Detrusor relaxing agents for neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence regarding the therapeutic benefits and safety of oral detrusor relaxing agents (DRAs) in treating neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed on 1 September 2022. Two authors independently reviewed the articles to extract data using a pre-designed form. The meta-analysis was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A common-effect or random-effects model was used based on the heterogeneity among studies. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was further performed to make indirect comparisons of antimuscarinics and mirabegron. RESULTS: A total of 23 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 1697 patients were included in our analysis. Compared to placebo, the clinical benefits of oral DRAs, along with more adverse events (AEs), were demonstrated in the treatment of NDO. In the subgroup analysis, antimuscarinics significantly improved both urodynamic and bladder diary outcomes (including urinary incontinence episodes, urinary frequency, and residual volume), with a higher rate of AEs, such as xerostomia. Mirabegron improved some of the parameters and had fewer bothersome side-effects in patients with NDO. The NMA showed that none of the antimuscarinics or mirabegron was superior or inferior to the other. CONCLUSIONS: Detrusor relaxing agents are associated with improved outcomes in patients with NDO and our analysis has added new evidence regarding antimuscarinics. Evidence concerning mirabegron as first-line therapy for NDO is still limited. Well-designed RCTs are still required in this specific population.

What is the best first choice oral drug therapy for OAB?

AIMS: The management of overactive bladder (OAB) involves lifestyle changes and conservative measures in the first instance with the use of liquid/dietary advice, weight loss, and bladder training. Thereafter oral pharmacotherapy is instigated in symptomatic patients. Antimuscarinics and beta 3 agonists form the main classes of drug therapy in this field. Views on what is the best first line OAB treatment is changing based on recent evidence and adverse event profiles of these medications. METHODS: At the ICI-RS meeting 2023, Bristol, UK this topic was discussed and debated as a proposal. The following article summarizes the concepts presented that day as well as the interactive discussion that took place thereafter. RESULTS: OAB guidelines are moving in many circumstances to an either antimuscarinic or beta 3 agonist approach based on patient factors. Several studies have raised concerns on the long-term impact of antimuscarinics, in relation to cognition, dementia, cardiovascular events, and mortality all related to antimuscarinic load. Neither antimuscarinics nor beta 3 agonists have good persistence and adherence rates in the medium to long term. Several barriers also exist to prescribing including guidelines recommending utilizing drugs with the lowest acquisition cost and "step therapy." A newer approach to managing OAB is personalized therapy in view of the many possible etiological factors and phenotypes. These concepts are highlighted in this article. CONCLUSIONS: Current oral pharmacotherapy in managing OAB is limited by adverse events, adherence and persistence problems. Both antimuscarinics and beta 3 agonists are efficacious but most clinical trials demonstrate significant placebo effects in this field. Personalizing treatment to the individual seems a logical approach to OAB. There is a need for better treatments and further studies are required of existing treatments with high quality longer term outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of an α1 -blocker plus mirabegron compared with an α1 -blocker plus antimuscarinic in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and overactive bladder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIM: Antimuscarinics and the ß3-adrenoreceptor agonist, mirabegron, are commonly used for treating patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and α1 -adrenoreceptor antagonists (α1 -blockers) are the main pharmacological agents used for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). As these conditions commonly occur together, the aim of this systematic review was to identify publications that compared the use of an α1 -blocker plus mirabegron with an α1 -blocker plus antimuscarinic in men with LUTS secondary to BPH and OAB. A meta-analysis was subsequently conducted to explore the safety and efficacy of these combinations. METHODS: Included records had to be from a parallel-group, randomized clinical trial that was ≥8 weeks in duration. Participants were male with LUTS secondary to BPH and OAB. The indirect analyses that were identified compared an α1 -blocker plus OAB agent with an α1 -blocker plus placebo. The PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, the Excerpta Medica Database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for relevant records up until March 5, 2020. Safety outcomes included incidences of overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and urinary retention, postvoid residual volume, and maximum urinary flow (Qmax ). Primary efficacy outcomes were micturitions/day, incontinence episodes/day, and urgency episodes/day, and secondary outcomes were Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and International Prostate Symptom Score. A Bayesian network meta-analysis approach was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1039 records identified, 24 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the α1 -blocker plus mirabegron and α1 -blocker plus antimuscarinic groups in terms of the comparisons identified for all the safety and efficacy analyses conducted. Numerically superior results were frequently observed for the α1 -blocker plus mirabegron group compared with the α1 -blocker plus antimuscarinic group for the safety parameters, including TEAEs, urinary retention, and Qmax . For some of the efficacy parameters, most notably micturitions/day, numerically superior results were noted for the α1 -blocker plus antimuscarinic group. Inconsistency in reporting and study variability were noted in the included records, which hindered data interpretation. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that an α1 -blocker plus mirabegron and an α1 -blocker plus antimuscarinic have similar safety and efficacy profiles in male patients with LUTS secondary to BPH and OAB. Patients may, therefore, benefit from the use of either combination within the clinical setting.

