Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for CTLA-4 insufficiency across Europe: an EBMT Inborn Errors Working Party study.

BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) insufficiency causes a primary immune regulatory disorder characterised by lymphoproliferation, dysgammaglobulinaemia, and multi-organ autoimmunity including cytopenias and colitis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcome of HSCT for CTLA-4 insufficiency and study the impact of pre-HSCT CTLA-4-Ig therapy and pre-HSCT immune dysregulation on survival and immunological outcome. METHODS: Retrospective study of HSCT for CTLA-4 insufficiency and 2q33.2-3 deletion from the Inborn Errors Working Party of EBMT. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease- and chronic GvHD-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoint was immunological outcome assessed by Immune Dysregulation Disease Activity (IDDA) score. RESULTS: Forty patients were included over a 25-year period. Pre-HSCT, 60% received CTLA-4-Ig and IDDA was 23.3 (3.9-84.0). Median age at HSCT was 14.2 (1.3-56.0) years. Patients received PBSC (58%) or marrow (43%) from MUD (75%), MMUD (12.5%) or MFD (12.5%). Median follow-up was 3 years (0.6-15 years) and 3-year OS was 76.7% (58-87%) and DFS was 74.4% (54.9-86.0%). At latest follow-up, 28/30 surviving patients are in disease-free remission with median IDDA reduction of 16. Probability of OS and DFS was greater in patients with lower disease activity pre-HSCT (IDDA<23, p=0.002 and p=0.006, respectively). CTLA-4-Ig receipt did not influence OS or DFS. Cause of death was transplant-related in 7/8 patients. CONCLUSION: This is the largest retrospective study of HSCT for CTLA-4 insufficiency to date. HSCT is an effective therapy to prevent ongoing disease progression and morbidity, with improving survival rates over time and in patients with lower pre-HSCT disease activity.

Abatacept and non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive evaluation of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk associated with abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This evaluation included 16 abatacept RA clinical trials and 6 observational studies. NMSC incidence rates (IRs)/1000 patient-years (p-y) of exposure were compared between patients treated with abatacept versus placebo, conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other biological/targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARDs. For observational studies, a random-effects model was used to pool rate ratios (RRs). RESULTS: ~49 000 patients receiving abatacept were analysed from clinical trials (~7000) and observational studies (~42 000). In randomised trials (n=4138; median abatacept exposure, 12 (range 2-30) months), NMSC IRs (95% CIs) were not significantly different for abatacept (6.0 (3.3 to 10.0)) and placebo (4.0 (1.3 to 9.3)) and remained stable throughout the long-term, open-label period (median cumulative exposure, 28 (range 2-130 months); 21 335 p-y of exposure (7044 patients over 3 years)). For registry databases, NMSC IRs/1000 p-y were 5-12 (abatacept), 1.6-10 (csDMARDs) and 3-8 (other b/tsDMARDs). Claims database IRs were 19-22 (abatacept), 15-18 (csDMARDs) and 14-17 (other b/tsDMARDs). Pooled RRs (95% CIs) from observational studies for NMSC in patients receiving abatacept were 1.84 (1.00 to 3.37) vs csDMARDs and 1.11 (0.98 to 1.26) vs other b/tsDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the warnings and precautions of the abatacept label, this analysis suggests a potential increase in NMSC risk with abatacept use compared with csDMARDs. No significant increase was observed compared with b/tsDMARDs, but the lower limit of the 95% CI was close to unity.

Association of rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and shared epitope with clinical response to initial treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: data from a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and shared epitope (SE) allele-related genetic markers associate with treatment response to abatacept, certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment (ACT). METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve early rheumatoid arthritis were randomised in the NORD-STAR trial to ACT, certolizumab pegol, abatacept or tocilizumab, all with methotrexate. Centralised laboratory analyses for ACPA, RF and SE were performed. Clinical Disease Activity Index remission was analysed longitudinally with logistic generalised estimating equations. Differences in treatment effect across RF, ACPA and SE subgroups were assessed with interaction terms at 24 and 48 weeks, adjusted for sex, country, age, body mass index, Disease Activity Score of 28 joints based on C-reactive protein and smoking. RESULTS: In total, 778 patients were included. At 24 weeks, abatacept treatment showed a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroups, but this effect was not significantly different from the negative subgroups. By 48 weeks, abatacept treatment showed better response regardless of RF/ACPA status. No differences were found across RF, ACPA, SE allele, valine at amino acid position 11 or valine-arginine-alanine haplotype subgroups for any biological treatment at 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this randomised controlled trial, abatacept treatment was associated with a better response than ACT in the RF and/or ACPA-positive subgroup at 24 weeks, but this was no longer seen at 48 weeks; adding SE allele-related genetic markers did not strengthen the association. Moreover, ACPA, RF and SE allele-related genotypes were not, alone or in combination, associated with clinical responses of importance sufficiently strongly to warrant implementation in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2011-004720-35; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01491815.

