Impact of pharmacist interventions on cost avoidance in an ambulatory cancer center.

Objective To provide a foundation to justify the presence of a full-time clinical pharmacist in the ambulatory cancer center in addition to an existing centralized pharmacist through cost avoidance calculation and patient and staff satisfaction surveys. Methods The prospective, pilot study took place in an ambulatory cancer center over four weeks in 2014. Cost avoidance values were assigned to interventions performed by a pharmacy resident, who was present in the ambulatory cancer center during clinic hours, along with a centralized oncology pharmacist routinely working with the cancer center. Anonymous patient and staff satisfaction surveys based on a 5-point Likert scale were distributed to assess the perceived benefit of a pharmacist located in the ambulatory cancer center. Results Data collection took place over approximately one month. After evaluation of 962 interventions from both pharmacists, the estimated cost avoidance was US$282,741 per pharmacist per year, yielding a net benefit of US$138,441. The most common interventions made by the resident included chemotherapy regimen review (n = 290, 69%) and patient counseling (n = 102, 24%), while the majority of the centralized pharmacist's interventions was chemotherapy regimen review (n = 525, 97%). Results from the anonymous patient and staff surveys revealed an overall positive perception of the pharmacy resident while in the ambulatory cancer center. Conclusion A full-time clinical pharmacist in an ambulatory cancer center is both financially beneficial and positively perceived by patients and staff.

Factors associated with psychological distress amongst outpatient chemotherapy patients: An analysis of depression, anxiety and stress using the DASS-21.

AIM: This study sought to identify clinical, demographic and service-related factors associated with psychological distress amongst outpatient chemotherapy patients. BACKGROUND: Distress in cancer patients leads to increased risk of psychological comorbidity, contributing to sub-optimal treatment adherence and potentially leading to poorer health outcomes. Screening and recognition of distress and risk factors is an important aspect of holistic care within a multidisciplinary team environment. METHODS: Data were obtained via survey and chart review of ambulatory chemotherapy patients at three public tertiary referral hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. The DASS-21 was used to screen for psychological distress. Regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between distress and a range of cancer, socioeconomic and treatment factors. RESULTS: Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Score≤80 (OR 3.8, 95% CI [1.7, 78.7]) and average waiting time (between oncology outpatient appointment and commencement of chemotherapy infusion) >60min (OR 2.4, 95% CI [1.04, 5.5]) were at increased risk of moderate-severe distress. Patients with a household income between $AU 50-75,000 p.a. had a lower risk of distress compared to <$25,000 p.a. (OR 0.05, 95% CI [0.01, 0.52]). On sub-scale analysis, depression and anxiety contributed more to overall distress than the stress subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Performance status, waiting times and household income were key predictors of distress. Findings could assist clinicians to identify higher-risk population subsets that could benefit from targeted screening and additional psychological and social work support. Findings could also assist administrators to consider the contribution of modifiable factors such as waiting times to patient distress.

Novel Insights in Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Methods in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: From the Guidelines to Clinical Practice.

Many cancer patients will experience venous thromboembolism (VTE) at some stage, with the highest rate in the initial period following diagnosis. Novel cancer therapies may further enhance the risk. VTE in a cancer setting is associated with poor prognostic, a decreased quality of life, and high healthcare costs. If thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients and perioperative settings is widely accepted in clinical practice and supported by the guidelines, it is not the same situation in ambulatory cancer patient settings. The guidelines do not recommend primary thromboprophylaxis, except in high-risk cases. However, nowadays, risk stratification is still challenging, although many tools have been developed. The Khrorana score remains the most used method, but it has many limits. This narrative review aims to present the current relevant knowledge of VTE risk assessment in ambulatory cancer patients, starting from the guideline recommendations and continuing with the specific risk assessment methods and machine learning models approaches. Biomarkers, genetic, and clinical features were tested alone or in groups. Old and new models used in VTE risk assessment are exposed, underlining their clinical utility. Imaging and biomolecular approaches to VTE screening of outpatients with cancer are also presented, which could help clinical decisions.

Hazardous Drug Contamination: Presence of Bathroom Contamination in an Ambulatory Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Many hazardous drugs (HDs) are excreted in urine and feces, and evidence has shown that bathrooms of patients receiving chemotherapy at home are contaminated with HDs. However, little information exists on bathroom contamination in ambulatory clinics where HDs are administered. OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to determine the presence of HD residue in the patient and staff bathrooms of an ambulatory cancer center. METHODS: A quality improvement project was initiated to examine potential contamination by the HDs 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in a patient bathroom and a secured badge-access staff bathroom in the infusion department of an ambulatory comprehensive cancer center. Twice-daily wipe testing was conducted on the floor in front of the toilet and the flush handle for five consecutive days. FINDINGS: Sixty-five percent of the samples from the floor of the patient bathroom were positive for at least one of the HDs. In the staff bathroom, 35% of the floor samples were positive for at least one HD. None of the flush handle samples were above the level of detection.

