Evaluating intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath-hold.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intra-fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and to investigate the adequacy of the current planning target volume (PTV) margins. METHODS: Twenty-eight lung SBRT patients with DIBH were selected in this study. Among the lesions, twenty-three were at right or left lower lobe, two at right middle lobe, and three at right or left upper lobe. Post-treatment gated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was acquired to quantify the intra-fractional tumor shift at each treatment. These obtained shifts were then used to calculate the required PTV margin, which was compared with the current applied margin of 5 mm margin in anterior-posterior (AP) and right-left (RL) directions and 8 mm in superior-inferior (SI) direction. The beam delivery time was prolonged with DIBH. The actual beam delivery time with DIBH (Tbeam_DIBH) was compared with the beam delivery time without DIBH (Tbeam_wo_DIBH) for the corresponding SBRT plan. RESULTS: A total of 113 treatments were analyzed. At six treatments (5.3%), the shifts exceeded the tolerance defined by the current PTV margin. The average shifts were 0.0 ± 1.9 mm, 0.1±1.5 mm, and -0.5 ± 3.7 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The required PTV margins were determined to be 4.5, 3.9, and 7.4 mm in AP, RL, and SI directions, respectively. The average Tbeam_wo_DIBH and Tbeam_DIBH were 2.4 ± 0.4 min and 3.6 ± 1.5 min, respectively. The average treatment slot for lung SBRT with DIBH was 25.3 ± 7.9 min. CONCLUSION: Intra-fractional tumor motion is the predominant source of treatment uncertainties in CBCT-guided lung SBRT with DIBH. The required PTV margin should be determined based on data specific to each institute, considering different techniques and populations. Our data indicate that our current applied PTV margin is adequate, and it is possible to reduce further in the RL direction. The time increase of Tbeam_DIBH, relative to the treatment slot, is not clinically significant.

Setup margins based on the inter- and intrafractional setup error of left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH) and surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT).

PURPOSE: The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), and hypofractionated regimen requires adequate patient setup accuracy to achieve an optimal outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the setup accuracy of patients receiving left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH) and surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and to calculate the corresponding setup margins. METHODS: The patient setup accuracy between and within radiotherapy fractions was measured by comparing the 6DOF shifts made by the SGRT system AlignRT with the shifts made by kV-CBCT. Three hundred and three radiotherapy fractions of 23 left-sided breast cancer patients using DIBH and SGRT were used for the analysis. All patients received pre-treatment DIBH training and visual feedback during DIBH. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test patient setup differences for statistical significance. The corresponding setup margins were calculated using the van Herk's formula. RESULTS: The intrafractional patient setup accuracy was significantly better than the interfractional setup accuracy (p < 0.001). The setup margin for the combined inter- and intrafractional setup error was 4, 6, and 4 mm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions if based on SGRT alone. The intrafractional error contributed ≤1 mm to the calculated setup margins. CONCLUSION: With SGRT, excellent intrafractional and acceptable interfractional patient setup accuracy can be achieved for the radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer using DIBH and modern radiation techniques. This allows for reducing the frequency of kV-CBCTs, thereby saving treatment time and radiation exposure.

Surface-guided radiotherapy systems in locoregional deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for breast cancer - a multicenter study on the setup accuracy.

Background: Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique are recommended for locoregional RT of breast cancer. The optimal workflow for a combination of surface-guided RT (SGRT) with DIBH technique is of current clinical interest. Materials and methods: The setup accuracy at three hospitals was evaluated using different SGRT workflows. A total of 150 patients (2269 image pairs) were analyzed in three groups: patient setup with the AlignRT® SGRT system in Tampere (Site 1, n = 50), the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Turku (Site 2, n = 50) and the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Jönköping (Site 3, n = 50). Each site used their routine workflow with SGRT-based setup and IGRT positioning. Residual errors of the bony chest wall, thoracic vertebra (Th 1) and humeral head were evaluated using IGRT images. Results: Systematic residual errors in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction and in pitch were generally larger at Site 2 than those at Sites 1 and 3 (p = 0.01-0.7). With daily IGRT, only a small difference (p = 0.01-0.9) was observed in residual random errors of bony structures in other directions between sites. Conclusion: The introduction of SGRT and the use of daily IGRT lead to small residual errors when combining the best workflow practices from different hospitals. Our multicenter evaluation led to improved workflow by tightening the SGRT tolerances on Site 2 and fixation modification. Because of mainly small random errors, systematic posture errors in the images need to be corrected after posture correction with new setup surfaces. We recommend tight SGRT tolerances, good fixation and correction of systematic errors.

