Oral Prednisone Use Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Increase Infections, but can be Associated With Higher Risk for Medical and Surgical Complications.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative use of oral prednisone to augment the effect of multimodal pain regimens after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased in popularity. However, data on the risks of its utilization, especially as it relates to infection, have been lacking. We tested the null hypothesis that perioperative prednisone use is not associated with the incidence of surgical and medical complications after TKA. METHODS: Using a national administrative claims database, we identified 949,555 patients undergoing primary TKA. We excluded patients who filled oral prednisone prescriptions within 90 days prior to surgery or between 90 and 364 days after surgery. Patients who had acute prednisone use were defined as those who filled prednisone prescriptions only within 30 days after surgery. Outcomes consisted of surgical and medical complications after TKA. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between acute prednisone use and complications, adjusting for age, sex, region, insurance plan, and Elixhauser comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients in the acute prednisone cohort had greater adjusted odds of subsequent manipulation under anesthesia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.23 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.09 to 1.38]; P < .001) and lysis of adhesions (adjusted OR = 1.58 [95% CI: 1.02 to 2.33]; P = .03) compared to patients who did not have acute prednisone use. Patients who had acute prednisone use also had greater adjusted odds of acute kidney injury (adjusted OR = 1.47 [95% CI: 1.25 to 1.71]; P < .001) and pneumonia (adjusted OR = 4.04 [95% CI: 3.53 to 4.59]; P < .001). There was no increased incidence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisone use shortly following TKA may be associated with a higher incidence of certain surgical and medical complications, but without increased risk for infection. However, given these risks, the optimal patient profile for postoperative prednisone use remains to be defined.

Effect of the enhanced recovery protocol in patients with brain tumors undergoing elective craniotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Enhanced recovery after surgery, or the enhanced recovery protocol (ERP), introduces a contemporary concept for perioperative care within neurosurgery. In recent years, mounting evidence has highlighted the significant impact of this approach on brain tumor surgery. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of current publications, with a primary focus on assessing the efficiency and safety of implementing ERP in the management of patients undergoing elective craniotomies for brain tumor resection. METHODS: This study followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases was performed, and two independent reviewers extracted the data, assessed bias, and resolved disagreements through discussion. Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization cost. The secondary outcomes were complications, including death, reoperation, readmission, intracerebral hemorrhage, CNS infection, and deep vein thrombosis. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the effects of implementing the ERP using the mean difference (MD) for primary outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Eight studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective studies, and 2 retrospective studies, were included in this meta-analysis. The ERP group had significantly shorter LOS (MD -2.69, 95% CI -3.65 to -1.73; p < 0.00001, I2 = 87%) and lower hospitalization cost (MD -$1188 [US dollars] 95% CI -$1726 to -$650; p = 0.0008, I2 = 71%) than the non-ERP group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of perioperative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of the ERP in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing elective craniotomies for brain tumors. This protocol has demonstrated the ability to reduce hospital stays and costs while maintaining a low complication rate. However, the study acknowledges the presence of clinical and statistical heterogeneity among the included articles, limiting the scope of its conclusions. Further high-quality comparative studies are necessary to substantiate these findings and establish their reliability.

Determination of Knowledge and Attitudes of Cardiac Surgery Nurses Regarding the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the knowledge and attitudes of cardiac surgery nurses regarding the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. DESIGN: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. METHODS: The sample consisted of 50 nurses working in the cardiovascular surgery clinic of a university hospital in the province of Izmir, Turkey. A questionnaire consisting of three sections was prepared by the researchers to collect data. The first section of the form captured sociodemographic and descriptive characteristics; the second section examined the level of knowledge about the enhanced recovery protocol for cardiac surgery; the third section captured the nurses' attitudes regarding the enhanced recovery protocol. The questionnaire was distributed to the nurses and the research data were collected after a certain amount of time. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and correlation analysis were used in the analysis of the data. FINDINGS: The mean age of the nurses was 31.26 ± 6.74 (min = 23, max = 47); 78% were female; 76% had a bachelor's degree; 48% were employed in the intensive care unit. The mean score of the nurses regarding their level of knowledge on the enhanced recovery protocol for cardiac surgery was 18.70 ± 5.29 (min = 0.00, max = 28.00); the mean score regarding attitude toward the enhanced recovery protocol after surgery was 30.00 ± 3.86 (min = 12.00, max = 33.00). There was a positive, moderate, statistically significant correlation (r = 0.396, P = .005) between the mean knowledge level score and the mean attitude level score. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that nurses' knowledge was at a moderately positive level. Increasing the level of knowledge increased positive attitudes. Recommendations include disseminating protocol information and providing necessary training to increase positive attitudes in an effort to ensure protocol adherance.