Effects of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Women Refractory to and Never Used Pharmacological Agents for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) on quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters related to incontinence in pharmacological agents (PhAs) naive and refractory women with idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB). METHODS: In this prospective nonrandomized clinical trial, women with resistance to PhAs were included in the first group (n=21), PhA-naive women were included in the second group (n=21). TTNS was performed 2 days a week, a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks. Every session lasted 30 min. Women were evaluated for the severity of incontinence (Pad test), 3-day voiding diary (voiding frequency, nocturia, incontinence episodes, and number of pads), symptom severity (Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-V8), quality of life (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7), treatment satisfaction, positive response, and cure-improvement rates. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement was found in all parameters for each group at the 6th week compared with the baseline values (p<0.05). It was found that the severity of incontinence, incontinence episodes, symptom severity, treatment satisfaction, and QoL parameters were significantly improved in PhA-naive group compared with the PhA-resistant group at the 6th week (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of voiding, nocturia, and number of pads between the two groups (p>0.05). Positive response rates, the primary outcome measure, were statistically significantly higher in the PhA-naive group than in the PhA-resistant group. CONCLUSIONS: Although TTNS is more effective in PhA-naive women with iOAB, it appears to be an effective therapy that can also be used in the management of PhA-resistant women with iOAB.

Comparison of the efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation in women with idiopathic overactive bladder naive and refractory to pharmacological agents.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intravaginal electrical stimulation (IVES) with regard to quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters related to incontinence in women with idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) naive or refractory to treatment with pharmacological agents (PhA). METHODS: In this prospective trial, PhA-naive women were included in Group 1 (n = 24) and women with PhA-resistant iOAB were included in Group 2 (n = 24). IVES was performed 3 days a week, with a total of 24 sessions for 8 weeks. Every session lasted 20 minutes. Women were evaluated for the severity of incontinence (24-hour pad test), pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength (perineometer), 3-day voiding diary (frequency of voiding, nocturia, incontinence episodes, and the number of pads), symptom severity (OAB-V8), quality of life (IIQ-7), treatment success (positive response rate), cure/improvement rate, and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement was found in all parameters for each group at the 8th week compared to the baseline values (p < 0.05). At the 8th week, there were no statistically significant differences in the severity of incontinence, PFM strength, incontinence episodes, nocturia, number of pads, QoL, treatment satisfaction, cure-improvement, or positive response rates between the two groups (p > 0.05). It was found that the frequency of voiding and symptom severity parameters were significantly more improved in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although IVES was more effective in PhA-naive women with iOAB, it also appears to be an effective treatment in the management of women with PhA-resistant iOAB. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under no. NCT05416450.

Pharmacological prophylaxis with pyridostigmine bromide against nerve agents adversely impact on airway function in an ex vivo rat precision-cut lung slice model.

