Prospective study to validate the clinical utility of DNA diagnosis of peritoneal fluid cytology test in gastric cancer.

The clinical efficacy of DNA cytology test (CY) in gastric cancer (GC) has been retrospectively proposed using cancer-specific methylation of cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1). We confirmed the clinical utility of DNA CY in a prospective cohort. Four hundred GC samples were prospectively collected for washing cytology (UMIN000026191), and detection of the DNA methylation of CDO1 was assessed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR in the sediments. Endpoint was defined as the match rate between conventional CY1 and DNA CY1 (diagnostic sensitivity), and the DNA CY0 rate (diagnostic specificity) in pStage IA. DNA CY1 was detected in 45 cases (12.5%), while CY1 was seen in 31 cases (8.6%) of 361 chemotherapy-naïve samples, where the sensitivity and specificity of the DNA CY in the peritoneal solutions were 74.2% and 96.5%, respectively. The DNA CY was positive for 3.5/0/4.9/11.4/58.8% in pStage IA/IB/II/III/IV, respectively (P < .01). In the multivariate analysis, DNA CY1 was independently correlated with pathological tumor depth (pT) (P = .0012), female gender (P = .0099), CY1 (P = .0135), P1 (P = .019), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (P = .036). The combination of DNA CY1 and P factor nearly all covered the potential peritoneal dissemination (P1 and/or CY1 and/or DNA CY1) (58/61:95.1%). DNA CY1 had a significantly poorer prognosis than DNA CY0 in GC patients (P < .0001). DNA CY1 detected by CDO1 promoter DNA methylation has a great value to detect minimal residual disease of the peritoneum in GC clinics, representing poor prognosis as a novel single DNA marker.

DNA diagnosis of peritoneal fluid cytology test by CDO1 promoter DNA hypermethylation in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease of the peritoneum is challenging for early cancer detection in gastric cancer (GC). Utility of PCR amplification of cancer-derived DNA has been considered feasible due to its molecular stability, however such markers have never been available in GC clinics. We recently discovered cancer-specific methylation of CDO1 gene in GC, and investigated the clinical potential to detect the minimal residual disease. METHODS: One hundred and two GC patients were investigated for peritoneal fluid cytology test (CY), and detection level of the promoter DNA methylation of CDO1 gene was assessed by quantitative methylation specific PCR (Q-MSP) in the sediments (DNA CY). RESULTS: (1) CY1 was pathologically confirmed in 8 cases, while DNA CY1 was detected in 18 cases. All 8 CY1 were DNA CY1. (2) DNA CY1 was recognized in 14.3, 25.0, 20.0, and 42.9%, in macroscopic Type II, small type III, large type III, and type IV, respectively, while it was not recognized in Type 0/I/V. (3) DNA CY1 was prognostic relevance in gastric cancer (p = 0.0004), and its significance was robust among Type III/IV gastric cancer (p = 0.006 for overall survival and p = 0.0006 for peritoneal recurrence free survival). (4) The peritoneal recurrence was hardly seen in GC patients with potent perioperative chemotherapy among those with DNA CY1. CONCLUSIONS: DNA CY1 detected by Q-MSP for CDO1 gene promoter DNA methylation has a great potential to detect minimal residual disease of the peritoneum in GC clinics as a novel DNA marker.

Promoter DNA methylation of CDO1 gene and its clinical significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

We have demonstrated that CDO1 methylation is frequently found in various cancers, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but its clinical relevance has remained elusive. CDO1 methylation was investigated in 169 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1996 and 2007. CDO1 methylation was assessed by Q-MSP (quantitative methylation specific PCR), and its clinical significance, including its relationship to prognosis, was analyzed. (i) The median TaqMeth value of CDO1 methylation was 9.4, ranging from 0 to 279.5. CDO1 methylation was significantly different between cStage I and cStage II/III (P = 0.02). (ii) On the log-rank plot, the optimal cut-off value was determined to be 8.9; ESCC patients with high CDO1 methylation showed a significantly worse prognosis than those with low CDO1 methylation (P = 0.02). (iii) A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified only CDO1 hypermethylation as an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.00, CI 1.09-3.78, P = 0.03). (iv) CDO1 hypermethylation stratified ESCC patients' prognosis in cStage II/III for both neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (NAC)-positive and NAC-negative cases. Moreover, the CDO1 methylation level was significantly lower in cases with Grade 2/3 than in those with Grade 0/1 (P = 0.02) among cStage II/III ESCC patients with NAC. Promoter DNA hypermethylation of CDO1 could be an independent prognostic factor in ESCC; it may also reflect NAC eradication of tumor cells in the primary tumors.

Hypermethylated CDO1 and CELF4 in cytological specimens as triage strategy biomarkers in endometrial malignant lesions.