Cardiac segments dosimetric benefit from deep inspiration breath hold technique for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.

Background: The objective was to compare dosimetry in left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) patients receiving deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy (RT) with free-breathing (FB) treatment plans. Materials and methods: Voluntary DIBH with a spirometer-based video-assisted system and CT-simulation were performed under FB and DIBH conditions on 40 LSBC patients, segmented according Duane's atlas. IMRT plans kept the same dosimetric goals on FB and DIBH conditions. Target, lungs and heart volumes were measured. Planning target volume (PTV) dose distribution, organs at risk (OARs) dose/volume parameters, including cardiac substructures, were calculated. Results: Lungs and left-lung volumes increased in DIBH conditions (ΔV = 1637.8 ml ± 555.3 and 783.5 ml ± 286.4, respectively). Heart volume slightly decreased in apnea (p = 0.04), but target volumes, CTV and PTV were similar in FB or DIBH plans. PTV dose coverage was similar irrespective of respiratory conditions (median D50% = 41.1 Gy vs 41.0 Gy, p = 0.665; V95% = 96.9% vs. 97%). Mean dose for the whole heart (MHD), left ventricle (LV), and LV segments were significantly reduced in DIBH plans. V20 values for heart subvolumes were significantly different only for those that received considerable doses (apical and anterior). DIBH plans provided significantly smaller doses (Dmax, D2%, and V20) to the LAD artery. Conclusion: Important dosimetric improvements can be achieved with DIBH technique for LSBC patients, reducing the dose to the LAD artery and heart, particularly to the segments closer to the chest wall. Apical/anterior LV segments, should be considered as separate organ at risk in breast RT.

Deep inspiration breath-hold radiation therapy in left-sided breast cancer patients: a single-institution retrospective dosimetric analysis of organs at risk doses.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy can induce cardiac injury in left-sided breast cancer cases. Cardiac-sparing irradiation using the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique can achieve substantial dose reduction to vulnerable cardiac substructures compared with free breathing (FB). This study evaluated the dosimetric differences between both techniques at a single institution. METHODS: From 2017 to 2019, 130 patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS; n = 121, 93.1%) or mastectomy (ME; n = 9, 6.9%) along with axillary lymph node staging (n = 105, 80.8%), followed by adjuvant irradiation in DIBH technique; adjuvant systemic therapy was included if applicable. 106 (81.5%) patients received conventional and 24 (18.5%) hypofractionated irradiation. Additionally, 12 patients received regional nodal irradiation. Computed tomography (CT) scans in FB and DIBH position were performed for all patients. Intrafractional 3D position monitoring of the patient surface in deep inspiration and breath gating was performed using Sentinel and Catalyst HD 3D surface scanning systems (C-RAD, Catalyst, C­RAD AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Individual coaching and determination of breathing amplitude during the radiation planning CT was performed. Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed using standard tangential treatment portals (6 or 18 MV). The delineation of cardiac structures and both lungs was done in both the FB and the DIBH scan. RESULTS: All dosimetric parameters for cardiac structures were significantly reduced (p < 0.01 for all). The mean heart dose (Dmean) in the DIBH group was 1.3 Gy (range 0.5-3.6) vs. 2.2 Gy (range 0.9-8.8) in the FB group (p < 0.001). The Dmean for the left ventricle (LV) in DIBH was 1.5 Gy (range 0.6-4.5), as compared to 2.8 Gy (1.1-9.5) with FB (p < 0.001). The parameters for LV (V10 Gy, V15 Gy, V20 Gy, V23 Gy, V25 Gy, V30 Gy) were reduced by about 100% (p < 0.001). The LAD Dmean in the DIBH group was 4.1 Gy (range 1.2-33.3) and 14.3 Gy (range 2.4-37.5) in the FB group (p < 0.001). The median values for LAD such as V15 Gy, V20 Gy, V25 Gy, V30 Gy, and V40 Gy decreased by roughly 100% (p < 0.001). An increasing volume of left lung in the DIBH position resulted in dose sparing of cardiac structures. CONCLUSION: For all ascertained dosimetric parameters, a significant dose reduction could be achieved in DIBH technique.