The carbamate pyridostigmine bromide (PB) is the only fielded pharmacological prophylaxis for military use against nerve agents. Previous studies have shown differences in the PB-pretreatment efficacy for various nerve agents and in the influence of post-exposure treatment with common antidotes. In the present study, the aim was to evaluate the possibility of using an ex vivo rat precision-cut lung slice model to determine the impact of PB pretreatment on VX-induced bronchoconstriction. In addition, the efficacy of post-exposure treatment with atropine sulfate following PB-prophylaxis was investigated.Bronchoconstriction was induced by electric-field stimulation and was significantly aggravated by 10 µM PB. Airway recovery was decreased by both 1 and 10 µM PB. Evaluation of acetylcholineesterese inhibition by PB showed that the lower concentration met the clinical criteria of residual enzyme activity while the higher concentration completely inhibited the activity. Exposure to VX with or without pretreatment demonstrated similar contractions. However, VX-incubation following pretreatment caused decreased airway relaxation compared to pretreatment alone. Atropine treatment following PB- and VX-exposure significantly decreased the maximum airway contraction and increased the relaxation.In conclusion, no beneficial effect of PB-prophylaxis on VX-induced contractions was observed. The atropine efficacy to relax airways was significant demonstrating the importance of efficient post-exposure therapeutics to protect against the life-threatening respiratory contractions.

[Assessment of prescribing practices in overactive bladder pharmacotherapy across different specialties of India: a prescription trend analysis].

PURPOSE: To assess the prescribing practices for overactive bladder (OAB) pharmacotherapy based on the prescription trend analysis across different specialties of India. METHOD: s: IQVIA (Quintiles and IMS Health) secondary sales audit (SSA), as well as a prescription audit for antimuscarinics and beta-3 adrenoceptor agonists (mirabegron) from 2014 to 2021, were analyzed. The data includes SSA data of various antimuscarinics like solifenacin, oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, trospium and mirabegron change in the prescription trend of antimuscarinics and mirabegron across different specialties; prescribers overlap analysis for solifenacin and mirabegron among Indian urologists were also analyzed. RESULTS: Urologists prescription rates of OAB drugs were 65% in 2016 and 54% in 2021. The rate of OAB medication prescription by non-urologist was highest from the surgeon (11%), followed by gynecologists (9%) and consultant physicians (8%) in 2021. In addition, among OAB medication prescription rates for antimuscarinics were 100% in 2016 and 58% in 2021 whereas for mirabegron, it was 0% in 2016 and 42% in 2021. Solifenacin was most frequently prescribed anticholinergics, followed by oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, and trospium. The proportion of prescribers of OAB medication among urologists was 38% in 2016 and 33% in 2021. Exclusive prescribers of solifenacin were 748 in 2018 and 739 in 2021 at the urologist, whereas for mirabegron, it was 961 in 2018 and 934 in 2021. The compound annual growth rate for prescription of the last 6 years (from 2016-2021) for solifenacin and mirabegron was -3% and 8% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Urology remained a top prescribing specialty for OAB drugs, although prescription share increased at surgeon and consultant physician. OAB medicines prescriptions by urologists are shifting from leading antimuscarinic solifenacin to beta-agonist mirabegron. Data from this study will ultimately lead to the OAB medication preference by the specialist that could lead to more advanced OAB management.

[Impact of the SARS-CV-2 virus on the urinary bladder].