Objective recovery time with end-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite reports of the short-term benefits of end-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis, we are aware of no prospective studies in which these methods were compared. We hypothesized the superiority of end-to-side over side-to-side anastomosis in terms of recovery after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer under an enhanced recovery program. METHODS: From September 2016 to August 2019, 130 patients were randomly allocated to receive end-to-side or side-to-side anastomosis at a single tertiary hospital in Korea. The primary outcome was the cumulative recovery rate seven days after surgery, defined as the percentage of patients who met all four recovery criteria: diet tolerance, no analgesia, safe ambulation, and an afebrile status. Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the χ2 test, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare variables, as applicable. RESULTS: The cumulative recovery rate at seven days did not differ between patients receiving end-to-side (92.3%, 60/65) or side-to-side anastomosis (92.3%, 60/65; P ≥ 0.999). The end-to-side and side-to-side groups had similar cumulative recovery rates at postoperative days 4, 5, and 6 (end-to-side vs. side-to-side: 41.5% vs 35.4%, P = 0.589; 73.8% vs 63.1%, P = 0.257; and 86.2% vs 81.5%, P = 0.634, respectively). None of the secondary endpoints differed for end-to-side vs. side-to-side anastomosis: the median length of postoperative hospitalization (5 [IQR 5-7] vs. 6 [IQR 5-7] days, respectively, P = 0.376), the 30-day complication rate (16.9% vs. 12.3%, respectively, P = 0.620), the enhanced recovery protocol failure rate (10.8% vs. 7.7%, respectively, P = 0.763), and the 30-day readmission rate (4.6% vs. 3.1%, respectively, P ≥ 0.999). CONCLUSIONS: End-to-side anastomosis was not superior to side-to-side anastomosis in terms of recovery criteria after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. These findings do not provide evidence for a functional advantage of end-to-side compared to side-to-side anastomosis.

[Ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy : First experiences at the CHU of Liège]. / Colectomie cœlioscopique ambulatoire. Premières expériences au CHU de Liège.

CONTEXT: For many years, enhanced recovery programs (ERP) for colorectal surgery have been developed in many hospitals around the world. Recently, our institution took a new step forward in colonic surgery : ambulatory laparoscopic colectomies. METHODS: Our eligibility criteria for our ambulatory colectomy program were defined and our perioperative ERP protocol was adapted to the ambulatory setting. Five patients consented to inclusion in this program. RESULTS: Patients' characteristics were as follows : four women, one male, age : 48 years (range 21-67); surgical indication : cancer in two patients, diverticulitis in two patients, and Crohn disease in one patient. The surgical site was the left colon in four cases and the right colon in one case. Four out of the five patients left the hospital 5-8 h after the end of the surgery. No postoperative complication occurred, no readmission was necessary. DISCUSSION: This article discusses the benefits and risks of ambulatory colectomy. We emphasize that such outpatient management must not be pursued at the expense of the patient's safety and well-being.

Contexte : Depuis de nombreuses années, les programmes de réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie (RAC) colorectale ont été développés dans de nombreux centres hospitaliers à travers le monde. Récemment, notre institution a franchi une nouvelle étape en chirurgie colique : la réalisation de colectomies coelioscopiques en ambulatoire. Méthodes : Après avoir déterminé nos critères d'inclusion dans le programme de colectomie ambulatoire et adapté notre protocole péri-opératoire de RAC au contexte ambulatoire, nous y avons inclus cinq patients. Résultats : Les caractéristiques des patients étaient les suivantes : quatre femmes et un homme; âge : 48 ans (range 21-67); indications chirurgicales : deux patients pour cancer, deux patients pour diverticulite et un patient pour maladie de Crohn. La colectomie concernait le côlon gauche dans quatre cas et le côlon droit dans un cas. Quatre des cinq patients ont quitté l'hôpital 5-8 h après la fin de l'intervention chirurgicale. Aucune complication postopératoire n'est survenue, aucune réadmission n'a été nécessaire. Discussion : Cet article discute les bénéfices et risques de la colectomie ambulatoire. Nous insistons sur le fait qu'une prise en charge ambulatoire ne doit pas être poursuivie au détriment du bien-être et de la sécurité du patient.