Surface-guided DIBH radiotherapy for left breast cancer: impact of different thresholds on intrafractional motion monitoring and DIBH stability.

PURPOSE: To compare two left breast cancer patient cohorts (tangential vs. locoregional deep-inspiration breath-hold - DIBH treatment) with different predefined beam gating thresholds and to evaluate their impact on motion management and DIBH stability. METHODS: An SGRT-based clinical workflow was adopted for the DIBH treatment. Intrafractional monitoring was performed by tracking both the respiratory signal and the real-time displacement between the isocenter on the daily reference surface and on the live surface ("SGRT shift"). Beam gating tolerances were 5 mm/4 mm for the SGRT shifts and 5 mm/3 mm for the gating window amplitude for breast tangential and breast + lymph nodes locoregional treatments, respectively. A total of 24 patients, 12 treated with a tangential technique and 12 with a locoregional technique, were evaluated for a total number of 684 fractions. Statistical distributions of SGRT shift and respiratory signal for each treatment fraction, for each patient treatment, and for the two population samples were generated. RESULTS: Lateral cumulative distributions of SGRT shifts for both locoregional and tangential samples were consistent with a null shift, whereas longitudinal and vertical ones were slightly negative (mean values < 1 mm). The distribution of the percentage of beam on time with SGRT shift > 3 mm, > 4 mm, or > 5 mm was extended toward higher values for the tangential sample than for the locoregional sample. The variability in the DIBH respiration signal was significantly greater for the tangential sample. CONCLUSION: Different beam gating thresholds for surface-guided DIBH treatment of left breast cancer can impact motion management and DIBH stability by reducing the frequency of the maximum SGRT shift and increasing respiration signal stability when tighter thresholds are adopted.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer patients-comparative analysis of dose distribution and estimation of projected secondary cancer risk.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim of the study was estimation of the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer for both radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 25 patients who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), three treatment plans were generated: one using a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and two using volumetric modulated arc therapy. First VMAT-DIBH geometry consisted of three partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 3A) and second consisted of four partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 4A). Cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], ipsilateral and contralateral lung [IL, CL], and contralateral breast [CB]). Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) and organ equivalent doses (OEDs) were calculated using the differential DVHs. Excess absolute risks (EARs) for second cancers were estimated using Schneider's full mechanistic dose-response model. RESULTS: All plans fulfilled the criterium for PTV V95% ≥ 95%. The PTV coverage, homogeneity, and conformity indices were significantly better for VMAT-DIBH. VMAT showed a significantly increased mean dose and V5Gy for all OARs, but reduced LAD Dmax by 15 Gy. For IL, CL, and CB, the 3D-CRT DIBH method achieved the lowest values of EAR: 28.38 per 10,000 PYs, 2.55 per 10,000 PYs, and 4.48 per 10,000 PYs (p < 0.001), compared to 40.29 per 10,000 PYs, 15.62 per 10,000 PYs, and 23.44 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 3A plans and 41.12 per 10,000 PYs, 15.59 per 10,000 PYs, and 22.73 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 4A plans. Both techniques provided negligibly low NTCPs for all OARs. CONCLUSION: The study shows that VMAT-DIBH provides better OAR sparing against high doses. However, the large low-dose-bath (≤ 5 Gy) is still a concern due to the fact that a larger volume of normal tissues exposed to lower doses may increase a radiation-induced risk of secondary cancer.