Objective: Developing a non-invasive and reliable triage test for endometrial malignant lesions is an important goal, as it could help to reduce the number of invasive diagnostic procedures required and improve patient survival. We aimed to estimate the diagnostic value of DNA methylation levels in cervical cytological samples of endometrial cancer (EC) and endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH). Methods: A total of 607 women who had indications for endometrial biopsy in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Cangzhou Central Hospital from October 2022 to April 2023 were enrolled in this study. The cervical exfoliated cells were collected for gene methylation before endometrial biopsy. Clinical information, tumor biomarkers, and endometrial thickness (ET) of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) were also collected. With endometrial histopathology as the gold standard, multivariate unconditional logistic regression was applied to analyze the risk factors of endometrial malignant lesions. The role of cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) and CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 (CELF4) gene methylation as a triage strategy biomarker in endometrial malignant lesions was specifically explored. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that premenopausal ET ≥ 11 mm or postmenopausal ET ≥ 5 mm, CDO1 ΔCt ≤ 8.4, or CELF4 ΔCt ≤ 8.8 were the risk factors for AH and EC, with odds ratios (ORs) (95%CI) of 5.03 (1.83-13.82) and 6.92 (1.10-43.44), respectively (p-values < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of CDO1/CELF4 dual-gene methylation assay for AH and EC reached 84.9% (95%CI: 75.3%-94.5%) and 86.6% (95%CI: 83.8%-89.5%), respectively. ET combined with DNA methylation detection further improved the specificity to (94.9%, 95%CI: 93.1%-96.8%). Conclusion: The accuracy of cervical cytology DNA methylation is superior to that of other clinical indicators in the non-invasive examination of endometrial malignant lesions. DNA methylation combined with TVS can further improve the specificity and is a promising biomarker triage strategy in women with suspected endometrial lesions.

Hypermethylated CDO1 and ZNF454 in Cytological Specimens as Screening Biomarkers for Endometrial Cancer.

We aimed to estimate the diagnostic value of DNA methylation levels in cytological samples of endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical hyperplasia (AH). Two hypermethylated genes, namely, cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) and zinc finger protein 454 (ZNF454), in patients with EC were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. In 103 endometrial histological specimens (the training set), the methylation levels of candidate genes were verified by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP). The methylation levels of another 120 cytological specimens (the testing set) were evaluated. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were determined, with diagnosis verified by histopathological results. CDO1 and ZNF454 verified hypermethylation in histological specimens of patients with EC and AH compared with those with benign and normal endometrium (P < 0.001). In cytological specimens, hypermethylated CDO1 showed 86.36% Se and 90.79% Sp with the cutoff value of 6.0 to distinguish between malignant and benign groups; ZNF454 showed 79.55% Se and 93.42% Sp with the cutoff value of 7.1. When the two genes were combined, Se increased to 90.91% and Sp was 86.84%. AUC reached 0.931 (95% CI: 0.885-0.976). The diagnostic accuracy with cytology had no significant difference with endometrial tissue (P = 0.847 for CDO1, P = 0.108 for ZNF454, and P = 0.665 for their combination). Hypermethylated CDO1 and ZNF454 in endometrial cytology showed high Se, Sp, and AUC to detect EC and AH. Methylation analysis of endometrial cytology is promising biomarker for the screening of EC and AH.

Promoter hypermethylation of cysteine dioxygenase type 1 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

In the present study, promoter hypermethylation of cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) was evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues to assess the value of CDO1 as a novel biomarker to improve the diagnosis of NSCLC. Tumor tissue samples and corresponding normal lung tissue samples from 42 patients with NSCLC were obtained at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital (Changsha, China). Conventional methylation-specific PCR (cMSP) and methylation-on-beads followed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR (MOB-qMSP) were used to analyze the tumor and normal lung tissue samples. Using these two methods, promoter DNA hypermethylation of the CDO1 gene was detected in 59.4 and 71.0% of tumor tissues of patients with NSCLC and in 9.4 and 0% of normal lung tissue, respectively. Compared with the rate of methylation in the well-differentiated NSCLC tissues (15.4 and 55.6%, respectively), the rate of CDO1 gene promoter methylation was higher in the poorly differentiated tissues (89.5 and 92.3%, respectively). Overall, it was demonstrated that the MOB-qMSP method had a higher positive detection rate for CDO1 hypermethylation compared with the cMSP method. In conclusion, CDO1 gene promoter hypermethylation was more frequently observed in NSCLC tissues compared with in normal lung tissues, and a high methylation frequency of the CDO1 gene in biopsy specimens of NSCLC was associated with the degree of differentiation.

Promoter methylation of cysteine dioxygenase type 1: gene silencing and tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) acts as a tumor suppressor and is silenced by promoter methylation in various malignancies. The relationship between the CDO1 methylation status and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumorigenesis was evaluated. METHODS: Using a HCC cell line (SNU423), an in vitro demethylation study was performed to confirm whether promoter methylation causes CDO1 down-regulation. The SNU423 cells transfected with the CDO1 cell function was compared to that of naïve cells. An in vivo study using immunohistochemical staining of HCC specimens that were collected from patients who underwent curative liver resection was also performed. RESULTS: CDO1 was activated after demethylation treatment in the HCC specimens. Moreover, tumor cell proliferation, colony-forming, migration, and invasion activities significantly decreased after CDO1 transfection (p<0.05). The percentage of tumors that were larger than 5 cm was higher in patients who had a lower expression of CDO1 (p=0.030). Vascular invasion and histological grade were independent prognostic factors for poor overall and recurrence-free survival. The degree of CDO1 expression was not an independent prognostic factor in this study's population. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that methylation down-regulated CDO1 expression in the HCC cells. CDO1 methylation may be a potentially valuable diagnostic biomarker for HCC.