prevalent in patients with COPD. The prevalence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease exceeds that reported in the general population. No relationship was found between the severity of airflow obstruction and the presence of cardiovascular comorbidity.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Demografia , Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be classified into groups A/C or B/D based on symptom intensity. Different threshold values for symptom questionnaires can result in misclassification and, in turn, different treatment recommendations. The primary aim was to find the best fitting cut-points for Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) symptom measures, with an modified Medical Research Council dyspnea grade of 2 or higher as point of reference. METHODS: After a computerized search, data from 41 cohorts and whose authors agreed to provide data were pooled. COPD studies were eligible for analyses if they included, at least age, sex, postbronchodilator spirometry, modified Medical Research Council, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) total scores. MAIN OUTCOMES: Receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index were used to determine the best calibration threshold for CAT, COPD Clinical Questionnaire, and St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total scores. Following, GOLD A/B/C/D frequencies were calculated based on current cut-points and the newly derived cut-points. FINDINGS: A total of 18,577 patients with COPD [72.0% male; mean age: 66.3 years (standard deviation 9.6)] were analyzed. Most patients had a moderate or severe degree of airflow limitation (GOLD spirometric grade 1, 10.9%; grade 2, 46.6%; grade 3, 32.4%; and grade 4, 10.3%). The best calibration threshold for CAT total score was 18 points, for COPD Clinical Questionnaire total score 1.9 points, and for St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score 46.0 points. CONCLUSIONS: The application of these new cut-points would reclassify about one-third of the patients with COPD and, thus, would impact on individual disease management. Further validation in prospective studies of these new values are needed.
Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/classificação , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Saúde Global , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Perfil de Impacto da DoençaRESUMO
The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of smoking among SEPAR members, and their approach to smoking cessation in their patients. An online survey was completed by 640 members (496 pulmonologists, 45 nurses, 34 thoracic surgeons, 37 physiotherapists, and 28 other specialists). Of the members interviewed, 5% confessed that they were smokers: 3.5% pulmonologists; 8.9% nurses; 8.8% thoracic surgeons, and 13.5% physiotherapists. A total of 96% of members assign a lot or quite a lot of importance to setting an example; 98% of members always or often ask their patients about their smoking habit. The most effective anti-smoking intervention, according to 77% of members, is a combination of drugs and psychological support. These results are an indicator of the awareness and commitment of SEPAR members to smoking and its cessation.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pneumologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Sociedades Médicas , Cirurgia Torácica , Adulto , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Fisioterapeutas/psicologia , Médicos/psicologia , Prevalência , Pneumologia/organização & administração , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/psicologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cirurgia Torácica/organização & administração , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Tabagismo/psicologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with 2 closely related respiratory diseases: obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). It has been shown that noninvasive ventilation during sleep produces clinical and functional improvement in these patients. The long-term survival rate with this treatment, and the difference in clinical progress in OHS patients with and without OSAHS are analyzed. METHODOLOGY: Longitudinal, observational study with a cohort of patients diagnosed with OHS, included in a home ventilation program over a period of 12 years, divided into 2 groups: pure OHS and OSAHS-associated OHS. Bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation was administered. During the follow-up period, symptoms, exacerbations and hospitalizations, blood gas tests and pulmonary function tests, and survival rates were monitored and compared. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were eligible for analysis, 60 women (72.3%) and 23 men (27.7%), with a mean survival time of 8.47 years. Fifty patients (60.2%) were included in the group without OSAHS (OHS) and 33 (39.8%) in the OSAHS-associated OHS group (OHS-OSAHS). PaCO2 in the OHS group was significantly higher than in the OHS-OSAHS group (P<.01). OHS patients also had a higher hospitalization rate (P<.05). There was a significant improvement in both groups in FEV1 and FVC, and no differences between groups in PaCO2 and PaO2 values. There were no differences in mortality between the 2 groups, but low FVC values were predictive of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mechanical ventilation in patients with OHS, with or without OSAHS, is an effective treatment for the correction of blood gases and functional alterations and can achieve prolonged survival rates.
Assuntos
Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas , Síndrome de Hipoventilação por Obesidade/terapia , Idoso , Dióxido de Carbono/sangue , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Hipercapnia/etiologia , Hipercapnia/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome de Hipoventilação por Obesidade/sangue , Síndrome de Hipoventilação por Obesidade/mortalidade , Síndrome de Hipoventilação por Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Oxigênio/sangue , Pressão Parcial , Cooperação do Paciente , Polissonografia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
Streptococcus pneumoniae is responsible for several clinical syndromes, such as community-acquired pneumonia, sinusitis, otitis media, and others. The most severe clinical entity caused by this bacteria is undoubtedly invasive pneumococcal disease. Certain factors are known to increase the risk of presenting invasive pneumococcal disease, the most important being smoking habit and underlying concomitant diseases. This article comprises a consensus document on antipneumococcal vaccination in smokers, drawn up by a Smoking Expert Group from the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery and the Latin American Chest Association.
Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Fumar , Vacinação , Aderência Bacteriana , Comorbidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Sistema Respiratório/efeitos dos fármacos , Sistema Respiratório/imunologia , Sistema Respiratório/microbiologia , Sistema Respiratório/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Nicotiana , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) have been interchangeably proposed by GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) for assessing symptoms in patients with COPD. However, there are no data on the prognostic value of these tools in terms of mortality. We endeavored to evaluate the prognostic value of the CAT and CCQ scores and compare them with mMRC dyspnea. METHODS: We analyzed the ability of these tests to predict mortality in an observational cohort of 768 patients with COPD (82% men; FEV1, 60%) from the COPD History Assessment in Spain (CHAIN) study, a multicenter observational Spanish cohort, who were monitored annually for a mean follow-up time of 38 months. RESULTS: Subjects who died (n = 73; 9.5%) had higher CAT (14 vs 11, P = .022), CCQ (1.6 vs 1.3, P = .033), and mMRC dyspnea scores (2 vs 1, P < .001) than survivors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that higher CAT, CCQ, and mMRC dyspnea scores were associated with higher mortality (area under the curve: 0.589, 0.588, and 0.649, respectively). CAT scores ≥ 17 and CCQ scores > 2.5 provided a similar sensitivity than mMRC dyspnea scores ≥ 2 to predict all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The CAT and the CCQ have similar ability for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with COPD, but were inferior to mMRC dyspnea scores. We suggest new thresholds for CAT and CCQ scores based on mortality risk that could be useful for the new GOLD grading classification. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01122758; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Assuntos
Dispneia/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Avaliação de Sintomas , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Dispneia/etiologia , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Curva ROC , EspanhaRESUMO
The electronic cigarette (EC) is a device formed by three basic elements: battery, atomizer and cartridge. When assembled, it looks like a cigarette. The cartridge contains different substances: propylene glycol, glycerine and, sometimes, nicotine. When the user "vapes", the battery is activated, the atomizer is heated and the liquid is drawn in and vaporized. The smoker inhales the mist produced. Various substances have been detected in this mist: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein and some heavy metals. Although these are found in lower concentrations than in cigarettes, they may still be harmful for the human body. Several surveys show that 3-10% of smokers regularly use e-cigarettes. A randomized study has shown that the efficacy of e-cigarettes for helping smokers to quit is similar to nicotine patches. Nevertheless, the study has relevant methodological limitations and reliable conclusions cannot be deduced. This report sets down the Position Statement of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) on the efficacy and safety of e-cigarettes. This statement declares that e-cigarettes should be regulated as medicinal products.
Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adolescente , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/efeitos adversos , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/classificação , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/instrumentação , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/métodos , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Desenho de Equipamento , Europa (Continente) , Temperatura Alta , Humanos , Legislação de Dispositivos Médicos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Nicotina/administração & dosagem , Nicotina/efeitos adversos , Compostos Orgânicos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Orgânicos/análise , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Transtornos Respiratórios/induzido quimicamente , Fumaça/análise , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Soluções/efeitos adversos , Soluções/química , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/terapia , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) has been proposed for assessing health status in COPD, but little is known about its longitudinal changes. The objective of this study was to evaluate 1-year CAT variability in patients with stable COPD and to relate its variations to changes in other disease markers. METHODS: We evaluated the following variables in smokers with and without COPD at baseline and after 1 year: CAT score, age, sex, smoking status, pack-year history, BMI, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), lung function, BODE (BMI, obstruction, dyspnea, exercise capacity) index, hospital admissions, Hospital and Depression Scale, and the Charlson comorbidity index. In patients with COPD, we explored the association of CAT scores and 1-year changes in the studied parameters. RESULTS: A total of 824 smokers with COPD and 126 without COPD were evaluated at baseline and 441 smokers with COPD and 66 without COPD 1 year later. At 1 year, CAT scores for patients with COPD were similar (± 4 points) in 56%, higher in 27%, and lower in 17%. Of note, mMRC scale scores were similar (± 1 point) in 46% of patients, worse in 36%, and better in 18% at 1 year. One-year CAT changes were best predicted by changes in mMRC scale scores (ß-coefficient, 0.47; P < .001). Similar results were found for CAT and mMRC scale score in smokers without COPD. CONCLUSIONS: One-year longitudinal data show variability in CAT scores among patients with stable COPD similar to mMRC scale score, which is the best predictor of 1-year CAT changes. Further longitudinal studies should confirm long-term CAT variability and its clinical applicability. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01122758; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Assuntos