Hybrid planning techniques for early-stage left-sided breast cancer: dose distribution analysis and estimation of projected secondary cancer-relative risk.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (h-IMRT), and hybrid Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (h-VMAT, h-ARC), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim was to estimate the projected relative risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers for hybrid techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three treatment plans were prepared in 3D-CRT, h-IMRT, and h-VMAT techniques for each of the 40 patients, who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). For hybrid techniques, plans were created by combining 3D-CRT and dynamic fields with an 80%/20% dose ratio for 3D-CRT and IMRT or VMAT. Cumulative dose-volume histograms were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], left and right lung [LL, RL], right breast [RB]). Projected risk ratios for secondary cancers were estimated relative to 3D-CRT using the organ equivalent dose (OED) concept for the Schneider's linear exponential, plateau, and full mechanistic dose-response model. RESULTS: All plans fulfilled the PTV criterium: V95%≥95%. Compared to 3D-CRT, both hybrid techniques showed significantly better target coverage (PTV: V95%>98%, p < 0.001), and the best conformality was achieved by h-ARC plans (CI: 1.18 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). Compared to 3D-CRT and h-ARC, h-IMRT increased the average sum of monitor units (MU) over 129.9% (p < 0.001). H-ARC increased the mean dose of contralateral organs and the LL V5Gy parameter (p < 0.001). Both hybrid techniques significantly reduced the Dmax of the heart by 5 Gy. Compared to h-IMRT, h-ARC increased secondary cancer projected relative risk ratios for LL, RL, and RB by 18, 152, and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed that both hybrid techniques provide better target quality and OARs sparing than 3D-CRT. Hybrid VMAT delivers less MU compared to hybrid IMRT but may increase the risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies.

Voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold with volumetric modulated arc therapy in pediatric patients with mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma.

Background: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) has been established to decrease normal tissue radiation dose in breast cancer. Methods: Forty-nine patients had two CT scans during DIBH or free breathing. Chest-wall position, setup verification and breath-hold monitoring were performed. Cone-beam CT and a surface image system were used for verification. Results: A total of 1617 breath-holds were analyzed in 401 fractions. The mean time bit was 6.01 min. The mean breaths-holds per fraction was 4.96. The median for intra-breath hold variability was 3 mm. No patient stopped treatment for intolerance. Clinical target volume margins were calculated as 0.36, 0.36 and 0.32 for the three translational positions. The mean saved volume was 26.3%. Conclusion: Voluntary DIBH is feasible, tolerable and easy to apply for children with Hodgkin lymphoma involving the mediastinum.

Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a radiotherapy maneuver to decrease the exposure of normal tissues during the radiation of the target organ. It was developed for the treatment of breast cancer, both intact breast and chest wall, after mastectomy. For mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma, especially in children and adolescents, DIBH will benefit in decreasing the radiation dose to the lungs and heart in this category of patients who still have normal growing tissues. We treated 49 pediatric and adolescent patients with DIBH and precise radiotherapy (volumetric modulated arc therapy) to augment the benefit of lowering the dose to normal tissues. All patients were trained and coached to breath-hold for more than 20 s. No patient stopped treatment due to poor tolerance or discomfort. Only one breath-hold was required for CT simulation in all populations (100%). The mean number of breath-holds per treatment fraction was 5.1 ± 1.8. The mean treatment time was 6 ± 1.8 min. DIBH is feasible, tolerable and easy to apply for children and adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma involving the mediastinum. A considerable dose volume could be saved, hence decreasing the rate of side effects.

Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep-inspiration breath-holds: A comparative dosimetric study.

Deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the radiation dose to the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy in cancer. However, there is not enough discussion about suitable breathing methods for DIBH. Therefore, we investigated the radiation doses and organ and body surface displacement in abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) and thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH). Free-breathing, A-DIBH, and T-DIBH computed tomography images of 100 patients were used. After contouring the targets, heart, and lungs, radiotherapy plans were created. We investigated the heart and lung doses, the associations between the heart and left lung displacements, and the thorax and abdominal surface displacements. No significant differences were observed in the target dose indices. However, the heart and lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH than in T-DIBH for all the indices; the mean heart and lung doses were 1.69 and 3.48 Gy, and 1.91 and 3.55 Gy in A-DIBH and T-DIBH, respectively. The inferior displacement of the heart and the left lung was more significant in A-DIBH. Therefore, inferior expansion of the heart and lungs may be responsible for the respective dose reductions. The abdominal surface displaced more than the thoracic surface in both A-DIBH and T-DIBH, and thoracic surface displacement was greater in T-DIBH than in A-DIBH. Moreover, A-DIBH can be identified because abdominal surface displacement was greater in A-DIBH than in T-DIBH. In conclusion, A-DIBH and T-DIBH could be distinguished by comparing the abdominal and thoracic surfaces of A-DIBH and T-DIBH, thereby ensuring the implementation of A-DIBH and reducing the heart and lung doses.

