Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: clinical and imaging outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There are few clinical and radiographic studies of coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Additionally, reported AC joint reduction rates vary. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopically assisted double-bundle semitendinosus tendon autografts with CC and AC ligament reconstruction for AC joint reconstruction provide AC joint stability and improved function at the final visit. METHODS: In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, 21 patients surgically treated for chronic AC joint dislocation (Rockwood III-V) were assessed clinically and radiographically preoperatively, and at day 1, 3 months, 12 months, and at a final visit (>24 months) postoperatively. Clinical assessments included Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. The CC vertical distance (CCD) on the affected and unaffected sides [CCD ratio (%)] on the anterosuperior view were measured. AC joint vertical reduction loss was defined as an increase in the CCD ratio of >25%. Horizontal AC joint instability was evaluated on axillary views. Pearsons' correlation coefficients were generated to examine the relationships among postoperative clinical scores, CCD ratio, interval from injury to surgery, and age at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-one shoulders in 21 patients (mean age, 40.0 years at the time of surgery; 16 men, 5 women) were evaluated with a mean 31.7-month follow-up period. The mean Constant scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and CCD ratios significantly improved from preoperatively to the final visit (57.4 ± 10.1, 49.1 ± 12.1, 101.6 ± 64.1 preoperatively; 89.6 ± 5.3, 96.5 ± 4.2, 9.9 ± 34.5 at the final visit, respectively [P < .001 for all]). Vertical AC and horizontal AC joint instability were observed in 4 shoulders (19.0%) and in 1 shoulder (4.8%), respectively. However, there was no significant correlation between the increase in CCD and clinical scores at the final visit (Constant score; r = 0.179, P = .438: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; r = -0.260, P = .256) or the interval from injury to surgery (r = 0.099, P = .669) or age at the time of surgery (r = 0.019, P = .935). No clinical complications were associated with clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent the index procedure achieved significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related clinical symptom after a mean follow-up interval of 31.7 months. In contrast, the rates of total ACJ instability in the vertical and horizontal planes were unsatisfactory but compatible with those in previous studies.

Delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a modern suspensory device does not increase the risk of fixation failure or major complications.

BACKGROUND: Management of displaced acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries remains contentious. It is unclear if delayed vs. acute reconstruction has an increased risk of fixation failure and complications. The primary aim of this study was to compare complications of early vs. delayed reconstruction. The secondary aim was to determine modes of failure of ACJ reconstruction requiring revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all patients who underwent operative reconstruction of ACJ injuries over a 10-year period (Rockwood III-V) using suspensory devices with or without hamstring allograft. Reconstruction was classed as early (<12 weeks from injury) or delayed (≥12 weeks). Patient demographics, fixation method, and postoperative complications were noted, with 1-year follow-up a minimum requirement for inclusion. Patient-reported outcomes with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and EuroQol-5 Dimension were undertaken. Fixation failure was defined as loss of reduction requiring revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were analyzed (n = 59 early and n = 45 delayed). The mean age was 42.0 (standard deviation: 11.2; 17-70 years); 84.6% were male and 15.4% were smokers. No difference was observed between fixation failure (P = .39) or deep infection (P = .13) with regard to acute vs. delayed reconstruction. No patient demographic or timing of surgery was predictive of fixation failure on regression modeling. Overall, 11 patients underwent revision surgery for loss of reduction and implant failure (n = 5 suture fatigue, n = 2 endobutton escape, n = 2 coracoid stress fracture, and n = 2 deep infection). The EuroQol-5 Dimension (P = .084) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (P = .062) were comparable for early and delayed groups respectively and below the minimal clinically important difference. CONCLUSION: This study found that delayed surgical management of ACJ injuries using a modern device has comparable functional outcomes and is not associated with a higher incidence of fixation failure or major complications.

