Performance evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B antigens using mid-turbinate nasal swabs.

The Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel (Abbott) is an in vitro diagnostic rapid test designed for the qualitative detection of nucleocapsid proteins SARS-CoV-2 and nucleoprotein influenza A and B antigens in nasal mid-turbinate (NMT) swab specimens from symptomatic individuals meeting COVID-19 and influenza clinical and/or epidemiological criteria. This study, the largest global one to date using fresh samples, aimed to assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel in freshly collected NMT swab specimens from individuals suspected of respiratory viral infection consistent with COVID-19 and/or influenza within the first 5 days of symptom onset compared with results obtained with the cobas SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B qualitative assay (cobas 6800/8800 systems), which were tested using nasopharyngeal swab samples. A total of 512 evaluable subjects were enrolled in the COVID-19 cohort across 18 sites, and 1,148 evaluable subjects were enrolled in the influenza cohort across 22 sites in the Asia-Pacific, Europe, and the USA. The Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 99.7% for COVID-19. For influenza A, the sensitivity and specificity rates were 80.6% and 99.3%, respectively. Likewise, for influenza B, the sensitivity and specificity rates were 80.8% and 99.4%, respectively. In conclusion, the Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel emerges as a suitable rapid test for detecting COVID-19 and influenza in symptomatic subjects across diverse global populations, exhibiting high sensitivity. The assay achieved a sensitivity of 94.4% in samples with Ct ≤24 for COVID-19 and 92.6% in samples with Ct ≤30 for influenza A and B. IMPORTANCE: The Panbio COVID-19/Flu A&B Panel is a suitable rapid test for detecting COVID-19 and influenza in symptomatic subjects across diverse global populations, exhibiting high sensitivity. The assay achieved a sensitivity of 94.0% in samples with Ct ≤24 for COVID-19 and 92.6% in samples with Ct ≤30 for influenza A and B.

Urine high-risk human papillomavirus testing as an alternative to routine cervical screening: A comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two urine collection devices using a randomised study design trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of human papillomavirus (HPV) tested urine to detect high-grade cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ [CIN2+]) using two urine collection devices. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK. POPULATION: Colposcopy attendees with abnormal cervical screening; a total of 480 participants were randomised. Matched urine and cervical samples were available for 235 and 230 participants using a first-void urine (FVU)-collection device and standard pot, respectively. METHODS: Urine was self-collected and mixed with preservative - randomised 1:1 to FVU-collection device (Novosanis Colli-pee® 10 mL with urine conservation medium [UCM]) or standard pot. Matched clinician-collected cervical samples were taken before colposcopy. HPV testing used Roche cobas® 8800. A questionnaire evaluated urine self-sampling acceptability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured sensitivity of HPV-tested urine (FVU-collection device and standard pot) for CIN2+ detection. Secondary outcomes compared HPV-tested cervical and urine samples for CIN2+ and evaluated the acceptability of urine self-sampling. RESULTS: Urine HPV test sensitivity for CIN2+ was higher with the FVU-collection device (90.3%, 95% CI 83.7%-94.9%, 112/124) than the standard pot (73.4%, 95% CI 64.7%-80.9%, 91/124, p = 0.0005). The relative sensitivity of FVU-device-collected urine was 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.97, pMcN = 0.004) compared with cervical, considering that all women were referred after a positive cervical HPV test. Urine-based sampling was acceptable to colposcopy attendees. CONCLUSIONS: Testing of FVU-device-collected urine for HPV was superior to standard-pot-collected urine in colposcopy attendees and has promising sensitivity for CIN2+ detection. General population HPV testing of FVU-device-collected urine will establish its clinical performance and acceptability as an alternative to routine cervical screening.

Analysis of HbA1c using microfluidic card (Capitainer qDBS card) as a pre-step before determination of the HbA1c value with an immunological method.

