Anti-factor Xa and activated partial thromboplastin time strategies for unfractionated heparin dosing after HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: No clear guidelines exist for perioperative anticoagulation management after durable left ventricular assist device insertion. In this study, we sought to compare outcomes between anti-factor Xa (FXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing after HeartMate 3 (HM3) insertion. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review of patients who received UFH after HM3 insertion between 01/2020-12/2022. Post-operative UFH dose was titrated by aPTT goal 45-60 sec (n = 53) or FXa goal 0.1-0.2 U/mL (n = 59). Baseline differences between cohorts were balanced by inverse probability treatment weighting. RESULTS: At baseline, unadjusted FXa patients were more likely to be white (47.5% vs. 35.8%, p < 0.001), INTERMACS 1-2 (69.5% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.013), have history of coronary artery disease (66.1% vs. 43.4%, p = 0.026), and lower eGFR (54.1 vs. 63.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.029) compared to the aPTT group. After adjusting for several bleeding/thrombosis risk factors, 97.5% of FXa and 91.0% of aPTT patients reached therapeutic levels with comparable UFH duration and maximum dose. Moreover, in-hospital mortality (2.5% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.842), major bleeding events (4.2% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.360), and thromboembolic events (21.8% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.151) remained without significant differences between FXa and aPTT cohorts. There was a high degree of variability in FXa (r2 = 0.20) and aPTT (r2 = 0.22) values for any given UFH dose. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in frequency of bleeding or thromboembolic events were observed in this study between FXa versus aPTT cohorts after HM3 implantation. More longitudinal studies are warranted to determine whether or not one assay is superior to the other.

The 3-O-sulfation of heparan sulfate modulates protein binding and lyase degradation.

Humans express seven heparan sulfate (HS) 3-O-sulfotransferases that differ in substrate specificity and tissue expression. Although genetic studies have indicated that 3-O-sulfated HS modulates many biological processes, ligand requirements for proteins engaging with HS modified by 3-O-sulfate (3-OS) have been difficult to determine. In particular, the context in which the 3-OS group needs to be presented for binding is largely unknown. We describe herein a modular synthetic approach that can provide structurally diverse HS oligosaccharides with and without 3-OS. The methodology was employed to prepare 27 hexasaccharides that were printed as a glycan microarray to examine ligand requirements of a wide range of HS-binding proteins. The binding selectivity of antithrombin-III (AT-III) compared well with anti-Factor Xa activity supporting robustness of the array technology. Many of the other examined HS-binding proteins required an IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S sequon for binding but exhibited variable dependence for the 2-OS and 6-OS moieties, and a GlcA or IdoA2S residue neighboring the central GlcNS3S. The HS oligosaccharides were also examined as inhibitors of cell entry by herpes simplex virus type 1, which, surprisingly, showed a lack of dependence of 3-OS, indicating that, instead of glycoprotein D (gD), they competitively bind to gB and gC. The compounds were also used to examine substrate specificities of heparin lyases, which are enzymes used for depolymerization of HS/heparin for sequence determination and production of therapeutic heparins. It was found that cleavage by lyase II is influenced by 3-OS, while digestion by lyase I is only affected by 2-OS. Lyase III exhibited sensitivity to both 3-OS and 2-OS.

Anti-Xa level monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparin during intermittent venovenous hemofiltration.

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is an anticoagulant used to prevent clotting during blood purification treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical use of the anti-factor Xa level (anti-Xa) for monitoring LMWH anticoagulant levels during intermittent venovenous hemofiltration (IVVHF). This prospective observational study enrolled patients who required IVVHF for renal failure in Beijing Hospital between May 2019 and February 2021. The LMWH anticoagulation was assessed by the coagulation grade of the filter and line. One hundred and ten participants were included. There were 90 patients with a filter and line coagulation grade of ≤ 1 and 20 patients with grade > 1. The anti-Xa level of 0.2 IU/mL was a critical value. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that anti-Xa level > 0.2 IU/mL (odd ratio [OR] = 2.263; 95% CI: 1.290-4.871, P = 0.034) and cardiovascular disease (OR = 10.028; 95% CI: 1.204-83.488; P = 0.033) were independently associated with the coagulation grade of the filter and line. Anti-Xa level could monitor LMWH anticoagulation during IVVHF.

The Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over warfarin for many indications, though their safety has not been well established in patients with acute renal impairment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of bleeding complications associated with DOACs compared with warfarin in patients admitted to the hospital with acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients admitted to the Penn Medicine Lancaster General Hospital with a diagnosis of AKI from October 2017 through September 2021 and receiving therapy with oral anticoagulants. Comparing DOACs with warfarin, the primary endpoint was the percent frequency of composite major and minor bleeding during the admission and within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: There were 112 hospitalization encounters included in the study. Of these, 42 (37.5%) patients were receiving warfarin and 70 (62.5%) patients were receiving DOAC therapy before admission. There was a higher frequency of the primary endpoint of bleeding in patients receiving DOACs as compared with warfarin, though this was not statistically significant (18.5% vs. 11.9%, respectively, P = 0.432). There were no differences between groups in the frequency of major bleeding, minor bleeding, or transfusions. Patients receiving DOAC therapy were more likely to experience anticoagulation-related readmissions or emergency department visits compared with patients on warfarin therapy (11.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.024). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin were associated with statistically similar rates of bleeding in patients presenting with AKI. Further research is necessary to elucidate if DOACs are safer than warfarin in this patient population.

The effect of contrast agents on the anticoagulant properties of oral factor Xa inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Contrast agents may affect the anticoagulant properties of novel oral anticoagulants. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of iohexol as a contrast agent on the anticoagulant activity of oral factor Xa inhibitors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 65 individuals who underwent contrast computed tomography(CT). Group 1 comprised 20 patients using rivaroxaban, Group 2, 20 patients using apixaban, and Group 3, 20 patients using edoxaban. Group 4 was the control group of five healthy volunteers. Iohexol (60 mL) was used as a contrast agent. Blood samples of 2 mL were withdrawn into two tubes at 4 h after the drug dose and 1 h after the contrast CT (CT was performed 3 h after the drug was taken) from all the patients, and for the control group, at any time before and 1 h after contrast CT. The anticoagulant properties of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban were evaluated using anti-factor Xa levels. RESULTS: The anti-factor Xa level was increased after using the contrast agent in the rivaroxaban group (0.66 ± 0.32 U/mL vs. 0.67 ± 0.32 U/mL; P = 0.01) and the edoxaban group (0.74 ± 0.35 U/mL vs. 0.76 ± 0.36 U/mL; P = 0.006). No significant difference was observed in the apixaban group (0.66 ± 0.33 U/mL vs. 0.66 ± 0.32 U/mL; P = 0.21) and control group (0.02 ± 0.01 U/mL vs. 0.03 ± 0.01 U/mL; P = 0.33). CONCLUSION: The anticoagulant properties of rivaroxaban and edoxaban tended to increase significantly, but there was no statistically significant difference in the anticoagulant properties of apixaban after the administration of contrast agent. To determine whether the small laboratory difference has a clinical effect, there is a need for larger clinical trials (NCT04611386).

Heparin Monitoring with an Anti-Xa Protocol Compared to Activated Clotting Time in Patients on Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.

BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices are used for patients with severe cardiac or respiratory failure; however, these patients are at high risk for clotting and bleeding. The best method to monitor heparin in these patients has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risks for bleeding and clotting while monitoring heparin with either anti-Xa or activated clotting time (ACT) in tMCS patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on tMCS patients who received heparin adjusted according to an anti-Xa or ACT protocol. The primary outcome was incidence of major bleeding. Pertinent secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, clotting events, and time to therapeutic range. RESULTS: There were 103 patients included in the study: 53 in the ACT group and 50 in the anti-Xa group. Overall, there were 30 (56.6%) patients with major bleeding in the ACT group, compared with 16 (32%) patients in the anti-Xa group (P = 0.017). An anti-Xa-based protocol was associated with a decreased hazard of major bleeding (hazard ratio = 0.388 [0.215-0.701]; P = 0.002) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariable analysis, an anti-Xa protocol remained associated with a significantly lower hazard of bleeding. Findings were similar when broken down into more discrete subgroups of the entire cohort, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation life support (ECMO), and non-ECMO groups. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Anti-Xa monitoring was associated with a lower hazard of bleeding during tMCS compared to an ACT-based protocol. Further studies should evaluate if anti-Xa monitoring should be preferentially used in tMCS.

Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Anti-Xa Level Monitoring Versus Standard Monitoring in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (FxaIs) are renally eliminated; thus, acute kidney injury (AKI) may increase the risk for drug accumulation and bleeding. There is minimal data describing the effects of AKI on FxaI anti-Xa levels or clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare anti-Xa level monitoring with standard monitoring in patients who experience AKI on apixaban or rivaroxaban. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients admitted within a large hospital system from May 2016 to October 2020. Patients were included if they received apixaban or rivaroxaban prior to AKI. Patients were stratified into 1 of 2 groups: those with anti-Xa level monitoring or those who received standard monitoring. The primary outcome was major bleeding as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in the final analysis. Major bleeding occurred in 2 patients who received anti-Xa level monitoring, compared with 14 patients who received standard monitoring (2.1% vs 14%; P < 0.01). Variables identified as predictors of major bleeding included a documented history of liver disease (adjusted odds ratio = 3.17; 95% CI = 1.04-9.67; P = 0.04) and antiplatelet use (adjusted odds ratio = 4.18; 95% CI = 1.28-13.7; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the first study to demonstrate that anti-Xa level monitoring was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding compared with standard monitoring in patients with AKI who received apixaban or rivaroxaban. The optimal management of antithrombotic medications in patients with AKI and recent exposure to an FxaI requires further investigation.

Effectiveness and Safety of Lower Dose of Rivaroxaban for Cancer-Related Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Primary and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) commonly occur in patients with cancer. However, because of the National Health Insurance regulations, available dosage forms, and clinical conditions, the prescribed dose of rivaroxaban may not be consistent with its recommended dose. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 6-month recurrence rate of VTE and safety of rivaroxaban for patients with cancer. METHODS: Patients with new cancer diagnosis or recurrence from 2014 to 2018 who initiated rivaroxaban for VTE from January 2015 to January 2019 were included. We set the rivaroxaban initiation date as the index date and followed up the patients for 180 days. We collected information regarding the starting and maintenance dose/frequency and the treatment duration. The efficacy outcome was the recurrence of VTE within 180 days. The safety outcome included the major bleeding rate and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) rate. RESULTS: Approximately, 46.2% of the 65 included patients received a standard starting dose, and 45% of patients received a maintenance dose above 15 mg (median: 23.9 and 13.1 mg per day, respectively). Two-thirds of the patients stopped treatment within 180 days. Recurrent VTE occurred in 2 (3.1%) patients within 6 months. The major bleeding rate was 7.7%, and the CRNMB rate was 3.1%. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The 6-month recurrence rate of VTE and safety profile were similar between the lower and standard dose of rivaroxaban. This result may be applied to the institutions with dosage availability limited by formulary regulation and patients who cannot use full dose because of clinical considerations.