Circulating Tfh cells are differentially modified by abatacept or TNF blockers, and predict treatment response in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: CD4+CXCR5+PD-1hi follicular helper T (Tfh) cells dwell in the germinal centers (GCs) of lymphoid organs and participate in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) pathogenesis; the frequency of their circulating counterparts (cTfh-frequency) is expanded in RA and correlates with the pool of GC Tfh cells. Our objective was to study the effect of abatacept (ABT) or TNF blockers (TNFb) on the cTfh-frequency in RA. METHODS: Peripheral blood was drawn from seropositive-longstanding RA patients chronically receiving csDMARDS (n = 45), TNFb (n = 59), or ABT (n = 34), and healthy controls (HC) (n = 137). Also, patients with an incomplete response to csDMARDS (n = 41) who initiated TNFb (n = 19) or ABT (n = 22), were studied at 0 and 12 months. The cTfh-frequency was examined by cytometry. RESULTS: As compared with HC, an increased cTfh-frequency was seen in seropositive-longstanding RA chronically receiving csDMARDs or TNFb but not ABT. After escalating from csDMARDs, the cTfh-frequency did not vary in patients who were given TNFb but decreased to HC levels in those given ABT. In the ABT group, the baseline cTfh-frequency was higher for patients who attained 12M remission (12Mr), vs those who remained active (12Ma): 0m cutoff for remission >0.38% (Sens. 92%, Sp. 90%), OR 25.3. Conversely, in the TNFb group, the baseline cTfh-frequency was lower for 12Mr vs 12Ma: 0m cutoff for non-remission >0.44% (Sens. 67%, Sp. 90%), OR 8.5. CONCLUSION: ABT but not TNFb, is able to curtail the cTfh-frequency in RA. A higher baseline cTfh-frequency predicts a good response to ABT but a poor response to TNFb.

Anti-citrullinated protein antibody profiles predict changes in disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating biologics.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an expanded antigen-specific ACPA profile predicts changes in disease activity in patients with RA initiating biologics. METHODS: The study included participants from a prospective, non-randomized, observational RA cohort. For this sub-study, treatment groups of interest included biologic-naïve initiating anti-TNF, biologic-exposed initiating non-TNF, and biologic-naïve initiating abatacept. ACPAs to 25 citrullinated peptides were measured using banked enrolment serum. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed and associations of resulting principal component (PC) scores (in quartiles) and anti-CCP3 antibody (≤15, 16-250 or >250 U/ml) with EULAR (good/moderate/none) treatment response at 6 months were examined using adjusted ordinal regression models. RESULTS: Participants (n = 1092) had a mean age of 57 (13) years and 79% were women. At 6 months, 68.5% achieved a moderate/good EULAR response. There were three PCs that cumulatively explained 70% of variation in ACPA values. In models including the three components and anti-CCP3 antibody category, only PC1 and PC2 were associated with treatment response. The highest quartile for PC1 (odds ratio [OR] 1.76; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.53) and for PC2 (OR 1.74; 95% CI: 1.23, 2.46) were associated with treatment response after multivariable adjustment. There was no evidence of interaction between PCs and treatment group in EULAR responses (P-value for interaction >0.1). CONCLUSION: An expanded ACPA profile appears to be more strongly associated with biologic treatment response in RA than commercially available anti-CCP3 antibody levels. However, further enhancements to PCA will be needed to effectively prioritize between different biologics available for the treatment of RA.