The objective of the study was to evaluate Capitainer's quantitative dried blood spots (qDBS) card for Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing. qDBS cards can be used for at-home sampling for HbA1c determination in a Swedish laboratory setting. A total of 153 routine requested HbA1c samples were used in this evaluation of microfluidic cards (qDBS). The HbA1c was extracted from the disc and HbA1c was determined at cobas 6000 instruments with immunological technology. The results were compared with results from traditional venous HbA1c testing. The reproducibility of using this elution procedure was 4.0% measured as coefficient of variation at a HbA1c concentration of 51 mmol/mol. Analytical performance specifications for HbA1c < 52 mmol/mol using DBS card (c501) compared with assigned values from Capillarys 3 was (y) = 1.03 x Capillarys 3(x) - 0.87; R2 = 0.97. There is a good agreement between HbA1c determined by traditional HbA1c testing and determination from Capitainer's qDBS cards. This shows that the technology could be used for out-of doctor's office testing.

Evaluation of a Quantitative Dual-Target EBV DNA Test on a Fully Automated Molecular Testing System.

The measurement of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is key to diagnosing and managing EBV-associated complications in transplant recipients. The performance of the new Conformité Européenne (CE) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared quantitative Roche cobas EBV real-time PCR assay was determined by using EDTA-plasma dilution panels and clinical samples that were spiked with either the World Health Organization's EBV international standard or high-titer EBV lambda stock. Correlation with the Abbott Realtime EBV assay was assessed in clinical specimens and conducted at two independent laboratories. An in silico analysis revealed that the dual-target test (EBNA1 and BMRF2) was 100% inclusive for the known diversity of EBV. The overall limit of detection (LoD) was 16.6 IU/mL for genotype 1 (GT1). GT2 LoD was verified at 18.8 IU/mL. The linear ranges were from 1.40 × 101 to 2.30 × 108 IU/mL and from 2.97 × 101 to 9.90 × 107 IU/mL for GT1 and GT2, respectively. Accuracy was confirmed across the linear range (mean difference not exceeding ±0.18 log10). Precision was not influenced by the factors analyzed (standard deviation of 0.02 to 0.17 log10), including the presence of potentially interfering endogenous or exogenous substances. Plasma samples were stable under several conditions (variable time points, storage, and freeze/thaw cycles). In clinical EBV DNA-positive samples, correlation between the cobas EBV test and the comparator was high (n = 126 valid results; R2 = 0.96) with a 0.1 mean log10 titer difference. The cobas EBV test is an accurate, sensitive, specific, and reproducible assay for the detection of EBV DNAemia in plasma. In general, high levels of automation and calibration to the international standard will lead to improvements in the harmonization of quantitative EBV DNA test results across laboratories.

Impact of HPV molecular testing with partial genotyping as a feasibility study in cervical cancer community screening program in South India.

Cervical cancer can be eradicated by 2030 by the implementation of a global strategy involving the vaccination of young girls against human papillomavirus (HPV), screening 70% of women in 30-69 years of age and treating 90% of the women with precancerous lesions. For a country with a large population like India, all the three strategies can be a challenge. There is a need for implementation of a high throughput technology that can be scalable. Cobas 4800, a multiplexed assay based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction technology, identifies HPV 16 and HPV 18 along with the concurrent detection of 12 pooled other high-risk HPV infections. This technology was used to test 10 375 women from the South Indian community for the first time as a feasibility program. Upon testing, high-risk HPV was found in 595 (5.73%) women. A total of 127 women (1.2%) were found to be infected with HPV 16, 36 women (0.34%) with HPV 18 and 382 women (3.68%) with the 12 pooled high-risk HPV and multiple mixed infections were found in 50 women (0.48%). It was observed that there was a high prevalence of high-risk HPV in younger women, 30-40 years of age and a second peak was observed at 46-50 years of age. The second peak had higher mixed infections in the 46-50 years of age and this association was statistically significant. We found that 24/50 (48%) of the multiple mixed high-risk HPV infections were in the age group 46-50 years. The current study is the first attempt from India, on a completely automated platform using Cobas 4800 HPV test in a community screening program. This study shows HPV 16 and HPV 18 infections, when differentiated, can be valuable for risk stratification in community screening program. Women in the perimenopausal age (46-50yrs) showed a higher prevalence of multiple mixed infections, signifying a higher risk.