Tolerância ao Exercício/fisiologia , Nível de Saúde , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Teste de Esforço , Seguimentos , Morbidade/tendências , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
AIM: To determine the prevalence and analyze the most relevant clinical characteristics of three clinical phenotypes of COPD: emphysema (type 1), chronic bronchitis (type 2) or COPD-asthma (type 3). METHOD: Observational, multicenter study performed with 331 COPD patients recruited in pulmonology outpatient services. The stratification in three phenotypes was performed with imaging tests, pulmonary function, and a standardized clinical questionnaire. RESULTS: The 43.2% presented an emphysematous phenotype, 44.7% were chronic bronchitic and the other 12.1% presented a phenotype showing mixed characteristics with asthma. There were no significant differences in the smoking level, in the gasometric values or time of disease evolution. Type 1 patients showed lower FEV1 values in comparison with types 2 and 3, 46.6% (21.1), 55.2% (21.2) and 54.4% (21.8), respectively (p < 0.05), and greater levels of dyspnea (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the percentage of patients who had at least one exacerbation in the last year (68.8%, 63.9%, 64.9%; p = 0.25), in the number of exacerbations (p = 0.56), in the number of visits to the ER (total and due to COPD), or in the number of hospital admittances. Type 2 patients showed a greater prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities and of sleep apnea syndrome (4.9%, 23.6% and 12.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In COPD, emphysematous patients present worse pulmonary function and greater dyspnea, although there were no differences in the use of hospital health care resources. The greater comorbidity in Group 2 patients may require specific strategies in this subgroup of patients.
Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etiologia , Asma/fisiopatologia , Bronquite/epidemiologia , Bronquite/etiologia , Bronquite/fisiopatologia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/etiologia , Dispneia/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado/fisiologia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/etiologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Espanha/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/legislação & jurisprudência , Pneumologia/educação , Especialização/legislação & jurisprudência , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Humanos , Pneumologia/legislação & jurisprudência , EspanhaRESUMO
The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical characteristics of two COPD patient populations: one diagnosed using the lower limit of normal (LLN) and another diagnosed by the GOLD criteria. We also compared the population excluded by the LLN criterion with a non-COPD control population. The COPD patients determined with the LLN criterion presented significantly lower levels of FEV1/FVC at 0.55 (0.8) vs. 0.66 (0.2), P=.000; FEV1 44.9% (14) vs. 53.8% (13), P=.000, and FVC 64.7% (17) vs. 70.4% p 0.04. The two COPD groups presented more frequent ER visits in the last year (57% and 52% of the patients, respectively, compared with 11.9% of the control group), without any statistically significant differences between the two. This same pattern was observed in the number of ER visits in the last year: 1.98 (1.6), 1.84 (1.5) and 1.18 (0.7), respectively. When we analyzed the prevalence of the comorbidities that are most frequently associated COPD, there was a clear increase in the percentage of patients who presented associated disorders compared with the control group. Nevertheless, these differences were not very relevant between the two COPD groups. The differences also were not relevant between both COPD groups in the pharmacological prescription profile. In conclusion, the use of the LLN as a criterion for establishing the diagnosis of COPD, compared with the GOLD criteria, excludes a population with important clinical manifestations and with a high consumption of health-care resources. Before its implementation, the relevance of applying this criterion in clinical practice should be analyzed.
Assuntos
Volume Expiratório Forçado , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Capacidade Vital , Índice de Massa Corporal , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/economia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients present a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease. This excess of comorbidity could be related to a common pathogenic mechanism, but it could also be explained by the existence of common risk factors. The objective of this study was to determine whether COPD patients present greater cardiovascular comorbidity than control subjects and whether COPD can be considered a risk factor per se. METHODS: 1200 COPD patients and 300 control subjects were recruited for this multicenter, cross-sectional, case-control study. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the COPD group showed a significantly higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease (12.5% versus 4.7%; P < 0.0001), cerebrovascular disease (10% versus 2%; P < 0.0001), and peripheral vascular disease (16.4% versus 4.1%; P < 0.001). In the univariate risk analysis, COPD, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia were risk factors for ischemic heart disease. In the multivariate analysis adjusted for the remaining factors, COPD was still an independent risk factor (odds ratio: 2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.18-4.24; P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: COPD patients show a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease, higher than expected given their age and the coexistence of classic cardiovascular risk factors.