Cancer risk with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab compared with those who received tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and compared with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) naïve RA patients. METHODS: Nationwide registry-based cohort study of RA patients initiating treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, rituximab, TNFi, and bDMARD-naive patients their second type of conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Patients were identified in DANBIO and followed for cancer from 2006-2020. Patients could contribute multiple treatments, with person years (PYRS), deaths, and cancers allocated to each treatment group in a 'latest type of treatment' manner. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer in each tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab group compared with TNFI and bDMARD naïve groups, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 21 982 treatment initiations, 96 475 PYRS, and 1423 cancers were identified. There were no statistically significant increased HRs for overall cancer in tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab treatment groups (HRs ranged from 0.7-1.1). More than five years of abatacept exposure showed a non-significantly increased HR compared with TNFi (HR 1.41, 95% confidence intervals CI 0.74-2.71). For hematological cancers, rituximab treatment showed non-significantly reduced HRs: vs TNFi (HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.00-2.06) and bDMARD-naïve (HR 0.13; 95%CI 0.00-1.89). CONCLUSION: Treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab in RA patients was not associated with increased risks of cancer compared with TNFi-treated and with bDMARD-naïve RA patients in a real-world setting.

[18F]FDG PET/CT for therapeutic assessment of Abatacept in early-onset polymyalgia rheumatica.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the benefit of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose ([18F] FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the therapeutic assessment of Abatacept (ABA) as first-line therapy in early-onset polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients. METHODS: This was an ancillary study of ALORS trial (Abatacept in earLy Onset polymyalgia Rheumatica Study) assessing the ability of ABA versus placebo to achieve low disease activity (C-Reactive Protein PMR activity score (CRP PMR-AS) ≤ to 10) without glucocorticoid (GC) at week 12 in patients with early-onset PMR. The patients underwent [18F] FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Responses to treatments were evaluated according to CRP PMR-AS, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) PMR-AS, Clin PMR-AS, and CRP-Imputed (Imput-CRP) PMR-AS. Quantitative score by maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and combined qualitative scores according to liver uptake (Leuven, Leuven/Groningen, and Besançon Scores) were used for assessment of [18F] FDG uptake in regions of interest (ROI) usually affected in PMR. Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the clinical, biological, and [18F] FDG uptake variation difference in ABA and placebo groups between W0 and W12. Subgroup analysis by GC rescue was performed. RESULTS: At W12, there was no significant difference according to SUVmax between the ABA and the placebo groups in all ROI. Subgroup analysis according to GC administration demonstrated a significant (p 0.047) decrease in SUVmax within the left sternoclavicular joint ROI in the ABA group (- 0.8) compared to the placebo group (+ 0.6) without GC rescue. Other results did not reveal any significant difference between the ABA and placebo groups. According to combined qualitative scores, there was no significant difference between ABA and placebo groups for the direct comparison analysis and subgroup analysis according to GC rescue. CONCLUSION: [18F] FDG PET/CT uptake did not decrease significantly after ABA compared to placebo in anatomical areas usually affected in PMR patients. These results are correlated with the clinical-biological therapeutic assessment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee (CPP Sud-Est II Ref CPP: 2018-33), and all patients gave their written informed consent before study enrollment. The protocol was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03632187).

HBV reactivation in HBsAg-/HBcAb+ rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are at risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation when treated with biologic or targeted synthetic (b/ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study aims to investigate the risk in this population. METHODS: From January 2004 through December 2020, 1068 RA patients undergoing b/tsDMARDs therapy and 416 patients with HBsAg-/HBcAb+ were enrolled. Factors associated with HBV reactivation were analysed. RESULTS: During 2845 person-years of follow-up, 27 of 416 (6.5%,9.5 per 1000 person-years) patients developed HBV reactivation, with a cumulative rate of HBV reactivation of 3.5% at 5 years, 6.1% at 10 years and 24.2% at 17 years. The median interval from beginning b/tsDMARDs to HBV reactivation was 85 months (range: 9-186 months). The risk of HBV reactivation varied by type of b/tsDMARD, with rituximab having the highest risk (incidence rate: 48.3 per 1000 person-years), followed by abatacept (incidence rate: 24.0 per 1000 person-years). In multivariate analysis, rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 15.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.12-60.32, p = .001), abatacept (aHR: 9.30, 1.83-47.19, p = .007), adalimumab (aHR: 3.86, 1.05-14.26, p = .04) and negative baseline HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs, <10 mIU/mL) (aHR: 3.89, 1.70-8.92, p < .001) were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation. CONCLUSION: HBsAg-/HBcAb+ RA patients are susceptible to HBV reactivation during b/tsDMARD therapy. Those with negative baseline anti-HBs and those on certain b/tsDMARDs, such as rituximab, abatacept and adalimumab, have high reactivation risks. Risk stratification and management should be based on the patient's baseline anti-HBs titre and type of therapy.

From pre-clinical efficacy to promising clinical trials that delay Type 1 diabetes.

Recent advancements in immunology and islet biology have unveiled remarkable prospects for the postponement of Type 1 diabetes (T1D) through the strategic modulation of the immune system. In this Perspective, we discuss the pharmaceutical strides achieved, traversing from pre-clinical validation to the execution of impactful clinical trials. We begin with the initial investigations involving cyclosporine and glucocorticoids in rodent models, such as the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse, which guided early clinical trials. We then discuss the pre-clinical studies using suitable mouse models that eventually led to contemporary clinical trials targeting immune cell functionality and cytokine signaling pathways. Collectively, these discoveries promote the exciting paradigm of immune system modulation to mitigate autoimmunity, which continues to broaden. Notably, the use of baricitinib, a potent JAK1/2 inhibitor, and teplizumab, an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, represent discrete methodologies converging upon a singular outcome: the preservation of islet beta-cell functionality. The latter interventional strategies build on the original idea that tempering specific facets of the immune system will generate therapeutic benefit. Enthusiasm from these discoveries stems from efficacy with reduced side effects when compared with past approaches. The success of therapeutic intervention(s) in pre-clinical studies, combined with knowledge about stages of progression to clinical T1D, have ultimately encouraged the design of more successful clinical trials targeting highly specific populations at risk. Collectively, these findings instill a profound sense of optimism, suggesting that the prevention and even reversal of T1D may soon be within reach.

Full Guidelines-From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Perioperative management of systemic immunomodulatory agents in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunomodulatory agents are indicated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Perioperative use of these medications may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and complication. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of SSI and complication in patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease receiving immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa [TNF-α] inhibitors, interleukin [IL] 12/23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 costimulator, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate [MTX]) undergoing surgery. METHODS: We performed a search of the MEDLINE PubMed database of patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease on immune therapy undergoing surgery. RESULTS: We examined 48 new or previously unreviewed studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSION: For low-risk procedures, TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, ustekinumab, abatacept, MTX, CsA, and apremilast can safely be continued. For intermediate- and high-risk surgery, MTX, CsA, apremilast, abatacept, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, and ustekinumab are likely safe to continue; however, a case-by-case approach is advised. Acitretin can be continued for any surgery. There is insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations on tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib.

Vaccination recommendations for adults receiving biologics and oral therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Delphi consensus from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

Therapeutic modalities and clinical outcomes in a large cohort with LRBA deficiency and CTLA4 insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: LPS-responsive beige-like anchor (LRBA) deficiency (LRBA-/-) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) insufficiency (CTLA4+/-) are mechanistically overlapped diseases presenting with recurrent infections and autoimmunity. The effectiveness of different treatment regimens remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the comparative efficacy and long-term outcome of therapy with immunosuppressants, CTLA4-immunoglobulin (abatacept), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in a single-country multicenter cohort of 98 patients with a 5-year median follow-up. METHODS: The 98 patients (63 LRBA-/- and 35 CTLA4+/-) were followed and evaluated at baseline and every 6 months for clinical manifestations and response to the respective therapies. RESULTS: The LRBA-/- patients exhibited a more severe disease course than did the CTLA4+/- patients, requiring more immunosuppressants, abatacept, and HSCT to control their symptoms. Among the 58 patients who received abatacept as either a primary or rescue therapy, sustained complete control was achieved in 46 (79.3%) without severe side effects. In contrast, most patients who received immunosuppressants as primary therapy (n = 61) showed either partial or no disease control (72.1%), necessitating additional immunosuppressants, abatacept, or transplantation. Patients with partial or no response to abatacept (n = 12) had longer disease activity before abatacept therapy, with higher organ involvement and poorer disease outcomes than those with a complete response. HSCT was performed in 14 LRBA-/- patients; 9 patients (64.2%) showed complete remission, and 3 (21.3%) continued to receive immunosuppressants after transplantation. HSCT and abatacept therapy gave rise to similar probabilities of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept is superior to immunosuppressants in controlling disease manifestations over the long term, especially when started early, and it may provide a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to transplantation.