Rivaroxaban population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling in Iranian patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Although predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of rivaroxaban allow fixed dosing regimens without routine coagulation monitoring, there is still the necessity to monitor and predict the effects of rivaroxaban in specific conditions and different populations. The current study was designed and conducted to analyze the rivaroxaban population pharmacokinetics in Iranian patients and establish a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict the relationship between rivaroxaban concentration and its anticoagulant activity. METHODS: A sequential nonlinear mixed effect pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling method was used to establish the relation between rivaroxaban concentration and anti-factor Xa activity, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) as pharmacodynamic biomarkers in a population of sixty-nine Iranian patients under treatment with oral rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban plasma concentration was quantified by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The typical population values (inter-individual variability%) of the oral volume of distribution and clearance for a one-compartment model were 61.2 L (21%) and 3.68 L·h-1 (61%), respectively. Creatinine clearance and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score were found to affect the clearance. A direct link linear structural model best fitted the data for both prothrombin time and aPTT. The baseline estimates of aPTT and prothrombin time in the population were 35.0 (15%) and 12.6 (2%) seconds, respectively. The slope of the relationship between apTT, prothrombin time, and rivaroxaban concentration was 0.033 (28%) and 0.018 (54%) s·ml·ng-1 , respectively. The selected model for anti-factor Xa activity consisted of a direct link inhibitory Emax model with Hill coefficient. The maximum level of inhibition (Emax ) was 4 IU·ml-1 . The concentration of rivaroxaban producing 50% of the maximum inhibitory effect (EC50 ) was 180 (24%) ng·ml-1 , and Hill coefficient (γ) was 1.44 (108%). No covariates showed a statistically significant effect on PT and activated partial thromboplastin time prolonging properties and anti-factor Xa activity. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed that pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models similar to those of the other studies describe the relationship between the rivaroxaban concentration and its anticoagulant effect in Iranian patients. However, considerable differences were observed in the parameters of the pharmacodynamics-pharmacokinetic models with the results of other reports that can explain the unpredictable effects of rivaroxaban in some patients.

Unfractionated heparin using actual body weight without dose capping in obese pediatric patients-Subgroup analysis from an observational cohort study.

To evaluate the correlation between an uncapped, actual body weight-based unfractionated heparin dosing strategy, we performed a body mass index-based subanalysis of a previously reported pediatric cohort. Nearly half (45%) of obese patients were supra-therapeutic on initial anti-FXa assessment. Obese patients achieved therapeutic anti-FXa significantly faster than nonobese patients (median 4 vs 12 hours, P = .0192) and were more likely to have any supra-therapeutic anti-FXa levels (77% vs 35%; P = .0021). There was no statistically significant difference in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding rates between weight categories (P = .69). Prospective pediatric studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Effectiveness of a Calculation-Free Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Nomogram With Anti-Xa Level Monitoring Compared With Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time.

BACKGROUND: Accurate monitoring of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) is essential to mitigate the risk of adverse drug events associated with dosing errors. Although recent data support anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) monitoring preferentially over activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to improve time to therapeutic anticoagulation, the utility of incorporating anti-Xa monitoring with a calculation-free weight-based UFH nomogram has not been formally evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the time to therapeutic anticoagulation of a calculation-free weight-based UFH nomogram integrated with anti-Xa monitoring versus a historical control of aPTT monitoring utilizing manual dose calculations. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with anti-Xa monitoring and a novel calculation-free weight-based UFH nomogram compared with a historical control with aPTT monitoring and manual calculations. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients in the aPTT cohort and 100 patients in the anti-Xa cohort were analyzed. The anti-Xa cohort achieved goal therapeutic target 3.8 hours sooner than the aPTT cohort (P = 0.03). Patients with anti-Xa monitoring required 1 fewer adjustment per 2.5 patient-days of UFH with the venous thromboembolism nomogram (P = 0.02). Patients in the aPTT cohort required more infusion interruptions because of supratherapeutic values (P = 0.007) and boluses because of subtherapeutic values (P = 0.044). There were no differences in rates of thromboembolism, major bleeding, or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding between the cohorts. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrated that anti-Xa UFH monitoring integrated with a calculation-free nomogram results in faster time to therapeutic anticoagulation and fewer dose adjustments compared with aPTT monitoring with manual calculations.

Performance Assessment of a Multifaceted Unfractionated Heparin Dosing Protocol in Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator.