INTRODUCTION: There are publications about the impact of a new coronavirus infection (COVID) on the lower urinary tract, including the development of overactive bladder (OAB) or COVID-associated cystitis. The cause of dysuria in patients with COVID is not fully understood. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 14 consecutive patients after COVID with complaints of frequent urination with urgency were included in the study. The main inclusion criterion was the development or worsening of OAB symptoms after resolution of COVID, confirmed by the eradication of SARS-CoV-2 by a polymerase chain reaction. The severity of OAB was assessed using the International Scale of Symptoms (Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, OABSS). RESULTS: Three (21.4%) out of fourteen patients had OAB symptoms prior to COVID, while in 11 (78.6%) patients OAB symptoms developed in post-COVID period. In 4 patients (28.6% of the entire cohort and 36.4% of patients in de novo group) urge urinary incontinence and urgency developed. The average score on the OABSS scale in patients with baseline OAB was 6.7+/-0.8, which corresponded to the moderate severity. In this group, one patient developed urge urinary incontinence and urgency, which were not present prior to COVID. In a retrospective evaluation of symptoms before the COVID, their average score on the OABSS scale was 5.2 +/- 0.7, i.e., past COVID led to an increase in OAB symptoms by 1.5 points. In patients with OAB de novo, the symptoms were less pronounced, with a score of 5.1+/-0.6 points, that is between mild and moderate OAB. At the same time, urinalysis in 9 patients did not have signs of inflammation: in 5 cases, 5-7 white blood cells per field of view was seen only once. A follow-up urine test was normal, suggesting contamination. None of the cases revealed bacteriuria over 102 CFU/ml. All patients were prescribed trospium chloride at a dose of 30 mg per day. The choice of the drug was due to the absence of a negative effect on the central nervous system, which is very important both during COVID and in post-COVID period, since the neurotoxicity of SARS-CoV-2 has been proven. CONCLUSION: A past history of COVID led to an increase in OAB symptoms by 1.5 points in patients who had OAB prior to infection. In 11 patients, after the treatment of COVID, the moderate symptoms of OAB developed de novo. Our small study showed the importance of focusing the attention of internists and infectious disease doctors on urination disorders in patients with COVID and timely referral to a urologist. For the treatment of post-COVID OAB, trospium chloride is the drug of choice, as it does not aggravate the potential neurotoxicity of SARS-CoV-2.

Changes in overactive bladder medication following bariatric surgery: segmented regression analysis.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery has shown reductions in overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms; however, the impacts on OAB treatment is unknown. The goal of our study is to evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on OAB medication utilization. METHODS: We used IBM® MarketScan® commercial databases from 2005 to 2018. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with 360 days of continuous enrollment before and after bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy) with at least one fill of an OAB medication in the 360 days prior to bariatric surgery. We evaluated all included patients and stratified by surgery type and patient sex. Segmented regression analyses were used to assess the proportion of patients on OAB medications before and after bariatric surgery. We replicated our findings using hip or knee replacement surgery as a negative control. RESULTS: Among the included patients (n = 3069), 92.2% were females, 58.6% underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Immediately following bariatric surgery, the proportion of patients treated with an OAB medication reduced from 34.8 to 14.1% (p < 0.001) resulting in a 59.5% relative reduction. Patients who underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy (63.8% vs. 55.1%) relative reduction (p = 0.009)) and females versus males [62.3% vs. 52.9% relative reduction (p < 0.001)] had a more pronounced reduction in OAB medication use. There was slight decrease in OAB medication use in the negative control analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in OAB medication use following bariatric surgery may be associated with a reduction in OAB symptoms suggesting an additional benefit of bariatric surgery.

Utilization rate and long-term persistence of combination pharmacotherapy with ß3-agonists and antimuscarinics for overactive bladder refractory to monotherapy in a real-world setting.

