RESUMO
Tumor growth models have the potential to model and predict the spatiotemporal evolution of glioma in individual patients. Infiltration of glioma cells is known to be faster along the white matter tracts, and therefore structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can be used to inform the model. However, applying and evaluating growth models in real patient data is challenging. In this work, we propose to formulate the problem of tumor growth as a ranking problem, as opposed to a segmentation problem, and use the average precision (AP) as a performance metric. This enables an evaluation of the spatial pattern that does not require a volume cut-off value. Using the AP metric, we evaluate diffusion-proliferation models informed by structural MRI and DTI, after tumor resection. We applied the models to a unique longitudinal dataset of 14 patients with low-grade glioma (LGG), who received no treatment after surgical resection, to predict the recurrent tumor shape after tumor resection. The diffusion models informed by structural MRI and DTI showed a small but significant increase in predictive performance with respect to homogeneous isotropic diffusion, and the DTI-informed model reached the best predictive performance. We conclude there is a significant improvement in the prediction of the recurrent tumor shape when using a DTI-informed anisotropic diffusion model with respect to istropic diffusion, and that the AP is a suitable metric to evaluate these models. All code and data used in this publication are made publicly available.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão/métodos , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioma/cirurgia , Glioma/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , AnisotropiaRESUMO
Background: The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is defined by signal loss of the T2-weighted hyperintense area with Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) on magnetic resonance imaging, causing a hypointense region on FLAIR. It is a highly specific diagnostic marker for IDH-mutant astrocytoma and is postulated to be caused by intercellular microcystic change in the tumor tissue. However, not all IDH-mutant astrocytomas show this mismatch sign and some show the phenomenon in only part of the lesion. The aim of the study is to determine whether the T2-FLAIR mismatch phenomenon has any prognostic value beyond initial noninvasive molecular diagnosis. Methods: Patients initially diagnosed with histologically lower-grade (2 or 3) IDH-mutant astrocytoma and with at least 2 surgical resections were included in the GLASS-NL cohort. T2-FLAIR mismatch was determined, and the growth pattern of the recurrent tumor immediately before the second resection was annotated as invasive or expansive. The relation between the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and tumor grade, microcystic change, overall survival (OS), and other clinical parameters was investigated both at first and second resection. Results: The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign was significantly related to Grade 2 (80% vs 51%), longer post-resection median OS (8.3 vs 5.2 years), expansive growth, and lower age at second resection. At first resection, no relation was found between the mismatch sign and OS. Microcystic change was associated with areas of T2-FLAIR mismatch. Conclusions: T2-FLAIR mismatch in IDH-mutant astrocytomas is correlated with microcystic change in the tumor tissue, favorable prognosis, and Grade 2 tumors at the time of second resection.
RESUMO
Quantitative MR imaging is becoming more feasible to be used in clinical work since new approaches have been proposed in order to substantially accelerate the acquisition and due to the possibility of synthetically deriving weighted images from the parametric maps. However, their applicability has to be thoroughly validated in order to be included in clinical practice. In this pilot study, we acquired Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation scans to obtain T1, T2 and PD maps in 14 glioma patients. Abnormal tissue was segmented based on conventional images and using a deep learning segmentation technique to define regions of interest (ROIs). The quantitative T1, T2 and PD values inside ROIs were analyzed using the mean, the standard deviation, the skewness and the kurtosis and compared to the quantitative T1, T2 and PD values found in normal white matter. We found significant differences in pre-contrast T1 and T2 values between abnormal tissue and healthy tissue, as well as between T1w-enhancing and non-enhancing regions. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the potential of quantitative T1 and T2 values for voxel-wise classification of abnormal/normal tissue (AUC = 0.95) and of T1w enhancement/non-enhancement (AUC = 0.85). A cross-validated ROC analysis found high sensitivity (73%) and specificity (73%) with AUCs up to 0.68 on the a priori distinction between abnormal tissue with and without T1w-enhancement. These results suggest that normal tissue, abnormal tissue, and tissue with T1w-enhancement are distinguishable by their pre-contrast quantitative values but further investigation is needed.
Assuntos
Glioma , Substância Branca , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Substância Branca/diagnóstico por imagem , Curva ROCRESUMO
PURPOSE: Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) is the most widely used parameter derived from DSC perfusion MR imaging for predicting brain tumor aggressiveness. However, accurate rCBV estimation is challenging in enhancing glioma, because of contrast agent extravasation through a disrupted blood-brain barrier (BBB), and even for nonenhancing glioma with an intact BBB, due to an elevated steady-state contrast agent concentration in the vasculature after first passage. In this study a thorough investigation of the effects of two different leakage correction algorithms on rCBV estimation for enhancing and nonenhancing tumors was conducted. METHODS: Two datasets were used retrospectively in this study: 1. A publicly available TCIA dataset (49 patients with 35 enhancing and 14 nonenhancing glioma); 2. A dataset acquired clinically at Erasmus MC (EMC, Rotterdam, NL) (47 patients with 20 enhancing and 27 nonenhancing glial brain lesions). The leakage correction algorithms investigated in this study were: a unidirectional model-based algorithm with flux of contrast agent from the intra- to the extravascular extracellular space (EES); and a bidirectional model-based algorithm additionally including flow from EES to the intravascular space. RESULTS: In enhancing glioma, the estimated average contrast-enhanced tumor rCBV significantly (Bonferroni corrected Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, p < 0.05) decreased across the patients when applying unidirectional and bidirectional correction: 4.00 ± 2.11 (uncorrected), 3.19 ± 1.65 (unidirectional), and 2.91 ± 1.55 (bidirectional) in TCIA dataset and 2.51 ± 1.3 (uncorrected), 1.72 ± 0.84 (unidirectional), and 1.59 ± 0.9 (bidirectional) in EMC dataset. In nonenhancing glioma, a significant but smaller difference in observed rCBV was found after application of both correction methods used in this study: 1.42 ± 0.60 (uncorrected), 1.28 ± 0.46 (unidirectional), and 1.24 ± 0.37 (bidirectional) in TCIA dataset and 0.91 ± 0.49 (uncorrected), 0.77 ± 0.37 (unidirectional), and 0.67 ± 0.34 (bidirectional) in EMC dataset. CONCLUSION: Both leakage correction algorithms were found to change rCBV estimation with BBB disruption in enhancing glioma, and to a lesser degree in nonenhancing glioma. Stronger effects were found for bidirectional leakage correction than for unidirectional leakage correction.
RESUMO
The growth rate of non-enhancing low-grade glioma has prognostic value for both malignant progression and survival, but quantification of growth is difficult due to the irregular shape of the tumor. Volumetric assessment could provide a reliable quantification of tumor growth, but is only feasible if fully automated. Recent advances in automated tumor segmentation have made such a volume quantification possible, and this work describes the clinical implementation of automated volume quantification in an application named EASE: Erasmus Automated SEgmentation. The visual quality control of segmentations by the radiologist is an important step in this process, as errors in the segmentation are still possible. Additionally, to ensure patient safety and quality of care, protocols were established for the usage of volume measurements in clinical diagnosis and for future updates to the algorithm. Upon the introduction of EASE into clinical practice, we evaluated the individual segmentation success rate and impact on diagnosis. In its first 3 months of usage, it was applied to a total of 55 patients, and in 36 of those the radiologist was able to make a volume-based diagnosis using three successful consecutive measurements from EASE. In all cases the volume-based diagnosis was in line with the conventional visual diagnosis. This first cautious introduction of EASE in our clinic is a valuable step in the translation of automatic segmentation methods to clinical practice.