Associations of disease duration and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody status with the effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Post hoc analysis of a multicentre, real-world observational study in Japan (ORIGAMI).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the article is to investigate the associations of disease duration and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) status with the effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We performed post hoc analyses of the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI) study of biologic-naïve RA patients aged ≥20 years with moderate disease activity who were prescribed abatacept. Changes in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) at 4, 24, and 52 weeks of treatment were analysed in patients divided according to ACPA serostatus (positive/negative), disease duration (<1/≥1 year), or both. RESULTS: SDAI scores decreased from baseline in all groups. SDAI scores tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group and disease duration <1-year group than in the ACPA-negative group and disease duration ≥1-year group, respectively. In the disease duration <1-year group, SDAI tended to decrease more in the ACPA-positive group than in the ACPA-negative group. Disease duration was independently associated with the change in SDAI and SDAI remission at Week 52 in multivariable regression models. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that starting abatacept within 1 year of diagnosis was associated with greater effectiveness of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with RA and moderate disease activity.

Factors contributing to the improvement in J-HAQ after 3 years of treatment with abatacept in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients: Interim results of a long-term, observational, multicentre study in Japan (ORIGAMI).

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the long-term effectiveness, safety, and factors affecting Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) improvement during abatacept treatment in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: The ORIGAMI study is an ongoing observational study of biologic-naïve RA patients with moderate disease activity treated with subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg, once-weekly). Patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were extracted from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry as an historical, weighted control group. The primary endpoint for this interim analysis was the proportion of patients with J-HAQ remission (score ≤0.5) at 3 years. RESULTS: Among 279 abatacept-treated and 220 csDMARD-treated patients, J-HAQ remission was achieved at 3 years in 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.7%-46.2%) and 28.9% (95% CI 9.9%-47.8%), respectively. Age, RA duration <1 year, baseline J-HAQ score, and Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at 6 months were associated with 3-year J-HAQ remission in the abatacept group. Overall, 24/298 patients (8.1%; safety analysis set) experienced serious adverse drug reactions with an incidence of 5.3 per 100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the 3-year effectiveness and safety, and revealed potential factors associated with J-HAQ remission in biologic-naïve RA patients treated with abatacept in real-world clinical practice.

Siplizumab combination therapy with belatacept or abatacept broadly inhibits human T cell alloreactivity in vitro.

Combined antigen-specific T cell receptor stimulation and costimulation are needed for complete T cell activation. Belatacept and abatacept are nondepleting fusion proteins blocking CD28/B7 costimulation, whereas siplizumab is a depleting antiCD2 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD2/CD58 costimulation. Herein, the effect of siplizumab combination therapy with abatacept or belatacept on T cell alloreactivity in mixed lymphocyte reactions was investigated. In contrast to monotherapy, the combination of siplizumab with belatacept or abatacept induced near-complete suppression of T cell proliferation and increased the potency of siplizumab-mediated T cell inhibition. Furthermore, dual targeting of CD2 and CD28 costimulation enhanced the selective depletion of memory T cells compared with monotherapy. Although siplizumab monotherapy leads to significant regulatory T cell enrichment, high doses of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and a human IgG1 Fc fragment in the combination therapy reduced this effect. These results support the clinical evaluation of dual costimulation blockade, combining siplizumab with abatacept or belatacept, for the prophylaxis of organ transplant rejection and improvement of long-term outcomes following transplantation. Ongoing investigative research will elucidate when other forms of siplizumab-based dual costimulatory blockade may be able to induce similarly strong inhibition of T cell activation although still allowing for enrichment of regulatory T cells.

Efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in patients with autoimmune disorders: humoral and cellular immune response.