AIM: To assess real-world treatment profiles, including utilization rate, time to and reasons for discontinuation of combination pharmacotherapy with ß3 -agonists and antimuscarinics for refractory overactive bladder (OAB) through a retrospective chart review. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of OAB patients who received ß3 -agonists or antimuscarinics at our hospital between 2012 and 2020 and analyzed the clinical course of patients who progressed to combination therapy. Data on age, sex, major complaints, OAB symptom score at the initiation of combination therapy, treatment persistence, and reasons for discontinuation were collected. Treatment persistence was assessed with respect to the median time to discontinuation and persistence rate at 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 2163 patients receiving ß3 -agonists or antimuscarinics, only 84 (3.8%) progressed to combination therapy with both drug classes. At therapy initiation, most (98%) of these patients had moderate to severe OAB symptoms. Median treatment duration and 12-month persistence rate for combination therapy were 595 days and 64.0%, respectively. The reasons for discontinuation were insufficient treatment efficacy followed by adverse effects including voiding impairment in nearly 10% of the patients. None of the baseline parameters was independently associated with persistence in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: While underutilized among OAB patients refractory to monotherapy, combination pharmacotherapy showed a greater persistence rate than published mirabegron or antimuscarinic monotherapy when applied to patients with moderate to severe symptoms. Treatment-emergent voiding impairment is a concern associated with this mode of therapy. A small sample size at a single institution is the limitation of this study.

Risk of delirium associated with antimuscarinics in older adults: A case-time-control study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at an increased risk of delirium because of age, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities and acute illness. Antimuscarinics are the backbone of the pharmacological management of overactive bladder. However, the safety profiles of antimuscarinics vary because of their dissimilarities to muscarinic receptor-subtype affinities and are associated with differential central anticholinergic adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine delirium risk in new users of oxybutynin and solifenacin in older adults (≥ 65 years). In the secondary analyses, we examined the risk of delirium by type and dose of antimuscarinic. METHOD: We applied a case-time-control design to investigate delirium risk in older adults who started taking oxybutynin and solifenacin. We used a nationwide inpatient hospital data (2005-2016), National Minimum Data Set, maintained by the Ministry of Health, New Zealand (NZ), to identify older adults with a new-onset diagnosis of delirium. Eligible patients were older adults aged 65 at entry into the cohort on 1/1/2006. We used dispensing claims data to determine antimuscarinic treatment exposure. The antimuscarinic included in the study were new users of oxybutynin and solifenacin. These two antimuscarinics are subsidised by the Pharmaceutical Management Agency and are the most frequently used antimuscarinic in NZ. A conditional logistic regression model was used to compute matched odds ratios (MORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the case-time-control design, we made separate analyses to evaluate the dose-response risk of delirium. RESULTS: We identified 4818 individuals (mean age 82.14) from 2005 to 2015 with incident delirium and were exposed to at least one of the antimuscarinic of interest. The case-time-control matched odds ratio (MOR) for delirium with oxybutynin was (2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.96). Solifenacin was not associated with delirium (0.89 95%CI 0.64-1.23). In the sensitivity analyses, the case-time-control MOR for delirium using a shorter risk period (0-3 days) did not change the results. The dose-response risk of delirium was significant for oxybutynin (0.05, 95%CI 0.02-0.08) but not for solifenacin (-0.01, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.00). In addition, in the subgroup analyses, a statistically significant association of delirium was found for oxybutynin but not for solifenacin in the non-dementia cohort (2.11,95% CI 1.08-4.13) and the dementia cohort (1.25, 95%CI 0.05-26.9). CONCLUSION: The study found that oxybutynin but not solifenacin is associated with a risk of new-onset delirium in older adults. The higher blockade of M1 and M2 receptors by oxybutynin is likely to contribute to delirium than solifenacin, which is highly selective for the M3 receptor subtype. Therefore, the treatment choice with an M3 selective agent must be given due consideration, particularly in those with pre-existing cognitive impairment.

