Addendum to the German Consensus Recommendations on Ponatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Based on the new data from the primary analysis of the OPTIC (Optimizing Ponatinib Treatment in CP-CML) trial on dose optimization of ponatinib in patients with chronic phase (CP)-CML, the German consensus paper on ponatinib published in 2020 (Saussele S et al., Acta Haematol. 2020) has been updated in this addendum. SUMMARY: Focus is on the update of efficacy and safety of ponatinib, reflecting the new data set, as well as the update of the benefit-risk assessment and recommendations for ponatinib starting dose in CP-CML - provided that the decision to use ponatinib has already been made. Furthermore, based on OPTIC and additional empirical data, the expert panel collaborated to develop a decision tree for ponatinib dosing, specifically for intolerant and resistant patients. The recommendations on cardiovascular management have also been updated based on the most recent 2021 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. KEY MESSAGES: The OPTIC data confirm the high efficacy of ponatinib in patients with CP-CML and provide the basis for individualized dose adjustment during the course of treatment.

Ponatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Leukemia: Recommendations of a German Expert Consensus Panel with Focus on Cardiovascular Management.

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute leukemia (Ph+ ALL) has been revolutionized with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Most patients with CML achieve long-term survival similar to individuals without CML due to treatment with TKIs not only in frontline but also in further lines of therapy. The third-generation TKI ponatinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory CML and Ph+ ALL. Ponatinib is currently the most potent TKI in this setting demonstrating activity against T315I mutant clones. However, ponatinib's safety data revealed a dose-dependent, increased risk of serious cardiovascular (CV) events. Guidance is needed to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of TKIs, such as ponatinib, and safety measures to prevent treatment-associated CV events. An expert panel of German hematologists and cardiologists summarize current evidence regarding ponatinib's efficacy and CV safety profile. We propose CV management strategies for patients who are candidates for ponatinib.

[How to organise cardiovascular management of cancer patients?] / Comment organiser la prise en charge cardiovasculaire des patients cancéreux ?

How to organise cardiovascular management of cancer patients? Advances in cancer therapy have reduced cancer mortality. However, these results are sometimes achieved at the cost of cardiovascular adverse events that may limit the overall benefit of treatment. Cardio-oncology is a recent discipline that aims to prevent, screen and manage cardiovascular diseases associated with or secondary to cancer treatment without compromising its effectiveness. These goals must therefore be integrated into the patient care program at the time of cancer diagnosis. Therefore, a cardiovascular toxicity risk assessment should be conducted prior treatment to identify patients candidate for closer monitoring. In parallel with their oncologic follow-up, these high-risk patients should receive cardiovascular follow-up that should not be restricted to a solely measurement of the left ventricular ejection fraction. Indeed, toxicities can be multiple, so the assessment must be comprehensive and should include at least clinical examination, ECG, cardiac imaging, and sometimes biomarkers. In the case of cardiovascular events, this organisation will enable an earlier and coordinated management with oncologists, which will result in an improvement of the patients' overall prognosis.

Comment organiser la prise en charge cardiovasculaire des patients cancéreux ? Les progrès thérapeutiques réalisés en cancérologie ont permis de diminuer la mortalité par cancer. Cependant, ces résultats sont obtenus parfois au prix d'effets indésirables cardiovasculaires, dont la survenue peut limiter le bénéfice global du traitement. La cardio-oncologie est une discipline récente visant à prévenir, dépister et prendre en charge les maladies cardiovasculaires associées ou secondaires au traitement anticancéreux sans en compromettre l'efficacité. Ces objectifs doivent donc s'intégrer dans le programme de soins des patients dès le diagnostic du cancer. Ainsi, une évaluation du risque de toxicité cardiovasculaire doit être réalisée avant tout traitement afin d'identifier les patients candidats à une surveillance plus rapprochée. En parallèle de leur suivi oncologique, ces patients à risque doivent bénéficier d'un suivi cardiovasculaire, qui ne doit pas se restreindre à une simple mesure de la fraction d'éjection du ventricule gauche. En effet, les toxicités pouvant être multiples, l'évaluation doit être globale et inclure au moins un examen clinique, un électrocardiogramme et une imagerie cardiaque, voire le suivi de marqueurs biologiques. En cas d'événements cardiovasculaires, cette organisation permet une prise en charge plus précoce et mieux coordonnée avec les oncologues, dont l'objectif est l'amélioration du pronostic global des patients.

Interprofessional collaboration in the cardiovascular management of Marfan syndrome: A qualitative study based on interviews with professionals.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with Marfan syndrome, who present with a variety of symptoms and complex psychosocial problems, require interprofessional collaboration in their care. However, it is unclear how health care providers contribute to interprofessional collaboration for these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of interprofessional collaboration for patients with Marfan syndrome in the cardiovascular field. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health care specialists (5 physicians, 2 nurses, and 3 certified genetic counselors) were analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: Based on the medical collaboration for the management of cardiovascular complications in patients and their relatives, interprofessional collaboration was identified, such as collaboration and cooperation between physicians and certified genetic counselors, and nursing practice to facilitate interprofessional collaboration. In addition, issues such as difficulties in dealing with and coordinating medical care for noncardiovascular complications, lack of specialist physicians, and lack of opportunities to collaborate with nurses were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Effective interprofessional collaboration requires the acquisition of Marfan syndrome and genetic knowledge by healthcare providers and the development of a healthcare delivery system based on departments that can provide leadership. In addition, the assignment of nurses to work across organizational boundaries and effective collaboration between genetic counselors and nurses should be considered.