Amplicon size and non-encapsidated DNA fragments define plasma cytomegalovirus DNA loads by automated nucleic acid testing platforms: A marker of viral cytopathology?

Management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in transplant patients relies on measuring plasma CMV-loads using quantitative nucleic acid testing (QNAT). We prospectively compared the automated Roche-cobas®6800-CMV and Roche-CAP/CTM-CMV with laboratory-developed Basel-CMV-UL54-95bp, and Basel-CMV-UL111a-77bp. Roche-cobas®6800-CMV and Roche-CAP/CTM-CMV were qualitatively concordant in 142/150 cases (95%). In-depth comparison revealed higher CMV-loads of the laboratory-developed assay and correlated with smaller amplicon size. After calibration to the 1.WHO-approved CMV international standard, differences were reduced but remained significant. DNase-I pretreatment significantly reduced CMV-loads for both automated Roche-CAP/CTM-CMV and Roche-cobas®6800-CMV assays, whereby 90% and 95% of samples became undetectable. DNase-I pretreatment also reduced CMV-loads quantified by Basel-CMV-UL54-95bp and Basel-CMV-UL111a-77bp, but remaining detectable in 20% and 35%, respectively. Differences were largest for 110 samples with low-level CMV-DNAemia being detectable but not-quantifiable by Roche-cobas®6800-CMV, whereby the smaller amplicon sizes yielded higher viral loads for concordant positives. We conclude that non-encapsidated fragmented CMV-DNA is the major form of plasma CMV-loads also measured by fully-automated platforms. Amplicons of <150 bp and calibrators are needed for reliable and commutable QNAT-results. We hypothesize that non-encapsidated fragmented CMV-DNA results from lysis of CMV-replicating cells and represent a direct marker of viral cell damage, which contribute to delayed viral load responses despite effective antivirals.

Screening for Zika virus in US armed services blood program donors: An opportunity to compare emerging infectious disease risk between the general US population and military donors.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) collects blood from volunteer DoD donors in U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-regulated centers, and from emergency donor panels in overseas operations. Emerging infectious diseases could reduce DoD access to blood products. In August 2016, FDA determined that Zika virus was transfusion-transmitted and advised that donated blood should be screened for Zika utilizing one of two investigational new drug (IND) applications. The Armed Services Blood Program (ASBP) tested blood using its own protocol concurrently with the IND study sponsored by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., titled "A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Specificity of the cobas Zika test for use on the cobas 6800/8800 System for Screening of Blood Donations for the Presence of Zika virus RNA." STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective clinical trial (September 2016-August 2017) evaluated the specificity of the cobas Zika 6800/8800 System. Consenting volunteers were screened for Zika by participating reference labs. Participants with positive screens were offered a follow-up study using alternative PCR and serology assays. RESULTS: 92,618 DoD donors enrolled; four tested positive on screening (0.0043%; CI 0.001176896%, 0.01105894%). Three enrolled in follow-up testing and none were positive. These results were comparable to all U.S. donors: 3,858,114 enrolled (excluding Puerto Rico) with 459 positive screens (0.0119%; CI 0.01083582%, 0.01303962%). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the effectiveness of the cobas Zika test. DoD donors, who are included in emergency donor panels during military operations, were at no higher risk for Zika than the overall U.S. donor population.

The prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) at testing centers in Belgium, Germany, Spain, and the UK using the cobas TV/MG molecular assay.

Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) can lead to long-term sequelae in males and females; however, global prevalence data vary between geographical regions, as these sexually transmitted infections are not included in routine screening. The objective of this study was to use the cobas® TV/MG assay to assess the point prevalence of TV and MG in specimens from men and women over a broad European geographical area. Urine, vaginal, endocervical, and rectal samples were collected from patients aged ≥ 18 years receiving Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and/or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) screening as per local standard of care at sites in Belgium, Germany, Spain, and the UK (Wales). Remnant samples were assessed using the cobas TV/MG assay. Analysis of 2795 samples showed that MG prevalence varied slightly across female sample types (range: 1.7-5.8%; p = 0.0042). MG prevalence was higher in male rectal samples (12.5%) than in male urine samples (3.9%; p < 0.0001). TV prevalence was low in male (0.8%; 12/1535) and female (1.3%; 16/1260) samples across all sites. Co-infection of TV/MG with CT or NG was 10.0% (19/190) and 9.6% (7/73), respectively, in both male and female samples. MG and TV prevalence rates were comparable to the published literature in Europe. MG prevalence was highest in male rectal samples; as rectal testing is an off-label use of the cobas TV/MG assay, the clinical utility of this assay for rectal testing should be further investigated.