BACKGROUND: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) support devices are associated with complications, including bleeding and thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the gold standard anticoagulant in ECMO patients. Clinically, UFH is monitored through activated clotting time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and anti-factor Xa assay. It is unknown which assay best predicts anticoagulation effects in adults. OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation of UFH dosing and monitoring using an established protocol. METHODS: A pilot, prospective cohort, historically controlled study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients ≥18 years-old who received ECMO on the multifaceted anticoagulation protocol were included and compared with those on the conventional method of anticoagulation. The primary end point was to assess the correlation between UFH dose and different monitoring methods throughout 72 hours using the new protocol guided by ACT and anti-factor Xa assay. RESULTS: In each arm, 20 patients were enrolled. The study revealed that anti-factor Xa assay had the largest number of "strong" correlations 11/20 (55%), followed by both aPTT and aPTT ratio 10/20 (50%), and, finally, ACT 2/20 (10%). Concordance between anti-factor Xa assay and the other monitoring parameters in the prospective arm was generally low: 31% with aPTT ratio, 26% with ACT, and 23% with aPTT. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The adaption of a multifaceted anticoagulation protocol using anti-factor Xa assay may provide a better prediction of heparin dosing in adults ECMO patients compared with the conventional ACT-based protocol. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and different monitoring modalities.

Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban Following Bioprosthetic Valve Replacements: A Retrospective Evaluation.

Background: Data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in the setting of bioprosthetic valve replacements is limited. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe outcomes among patients who underwent a bioprosthetic valve replacement and were subsequently prescribed apixaban. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was completed for inpatients at a community hospital who were prescribed apixaban following a bioprosthetic valve replacement from 2015 to 2020. Endpoints assessed included incidence of all-cause readmission and emergency visits within 3 months following valvular surgery, incidence of mortality, and all-cause major and minor bleeding. A post hoc analysis was conducted comparing outcomes among patients who underwent mitral versus aortic valve replacement, as well as patients with and without atrial fibrillation. The study was deemed exempt by hospital and university institutional review boards. Results: A total of 54 patients were included for analysis. All-cause readmission or emergency visit occurred in 33% (n = 18) of patients and the mortality rate was 6% (n = 3). A minor bleeding event was reported in 6% (n = 3) of patients and a major bleeding event was reported in 2% (n = 1) of patients. A thrombotic event was reported in 2% (n = 1) of patients. Conclusion: Within this cohort of patients requiring anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve replacement, apixaban was safe and well-tolerated. However, more prospective data are needed to further correlate the safety and efficacy of apixaban, particularly in the setting of mitral valve replacement.

International external quality assessment for measurements of direct oral anticoagulants: results and recommendations.

There is limited information regarding the performance of tests for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). To generate more knowledge, the accuracy of DOAC tests were evaluated using external quality assessment data from multiple years. This data demonstrated a good correlation for the tests with a small overall interlaboratory variability (10% for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban and 12% for edoxaban). The greatest differences between the various reagents were observed for rivaroxaban, especially for concentrations below 100 ng/ml. In conclusion, the results show overall reliable DOAC levels with some differences between reagent groups. Important finding: clinical decision criteria could be affected by the choice of reagent.

Anti-Factor Xa Activity of Standard and Japan-Specific Doses of Rivaroxaban in Thai Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Recommended rivaroxaban doses for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) are 20 and 15 mg/day in patients with normal and reduced renal function, respectively, but lower doses (15 and 10 mg) have been tested and approved in Japan. It is not known whether 15 and 10 mg rivaroxaban are appropriate in other Asian populations. This study compared the anti-Factor Xa (FXa) activity of 20 and 15 mg rivaroxaban in Thai patients with normal renal function and 15 and 10 mg rivaroxaban in patients with reduced renal function.Methods and Results:Sixty non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving rivaroxaban (mean [±SD] age 69.3±9.1 years, mean creatinine clearance 59.2±22.7 mL/min) were enrolled. The anti-FXa activity of standard rivaroxaban and Japan-specific doses was measured at peak and trough concentrations. Median anti-FXa activity at peak concentrations was significantly higher for the standard than Japan-specific dose. Median anti-FXa activity measured at the trough was significantly higher for the standard dose only in those with impaired renal function. A higher proportion of patients receiving the Japan-specific rather than standard dose had anti-FXa activity at peak concentrations within the expected range (87.7% vs. 64.4%; P=0.001). One-third of those receiving the standard dose had anti-FXa activity higher than the expected range. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly higher proportion of Thai patients receiving the Japan-specific dose of rivaroxaban had anti-FXa activity at peak concentrations within the expected range.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Nadroparin Administration for Thromboprophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients on Vasopressors.