Young men in sports are at highest risk of acromioclavicular joint injuries: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To study the incidence of acromioclavicular joint injuries in a general population. METHODS: All acute shoulder injuries admitted to an orthopaedic emergency department were registered prospectively, using electronic patient records and a patient-reported questionnaire. The regional area was the city of Oslo with 632,990 inhabitants. Patients with symptoms from the acromioclavicular joint without fracture were registered as a dislocation (type II-VI) if the radiologist described widening of the joint space or coracoclavicular distance on standard anteroposterior radiographs. Patients without such findings were diagnosed as sprains (type I). RESULTS: Acromioclavicular joint injuries constituted 11% of all shoulder injuries (287 of 2650). The incidence was 45 per 105 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 40-51). 196 (68%) were diagnosed as sprains and 91 (32%) as dislocations. Median age of all acromioclavicular joint injuries was 32 years (interquartile range 24-44), and 82% were men. Thirty percent of all acromioclavicular joint injuries were registered in men in their twenties. Sports injuries accounted for 53%, compared to 27% in other shoulder injuries [OR 3.1 (95% CI 2.4-4.0; p < 0.001)]. The most common sports associated with acromioclavicular joint injuries were football (24%), cycling (16%), martial arts (11%), alpine skiing and snowboarding (both 9%), and ice hockey (6%). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that in the general population, one in ten shoulder injuries involves the acromioclavicular joint and young men in sports are at highest risk. A prognostic level II cohort study.

Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allograft is effective for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries at mid-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allografts for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries with a minimum 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACCR for chronic ACJ injuries between 2003 and 2017 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley (CM), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores. Radiographic loss of reduction during follow-up was evaluated by calculating the difference (mm) in the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) of the involved side immediately postoperatively and at terminal follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (mean age: 42.7 ± 12.8 years) were included in the study with an average follow-up of 3.8 ± 3.1 years (range: 1.1-11.5 years). Patients achieved significant improvement in ASES (50.2 ± 20.1 pre to 85.2 ± 16.3 post), CM (60.2 ± 18.5 pre to 88.2 ± 9.1 post), SST (6.1 ± 3.2 pre to 9.5 ± 3.7 post), and SANE (24.0 ± 25.7 pre to 89.0 ± 12.7 post) scores (P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in functional improvement when comparing type III and V injuries (n.s.). Mean increase in CCD of the involved side from immediately postoperative to final radiographic follow-up was 4.1 ± 3.9 mm, with no significant correlation to clinical outcomes scores. Complications occurred in 33.3% of cases, with postoperative heterotopic ossification being most frequent (14.3%). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing ACCR using free tendon allografts for chronic ACJ injuries achieved significant improvement in shoulder function at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. No correlation was observed between the amount of loss of reduction and clinical outcome scores. Free tendon allografts may be a reliable alternative to autografts in the treatment of chronic ACJ dislocations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Acromioclavicular joint separation treated with clavicular hook plate: a study of radiological and functional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: ACJ separation is a common shoulder injury. A variety of surgical techniques for high-grade ACJ separations have been described. A commonly used technique represents open reduction and fixation by a hook plate. Goal of the present study was to evaluate radiographic and functional outcome in patients with high-grade ACJ separations following surgical treatment with a hook plate before and after surgery as well as after hook plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery with a hook plate due to traumatic ACJ separation between 2012 and 2014 were included and examined during a follow-up control. Demographic and clinical data as well as radiographs pre- and postoperatively were evaluated. Additionally, range of motion, DASH Score and Constant-Murley Score (CMS) were analysed in a follow-up examination. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's rank correlation were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 99 patients (88 m/11 w, 44 y) were included in the present study. 69 (64 m/5 w, 49 y) could be examined during long-term follow-up (38 month). After hook plate removal, the CCD increased significantly (13.7 ± 0.9 mm) compared to the hook plate in situ (9.9 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.000001). 68% of all patients achieved a full range of motion post-operatively. Main limitations of range of motion affected external rotation as well as ante-/retroversion. Mean DASH Score was 5.6 ± 1 points and CMS 90.0 ± 1.4 points. CONCLUSION: In contrast to a significant higher CCD after hook plate removal, nearly all patients achieved good to excellent functional results for DASH and CMS. This indicates that loss of reduction does not necessarily lead to poor functional outcome after ACJ separation surgery.

Anatomic ligament consolidation of the superior acromioclavicular ligament and the coracoclavicular ligament complex after acute arthroscopically assisted double coracoclavicular bundle stabilization.

