Textile testing to assess the resistance to damage of long-lasting insecticidal nets for malaria control and prevention.

BACKGROUND: LLINs are susceptible to forming holes within a short time in use, compromising their ability to provide long-term physical protection against insect-borne vectors of disease. Mechanical damage is known to be responsible for the majority of holes, with most being the result of snagging, tearing, hole enlargement, abrasion and seam failure, which can readily occur during normal household use. To enable an assessment of the ability of LLINs to resist such damage prior to distribution, a new suite of testing methods was developed to reflect the main damage mechanisms encountered during normal use of LLINs. METHODS: Four existing BS EN and ISO standards used by the textile industry were adapted to determine the ability of LLINs to resist the most common mechanisms of real-world damage experienced in the field. The new suite comprised tests for snag strength (BS 15,598:2008), bursting strength (ISO 13938-2:1999), hole enlargement resistance (BS 3423-38:1998), abrasion resistance (ISO 12947-1:1998) and new guidance around the seam construction of LLINs. Fourteen different LLINs were tested using the new suite of tests to evaluate their resistance to damage. RESULTS: The resistance to mechanical damage of LLINs is not the same, even when the bursting strength values are comparable. Differences in performance between LLINs are directly related to the fabric design specifications, including the knitted structure and constituent yarns. The differences in performance do not primarily relate to what polymer type the LLIN is made from. LLINs made with a Marquisette knitted structure produced the highest snag strength and lowest hole enlargement values. By contrast, LLINs made with a traverse knitted structure exhibited low snag strength values when compared at the same mesh count. CONCLUSIONS: Prequalification of LLINs should consider not only insecticidal performance, but also inherent resistance to mechanical damage. This is critical to ensuring LLINs are fit for purpose prior to distribution, and are capable of remaining in good physical condition for longer. The new suite of test methods enables the performance of LLINs to be assessed and specified in advance of distribution and can be used to establish minimum performance standards. Implementation of these testing methods is therefore recommended.

Evaluation of anastomotic strength and drug safety after short-term sunitinib administration in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib (Sutent) is a Food and Drug Administration-approved receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor found to reduce postoperative adhesion formation in animal models. The objective of the present study was to evaluate anastomotic healing and potential drug-related toxicities after short-term sunitinib administration in New Zealand White rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under an approved study protocol, 40 rabbits underwent a laparotomy followed by colonic transection and anastomosis. Animals were randomly assigned to treatment with oral sunitinib (10 mg/kg/d) or placebo, received one preoperative dose followed by 10 postoperative doses, and were divided into two groups following the procedure: group I animals were euthanized on completion of drug treatment and group II animals were euthanized 30 d after completion of treatment. Prior to study completion, animals underwent an echocardiogram and laboratory test results were obtained. At necropsy, intestinal bursting strength (in mmHg) was evaluated. RESULTS: All animals survived until designated euthanasia. There was no evidence of intra-abdominal sepsis or intestinal obstruction. Sunitinib-treated animals were found to have lower intestinal anastomotic strength compared with placebo-treated animals, as measured by bursting pressure at euthanasia, and a greater percentage of bursting at the anastomosis. On echocardiography, all ejection and shortening fractions were within established normal reference values. There were no significant differences in liver enzymes between animals. There were no wound infections, dehiscence, or delayed wound healing in any animal. CONCLUSIONS: These results caution against the administration of sunitinib in cases involving intestinal anastomoses because of the elevated risk of anastomotic leak. No evidence of cardiotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, or detrimental effect on wound healing was found in any animal.

Fiber types and fabric structures influence on weft knitted fabrics.

The physical properties of weft knitted fabrics can be modified according to the fabric structure and the raw material used to manufacture the final fabric. This research demonstrates the influence of fiber types and fabric structure on some specific physical properties such as bursting strength, wicking behavior, pilling effect, and abrasion resistance of weft knitted fabrics. For this purpose, in this research study, one natural fiber cotton, one regenerated fiber viscose, and one synthetic fiber polyester were used. At the same time, to avoid any conflicts of the other fabric production factors, the number of feeders, machine diameter, needle gauge, stitch length was kept constant during the production of the weft-knitted fabrics. Moreover, three different structures of single jersey fabric like plain single jersey, single lacoste, and double lacoste were used to produce nine single jerseys of weft knitted fabric, while in each knit structure, three fabrics were produced using 100% cotton, 100% viscose, and 100% polyester fiber. Statistical analysis has been performed along with factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by simple main effect and simple comparison analysis. The finding illustrates that both fiber types and fabric structure regulate the physical properties of weft knitted fabrics. The polyester fiber seems to possess excellent mechanical properties such as bursting strength, abrasion, and pilling resistance without any influence of fabric structures studied in this research. However, both the fiber types and fabric structure combinedly influence the wicking of weft knitted fabrics. Additionally, it has been assumed that the influence of fiber types and fabric structure on strength, pilling, abrasion-resistant, and wicking properties of fabrics also combined with the areal density and extensibility of weft knitted fabrics.

Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the bursting strength and characterize the mode of failure of cranial and caudal midline celiotomies closed with 2 suture patterns and an absorbable monofilament suture material. Design: Randomized, cadaveric, ex- vivo mechanical testing. Sample: Feline cadavers (n = 32). Methods: Specimens were randomized into two groups based on the closure technique (small 2 × 2 mm or large 5 × 5 mm suture-bite-stitch-interval [SBSI] groups). Cranial or caudal midline celiotomies, 7.5 cm long, were created. A custom-made polyurethane bladder was inserted into the abdomen, and the celiotomies were closed in a simple continuous pattern using 3-0 polydioxanone. The repair was loaded to failure by inflating the bladder with compressed air. Bursting strength and mode of failure were recorded. Effects of body weight, gender, thickness and width of linea alba, suture-bite-stitch-interval, and location of celiotomy were analyzed using a mixed model analysis and an independent t- test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: There was no difference in bursting strength between cranial and caudal celiotomies. Bursting strength was lower for celiotomies closed with a large SBSI (P = 0.003). Bursting strength was greater in males compared to females (P = 0.003). Twenty five specimens failed distant from celiotomy closure, while 4 failed by fascial tearing at the site of needle penetration. Failure by loosening of the suture line with intact knots only occurred in 3 caudal celiotomies closed with a large SBSI. Gender, body weight and SBSI accounted for 61.5% of variability in bursting strength (P = 0.005). Conclusions: Small SBSI technique was mechanically superior to large SBSI when tested under these loading conditions. Clinical relevance: Supraphysiological pressures were required to cause failure in all specimens. Both small and large SBSI may be clinically applicable for midline celiotomy closure in domestic cats.