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients are exposed to a high risk of developing thromboembolism. Moreover, standard prophylaxis with subcutaneous (SC) heparin is less efficient in patients requiring vasopressors. The aim is a comparison of pharmacokinetics between SC and intravenous (IV) applied nadroparin. METHODS: Thirty-eight ventilated ICU patients requiring vasopressor support were randomized into a single dose of nadroparin 3,800 IU (0.4 mL) subcutaneously (SC group) or 1,900 IU (0.2 mL) intravenously (IV group). Anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) was observed over 24 h; data are stated as median (IQR). RESULTS: Peak anti-Xa was significantly higher in the IV group 0.42 (0.39-0.43) IU/mL than in the SC group 0.16 (0.09-0.18) IU/mL (p < 0.001). There was a trend towards higher area under the curve (AUC) of anti-Xa in the SC group 1.41 (0.41-1.80) IU/mL × h than in the IV group 1.04 (0.93-1.13) IU/mL × h (p = 0.08). In the SC group, there was a negative correlation between anti-Xa AUC and both capillary refill time Xa (r = -0.86) and norepinephrine dose (r = -0.68). In the IV group, anti-Xa decrease half-life was 1.6 (1.4-2.0) h. CONCLUSIONS: IV administration of 1,900 IU of nadroparin led to a predictable effective peak anti-Xa. After SC administration, anti-Xa was heterogeneous and significantly influenced by peripheral perfusion.

Anti-Factor Xa-Based Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin: Clinical Outcomes in a Pediatric Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical outcomes in children treated with unfractionated heparin and monitored using an anti-factor Xa (Anti-FXa)-based nomogram. We also sought to assess the correlation between activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and Anti-FXa. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, observational cohort study conducted over a 20-month period that included all pediatric patients (<21 years) who received therapeutic unfractionated heparin and were monitored using an anti-FXa-based nomogram. RESULTS: In total, 95 patients met prespecified inclusion criteria, and 1098 pairs of APTT and Anti-FXa measurements were performed. The median unfractionated heparin dose required to reach therapeutic Anti-FXa goal was significantly greater in infants compared with older children (P <.0001). The median time to achieve therapeutic Anti-FXa was 10 hours (range 2-96 hours) and was significantly shorter in patients who received a bolus compared with those who did not (P = .03). Five (5.3%) major bleeding events were noted. Age, peak Anti-FXa, peak APTT, lowest platelet count, and fibrinogen were not predictive of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeds. Moderate correlation between the APTT and Anti-FXa (r = 0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.77) assays was appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: Using an anti-FXa-based nomogram to monitor unfractionated heparin in children is feasible. Although moderate correlation was observed between the APTT and Anti-FXa assays, the APTT frequently overestimated heparin activity. Safety and efficacy of an Anti-FXa nomogram needs further validation.

Comparing Anti-Factor Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Levels for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin.