A comparative analysis of cycle threshold (Ct) values from Cobas4800 and AmpFire HPV assay for triage of women with positive hrHPV results.

BACKGROUND: To compare the triage performance of HPV viral loads reflected by cycle threshold values (CtV) from two different HPV testing assays: the PCR based Cobas4800 and the isothermal amplification based AmpFire assay. METHODS: We used the data from a sub-study of The Chinese Multi-Center Screening Trial and analyzed the data of the cases positive in both Cobas4800 and AmpFire assays with recorded CtV. Spearman's correlation was applied to analyze the association between CtV from AmpFire and Cobas4800 assays, as well as the correlation between CtV and the histological lesion grades. The 50th percentile of CtV was used as the cutoff to construct triage algorithms for HPV-positive cases. McNemar's test was used to analyze the differences in sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIN2 + and CIN3 + in different triage algorithms. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-six HPV positive women who had consistent HPV results from Cobas4800 and AmpFire in terms of the HPV genotype and reported Ct values were included in the analysis. The mean CtV of hrHPV tested by Cobas4800 and AmpFire were linear correlated. Direct association were showed between the severity of cervical lesions and the HPV viral loads reflected by CtV of hrHPV, HPV16, non-16/18 hrHPV and A9 group from both assays. HPV16/18 genotyping combined with low-CtV for non-16/18 hrHPV, especially A9 group, were demonstrated to be satisfactory in the sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIN2 + or CIN3 + . CONCLUSION: Ct value represented a good triage marker in both PCR-based and isothermal amplification HPV detection.

Rapid Adaptation of Established High-Throughput Molecular Testing Infrastructure for Monkeypox Virus Detection.

Beginning in May 2022, a rising number of monkeypox cases were reported in non-monkeypox-endemic countries in the Northern Hemisphere. We adapted 2 published quantitative PCRs for use as a dual-target monkeypox virus test on widely used automated high-throughput PCR systems. We determined analytic performance by serial dilutions of monkeypox virus reference material, which we quantified by digital PCR. We found the lower limit of detection for the combined assays was 4.795 (95% CI 3.6-8.6) copies/mL. We compared clinical performance against a commercial manual orthopoxvirus research use only PCR kit by using clinical remnant swab samples. Our assay showed 100% positive (n = 11) and 100% negative (n = 56) agreement. Timely and scalable PCR tests are crucial for limiting further spread of monkeypox. The assay we provide streamlines high-throughput molecular testing for monkeypox virus on existing broadly established platforms used for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing.

Assessment of the cobas® HBV RNA investigational assay in the setting of nucleoside analog therapy cessation.

HBV RNA is used as a marker of cccDNA transcription and is applicable in the setting of nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment, which suppresses HBV DNA. Traditional assays for quantification of HBV RNA rely on labor-intensive 3'RACE assays targeting the polyA tail. In this study, the high-throughput Roche cobas®HBV RNA investigational assay was assessed on the Roche cobas® 6800 automated platform. Of 969 samples collected for a NA treatment cessation trial, and tested on the cobas assay, 249 were analyzed for sensitivity, reproducibility, sample type applicability, and results were compared to a RACE-based assay. Results of 97 paired serum and plasma samples demonstrated an excellent correlation of 0.98. However, 14.5% of plasma samples yielded detectable (below the limit of quantification) results, when the paired serum was undetectable, and plasma was shown to yield a statistically significant (p < 0.001) greater mean 0.119 log10 copies/ml. Quantification of 152 samples showed good correlation (0.91) between the cobas and RACE assays. The cobas assay demonstrated superior lower limit of quantification, 10 copies/ml, which resulted in detection of 13.2% more samples than the RACE assay. Reproducibility and linear range of the automated assay were also confirmed. The Roche cobas assay for HBV RNA is sensitive and highly recommended.