PURPOSE: The consolidation of the acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament complex after arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation is still under consideration. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients after arthroscopically assisted double-CC-bundle stabilization within 14 days after acute high-grade ACJ separation were studied prospectively. All patients were clinically analysed preoperatively (FU0) and post-operatively (FU1 = 6 months; FU2 = 12 months). The structural MRI assessments were performed at FU0 (injured ACJ) and at FU2 bilateral (radiologic control group) and assessed separately the ligament thickness and length at defined regions for the conoid, trapezoid and the superior AC ligament. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were assessed after 6.5 months and after 16.0 months. The 16-month MRI analysis revealed for all patients continuous ligament healing for the CC-complex and the superior AC ligament with in the average hypertrophic consolidation compared to the control side. Separate conoid and trapezoid strands (double-strand configuration) were detected in 27 of 37 (73%) patients, and a single-strand configuration was detected in 10 of 37 (27%) patients; both configurations showed similar CCD data. The ligament healing was not influenced by the point of surgery, age at surgery and heterotopic ossification. The clinical outcome was increased (FU0-FU2): Rowe, 47.7-97.0 pts.; TAFT, 3.9-10.6 pts.; NAS pain, 8.9-1.4 pts. (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The arthroscopically assisted double-CC-bundle stabilization within 14 days after acute high-grade ACJ separation showed 16 months after surgery sufficient consolidations of the AC and double-CC ligament complex in 73%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Case series.

Surgical management of chronic high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: To date, no gold-standard technique exists for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability. We systematically reviewed the clinical results of 3 main categories of ACJ reconstruction for high-grade chronic instability. METHODS: A literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies involving patients with ACJ instability (Rockwood grades III-VI) for at least 6 weeks, managed with ACJ stabilization, with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Depending on the surgical technique, patients were divided into 1 of 3 groups: nonbiological fixation between the coracoid and clavicle, for example, suture loops and synthetic ligaments (group 1); biological reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments, for example, allograft or autograft ligament reconstruction (group 2); and ligament and/or tendon transfer, for example, the Weaver-Dunn procedure (group 3). Patient demographic characteristics, functional scores, radiographic outcomes, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Two independent investigators reviewed 960 articles. A total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 590 patients divided into 1 of 3 groups. The complication rates were similar among the 3 groups: 15% for nonbiological fixation, 15% for biological reconstruction, and 17% for ligament and/or tendon transfer, with failure rates of 8%, 7%, and 5%, respectively. In terms of functional results, the mean Constant score was 87.2 points for nonbiological fixation (n = 89), 92.4 points for biological reconstruction (n = 86), and 87.4 points for ligament and/or tendon transfer (n = 49). CONCLUSION: On comparison of the results of 3 different ACJ reconstruction methods, all techniques showed similar complication rates. Among the level II studies, ACJ reconstruction with a tendon graft showed superior results.

Return to sport after acute acromioclavicular stabilization: a randomized control of double-suture-button system versus clavicular hook plate compared to uninjured shoulder sport athletes.

PURPOSE: Traumatic high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations can be surgically stabilized by numerous anatomic and non-anatomic procedures. The return to sport (Maffe et al. in Am J Sports Med 23:93-98, 1995] and remaining sport-associated impairments after acute ACJ stabilization has not yet been investigated. METHODS: 73 consecutive athletes with acute high-grade ACJ separation were prospectively assigned into two groups (64.4% randomized, 35.6% intention-to-treat): open clavicular hook plate (cHP) implantation (GI) or arthroscopically assisted double double-suture-button (dDSB) implantation (GII). Patients were analyzed using shoulder sport-specific measurement tools for sport ability (ASOSS), sport activity (SSAS), and numerical analog scales: NASpain during sport, NASshoulder function in sport, and NASre-achievement of sport level. Four points of examination were established: preoperative evaluation (FU0) and first postoperative follow-up (FU1) at 6 months; FU2 at 12 months; and FU3 at 24 months after surgery. The control group (GIII) consisted of 140 healthy athletes without anamnesis of prior macro-injury or surgery. RESULTS: After surgical stabilization, 29 of 35 athletes in GI (82.9%; 38.6 ± 9.9 years) and 32 of 38 in GII (82.9%; 38.6 ± 9.9 years) were followed up for 24 months (FU3) (loss 17.8%). All operated athletes showed significantly increased scores compared to FU0 (p < 0.05). Compared to GI, GII showed significantly superior outcome data for sporting ability as well as for NASre-achievement of sport level (p < 0.05). While GII re-achieved GIII-comparable SSAS and ASOSS levels, GI remained at a significantly inferior level. Athletes after ACJ injury of Rockwood grade IV/V and overhead athletes benefited significantly from the dDSB procedure. CONCLUSION: The dDSB procedure enabled significantly superior sport-specific outcomes compared to the cHP procedure. Athletes after dDSB surgeries re-achieved the sporting ability and the sport activity levels of healthy athletes, whereas athletes after cHP implantation remained at significantly inferior levels. The more extensive dDSB procedure and the more restrictive rehabilitation are recommended for treatment of acute high-grade ACJ separations of functionally high-demanding athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation with that of hook plate fixation in patients with acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective case-control study of twenty-six patients with an acute ACJ dislocation who underwent surgical repair with either an arthroscopic TightRope® fixation or a hook plate from 2013 to 2016. Clinical and radiological data were collected prospectively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Constant Score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score as well as the visual analogue scale. Radiological outcomes were assessed with the coracoclavicular distance (CCD). RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent arthroscopic TightRope® fixation, while 10 patients underwent hook plate fixation. There were no significant differences in the preoperative variables except for the mean UCLA 4b infraspinatus score (TightRope® 2.8 vs. hook plate 3.8; p = 0.030). Duration of surgery was significantly longer in the TightRope® group. At 1 year post-operatively, the TightRope® group had a significantly better Constant Score and CCD with no complications. All patients with hook plate fixation had to undergo a second procedure for removal of implant, and 3 patients had complications. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic TightRope® fixation is a good option for the treatment of acute unstable ACJ dislocations. It has better short-term clinical and radiological outcomes as well as lesser complications when compared to hook plate fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.