High-Risk Aortic Plaque in Atrial Fibrillation: A Therapeutic Dilemma.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common cardiac arrhythmia, is often accompanied by aortic plaques that are associated with an increased risk of embolic events, including stroke. Evidence-based management in this population is lacking. We present a case of a 77-year-old female with new-onset AF who was found to have a high-risk aortic plaque at the level of the ascending aorta and ostium of the right coronary artery. Definitive treatment for AF, cardioversion, high-risk aortic plaque, and cardiothoracic surgery, could not be performed due to the elevated risk of ischemic stroke and embolic complications. Based on existing literature, the cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon collaboratively decided to treat both conditions with anticoagulation, statin, and periodic imaging surveillance of high-risk aortic plaque. The patient was successfully managed without any thromboembolic complications despite an elevated risk. This case report provides a comprehensive literature review of managing AF with high-risk aortic plaques. It delves into the integration of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents in the dual challenge of stroke prevention in AF and mitigating embolic risks associated with aortic plaques. To date, there has been no consensus on managing AF and high-risk aortic plaques; thus, we aim to fill this gap.

Effectiveness of Mindfulness and Positive Strengthening mHealth Interventions for the Promotion of Subjective Emotional Wellbeing and Management of Self-Efficacy for Chronic Cardiac Diseases.

Intervention in health prevention and treatment via mobile phones is becoming a key element on health promotion. Testing the efficacy of these mobile health (mHealth) psychological interventions for cardiovascular health is necessary as it is a chronic pathology, and it can influence the affective and cognitive states of patients. This research aimed to analyze the effectiveness of two brief psychological interventions-mindfulness and positive strengthening-to promote subjective emotional wellbeing and disease management self-efficacy using mHealth. This was a three-arm intervention and feasibility study, with a pre-post design and three follow-up measures with 105 patients (93 completed all phases) with cardiovascular diseases. Group 1 and 2 received the mindfulness or strengthening intervention, and Group 3 was the control group. The positive-negative affect and management self-efficacy for chronic and cardiovascular diseases were analyzed over time, while anxiety and depression levels were assessed at the beginning of the study. The results showed that mindfulness and positive strengthening interventions both had a positive effect on participants' affective state and management self-efficacy for the disease in comparison with the control group over time, even after controlling for baseline anxiety and depression levels. Positive strengthening seems to be more effective for improving cardiac self-efficacy, while mindfulness practice was significantly more effective at reducing negative affect at the first face-to-face evaluation.

Preoperative Assessment and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: Implementing a Systematic Stepwise Approach during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.

Major adverse cardiac events, defined as death or myocardial infarction, are common causes of perioperative mortality and major morbidity in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Reduction of perioperative cardiovascular risk in relation to non-cardiac surgery requires a stepwise patient evaluation that integrates clinical risk factors, functional status and the estimated stress of the planned surgical procedure. Major guidelines on preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment recommend to establish, firstly, the risk of surgery per se (low, moderate, high) and the related timing (elective vs. urgent/emergent), evaluate the presence of unstable cardiac conditions or a recent coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting), assess the functional capacity of the patient (usually expressed in metabolic equivalents), determine the value of non-invasive and/or invasive cardiovascular testing and then combine these data in estimating perioperative risk for major cardiac adverse events using validated scores (Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) or National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)). This stepwise approach has the potential to guide clinicians in determining which patients could benefit from cardiovascular therapy and/or coronary artery revascularization before non-cardiac surgery towards decreasing the incidence of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Finally, it should be highlighted that there is a need to implement specific strategies in the 2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to minimize the risk of transmission of COVID-19 infection during the preoperative risk assessment process.

Lifetime cardiovascular management of patients with previous Kawasaki disease.

Kawasaki disease (KD) is an inflammatory disorder of young children, associated with vasculitis of the coronary arteries with subsequent aneurysm formation in up to one-third of untreated patients. Those who develop aneurysms are at life-long risk of coronary thrombosis or the development of stenotic lesions, which may lead to myocardial ischaemia, infarction or death. The incidence of KD is increasing worldwide, and in more economically developed countries, KD is now the most common cause of acquired heart disease in children. However, many clinicians in the UK are unaware of the disorder and its long-term cardiac complications, potentially leading to late diagnosis, delayed treatment and poorer outcomes. Increasing numbers of patients who suffered KD in childhood are transitioning to the care of adult services where there is significantly less awareness and experience of the condition than in paediatric services. The aim of this document is to provide guidance on the long-term management of patients who have vascular complications of KD and guidance on the emergency management of acute coronary complications. Guidance on the management of acute KD is published elsewhere.

Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment, management and next steps.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality which cannot be fully explained by traditional CV risk factors; cumulative inflammatory burden and antirheumatic medication-related cardiotoxicity seem to be important contributors. Despite the acknowledgment and appreciation of CV disease burden in RA, optimal management of individuals with RA represents a challenging task which remains suboptimal. To address this need, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) published recommendations suggesting the adaptation of traditional risk scores by using a multiplication factor of 1.5 if two of three specific criteria are fulfilled. Such guidance requires proper coordination of several medical specialties, including general practitioners, rheumatologists, cardiologists, exercise physiologists and psychologists to achieve a desirable result. Tight control of disease activity, management of traditional risk factors and lifestyle modification represent, amongst others, the most important steps in improving CV disease outcomes in RA patients. Rather than enumerating studies and guidelines, this review attempts to critically appraise current literature, highlighting future perspectives of CV risk management in RA.