Comparative analysis of specificity and sensitivity between Cobas 6800 system and SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR to detect COVID-19 infection in clinical samples.

Fast and reliable testing for the COVID 19 infection is the need of the hour for the development of effective and reliable tools and assays. However, it is difficult to find the performance relativity among all these tests which are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the two different platforms where we determine the difference of sensitivity and specificity between the fully automated analyzer (Roche Diagnostics Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 test) under FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and the laboratory designed test (SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR) based on the protocol developed by ICMR (Indian Council for Medical Research). The study was conducted for individual samples. We performed our study with two different approaches, first with validation method consisting of 188 samples (2 batches) on cobas 6800 instrument (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ) soon after we received US FDA EUA on 1 June 2021, all these samples were tested earlier with laboratory designed tests on 25th and 26th May 2021. Over all agreement between the two tests is of 88% and the coefficient of agreement between the two testing platform Cohen'sκ coefficient was found to be 0.76 (95% CI, 2.5897-13.4103) suggesting the substantial agreement between the two platforms. However, in some of the cases, both tests have shown a little disagreement. An overall discordance rate between two systems was found 11.1%. The difference may be due to the limit of detection, variation in the sequences of the primer design or may be due to other factors depicting the importance of comparing the two platforms used in the testing for SARS-CoV-2. Second approach includes head to head evaluation which comprises 1631 samples showed overall agreement of 99% and kappa value of 0.98. These results showed that cobas is effective and reliable assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis from oral wash specimens using the Abbott RealTime CT/NG assay and the Cobas 4800 CT/NG assay: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Isolating oropharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) from oral wash specimens (OWSs) is uncommon. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG assay and the Cobas 4800 CT/NG assay in detecting NG and CT in OWSs. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study included 457 patients from 14 medical facilities suspected of having untreated male urethritis or female cervicitis from November 2014 to December 2015. OWSs were collected and tested using the Abbott and Cobas assays. Finally, the discordant results were confirmed using the APTIMA Combo 2 transcription-mediated amplification assay and retested using each assay. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the Abbott assay were 100% and 97.2% for NG and 87.5% and 100% for CT, respectively, and of the Cobas assay were 100% and 98.8% for NG and 93.8% and 99.8% for CT, respectively. Both assays had high negative but low positive predictive values for oropharyngeal NG (Abbott assay: 65.7%, Cobas assay: 82.1%). Based on the definition of "true positive," the prevalence of oropharyngeal NG and CT were 5.0% and 3.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Abbott and Cobas assays using OWSs had high sensitivity and specificity, which can help diagnose oropharyngeal NG and CT. We consider that if a positive result is obtained, the patient should be treated because the negative predictive values were high. However, limited data are available on oropharyngeal NG and CT detection, and further studies are needed to clarify the role of oropharyngeal sexually transmitted infections.

Clinical Performance of the Point-of-Care cobas Liat for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 20 Minutes: a Multicenter Study.

Highly accurate testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the point of care (POC) is an unmet diagnostic need in emergency care and time-sensitive outpatient care settings. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) technology is the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. We performed a multisite U.S. study comparing the clinical performance of the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized POC RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 20 min, the cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B nucleic acid test, to the most widely used RT-PCR laboratory test, the cobas 68/8800 SARS-CoV-2 test. Clinical nasopharyngeal swab specimens from 444 patients with 357 evaluable specimens at five U.S. clinical laboratories were enrolled from 21 September 2020 to 23 October 2020. The overall agreement between the Liat and 68/8800 systems for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics was 98.6% (352/357). Using Liat, positive percent agreement for SARS-CoV-2 was 100% (162/162) and the negative percent agreement was 97.4% (190/195). The Liat is an RT-PCR POC test that provides highly accurate SARS-CoV-2 results in 20 min with performance equivalent to that of high-throughput laboratory molecular testing. Rapid RT-PCR testing at the POC can enable more timely infection control and individual care decisions for coronavirus disease 2019.