BACKGROUND: The impact of immunosuppressive therapies on the efficacy of vaccines to SARS-CoV-2 is not completely clarified. We analyzed humoral and T cell-mediated response after COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in immunosuppressed patients and patients with common variable immunodeficiency disease (CVID). PATIENTS: We enrolled 38 patients and 11 healthy sex- and age-matched controls (HC). Four patients were affected by CVID and 34 by chronic rheumatic diseases (RDs). All patients with RDs were treated by corticosteroid therapy and/or immunosuppressive treatment and/or biological drugs: 14 patients were treated with abatacept, 10 with rituximab, and 10 with tocilizumab. METHODS: Total antibody titer to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was assessed by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, CD4 and CD4-CD8 T cell-mediated immune response was analyzed by interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assay, the production of IFN-γ-inducible (CXCL9 and CXCL10) and innate-immunity chemokines (MCP-1, CXCL8, and CCL5) by cytometric bead array after stimulation with different spike peptides. The expression of CD40L, CD137, IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17 on CD4 and CD8 T cells, evaluating their activation status, after SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides stimulation, was analyzed by intracellular flow cytometry staining. Cluster analysis identified cluster 1, namely the "high immunosuppression" cluster, and cluster 2, namely the "low immunosuppression" cluster. RESULTS: After the second dose of vaccine, only abatacept-treated patients, compared to HC, showed a reduced anti-spike antibody response (mean: 432 IU/ml ± 562 vs mean: 1479 IU/ml ± 1051: p = 0.0034), and an impaired T cell response, compared with HC. In particular, we found a significantly reduced release of IFN-γ from CD4 and CD4-CD8 stimulated T cells, compared with HC (p = 0.0016 and p = 0.0078, respectively), reduced production of CXCL10 and CXCL9 from stimulated CD4 (p = 0.0048 and p = 0.001) and CD4-CD8 T cells (p = 0.0079 and p = 0.0006). Multivariable General Linear Model analysis confirmed a relationship between abatacept exposure and impaired production of CXCL9, CXCL10, and IFN-γ from stimulated T cells. Cluster analysis confirms that cluster 1 (including abatacept and half of rituximab treated cases) showed a reduced IFN-γ response, as well as reduced monocyte-derived chemokines All groups of patients demonstrated the ability to generate specific CD4 T activated cells after spike proteins stimulation. After the third dose of vaccine, abatacept-treated patients acquired the ability to produce a strong antibody response, showing an anti-S titer significantly higher compared to that obtained after the second dose (p = 0.0047), and comparable with the anti-S titer of the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with abatacept showed an impaired humoral immune response to two doses of COVID-19 vaccine. The third vaccine dose has been demonstrated to be useful to induce a more robust antibody response to balance an impaired T cell-mediated one. All patients, exposed to different immunosuppressive drugs, were able to produce specific CD4-activated T cells, after spike proteins stimulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Local Ethical Committee NP4187.

Certolizumab pegol, abatacept, tocilizumab or active conventional treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: 48-week clinical and radiographic results of the investigator-initiated randomised controlled NORD-STAR trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal first-line treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is debated. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of active conventional therapy with each of three biological treatments with different modes of action. METHODS: Investigator-initiated, randomised, blinded-assessor study. Patients with treatment-naïve early RA with moderate-severe disease activity were randomised 1:1:1:1 to methotrexate combined with (1) active conventional therapy: oral prednisolone (tapered quickly, discontinued at week 36) or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in swollen joints; (2) certolizumab pegol; (3) abatacept or (4) tocilizumab. Coprimary endpoints were week 48 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (CDAI ≤2.8) and change in radiographic van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score, estimated using logistic regression and analysis of covariance, adjusted for sex, anticitrullinated protein antibody status and country. Bonferroni's and Dunnet's procedures adjusted for multiple testing (significance level: 0.025). RESULTS: Eight hundred and twelve patients were randomised. Adjusted CDAI remission rates at week 48 were: 59.3% (abatacept), 52.3% (certolizumab), 51.9% (tocilizumab) and 39.2% (active conventional therapy). Compared with active conventional therapy, CDAI remission rates were significantly higher for abatacept (adjusted difference +20.1%, p<0.001) and certolizumab (+13.1%, p=0.021), but not for tocilizumab (+12.7%, p=0.030). Key secondary clinical outcomes were consistently better in biological groups. Radiographic progression was low, without group differences.The proportions of patients with serious adverse events were abatacept, 8.3%; certolizumab, 12.4%; tocilizumab, 9.2%; and active conventional therapy, 10.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with active conventional therapy, clinical remission rates were superior for abatacept and certolizumab pegol, but not for tocilizumab. Radiographic progression was low and similar between treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01491815.

