Active surveillance of oesophageal cancer after response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: dysphagia is uncommon.

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance is being investigated as an alternative to standard surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. It is unknown whether dysphagia persists or develops when the oesophagus is preserved after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and severity of dysphagia during active surveillance in patients with an ongoing response. METHODS: Patients who underwent active surveillance were identified from the Surgery As Needed for Oesophageal cancer ('SANO') trial. Patients without evidence of residual oesophageal cancer until at least 6 months after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included. Study endpoints were assessed at time points that patients were cancer-free and remained cancer-free for the next 4 months. Dysphagia scores were evaluated at 6, 9, 12, and 16 months after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Scores were based on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer oesophago-gastric quality-of-life questionnaire 25 (EORTC QLQ-OG25) (range 0-100; no to severe dysphagia). The rate of patients with a (non-)traversable stenosis was determined based on all available endoscopy reports. RESULTS: In total, 131 patients were included, of whom 93 (71.0 per cent) had adenocarcinoma, 93 (71.0 per cent) had a cT3-4a tumour, and 33 (25.2 per cent) had a tumour circumference of greater than 75 per cent at endoscopy; 60.8 to 71.0 per cent of patients completed questionnaires per time point after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. At all time points after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, median dysphagia scores were 0 (interquartile range 0-0). Two patients (1.5 per cent) underwent an intervention for a stenosis: one underwent successful endoscopic dilatation; and the other patient required temporary tube feeding. Notably, these patients did not participate in questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Dysphagia and clinically relevant stenosis are uncommon during active surveillance.

Suction Drainage for Anastomotic Leakage After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most life-threatening complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE), with various treatment strategies. Endoscopic techniques are emerging as a less invasive alternative to surgery. Among the current endoscopic techniques, a single placement of an endoluminal nasogastric tube inside the cavity with controlled suction drainage (SD) seems to be an attractive option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SD as treatment for anastomotic leakage after ILE. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed among patients who underwent ILE in a high-volume esophageal cancer center in the Netherlands. Patients with an anastomotic leakage that received SD as primary treatment were selected. A nasogastric tube was endoscopically placed into the cavity of the leakage for controlled suction with 15 mm Hg. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients received SD and was successful in 26 patients (77%). Seven patients (21%) developed empyema despite the SD for which additional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed. Mortality was 5.9% (2 patients) and median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 3 days (1 to 9) and 25 days (14 to 43), respectively. The median time to closure of the leak was 41 days (23 to 65). A total of 16 patients underwent home treatment for a median of 23 (14 to 42) days. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled SD seems to be an effective treatment for anastomotic leakage after ILE. This therapy can safely and effectively be completed in an ambulant, outpatient setting.