On-demand use of fesoterodine: a new paradigm for extended release antimuscarinics.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to compare on-demand and continuous use of fesoterodine 4 mg concerning efficacy and adverse effects. METHODS: A total of 100 patients who were diagnosed with non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome were included in the study. All patients were evaluated with MMSE, ICIQ-SF, SEAPI quality of health and OAB-V8 questionnaires, at the beginning, 1st month and 4th month. Fesoterodine 4 mg was started for treatment. At the end of the 1st month, patients who obtained benefit from the treatment were 1:1 randomized into two groups. In group 1, fesoterodine 4 mg was given 1 × 1 in a standard manner whereas in group 2 patients took the pills on demand. Both groups were evaluated for efficacy and adverse events at 4 months. RESULTS: Final analyses included 69 patients. At 4-month follow-up, OAB-V8 scores were significantly improved compared to 1 month in both groups. Again at h months, no difference was detected between the two groups for MMSE, ICIQ-SF and SEAPI scores. In continuous usage group, 4th month MMSE scores were significantly lower than 1st month scores. At 4 months, dry mouth and constipation were lower in the on-demand group compared to continuous usage group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard continuous usage, on-demand usage of fesoterodine showed similar efficacy with fewer adverse events.

Therapeutic efficacy and cognitive adverse events of overactive bladder medication in patients with central nervous system Disorders-A cohort study.

PURPOSE: This cohort study evaluates therapeutic efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of various overactive bladder (OAB) medications for patients with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. METHODS: Patients with OAB and CNS disorders were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly allocated to 3 different treatment subgroups: (1) mirabegron 50 mg once daily (2) solifenacin 5 mg per day, and (3) combined solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 50 mg once daily. Efficacy and safety questionnaires and objective parameters were compared among the subgroups, and subgroups between baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment. AEs, including cognitive dysfunction, were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: 102 patients (mean age, 71.8 ± 8.7 years) were enrolled, including 35, 36, and 31 patients received mirabegron monotherapy, solifenacin monotherapy, and combination therapy, respectively. OAB symptoms scores all significantly improved 3 months after treatment in different subgroup. However, PVR increased and VE decreased significantly after treatment in patients receiving solifenacin monotherapy and combination therapy. Dry mouth and constipation were the most common AEs, especially in the solifenacin and combination subgroups. Mild incidence of AEs was noted in patients receiving mirabegron monotherapy. No significant change in MMSE was noted among the subgroups after treatment. CONCLUSION: OAB medication had good therapeutic efficacy in patients who had OAB with CNS disorders, especially in cerebrovascular accident and parkinsonism. No OAB medication or their combination affected cognitive function, whereas minimal AEs were noted with mirabegron. Mirabegron could be recommended as the first choice for managing OAB in these patients.

Aqua: A new questionnaire assessing anticholinergic side effects in neurogenic population (Aqua: Anticholinergic side effects questionnaire).

AIMS: Validate a new questionnaire to assess the side effects secondary to anticholinergics in neurogenic population suffering from Adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (ANLUTD). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, monocentric study in a Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital between February 2015 and April 2020. To allow a full psychometric validation of a questionnaire, the study protocol included 3 steps: qualitative interviews, feasibility study and validation study. The primary outcome was good psychometric properties defined with good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α>0.7) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)>0.7). RESULTS: we included 64 patients with ANLUTD secondary to neurogenic disorders. Feasibility study demonstrate very good acceptation and comprehension for 97% of patients. Validation study showed good internal consistency with Cronbach's α=0,69 and very good ICC=0,73. AQUA is composed with 8 items scoring 0 (no side effect) to 2 (major side effect) for a total score between 0 to 16. Time to fulfill is very quick. Mean score in our population was 4,1 (sd 2,9). CONCLUSION: AQUA is the first validated tool to assess side effects secondary to antimuscarinic treatment for neurogenic population suffering from ANLUTD. LEVEL OF PROOF: 2.

Efficacy of atropine and scopolamine on airway contractions following exposure to the nerve agent VX.

