Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 31(6): 505-12, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24000108

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Resuscitation guidelines give no preference over use of self-inflating bags (SIBs) or T-piece resuscitators (TPR) for manual neonatal ventilation. We speculated that devices would differ significantly regarding time required to adjust to changed ventilation settings. STUDY DESIGN: This was a laboratory study. Time to adjust from baseline peak inflation pressure (PIP) (20 cmH2O) to target PIP (25 and 40 cmH2O), ability to adhere to predefined ventilation settings (PIP, PEEP, and inflation rate [IR]), and the variability within and between operators were assessed for a SIB without manometer, SIB with manometer (SIBM), and two TPRs. RESULTS: Adjustment time was significantly longer with TPRs, compared with SIB and SIBM. The SIBM and TPRs were < 5% (median) off target PIP, and the SIB was 14% off target PIP. Significant variability between operators (interquartile range [IQR]: 71%) was seen with SIBs. CONCLUSION: PIP adjustment takes longer with TPRs, compared with SIB/SIBM. TPRs and SIBM allow satisfactory adherence to ventilation parameters. SIBs should only be used with manometer attached.


Assuntos
Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Ressuscitação/instrumentação , Pressão do Ar , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Manequins , Manometria , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Ressuscitação/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA