RESUMO
The demand within the European Union (EU) for the crucial raw material Scandium (Sc), coupled with the lack of sufficient recovery strategies, has gravitated research into exploiting alternative secondary sources. Utilizing residues from ore-production processes has proven to be a successful attempt for advanced Sc recovery. Despite the emergence of new technologies for Sc recovery from such residues, the potential environmental impacts of byproducts and technology wastes are often disregarded. Our study aimed to assess the environmental efficiency of a pilot-scale Sc recovery technology that relies solely on filtration. We employed a problem-specific ecotoxicity toolkit based on the approach of Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA). The results of DTA provide an indication of the scale of the adverse effect of (contaminated) samples without the necessity of translating the results into chemical concentration. Standardized test methods (Aliivibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition, Daphnia magna lethality and Sinapis al b a root and shoot elongation inhibition) were applied, supplemented by a bioconcentration assessment with the D. magna bioaccumulation test method to gain insight on the bioaccumulation potential of different metals in the case of all samples from the filtration technology. Comprehensive genotoxicity evaluations were also implemented using three distinct test methods (Ames test, Ames MPF test, SOS Chromotest). We conducted a comparative direct toxicity assessment to anticipate the potential environmental impacts of residues generated at each filtration step on the aquatic ecosystem. Our findings indicate that the environmental impact of the generated intermediate and final residues was alleviated by the consecutive filtration steps employed. The pilot-scale application of the Sc recovery technology achieved a high and statistically significant reduction in toxicity according to each test organism during the filtration processes. Specifically, toxicity decreased by 73 %, 86 % and 87 % according to the Aliivibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition assay, the Sinapis alba shoot elongation inhibition test, and the Daphnia magna lethality test, respectively. The toolbox of industrial ecotoxicology is recommended to predict the environmental performance of metal recovery technologies related to potential ecosystem effects.
RESUMO
The lack of high-grade scandium (Sc) ores and recovery strategies has stimulated research on the exploitation of non-ore-related secondary sources that have great potential to safeguard the critical raw materials supply of the EU's economy. Waste materials may satisfy the growing global Sc demand, specifically residues from titanium dioxide (TiO2) production. New technologies are being developed for the recovery of Sc from such residues; however, the possible environmental impacts of intermediary products and residues are usually not considered. In order to provide a comprehensive ecotoxicity characterisation of the wastes and intermediate residues resulting from one promising new technology, acid-resistant nanofiltration (arNF), a waste-specific ecotoxicity toolkit was established. Three ecotoxicity assays were selected with specific test parameters providing the most diverse outcome for toxicity characterisation at different trophic levels: Aliivibrio fischeri (bacteria) bioluminescence inhibition (30 min exposure), Daphnia magna (crustacean) lethality and immobilisation (24 h exposure) and Lemna minor (plant) growth inhibition with determination of the frond number (7 d exposure). According to our results, the environmental impact of the generated intermediate and final residues on the aquatic ecosystem was mitigated by the consecutive steps of the filtration methods applied. High and statistically significant toxicity attenuation was achieved according to each test organism: toxicity was lowered based on EC20 values, according to the A. fischeri bioluminescence inhibition assay (by 97%), D. magna lethality (by 99%) and L. minor frond number (by 100%), respectively, after the final filtration step, nanofiltration, in comparison to the original waste. Our results underline the importance of assessing chemical technologies' ecotoxicological and environmental impacts with easy-to-apply and cost-effective test methods to showcase the best available technologies.