Reproducibility of chestwall and heart position using surface-guided versus RPM-guided DIBH radiotherapy for left breast cancer.

This study compared the reproducibility of chestwall and heart position using surface-guided versus RPM (real-time position management)-guided deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy for left sided breast cancer. Forty DIBH patients under either surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) or RPM guidance were studied. For patients treated with tangential fields, reproducibility was measured as the displacements in central lung distance (CLD) and heart shadow to field edge distance (HFD) between pretreatment MV (megavoltage) images and planning DRRs (digitally reconstructed radiographs). For patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), sternum to isocenter (ISO) distance (StID), spine to rib edge distance (SpRD), and heart shadow to central axis (CAX) distance (HCD) between pretreatment kV images and planning DRRs were measured. These displacements were compared between SGRT and RPM-guided DIBH. In tangential patients, the mean absolute displacements of SGRT versus RPM guidance were 0.19 versus 0.23 cm in CLD, and 0.33 versus 0.62 cm in HFD. With respect to planning DRR, heart appeared closer to the field edge by 0.04 cm with surface imaging versus 0.62 cm with RPM. In VMAT patients, the displacements of surface imaging versus RPM guidance were 0.21 versus 0.15 cm in StID, 0.24 versus 0.19 cm in SpRD, and 0.72 versus 0.41 cm in HCD. Heart appeared 0.41 cm further away from CAX with surface imaging, whereas 0.10 cm closer to field CAX with RPM. None of the differences between surface imaging and RPM guidance was statistically significant. In conclusion, the displacements of chestwall were small and were comparable with SGRT- or RPM-guided DIBH. The position deviations of heart were larger than those of chestwall with SGRT or RPM. Although none of the differences between SGRT and RPM guidance were statistically significant, there was a trend that the position deviations of heart were smaller and more favorable with SGRT than with RPM guidance in tangential patients.

Correlation between the setting of gating window width and setup accuracy in left breast cancer radiotherapy based on deep inspiration breath hold.

Personalized precision irradiation of patients with left-sided breast cancer is possible by examining the setup errors of 3- and 4-mm gated window widths for those treated with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) treatment. An observational study was performed via a retrospective analysis of 250 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 60 left-breast cancer patients who underwent whole-breast radiotherapy with the DIBH technique between January 2021 and 2022 at our hospital. Among them, 30 patients had a gated window width of 3 mm, while the remaining 30 had a gated window width of 4 mm; both groups received radiotherapy using DIBH technology. All patients underwent CBCT scans once a week, and the setup errors in the left-right (x-axis), inferior-superior (y-axis), and anterior-posterior (z-axis) directions were recorded. The clinical-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins of the two gating windows were calculated using established methods. The setup error in the Y direction was 1.69 ± 1.33 mm for the 3-mm - wide gated window and 2.42 ± 3.02 mm for the 4-mm - wide gated window. The two groups had statistically significant differences in the overall mean setup error (Dif 0.7, 95% CI 0.15-1.31, t = 2.48, p= 0.014). The Z-direction setup error was 2.32 ± 2.12 mm for the 3-mm - wide gated window and 3.15 ± 3.34 mm for the 4-mm - wide gated window. The overall mean setup error was statistically significant between the two groups (Dif 0.8, 95% CI 0.13-1.53, t= 2.34, p = 0.020). There was no significant difference in the X-direction setup error (p > 0.05). Therefore, the CTV-PTV margin values for a 3-mm gated window width in the X, Y, and Z directions are 5.51, 5.15, and 7.28 mm, respectively; those for a 4-mm gated window width in the X, Y, and Z directions are 5.52, 8.16, and 10.21 mm, respectively. The setup errors of the 3-mm - wide gating window are smaller than those of the 4-mm - wide gating window in the three dimensions. Therefore, when the patient's respiratory gating window width is reduced, the margin values of CTV-PTV can be reduced to increase the distance between the PTV and the organs at risk (OARs), which ensures adequate space for the dose to decrease, resulting in lower dose exposure to the OARs (heart, lungs, etc.), thus sparing the OARs from further damage. However, some patients with poor pulmonary function or unstable breathing amplitudes must be treated with a slightly larger gating window. Therefore, this study lays a theoretical basis for personalized precision radiotherapy, which can save time and reduce manpower in the delivery of clinical treatment to a certain extent. Another potential benefit of this work is to bring awareness to the potential implications of a slightly larger gating window during treatment without considering the resulting dosimetric impact.