A validation of the Nottingham Clavicle Score: a clavicle, acromioclavicular joint and sternoclavicular joint-specific patient-reported outcome measure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) and sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) injuries and with clavicle fractures are typically younger and more active than those with other shoulder pathologies. We developed the Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS) specifically for this group of patients to improve sensitivity for assessing the outcomes of treatment of these conditions compared with the more commonly used Constant Score (CS) and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cohort study in which the preoperative and 6-month postoperative NCS evaluations of outcome in 90 patients were compared with the CS, OSS, Imatani Score (IS), and the EQ-5D scores. Reliability was assessed using the Cronbach α. Reproducibility of the NCS was assessed using the test/retest method. Effect sizes were calculated for each score to assess sensitivity to change. Validity was examined by correlations between the NCS and the CS, OSS, IS, and EQ-5D scores obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Significant correlations were demonstrated preoperatively with the OSS (P = .025) and all subcategories of the EQ-5D (P < .05) and postoperatively with the OSS (P < .001), CS (P = .008), IS (P < .001), and all subcategories of EQ-5D (P < .02). The NCS had the largest effect size (1.92) of the compared scores. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach α = 0.87). CONCLUSION: The NCS has been proven to be a valid, reliable and sensitive outcome measure that accurately measures the level of function and disability in the ACJ, SCJ and clavicle after traumatic injury and in degenerative disease.

Prevalence of remaining horizontal instability in high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries surgically managed.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of remaining horizontal instability in high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries surgically managed by means of four different surgical strategies and to assess its relation to the clinical outcomes and the quality of life. METHODS: In this multicentric non-randomized retrospective study, 53 patients with high-grade ACJ injuries surgically managed (by means of open or arthroscopic surgery) were clinically and radiographically assessed at 24 months or more after shoulder surgery. The presence of post-surgical remaining horizontal instability was evaluated by means of Alexander or axillary X-ray views. The study population was divided into two groups: patients with evidence of post-surgical remaining horizontal instability and patients without evidence of post-surgical remaining horizontal instability at the last follow-up visit. The relationship between remaining horizontal instability and the quality-of-life questionnaires was analyzed. RESULTS: 18.87% (10/53) of the Alexander or axillary X-rays views showed post-surgical remaining horizontal instability at the last follow-up visit (INSTAB-group). Results of the questionnaires were: (1) physical SF36 score (INSTAB-group 57.02 ± 3.17 and NO-INSTAB-group 57.66 ± 3.30, p = 0.583); (2) mental SF36 score (INSTAB-group 53.95 ± 3.98 and NO-INSTAB-group 55.71 ± 3.30, p = 0.150); (3) NRS for pain (INSTAB-group 1.30 ± 1.49 and NO-INSTAB-group 0.83  ± 1.08, p = 0.260); (4) DASH questionnaire (INSTAB-group 5.27 ± 5.42 and NO-INSTAB-group 3.06 ± 2.30, p = 0.049); (5) Constant score (INSTAB-group 93.4 ± 3.5 and NO-INSTAB-group 94.83  ± 4.3, p = 0.333); and Global satisfaction (INSTAB-group 8.7  ± 0.95 and NO-INSTAB-group 8.64 ± 1.03, p = 0.874). CONCLUSION: Independently of the type of procedure, post-surgical remaining horizontal instability was present in almost one-fifth of the patients, and this group of patients showed a significantly worse DASH score. The addition of an acromioclavicular augmentation might have to be considered, taking into account that its absence may have a negative impact in terms of shoulder disabilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.