Despite Excellent Test Characteristics of the cobas 4800 CT/NG Assay, Detection of Oropharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Remains Challenging.

Oropharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections and, especially, Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections are common, but few commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) specify extragenital samples for intended use. The test characteristics of the cobas 4800 CT/NG assay were evaluated for oropharyngeal swabs. The technical validation included analysis of the specificity, sensitivity, dynamic range, linearity, efficiency, and precision. The probability of detection curve combined with historical data enabled the estimation of potentially missed diagnoses. A clinical evaluation was performed on a subset of 2,798 clinical samples available from routine diagnostics. Results of the cobas 4800 were compared with those from in-house C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae PCR assays. Discrepant samples were tested with resolver assays, and these results were considered decisive. No cross-reactivity was seen in the analytical specificity analysis. High linearity (R2 ≥ 0.983), efficiency (89% to 99%), and precision (cycle threshold [CT ] value of 0.1 to 0.9) were seen for both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae The limit of detection in oropharyngeal samples was 3.2 × 102 inclusion-forming units (IFU)/ml for C. trachomatis and 6.7 × 102 CFU/ml for N. gonorrhoeae Estimates on potentially missed diagnoses were up to 7.2% for C. trachomatis and up to 24.7% for N. gonorrhoeae Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with 25 C. trachomatis-positive, 86 N. gonorrhoeae-positive, and 264 negative samples, resulting in 100% and 99.6% for C. trachomatis and 100% and 96.7% for N. gonorrhoeae, respectively. The findings in this study demonstrate the utility of the cobas 4800 CT/NG assay for oropharyngeal samples. Despite its being a highly accurate test, the range of reported CT values, especially for N. gonorrhoeae, suggests relatively low oropharyngeal loads. Hence, consistent detection over the full range of oropharyngeal loads could be impaired.

The performance of Cobas HPV test for cervical cancer screening in Chinese female migrant workers.

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Cobas human papillomavirus (HPV) test in cervical cancer screening. A total of 3442 women aged ⩾20 years used Cobas HPV and hybrid capture 2 (HC2) tests were included in this study. Women with any positive result were examined by liquid-based cytology (LBC) test. Then subjects with abnormal LBC or positive Cobas HPV16/18 were further checked by colposcopy to observe the visible lesions to perform the pathological examination. Of these 3442 women, 328 cases were Cobas HPV positive, and the positive rate was 9.53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.50-10.53). The positive rate of HPV16, HPV18, and other 12 types of high-risk HPV were 1.54% (95% CI 1.12-1.95), 0.55% (95% CI 0.30-0.80), and 7.44% (95% CI 6.56-8.32), respectively. The coincidence rate of Cobas HPV test and HC2 test was 90% (95% CI 89.00-91.00; Kappa = 0.526) in the primary screening. Age had a non-linear relationship with Cobas HPV positive rate (χ2 = 4.240, P = 0.040) and HPV16/18 typing positive rate (χ2 = 6.610, P = 0.010). Compared with the LBC test, the Cobas HPV test had higher sensitivity when detecting patients with high cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+ and CIN3+).

Pooled testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in an automated high-throughput platform.

BACKGROUND: Active detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection through testing is elementary for the control of COVID-19 pandemic. The implementation of large-scale RT-PCR testing has led to a rise in the demand for testing kits whose availability is always a concern. OBJECTIVE: To find out the feasibility of pooled testing in a high-throughput platform. METHODOLOGY: Pooled testing was conducted in Roche cobas 6800 in 2 methods. Firstly, the simple two-stage testing algorithm was conducted for 1410 samples individually and then as pooled samples. Secondly, we evaluated the sensitivity of cobas 6800 for the detection of a single positive sample within a pool of negative samples. RESULTS: Implementing the five-sample Dorfman pooling to test 1410 samples, we identified 42 (2.9%) individual SARS-CoV-2-positive samples and 27 (9.5%) positive pool samples. The pooling strategy precisely identified all the positive samples. All individually negative samples were also accurately determined by pooling. There was 100% sensitivity of detecting positive samples in a pool of negative samples even up to 1:64 dilution. There was a threefold increase in total throughput in one-third of the cost per day. CONCLUSION: A high-throughput platform such as Cobas 6800 can effectively increase the testing capacity by twofold to threefold by adopting the pooled testing strategy for successful management of SARS-CoV-2 and helping in the containment of community transmission.