Can we predict who will benefit from the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique for breast cancer irradiation?

Background: The objective was to explore the clinical use of an "in-house" prototype developed to monitor respiratory motion to implement the deep inspiration breath hold technique (DIBH), compare dosimetric differences, and assess whether simple anatomic metrics measured on free breathing (FB) computed tomography scan (CT) can help in selecting patients that would benefit the most from the technique. Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted on patients with left breast cancer with an indication of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast only. Treatment simulation consisted of four series of CTs: the first during FB and three in DIBH to assess the reproducibility and stability of apnea. Contouring was based on the RTOG atlas, and planning was done in both FB and DIBH. Dosimetric and geometric parameters were assessed and compared between FB and DIBH. Results: From June 2020 to December 2021, 30 patients with left breast cancer were recruited. Overall, the DIBH technique presented a mean dose reduction of 24% in the heart and 30% in the left anterior descendent coronary artery (LAD) (p < 0.05). The only geometric parameter correlated to a 30% dose reduction in the mean heart dose and LAD doses was the anterolateral distance from the heart to the chest wall of at least 1.5 cm measured on FB (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The prototype enabled the use of the DIBH technique with dose reductions in the heart and LAD. The benefit of the DIBH technique can be predicted on FB CT by measuring the distance between the heart and chest wall at the treatment isocenter.

Comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided whole-breast irradiation using automated planning.

BACKGROUND: Published treatment technique comparisons for postoperative left-sided whole breast irradiation (WBI) with deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) are scarce, small, and inconclusive. In this study, fully automated multi-criterial plan optimization, generating a single high-quality, Pareto-optimal plan per patient and treatment technique, was used to compare for a large patient cohort 1) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with two tangential fields and 2) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with two small tangential subarcs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight randomly selected patients recently treated with DIBH and 16â€¯× 2.66 Gy were included. The optimizer was configured for the clinical planning protocol. Comparisons between IMRT and VMAT included dosimetric plan parameters, estimated excess relative risks (ERR) for toxicities, delivery times, MUs, and deliverability accuracy at a linac. RESULTS: The automatically generated IMRT and VMAT plans applied in this study were similar or higher in quality than the manually generated clinical plans. For equal PTVin V95% (98.4 ± 0.9%), VMAT had significant advantages compared to IMRT regarding breast dose homogeneity and doses in heart and ipsilateral lung, at the cost of some minor deteriorations for contralateral breast (few cases with larger deteriorations) and lung. Conformality improved from 1.38 to 1.18 (p < 0.001). With VMAT, ERR for major coronary events and ipsilateral lung tumors were reduced by 3% (range: -1-12%) and 16% (range: -3-38%), respectively. MUs and delivery times were higher for VMAT. There were no statistical differences in γ passing rates. CONCLUSION: For WBI in conservative therapy of left-sided breast patients treated with DIBH, VMAT with two tangential subarcs was generally dosimetrically superior to IMRT with two tangential static fields. Results need confirmation by robustness analyses.