Ways to harness the built environment of ambulatory cancer facilities for comprehensive patient support: A review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To review patient experiences of the architectural elements conducive to a supportive or healing-promoting environment in the context of ambulatory oncology care. DESIGN: A comprehensive review of original peer-reviewed qualitative studies conducted to reveal the meaning and significance of patient experience in this context was undertaken. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified through electronic databases including Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed and Embase. No time limit was applied and language was restricted to English. REVIEW METHODS: The generated records were screened at the titles and abstracts level by the first reviewer, with full text assessment conducted by both authors. Main themes were extracted in an excel file and a narrative synthesis strategy was used to systematically gather evidence and explain the findings. The guidelines of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination have been followed in the searching and reporting of the essential matters relevant to this review. RESULTS: Eleven original studies were selected; in addition to these, fourteen other studies that did not fully meet the selection criteria, however held important information relevant to the scope of the review, were considered to expand the discussion with relevant information to ambulatory cancer facilities. The findings of these studies were synthesized into five major themes: stimulating and homely environments; flexibility and environmental enrichment; social support; complementary support and engagement; and physical and sensory support. CONCLUSION: The paper identified key architectural design qualities that have the potential to support treatment and empower patients, with particular reflection on patients undergoing intravenous anti-cancer treatment within ambulatory settings. It provides examples in which designing the built environment with people in mind and providing tailored solutions to meet their actual needs and preferences may help cancer patients cope with the emotional and physical challenges of the disease and its treatment and support a general experience of patient-centred care. A conceptual framework that articulates the principal constituents of a supportive environment is tentatively proposed, extending existing theoretical propositions to facilitate further investigation of this context.

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory cancer patients carry a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the optimal prophylaxis strategy remains controversial. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness and safety of apixaban, rivaroxaban, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), semuloparin, aspirin, and warfarin for the prevention of VTE in ambulatory cancer patients. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) and EMBASE electronic databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2019. In the meta-analysis, 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in ambulatory cancer patients administrated venous thromboprophylaxis agents were included. The primary outcome was the risk of VTE. Safety outcomes included the occurrence of major-bleeding. Two investigators identified the studies and performed data extraction. A network meta-analysis was performed and agents were ranked using cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. RESULTS: We identified 19 studies, including 11,430 patients comparing 10 interventions. Compared to placebo controls, apixaban (5 mg) showed the highest efficacy for the prevention of VTE [odds ratio (OR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.71, SUCRA=69.5] and was more effective than LMWH (OR 0.5, 0.39-0.63; SUCRA=52.1) or warfarin (OR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.35-1.59; SUCRA=25.6). Moreover, the safety of apixaban (5 mg) (OR 1.41, 95% CI: 0.33-5.93; SUCRA=58.5) was higher than LMWH (OR 1.96, 95% CI: 0.99-3.86; SUCRA=44.1) or warfarin (OR 3.06, 95% CI: 1.03-9.08; SUCRA=29.1). There were no significant differences between placebo and experimental groups in terms of patient deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation therapies in ambulatory cancer patients can significantly reduce the risk of VTE. However, this protective effect was associated with a significantly increased risk of major bleeding. Apixaban at the appropriate dose can decrease the risk of VTE without increasing the bleeding risk. These findings require validation in larger study cohorts.

Opportunities for Quality Improvement Programs (QIPs) in the Nutrition Support of Patients with Cancer.

Malnutrition in patients with cancer is a ubiquitous but neglected problem that can reduce patient survival/quality of life and increase treatment interruptions, readmission rates, and healthcare costs. Malnutrition interventions, including nutrition support through dietary counseling, diet fortification, oral nutrition supplements (ONS), and enteral and parenteral nutrition can help improve health outcomes. However, nutritional care standards and interventions for cancer are ambiguous and inconsistently applied. The lack of systematic malnutrition screening and intervention in ambulatory cancer care has especially significant consequences and thus the nutrition support of patients with cancer represents an area for quality improvement. United States healthcare payment models such as the Oncology Care Model are linked to quality of care and health outcomes. Quality improvement programs (QIPs) can advance patient-centered care, perfect care processes, and help healthcare professionals meet their quality measure performance goals. Malnutrition QIPs like the Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii) have been shown to be effective in identifying and treating malnutrition. However, little is known about or has been reported on nutrition or malnutrition-focused QIPs in cancer care. This paper provides information to support translational research on quality improvement and outlines the gaps and potential opportunities for QIPs in the nutrition support of patients with cancer.

Retrospective Cohort Study of Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Association With Khorana Score and Other Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines do not recommend that cancer outpatients receive thromboprophylaxis unless at high venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, with the Khorana score suggested for risk stratification. This study investigated VTE incidence in outpatients with pancreatic, endometrial, colorectal, ovarian and cervical cancer, the role of Khorana score in risk assessment and potential risk factors. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected 1 year after cancer diagnosis. VTE associated with inpatient admissions was excluded. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-six patients were included. VTE rates varied: 26.8% pancreatic; 5.7% endometrial; 9.8% colorectal; 10.2% ovarian; and 0.0% cervical cancer. Excluding VTE at diagnosis, potentially preventable VTE rates were 16.5% in pancreatic, 3.8% in endometrial, 9.8% in colorectal and 8.7% in ovarian cancer. Khorana score was associated with VTE in endometrial cancer only (high-risk: 16.7% vs. low-risk: 1.5%; P < 0.001). VTE rates for patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) were 22.6-34.8% in pancreatic, endometrial, colorectal and ovarian cancers. VTE was associated with CVCs in endometrial, colorectal and ovarian; chemotherapy and Hb < 100 g/L in pancreatic; surgery in endometrial and ovarian; and body mass index > 35 in ovarian cancers following adjusted analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VTE is a significant burden in pancreatic, endometrial, colorectal and ovarian cancers. Khorana score was not predictive in most cancers. The major VTE-associated variable was CVC. Our data suggest a role for clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis in targeted cancer outpatients.