Severe heterotopic ossifications after Rockwood type II acromioclavicular joint injury: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a benign condition of abnormal bone formation in soft tissue. It is frequently asymptomatic, though it manifests as decreased range of motion in the affected joints that may occur in the shoulder after a substantial traumatic injury and can complicate the functional outcome of the affected upper extremity. However, severe HO is an extremely rare event following acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We are presenting a case of a 29-year-old male patient who had a trauma with resultant Rockwood type II injury. He subsequently complained of left shoulder pain with decreased range of motion 3 years later. HO was diagnosed after X-rays and the severity was assessed with a computerized tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging. The patient was treated with a combination of pre-operative radiotherapy, surgical excision, mobilization under anesthesia, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy and physiotherapy. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, excellent clinical and radiological outcomes were achieved with a Constant score of 92 points, DASH score of 24%, and ASES score 100%, with a full range of motion of the left shoulder. Furthermore, there was no more radiological evidence of HO on plain radiographs. CONCLUSION: Severe heterotopic ossification after a Rockwood type II ACJ injury in this case was successfully treated with combination of pre-operative radiotherapy, surgical excision and manipulation under anesthesia as well as NSAID therapy and physiotherapy.

Acute lateral dislocated clavicular fractures: arthroscopic stabilization with TightRope.

HYPOTHESIS: Type IIA, IIB, and V lateral clavicular fractures (Craig modification of the Neer classification) are characterized by a constant displacement and are associated with a high rate of nonunion. The aim of this study is to verify whether the reduction and arthroscopic stabilization of these clavicular fractures with coracoclavicular cerclage provide stable fixation to allow for bone healing. To date, the treatment of these fractures is still controversial in young active patients in whom functional requirements are to be met. METHODS: Fourteen male patients, with type IIA, IIB, and V lateral clavicular fractures (2 type IIA, 10 type IIB, and 2 type V) had been treated arthroscopically with a TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) and had a radiologic/clinical follow-up of at least 2 years. RESULTS: All fractures were confirmed to have healed without limitations in range of motion or loss of reduction. The acromioclavicular joint and the coracoclavicular interspace were restored to the level of the healthy site in all but 1 patient, in whom a reduction was observed because of hypercorrection of the fracture. The mean Constant score was 95, and all patients had a Simple Shoulder Test score of 12 points. Healing was delayed up to 20 days in 1 patient because of a skin infection, and the coracoid bone tunnel was too marginal in another patient, in whom the coracoid button broke the lateral side of the tunnel during fixation. CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic procedure with the TightRope allows for fracture healing with no loss of reduction in the acromioclavicular joint and full return to everyday activities.

Alveolar morphometry in young adults with and without agenesis of the upper lateral incisor: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare alveolar morphometry in young adults with agenesis of the upper lateral incisor versus the side without agenesis and versus matched controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this observational retrospective study, cone beam computed tomography scans were obtained of 36 upper hemiarches from young adults aged 15 to 30 years. The hemiarches were distributed into three groups: group 1: 12 upper hemiarches presenting agenesis of the upper lateral incisor; group 2: 12 upper hemiarches from the opposite side without agenesis of the upper lateral incisor (control group 1); and group 3: 12 upper hemiarches without agenesis of the upper lateral incisor matched for age and sex with respect to the affected group (control group 2). A trained and calibrated investigator performed all the alveolar measurements at two different times, including sagittal, coronal and axial slices of each hemiarch. Paired Student's t-tests, Chi-square and repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction were used, (P<0.05). RESULTS: Apical mesial evaluation of group 1 (4.22±1.19mm) was significantly lower (P<0.001) than that of groups 2 (6.72±1.17mm) and 3 (7.58±1.67mm). Apical distal evaluation also showed differences (P<0.001) among the three groups, with the dimension being smaller in group 1 with agenesis (4.53±1.14mm), followed by group 2 without agenesis (6.23±1.55mm) and the healthy control group 3 (7.73±1.71mm). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral incisor agenesis significantly reduces the alveolar dimensions of the affected area. In cases of unilateral agenesis, the unaffected side also shows sequelae, with decreased dimensions compared to cases without agenesis. This condition should be taken into account when making therapeutic decisions regarding rehabilitation with implants or canine replacement.