Incidental irradiation of the regional lymph nodes during deep inspiration breath-hold radiation therapy in left-sided breast cancer patients: a dosimetric analysis.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy using the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique compared with free breathing (FB) can achieve substantial reduction of heart and lung doses in left-sided breast cancer cases. The anatomical organ movement in deep inspiration also cause unintended exposure of locoregional lymph nodes to the irradiation field. METHODS: From 2017-2020, 148 patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME) with axillary lymph node staging, followed by adjuvant irradiation in DIBH technique. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy was administered depending on hormone receptor and HER2-status. CT scans in FB and DIBH position with individual coaching and determination of the breathing amplitude during the radiation planning CT were performed for all patients. Intrafractional 3D position monitoring of the patient surface in deep inspiration and gating was performed using Sentinel and Catalyst HD 3D surface scanning systems (C-RAD, Catalyst, C-RAD AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed using standard tangential treatment portals (6 or 18 MV). The delineation of ipsilateral locoregional lymph nodes was done on the FB and the DIBH CT-scan according to the RTOG recommendations. RESULTS: The mean doses (Dmean) in axillary lymph node (AL) level I, II and III in DIBH were 32.28 Gy (range 2.87-51.7), 20.1 Gy (range 0.44-53.84) and 3.84 Gy (range 0.25-39.23) vs. 34.93 Gy (range 10.52-50.40), 16.40 Gy (range 0.38-52.40) and 3.06 Gy (range 0.21-40.48) in FB (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, in DIBH the Dmean for AL level I were reduced by 7.59%, whereas for AL level II and III increased by 22.56% and 25.49%, respectively. The Dmean for the supraclavicular lymph nodes (SC) in DIBH was 0.82 Gy (range 0.23-4.11), as compared to 0.84 Gy (range 0.22-10.80) with FB (p = 0.002). This results in a mean dose reduction of 2.38% in DIBH. The Dmean for internal mammary lymph nodes (IM) was 12.77 Gy (range 1.45-39.09) in DIBH vs. 11.17 Gy (range 1.34-44.24) in FB (p = 0.005). This yields a mean dose increase of 14.32% in DIBH. CONCLUSIONS: The DIBH technique may result in changes in the incidental dose exposure of regional lymph node areas.

Intrafractional accuracy and efficiency of a surface imaging system for deep inspiration breath hold during ablative gastrointestinal cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Beam gating with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) usually depends on some external surrogate to infer internal target movement, and the exact internal movement is unknown. In this study, we tracked internal targets and characterized residual motion during DIBH treatment, guided by a surface imaging system, for gastrointestinal cancer. We also report statistics on treatment time. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 14 gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with surface imaging-guided DIBH volumetrically modulated arc therapy, each with at least one radiopaque marker implanted near or within the target. They were treated in 25, 15, or 10 fractions. Thirteen patients received treatment for pancreatic cancer, and one underwent separate treatments for two liver metastases. The surface imaging system monitored a three-dimensional surface with ± 3 mm translation and ± 3° rotation threshold. During delivery, a kilovolt image was automatically taken every 20° or 40° gantry rotation, and the internal marker was identified from the image. The displacement and residual motion of the markers were calculated. To analyze the treatment efficiency, the treatment time of each fraction was obtained from the imaging and treatment timestamps in the record and verify system. RESULTS: Although the external surface was monitored and limited to ± 3 mm and ± 3°, significant residual internal target movement was observed in some patients. The range of residual motion was 3-21 mm. The average displacement for this cohort was 0-3 mm. In 19% of the analyzed images, the magnitude of the instantaneous displacement was > 5 mm. The mean treatment time was 17 min with a standard deviation of 4 min. CONCLUSIONS: Precaution is needed when applying surface image guidance for gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Using it as a solo DIBH technique is discouraged when the correlation between internal anatomy and patient surface is limited. Real-time radiographic verification is critical for safe treatments.

Clinical experience of volumetric-modulated flattening filter free stereotactic body radiation therapy of lesions in the lung with deep inspiration breath-hold.

This clinical study aimed to evaluate lung cancer patients' ability to perform deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) during CT simulation and throughout the treatment course of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In addition, target sizes, organ at risk (OAR) sizes, and doses to the respective volumes in filter-free volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans performed under free-breathing (FB) and DIBH conditions were evaluated. Twenty-one patients with peripheral lesions were included, of which 13 were eligible for SBRT. All patients underwent training for breath-hold during CT, and if they complied with the requirements, two CT scans were obtained: CT scan in DIBH and a four-dimensional CT scan in FB. The treatment plans in FB and DIBH were generated, and the dose parameters and volume sizes were compared. The endpoints for evaluation were patient compliance, target dose coverage, and doses to the OARs. This clinical study showed high patient DIBH compliance during both CT simulation and treatment for patients with lung cancer. A significant reduction in target volumes was achieved with SBRT in DIBH, in addition to significantly decreased doses to the heart, chest wall, and lungs. DIBH in SBRT of lung lesions is feasible, and a routine to manage intra-fractional deviation should be established upon implementation.

Evidence-based region of interest (ROI) definition for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of abdominal cancers using deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH).