Nerve agents are highly toxic organophosphorus compounds that inhibit acetylcholinesterase resulting in rapid accumulation of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) causing a cholinergic syndrome including respiratory failure. In the present study, respiratory responses and antimuscarinic treatment efficacy was evaluated ex vivo using rat precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) exposed to the nerve agent VX. The respiratory effects were evaluated either by adding exogenous ACh directly to the culture medium or by applying electric-field stimulation (EFS) to the PCLS to achieve a release of endogenous ACh from neurons in the lung tissue. The airway contraction induced by both methods was enhanced by VX and resulted in lingering airway recovery, in particular when airways were exposed to a high VX-dose. Both contractions induced by EFS and exogenously added ACh were significantly reduced by administration of the antimuscarinic drugs atropine or scopolamine. Two additions of atropine or scopolamine after maximal ACh-induced airway response was demonstrated effective to reverse the contraction. By adding consecutive doubled doses of antimuscarinics, high efficiency to reduce the cholinergic airway response was observed. However, the airways were not completely recovered by atropine or scopolamine, indicating that non-muscarinic mechanisms were involved in the smooth muscle contractions. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that antimuscarinic treatment reversed airway contraction induced by VX but supplemental pharmacological interventions are needed to fully recover the airways. Further studies should therefore clarify the mechanisms of physiological responses in lung tissue following nerve agent exposures to improve the medical management of poisoned individuals.

Mirabegron has longer treatment persistence than antimuscarinics: Real-world data from a Korean national cohort database.

AIMS: To descriptively evaluate treatment persistence among adults who received mirabegron or antimuscarinics in South Korea. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective analysis of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) database. Patients (≥18 years) who had a new prescription for an overactive bladder (OAB) target medication (mirabegron/antimuscarinic) within an 8-month index period (July 1, 2015-February 29, 2016) were included. The date when the target (index) medication was dispensed was the index date. The 6-month period before the index date was used to assess patient eligibility. A 12-month post-index period was used to assess medication persistence, which was defined as the time to discontinuation. Overall data were analyzed and the results were also stratified by age group (≤65, >65 years), sex, or prior OAB medication experience. Persistence rates were calculated after the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months. RESULTS: A data set of 52 722 cases was obtained (mirabegron: 11 424, antimuscarinics: 41 298). The mean age was 60.9 ± 16.1 years and the majority of the patients were female (30 862 [58.5%] patients). Median persistence was longer with mirabegron (51 days) versus antimuscarinics (25 days). The persistence rate with mirabegron was higher throughout the study compared with all the antimuscarinics (12-month data: 13.5% and 4.9%, respectively). Longer treatment persistence was noted in older, male, and treatment-experienced patients. CONCLUSION: The results from the HIRA database showed that persistence was longer with mirabegron than with antimuscarinics in South Korea. This finding may help inform clinical decision-making within the South Korean healthcare system.

Increased risk of incident dementia following use of anticholinergic agents: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Long-term treatment with anticholinergic agents may increase the risk of cognitive impairment or dementia. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of ≥3 months of exposure to anticholinergics as a class on the risk of dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and change in cognitive function. The impact of anticholinergic agents specifically used to treat overactive bladder was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify English language articles evaluating the impact of anticholinergic use for ≥3 months on dementia or cognitive function in adult patients. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were reported. RESULTS: A total of 2122 records were identified. Out of those, 21 studies underwent qualitative synthesis and 6 reported endpoints relevant for inclusion in a meta-analysis assessing the risk of incident dementia. The overall rate ratio for incident dementia was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.17-1.81; 95% PI: 0.70-3.04; n = 6). The risk of incident dementia increased with increasing exposure (n = 3). In addition, two studies from the meta-analysis reported an increased risk of dementia with ≥3 months of use of bladder antimuscarinics (adjusted odds ratios ranged from 1.21 to 1.65, depending on exposure category). CONCLUSION: Anticholinergic use for ≥3 months increased the risk of dementia on average by an estimated 46% versus nonuse. This relationship was consistent in studies assessing overactive bladder medications. The risk of developing dementia should be carefully considered in the context of potential benefit before prescribing anticholinergics.