Background: Lab tests such as activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels are typically used to monitor intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV heparin), with recent evidence suggesting that anti-Xa levels may provide a more accurate measure of anticoagulation. Objective: The Lexington Veterans Affairs Health Care System transitioned from using aPTT to anti-Xa levels in January 2017. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this change. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing all patients receiving IV heparin per protocol for at least 24 hours from August 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017 (aPTT group), and February 1, 2017, to July 31, 2017 (anti-Xa group). The primary objective was a comparison of IV heparin doses required to achieve goal range between the 2 cohorts. Secondary objectives included a comparison of time to therapeutic goal, percentage of time within goal range, number of rate changes until therapeutic goal, and adverse outcomes, such as number of bleeds. Results: A total of 155 patients were included in this study. Significantly higher IV heparin doses were required to achieve therapeutic goal in the anti-Xa group, despite significantly fewer IV heparin rate changes required. Anti-Xa monitoring was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Conclusion and Relevance: Significantly higher IV heparin doses were required to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels after transitioning from an aPTT-based protocol in the largely unstudied veteran population. However, the transition from aPTT to anti-Xa monitoring appears safe and efficacious in these patients.

Evaluation of global laboratory methods and establishing on-therapy ranges for monitoring apixaban and rivaroxaban: Experience at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The aim of this study was to find appropriate methods of monitoring the anticoagulant effects of are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and establish on-therapy ranges using conventional tests. METHODS: A total of 184 samples were collected from 91 patients receiving DOACs. Concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban in plasma were accessed by an anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay. PT, APTT, antithrombin, D-dimer, dRVVT screen/confirm, FDP, and fibrinogen levels were measured. On-therapy ranges were calculated by substituting previously reported trough plasma concentrations of DOACs. RESULTS: Anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay-based DOACs levels were 26.0-279.5 (115.9 ± 56.5) ng/mL for apixaban at 2.5 mg BID, 19.9-565.1 (205.3 ± 162.4) ng/mL for apixaban at 5 mg BID, 2.3-395.3 (205.3 ± 162.4) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 15 mg OD, 3.6-494.8 (119.6 ± 95.1) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 20 mg OD, and 9.6-431.4 (140.8 ± 113.6) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 15 mg BID. PT (%), antithrombin, and dRVVT confirm tests showed good correlation with plasma apixaban levels. Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations were correlated well with PT (sec), PT (%),and dRVVT confirm results. On-therapy ranges established for dRVVT confirm test by linear regression were as follows: 1.32-1.52 for apixaban 2.5 mg BID, 1.12-1.75 for apixaban 5 mg BID, 1.11-1.78 for rivaroxaban 15 mg OD, 1.09-1.64 for rivaroxaban 20 mg OD, and 1.22-1.81 for rivaroxaban 20 mg BID. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban concentrations were well correlated with PT (%), antithrombin, and dRVVT confirm test. Rivaroxaban concentrations showed good correlation with PT (sec), PT (%), and dRVVT confirm test.

Andexanet Alfa: A Recombinant Modified Human Factor Xa Protein for Drug Reversal of Rivaroxaban and Apixaban.

Objective: To review the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy of andexanet alfa (andexanet), a recombinant modified human factor Xa protein for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. Data Sources: English-language articles were obtained from MEDLINE (1966 to February 2019) using the following key words: andexanet, andexanet alfa, AndexXa, factor Xa, antidote, and reversal. Citations from selected articles were used to identify additional sources. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Available published articles reporting results of human studies of andexanet alfa were reviewed for inclusion. Prescribing information was used to obtain additional information regarding pharmacology, adverse events, contraindications, and precautions. Data Synthesis: Andexanet is a recombinant modified human factor Xa protein indicated for reversal of rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Onset of action is rapid and sustained throughout bolus and infusion administration. Medication effects subside 1 to 3 hours postadministration. Andexanet is administered as a bolus followed by a 120-minute continuous infusion. Anti-factor Xa activity was reduced by 95% and 92% in apixaban and rivaroxaban groups, respectively, on infusion completion. Thrombin regeneration occurred within 2 to 5 minutes in up to 96% of patients. Minor infusion reactions and gastrointestinal upset were reported most. A black box warning for thrombotic events, cardiac arrest, ischemia, and sudden death should be noted. Conclusions: Andexanet is effective in reversing rivaroxaban and apixaban anticoagulation due to reduction of anti-factor Xa activity in healthy patients and those with acute major bleeds. Safety concerns, including thrombotic risks, exist and should be assessed against individual patient factors.