Subcoracoid acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood type VI) sustained in motorcycle crash: A case report.

We present the case of a young male who sustained a rare acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury during a road traffic accident. A left-sided ACJ injury was identified on plain radiographs fourteen days following a motorcycling accident during which significant distracting injuries were sustained. Owing to persistent shoulder pain during awake tertiary surveillance, repeat shoulder plain radiographs were obtained, along with re-examination of the patient's index computed tomography (CT) shoulder imaging, indicating a grade VI left-sided acromioclavicular subluxation. The patient underwent operative management of the above injury at three weeks, with initial examination under anesthetic revealing a stiff shoulder joint significantly limited external rotation requiring extensive release of fibrosis. The left ACJ was reduced under anesthesia, being temporarily secured with Kirschner wire insertion. A Synthes locking distal tibial "L" plate was contoured and applied across the AC joint, and secured with locking screws. Intensive post-operative physiotherapy resulted in an significantly improved post-operative range of motion in the patient's left shoulder. Acromioclavicular joint injuries, commonly shortened to ACJ injuries, are most regularly traumatic in etiology, ranging in severity from mild sprain to complete joint disruption. ACJ injuries are classified according to the position of the clavicle with respect to the acromion and coracoid. The above case highlights the requirement for comprehensive tertiary surveillance of trauma patients both pre and postextubation, in order to identify such injuries that may require prompt surgical management in order to restore range of motion and function in affected joints.

Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review.

Background: While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades III-V) ACJ separations in order to compare outcomes between direct fixation and tendon graft ligament reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review of the literature evaluating outcomes for acute ACJ separation treatment with direct fixation or free biologic tendon graft reconstruction was performed. The following databases were examined: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2021), and Embase (1980-2021). Studies were included if they reported a mean time to surgery as <6 weeks, contained >10 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up, and reported clinical or radiographic outcomes. Results: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported outcomes following tendon graft ligament reconstruction (n = 128 patients). There were multiple methods of direct fixation. Thirty-three studies utilized suture button constructs (n = 1138), 16 studies used hook plates (n = 567), 2 studies used coracoclavicular screws (n = 94), 2 studies used suture fixation (n = 93), 2 studies used suture anchor (n = 55), 2 studies used suture cerclage fixation (n = 87), 1 used single multistrand titanium cable (n = 24), and 1 used K wire (n = 11). The mean follow-up Constant scores ranged from 77.5 to 97.1 in the fixation group compared to 90.3-96.6 in the tendon graft group. The mean visual analog scale scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 in the fixation group and 0.1-1 in the tendon graft group. Net CC distance ranged from 17.5 to 3.6 mm in the fixation group and 7.4-4 mm in the tendon graft group. The revision rates ranged from 0.0% to 18.18% in the direct fixation group and 5.88%-17% in the tendon graft group. Conclusion: Direct fixation and tendon graft reconstruction for management of acute, high-grade ACJ separations have similar patient subjective and radiographic outcomes, as well as complication and revision rates at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

The incidence and treatment of symptomatic acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) Osteoarthritis (OA) is very common in the general population. Despite this, there is little mention of concomitant glenohumeral and ACJ arthropathy in the literature, and no documented incidence of symptomatic ACJ OA post total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We present the incidence and timescale of the problem, and the response to treatments. Methods: Patients who had developed ACJ-related symptoms following a TSA were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. It was determined that these symptoms were not related to the prosthesis or other non-ACJ pathology. Results: There were 230 primary anatomic total shoulder replacements carried out over a 9-year period, with 219 with adequate follow-up for analysis. Thirty-five (16%) developed a symptomatic ACJ. The majority developed symptoms within the first two years however there was one patient who developed symptoms eight years later. Twenty six percent of patients responded to a period of rest. Seventy one percent had a cortisone injection in the ACJ and in 44% of patients this was effective. Twelve (34%) patients had an arthroscopic excision of distal clavicle with good resolution of the symptoms. Discussion: ACJ symptoms following a total shoulder replacement appears more common than thought and can be treated successfully.