Immunomics analysis of rheumatoid arthritis identified precursor dendritic cells as a key cell subset of treatment resistance.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the immunology underlying variable treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed large-scale transcriptome analyses of peripheral blood immune cell subsets to identify immune cells that predict treatment resistance. METHODS: We isolated 18 peripheral blood immune cell subsets of 55 patients with RA requiring addition of new treatment and 39 healthy controls, and performed RNA sequencing. Transcriptome changes in RA and treatment effects were systematically characterised. Association between immune cell gene modules and treatment resistance was evaluated. We validated predictive value of identified parameters for treatment resistance using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and mass cytometric analysis cohorts. We also characterised the identified population by synovial single cell RNA-sequencing analysis. RESULTS: Immune cells of patients with RA were characterised by enhanced interferon and IL6-JAK-STAT3 signalling that demonstrate partial normalisation after treatment. A gene expression module of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) reflecting the expansion of dendritic cell precursors (pre-DC) exhibited strongest association with treatment resistance. Type I interferon signalling was negatively correlated to pre-DC gene expression. qPCR and mass cytometric analysis in independent cohorts validated that the pre-DC associated gene expression and the proportion of pre-DC were significantly higher before treatment in treatment-resistant patients. A cluster of synovial DCs showed both features of pre-DC and pro-inflammatory conventional DC2s. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in pre-DC in peripheral blood predicted RA treatment resistance. Pre-DC could have pathophysiological relevance to RA treatment response.

Effectiveness of biological targeted therapies may discriminate seronegative from seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world effectiveness of targeting biologic drugs (bDMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients negative for rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). METHODS: We retrospectively selected 81 seronegative and 404 seropositive RA patients receiving treatment with abatacept, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, or tocilizumab. Effectiveness was evaluated by analyzing drug survival using Kaplan-Meyer analysis over 10-year follow-up. Survival rates were compared by log rank test, and hazard ratios (HRs) of therapy discontinuation were estimated through multivariate Cox-regression. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, except for a significantly higher percentage of inadequate responders to prior bDMARDs in the seronegative RA patients (p= 0.02). Among seronegative RA, tocilizumab demonstrated a survival rate of 73.9% with a mean survival time (MST) of 76.8 months (95% CI 61-92), which was significantly higher than abatacept (37.5%, MST 37.1 months (95% CI 22-51; p= 0.01). Anti-TNF alpha therapy fell in the middle (50.0%, MST 63.5 months (95% CI 47-79) but the difference was not significant. Nevertheless, seropositive RA patients did not show significantly different drug survival rates. Negative predictors of drug discontinuation were RF/ACPA positivity (HR 0.56) and sex male (HR 0.58), but treatment with abatacept (HR 1.88) or anti-TNF alpha (HR 1.79), no co-therapy with cDMARD (HR 1.74), absence of bone erosions (HR 1.41), and higher HAQ (HR 1.58) were positive predictors. CONCLUSIONS: To confirm these preliminary findings and to explore the hypothesis of a distinctive therapeutic algorithm in seronegative RA, prospective studies on larger cohorts are needed.

Comparative effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness and drug tolerability of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a multicentre cohort study. METHODS: Patients with RA initiated with bDMARD/JAKi monotherapy without conventional synthetic DMARDs were included. Monotherapy regimens were categorised as interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4Ig), JAKi, or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Multiple propensity score-based inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce selection bias. Linear mixed-effect models with IPW were used to examine changes in the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at 24 weeks, and drug retention was compared among monotherapy using IPW Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 849 treatment courses from 635 patients were included (IL-6Ri, 218; CTLA4Ig, 183; JAKi, 92; TNFi, 356). The difference in change in DAS28-ESR at week 24 as the primary outcome was -0.93 (95% CI: -1.20 to -0.66) lower in the IL-6Ri group than TNFi, while that of CTLA4Ig and JAKi was similar with that of TNFi (-0.20 [-0.48 to 0.08], -0.25 [-0.67 to 0.16], respectively). IL-6Ri use was associated with significantly lower overall drug discontinuation than TNFi use (hazard ratio = 0.55 [0.39-0.78], P = 0.001). Similar retention rates were identified among CTLA4Ig and JAKi compared to TNFi. CONCLUSION: In the analysis with IPW to reduce selection bias, IL-6Ri monotherapy was superior to TNFi monotherapy in terms of effectiveness and drug retention. No significant differences were identified between CTLA4Ig, JAKi, and TNFi monotherapy.