Predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has increased at a greater rate than other shoulder procedures. In general, clinical and functional outcomes after RTSA have been favorable regardless of indication. However, little evidence exists regarding patient specific factors associated with clinical improvement after RTSA. Predicting postoperative outcomes after RTSA may support patients and physicians to establish more accurate patient expectations and contribute in treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA for patients with degenerative shoulder disorders. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro were searched to identify cohort studies reporting on predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA. Authors independently screened publications on eligibility. Risk of bias for each publication was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A qualitative description of the results was given. The GRADE framework was used to establish the quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 1986 references were found of which 11 relevant articles were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed as low (N = 7, 63.6%) or moderate (N = 4, 36.4%). According to the evidence synthesis there was moderate-quality evidence indicating that greater height predicts better postoperative shoulder function, and greater preoperative range of motion (ROM) predicts increased postoperative ROM following. CONCLUSION: Preoperative predictive factors that may predict postoperative outcomes are: patient height and preoperative range of motion. These factors should be considered in the preoperative decision making for a RTSA, and can potentially be used to aid in preoperative decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I; Systematic review.

Exploring clinically relevant risk profiles in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: a cohort study.

PURPOSE: To explore risk profiles of patients scheduled for lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and their association with short-term recovery of patient after surgery. METHODS: Forty-nine patients scheduled for elective 1-3 level LSF between March 2019 and June 2020 were included. Patients underwent a preoperative risk screening, consisting of an anamnesis, questionnaires and physical performance tests. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify possible risk profiles within this population. RESULTS: Two risk profiles could be established: a fit and deconditioned risk profile. A significant between-profile difference was found in smoking status (p = 0.007), RAND36-PCS (p < 0.001), Timed Up and Go (TUG) (p < 0.001), de Morton Morbidity Index (DEMMI) (p < 0.001), finger floor distance (p = 0.050), motor control (p = 0.020) and steep ramp test (p = 0.005). Moreover, the fit risk profile had a significant shorter time to functional recovery (3.65 days versus 4.89 days, p = 0.013) and length of hospital stay (5.06 days versus 6.00 days, p = 0.008) compared to the deconditioned risk profile. No differences in complication rates between both risk profiles could be established. Allocation to a risk profile was associated with the functional recovery rate (p = 0.042), but not with LOS or complications. CONCLUSION: This study found a fit and deconditioned risk profile. The patients with a fit risk profile perceived a better quality of life, performed better in mobility, motor control, cardiopulmonary tests and showed also a significant shorter stay in the hospital and a shorter time to functional recovery. Preoperatively establishing a patient's risk profile could aid in perioperative care planning and preoperative decision-making.

Complications and survival of conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed primary osteosynthesis compared to primary total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment options for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck (FFN) are primary osteosynthesis as a femoral head-spearing technique or primary (hemi)arthroplasty. The most common complications after primary osteosynthesis, such as avascular necrosis (AVN) or non-union, can result in conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty (cTHA). Data concerning complications and survival rates of cTHA in comparison to primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (pTHA) after FFN are limited due to the absence of well-designed studies. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals comparing the rate of postoperative dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, prosthetic joint infections, blood loss during surgery (>1000 mL), postoperative cardiac- and pulmonary complications after pTHA and cTHA in the first year after surgery. As a secondary outcome implant survival of pTHA and cTHA in terms of revision rates was evaluated. RESULTS: In total 548 patients were included (pTHA n = 264 and cTHA n = 284) with a mean follow-up of 5 years (±3.5 SD). No significant differences were found in postoperative complications rates. The revision rate in the pTHA group was 7.2% in comparison to 7.7% in the cTHA group (p = 0.81). No difference in the short-term implant survival was found between both groups (p = 0.81). CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant differences in terms of postoperative complication rates in the first year after pTHA and cTHA in patients with FFN. Also, no significant difference in short-term implant survival of primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty was found.