Comparative risk of adverse outcomes associated with nonselective and selective antimuscarinic medications in older adults with dementia and overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: The differential muscarinic receptor selectivity could cause selective antimuscarinics to offer advantages over nonselective agents with respect to adverse effects. The objective was to examine the comparative risk of falls/fractures and all-cause hospitalizations among older adults with dementia and overactive bladder (OAB) using nonselective and selective antimuscarinics METHODS/DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study design was conducted among older patients with dementia and OAB using incident antimuscarinics. The primary exposure was classified as nonselective (oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium, and fesoterodine) and selective (solifenacin and darifenacin). Cox proportional-hazards regression using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) evaluated the risk of falls/fractures and all-cause hospitalizations within 6 months of nonselective and selective antimuscarinic use. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 13,896 (76.9%) nonselective and 4,179 (23.1%) selective antimuscarinic incident users. The unadjusted falls/fractures rate was 27.14% (3,772) for nonselective and 24.55% (1,026) for selective users (p-value< 0.01). The unadjusted all-cause hospitalizations rate was 24.14% (3,354) for nonselective and 21.58% (902) for selective users (p-value <0.01). The IPTW models did not find a significant difference in the risk of falls/fractures (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.99-1.07) and risk of all-cause hospitalizations (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.08) between nonselective and selective antimuscarinics. Several sensitivity analyses corroborated the main findings. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not find a differential risk of falls/fractures and all-cause hospitalizations in older adults with dementia and OAB using nonselective and selective antimuscarinics. More research is needed to understand the role of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in the safety profile of antimuscarinics in dementia.

Is imidafenacin an alternative to current antimuscarinic drugs for patients with overactive bladder syndrome?

PURPOSE: Previous studies have included a limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and compared limited parameters after treatment with imidafenacin and other anticholinergic drugs (ADs) for overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and controversy about the superiority of these ADs still remains. We aim to update the evidence and provide better clinical guidance. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrial.gov and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from January 2007 to April 2019. Meta-analysis of all published RCTs comparing imidafenacin with other ADs in patients with OAB was performed. The primary outcomes were the changes in OAB symptoms and OAB symptom score (OABSS). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and the dropout rate related to AEs. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies including 7 RCTs involving 1430 patients with mean follow-up of 23.43 weeks were included. All ADs improved OAB symptoms. Regarding efficacy, these drugs had similar efficacy in voids, urgency episodes, urgency incontinence episodes, incontinence episodes and OABSS. However, imidafenacin performed better in the reduction of nocturia episodes (MD = -0.24, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.04, P = 0.02). Moreover, imidafenacin was associated with a statistically lower dry mouth rate (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.00, P = 0.04), lower constipation rate (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.93, P = 0.01) and lower AE-related withdrawal rate (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.89, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in terms of other complications. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, imidafenacin was comparable to other ADs in the treatment of OAB. Moreover, imidafenacin presented a lower dry mouth rate, lower constipation rate and higher adherence and persistence.

The use of mirabegron in neurogenic bladder: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of mirabegron in patients with neurogenic bladder. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using four databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and EMBASE). Articles evaluating mirabegron in neurogenic bladder patients were collected, and assessment of the drug's efficacy was reviewed according to clinical and urodynamic parameters. RESULTS: Seven studies were selected and a total of 302 patients with NB were evaluated, ranging from 15 to 66 patients per study. All of the patients had received antimuscarinics as a previous treatment modality. Mirabegron was used as a second-line treatment after antimuscarinics lacked efficacy or caused adverse effects. The duration of the treatments ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. Reported in two studies each, bladder compliance and maximal cystometric capacity were the most commonly improved urodynamic parameters. In the majority of the studies, positive outcomes were reported for clinical scores. Additionally, analysis of the IPSS subscores revealed an improvement of storage symptoms as opposed to voiding symptoms. In all of the studies, mirabegron was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Mirabegron appears to be an effective treatment in the management of neurogenic bladder unresponsive to antimuscarinics, particularly in patients presenting with storage symptoms. There is still no evidence concerning the use of mirabegron as a first-line therapy for neurogenic bladder.