Analytical platforms Vitros ECi 3600 and Cobas 6000: comparative analysis of prolactin measurement.

Prolactin is a polypeptide hormone secreted by the lactotrophic cells of the anterior pituitary gland and has a wide range of biological effects in the human body. Accurate measurements of prolactin concentration are essential in obtaining biochemical data to support clinical decisions in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of diseases of the pituitary gland, reproductive, immune and other body systems. The aim of our study is to carry out a comparative analysis of the serum prolactin measurement determined by the two analytical platforms Vitros ECi 3600 (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics) and Cobas 6000 (Roche). Serum samples from 664 patients undergoing examination at the Endocrinology Research Center were included in the study. Comparative analysis of serum prolactin measurement showed that results obtained by the two analytical systems are consistent with each other (r = 0.89, p<0,05). Clinically accuracy of prolactin measurement and to a large extent using the same method is of particular importance in primary diagnosis, treatment and long-term follow-up of the patient.

Plasma screening for the T790M mutation of EGFR and phase 2 study of osimertinib efficacy in plasma T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer: West Japan Oncology Group 8815L/LPS study.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy allows the identification of patients whose tumors harbor specific mutations in a minimally invasive manner. No prospective data have been available for the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and who test positive for the TKI resistance-conferring T790M mutation of EGFR by liquid biopsy. Therefore, a phase 2 study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in such patients. METHODS: Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC with known TKI-sensitizing mutations of EGFR, had documented disease progression after treatment with at least 1 first- or second-generation EGFR TKI, and were positive for the T790M mutation in plasma according to the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Diagnostics) or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis. Patients were treated with osimertinib (80 mg/d) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) in patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and November 2017, 276 patients were screened for their T790M status with a liquid biopsy. Seventy-four patients were positive for T790M in plasma, and 53 of these individuals were enrolled in the study. The ORR for evaluable patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay (n = 49) was 55.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.2%-69.3%). The median progression-free survival for all evaluable patients (n = 52) was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-12.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the utility of liquid biopsy for the detection of T790M with the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. Plasma genotyping with this assay is informative for treatment selection in clinical practice when tumor sampling is not feasible.

Clinical Evaluation of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test and a Diagnostic Platform Switch during 48 Hours in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Laboratories are currently witnessing extraordinary demand globally for sampling devices, reagents, consumables, and diagnostic instruments needed for timely diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. To meet diagnostic needs as the pandemic grows, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently granted several commercial SARS-CoV-2 tests Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), but manufacturer-independent evaluation data are scarce. We performed the first manufacturer-independent evaluation of the fully automated sample-to-result two-target test cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 (cobas) (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ), which received U.S. FDA EUA on 12 March 2020. The comparator was a standardized 3-h SARS-CoV-2 protocol, consisting of RNA extraction using an automated portable instrument, followed by a two-target reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-PCR), which our laboratory has routinely used since January 2020 [V. M. Corman, O. Landt, M. Kaiser, R. Molenkamp, et al., Euro Surveill 25(3):pii=2000045, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045]. cobas and the comparator showed overall agreement of 98.1% and a kappa value of 0.95 on an in-house validation panel consisting of 217 well-characterized retrospective samples. Immediate prospective head-to-head comparative evaluation followed on 502 samples, and the diagnostic approaches showed overall agreement of 99.6% and a kappa value of 0.98. A good correlation (r2 = 0.96) between cycle threshold values for SARS-CoV-2-specific targets obtained by cobas and the comparator was observed. Our results showed that cobas is a reliable assay for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples collected in the Universal Transport Medium System (UTM-RT) (Copan, Brescia, Italy). Under the extraordinary circumstances that laboratories are facing worldwide, a safe diagnostic platform switch is feasible in only 48 h and in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic if carefully planned and executed.