Surgical Management of Acute Rockwood Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: A Systematic Review.

Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) occur frequently in young and active people. The best management of acute grade III injuries has been a source of controversy and extensive debate. When surgery is indicated, there is still no gold standard surgical technique for treating acute grade III ACJ injuries. The methodology of this review was a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases using various combinations of the keywords "Rockwood," "type III," "grade III," "treatment," "surgery," "acromioclavicular joint," and "dislocation," since the inception of the databases to December 2020. Surgical techniques were divided into two groups. In group 1 were ACJ fixation techniques using hardware such as the hook plate, Kirschner wires, and wire cerclage; group 2 included coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation/reconstruction techniques using double buttons, TightRope®, suture anchors, Endobuttons, the Infinity-LockTM Button System, etc. Fourteen studies were selected for the final review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This review showed better outcome scores in group 2. Overall, complication rates were higher in group 1 compared to group 2. The results of this review show that CC fixation, using suspensory or loop devices, of Rockwood grade III injuries, has better outcomes and fewer complications than fixation of the ACJ with hardware.

Percutaneous distal clavicle excision for acromioclavicular joint arthritis: our experience and early results of a novel surgical technique.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis causes pain and limitations in activities of daily living. Open and arthroscopic distal clavicle excision techniques have been described with good outcomes. However, both techniques have their own sets of advantages and disadvantages. This study describes a novel technique of percutaneous distal clavicle excision for symptomatic ACJ osteoarthritis and our two-year results. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients underwent percutaneous distal clavicle excision for ACJ arthritis. These patients had failed a trial of conservative treatment. The ACJ was confirmed as the pain generator with an intraarticular steroid/lignocaine injection, and shoulder MRI was used to exclude alternative pain generators in the shoulder. They had a minimum of two years of follow-up. RESULTS: At a mean of 26.8 months postoperatively, the mean VAS pain score was 0, and the mean Constant score for the shoulder was 87.3 points (range 50-94), which corresponded to 1 good, 1 very good and 13 excellent results. The mean SF-36 score was 94.9 points (range 65-100). There were statistically significant improvements in the VAS scores, Constant shoulder scores and SF-36 scores at one year and two years of follow-up (p < 0.05). Three unique complications, namely subcutaneous emphysema, "missing" of the distal clavicle and thermal skin injury, were encountered. Our surgical technique has since been modified to circumvent these complications. CONCLUSION: Our novel technique of percutaneous distal clavicle excision yields a 93.3% good-to-excellent results based on the Constant shoulder score and durable pain relief based on VAS at two years.

What is the optimal surgical treatment for Neer type IIB (IIC) distal clavicle fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to systematically review the current treatment strategies for the treatment of Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures in terms of functional outcome and complication rates and to examine the most appropriate surgical method by comparing all the available surgical techniques and implants. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the existing literature (2000-2021) in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Research Gate and Google Scholar using the general terms 'distal AND clavicle AND fracture' to capture as many reports as possible. The MINORS tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the nonrandomized studies. We categorized the reported surgical techniques into four main types: open or arthroscopic coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization, locking plate fixation with or without CC augmentation, hook plate fixation and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) transfixation. We reported findings for two main outcomes: clinical results and complication rates categorized into major and minor. RESULTS: Our database search yielded a total of 630 records; 34 studies were appropriate for qualitative analysis. There were 790 patients, with a mean age of 40.1 years, a female percentage of 37% and a mean follow-up period of 29.3 months. In total, 132 patients received a hook plate, 252 received a locking plate, 368 received CC stabilization and 41 received transacromial transfixation. All studies were retrospective and had fair MINORS scores. Locking plate, CC stabilization and ACJ transfixation showed similar clinical results but were much better than hook plate fixation; CC augmentation did not significantly improve the outcome of locking plate fixation. The rate of major complications was similar among groups; hook plate and AC joint transfixation had the worst rates of minor complications. Open CC techniques were slightly better than arthroscopic techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The present systematic review for the optimal fixation method for Neer type IIB fractures of the distal clavicle showed similar major complication rates among techniques; the hook plate technique demonstrated inferior clinical results to other techniques. Open CC stabilization and locking plate fixation without CC augmentation seem to be the best available treatment options.