To define and evaluate the appropriate abdominal region of interest (ROI) as a surrogate of diaphragm positioning in deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of abdominal cancers using 3D optical surface imaging (OSI). Six potential abdominal ROIs were evaluated to calculate their correlations with the diaphragm position using 4DCT images of 20 abdominal patients. Twelve points of interest (POIs) were defined (six on the central soft tissue and six on the bilateral ribs) at three superior-inferior levels, and different sub-groups represented different ROIs. ROI-1 was the largest, containing all 12 POIs from the xiphoid to the umbilicus and between the lateral body midlines while ROI-2 had only eight inferior POIs, ROI-3 had six lateral POIs, and ROI-4 had four superior-lateral POIs over the ribs, ROI-5 contained six central and two most inferior-lateral POIs and ROI-6 contained six central and four inferior-lateral POIs. Internally, the right diaphragm dome was used to represent its positions in 4DCT (0% and 50% within the cycle). The Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the diaphragm dome and all 12 external POIs individually or grouped as six ROIs. The quality of the abdominal ROIs was evaluated as potential internal surrogates and, therefore, potential ROIs for SGRT DIBH setup. The four most inferior POIs show the highest mean correlation (r = 0.75) with diaphragmatic motion, and the correlation decreases as POIs move superiorly. The mean correlations are the highest for ROIs with little or no rib support: r = 0.67 for ROI-2, r = 0.64 for ROI-5, and r = 0.63 for ROI-6, while lower for ROIs with rib support: ROI-1 has r = 0.60, ROI-3 has r = 0.50, and ROI-4 has only r = 0.28. This study demonstrates that the rectangular/triangular soft-tissue ROI (with little rib support) is an optimal surrogate for body positioning and diaphragmatic motion, even when treating tumors under the rib cage. This evidence-based ROI definition should be utilized when treating abdominal cancers with free-breathing (FB) and/or DIBH setup.

A system for real-time monitoring of breath-hold via assessment of internal anatomy in tangential breast radiotherapy.

The deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique assists in sparing the heart, lungs, and liver during breast radiotherapy (RT). The quality of DIBH is currently assessed via surrogates which correlate to varying degrees with the patient's internal anatomy. Since modern linacs are equipped with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID), images of the irradiated anatomy streamed from EPIDs and analyzed in real time could significantly improve assessment of the quality of DIBH. A system has been developed to quantify the quality of DIBH during tangential breast RT by analyzing the "beam's eye view" images of the treatment fields. The system measures the lung depth (LD) and the distance from the breast surface to the posterior tangential radiation field edge (skin distance, SD) at three user-defined locations. LD and SD measured in real time in EPID images of two RT phantoms showing different geometrical characteristics of their chest wall regions (computed tomography dose index [CTDI] and "END-TO-END" stereotactic body radiation therapy [E2E SBRT]) were compared with ground truth displacements provided by a precision motion platform. Performance of the new system was evaluated via static and dynamic (sine wave motion) measurements of LD and SD, covering clinical situations with stable and unstable breath-hold. The accuracy and precision of the system were calculated as the mean and standard deviation of the differences between the ground truth and measured values. The accuracy of the static measurements of LD and SD for the CTDI phantom was 0.31 (1.09) mm [mean (standard deviation)] and -0.10 (0.14) mm, respectively. The accuracy of the static measurements for E2E SBRT phantom was 0.01 (0.18) mm and 0.05 (0.08) mm. The accuracy of the dynamic LD and SD measurements for the CTDI phantom was -0.50 (1.18) mm and 0.01 (0.12) mm, respectively. The accuracy of the dynamic measurements for E2E SBRT phantom was -0.03 (0.19) mm and 0.01 (0.11) mm.

Radiation-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction: Optimizing Radiation Delivery and Postradiation Care.

Radiation therapy (RT) is part of standard-of-care treatment of many thoracic cancers. More than 60% of patients receiving thoracic RT may eventually develop radiation-induced cardiac dysfunction (RICD) secondary to collateral heart dose. This article reviews factors contributing to a thoracic cancer patient's risk for RICD, including RT dose to the heart and/or cardiac substructures, other anticancer treatments, and a patient's cardiometabolic health. It is also discussed how automated tracking of these factors within electronic medical record environments may aid radiation oncologists and other treating physicians in their ability to prevent, detect, and/or treat RICD in this expanding patient population.