[Enhanced recovery after surgery in colorectal surgery]. / La réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie colorectale.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery consists of multidisciplinary, multimodal, and patient-centred care. The implementation of pre-, intra-, and post-operative measures mitigates the surgical stress, the inflammatory reaction, and their consequences. The elements of this protocol are evidence-based medicine. This allows improved and accelerated recovery. Consequently, ERAS reduces the incidence of medical complications by 50 %, including fewer infectious complications, and a possible positive impact on survival after oncologic surgery. Hospital length of stay is shortened. There is no contraindication to ERAS, which must be used for all patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Adaptation of the protocol will nevertheless be necessary in the event of urgent surgery.

La réhabilitation améliorée après chirurgie (RAC) colorectale est une prise en charge multidisciplinaire et multimodale, centrée sur le patient. La mise en place de mesures pré-, per- et postopératoires réduit la réponse au stress chirurgical, la réaction inflammatoire et leurs conséquences. Ce protocole de soins, basé sur des preuves scientifiques, permet une récupération améliorée et accélérée. L'incidence des complications médicales est, secondairement, réduite de 50 %. La réhabilitation améliorée se traduit par une diminution significative de la durée d'hospitalisation, une diminution des complications infectieuses et, probablement, par un impact positif sur la survie après chirurgie oncologique. Il n'y a pas de contre-indication à la RAC qui doit donc être proposée à tous les patients devant subir une chirurgie colorectale. Une adaptation du protocole sera néanmoins nécessaire en cas de chirurgie urgente.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enhances early postoperative recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multimodal, multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to reduce surgical stress and enhance recovery in the postoperative period. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of ERAS protocol in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients with pancreatic/periampullary cancer who underwent PD between January 2016 to August 2017 were included in the study. As per the institute ERAS protocol, nasogastric tube (NGT) was removed on postoperative day (POD) 1 if output was less than 200 mL and oral sips were allowed; oral liquids were allowed on POD2; semisolid diet by POD3; abdominal drain was removed on POD 4 if output was less than 100 mL with no evidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF); normal diet was allowed on POD5. Discharge criteria on POD6 were afebrile, tolerating oral normal diet, pain free and no surgery related complications (defined as per the ISGPS definitions). RESULTS: NGT was removed on POD1 in 45 (90%) patients, abdominal drain removed by POD4 in 41 (82%) and 43 (86%) patients were discharged on POD6. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. Three (6%) patients had delayed gastric emptying (DGE). None had postoperative hemorrhage and POPF. Readmission rate was 8%. A significant relation was found between the length of hospital stay (LOS) with age (P < 0.05) and a marginal relation between LOS and postoperative albumin (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol can be safely followed in the perioperative care of patients who undergo PD. Early removal of NGT and allowing oral diet restore bowel function early. ERAS decreases the LOS and postoperative complications.

Recovery of gastric ileus following laparoscopic ventral rectopexy within an enhanced recovery protocol.

PURPOSE: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol has had limited adoption in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR), and the extent of gastric ileus shortly after LVR remains unknown. This study was designed to assess the degree of gastric emptying shortly after LVR within an ERAS protocol. METHODS: From August 2012 to June 2014, 40 patients diagnosed with external or internal rectal prolapse were recruited. All patients underwent LVR within an ERAS protocol. Carbohydrate solution (CS) was administered before and 5 h after surgery on the same day. The pyloric area (PA) was measured using ultrasonography before and after each CS intake. RESULTS: The PA was measured in 34 patients. The PA measured prior to CS intake, before surgery, was not significantly different from that after surgery. The rate of increase in the PA, which was calculated by the PA measured 1 h after CS intake divided by the PA measured prior to CS intake before surgery, was not significantly different from that after surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was 1 (1-2) day, and 36 patients (90 %) were discharged on the first postoperative afternoon. CONCLUSION: Postoperative gastric ileus was resolved in most cases within 5 h after LVR under an ERAS protocol.

Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for lung volume reduction surgery: an observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is an established therapeutic option for advanced emphysema. To improve patients' safety and reduce complications, an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) was implemented. This study aims to describe and evaluate the short-term outcome of this ERP. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre study included all consecutive LVRS patients (1 January 2017 until 15 September 2020). An ERP for LVRS was implemented and stepwise optimised from 1 August 2019, it consisted of changes in pre-, peri- and postoperative care pathways. Patients were compared before and after implementation of ERP. Primary outcome was incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo), and secondary outcomes included chest tube duration, incidence of prolonged air leak (PAL), length of stay (LOS) and 90-day mortality. Lung function and exercise capacity were evaluated at 3 and 6 months post-LVRS. RESULTS: Seventy-six LVRS patients were included (pre-ERP: n=41, ERP: n=35). The ERP cohort presented with lower incidence of postoperative complications (42% vs 83%, P=0.0002), shorter chest tube duration (4 vs 12 days, P<0.0001) with a lower incidence of PAL (21% vs 61%, P=0.0005) and shorter LOS (6 vs 14 days, P<0.0001). No in-hospital mortality occurred in the ERP cohort versus 4 pre-ERP. Postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s was higher in the ERP cohort compared to pre-ERP at 3 months (1.35 vs 1.02 l) and at 6 months (1.31 vs 1.01 l). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of ERP as part of a comprehensive reconceptualisation towards LVRS, demonstrated fewer postoperative complications, including PAL, resulting in reduced LOS. Improved short-term functional outcomes were observed at 3 and 6 months.

Enhanced recovery protocols in trauma and emergency abdominal surgery: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) have been shown to improve patient outcomes and is now regarded as standard of care in elective surgical setting. However, the literature addressing the use of ERP in trauma and emergency abdominal surgery (EAS) is limited and heterogenous. A scoping review was conducted to comprehensively assess the literature on ERP in trauma laparotomy and EAS. METHODS: Three bibliographic databases were searched for studies addressing ERP in trauma laparotomy and EAS. We extracted the study characteristics including study design, country, year, surgical procedures, ERP components used, and outcomes. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS: After screening of 1631 articles for eligibility, 39 studies were included in the review. There has been an increase in the number of articles in the field, with 44% of the identified studies published between 2020 and 2022. Fourteen different protocols were identified, with varying components for each operative phase (preoperative; 29, intraoperative; 20, postoperative; 27). The majority of the studies addressed the effectiveness of ERP on clinical outcomes (31/39: 79%). Only two studies (5%) included purely trauma populations. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on ERP implementations in the EAS populations were published across a range of countries, with improved outcomes. However, a clear gap in ERP research on trauma laparotomy was identified. This scoping review indicates that standardization of care through ERP implementation has potential to improve the quality of care in both EAS and trauma laparotomy.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Combined with an "Antimicrobial-Free" Strategy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) combined with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in the treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) without antibiotics. Methods: In this study, a total of 160 patients with AUA who underwent LA between January 2018 and December 2021 were included and divided into the antibiotic group (n = 80) or the no-antibiotic group (n = 80). The patients in the antibiotic group received the ERP combined with antimicrobials during the perioperative period, while those in the no-antibiotic group only received the ERP during the perioperative period. The clinical data of these patients were collected to compare the inflammation level and stress state before and after surgery. In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications and the recovery speed of the patients were compared between groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the inflammation level and stress state before or after surgery, the incidence of postoperative complications or the recovery speed between the antibiotic group and the no-antibiotic group (P > .05). Conclusion: The use of ERP combined with LA as an antimicrobial-free treatment scheme in the perioperative period was found to be safe and effective for patients with AUA. Therefore, this approach is clinically valuable.

The Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol Implementation on Postoperative Pain Management in the Era of Opioid Crisis: The Postchemotherapy Open RPLND Experience.

AIM: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been proven to optimize postoperative outcomes; however, misuse of opioid analgesics can still hinder postoperative recovery due to related side effects and potential complications. INTRODUCTION: To determine if the implementation of ERAS protocol in post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) patients could help with reducing postoperative pain and opioid use. METHODS: A case-control study of consecutive testicular cancer patients with indications for PCRLPND, who were offered Conventional Post-operative Management (CPM) or ERAS protocol. Outcomes of interest included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-assessed pain level at postoperative days 3, 7, and 30, and Morphine-Equivalent Doses (MEDs)/postoperative day. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative complications were recorded. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In total, 100 opioid-naïve PC-RPLND patients were studied. CPM and ERAS groups (36 and 64 patients, respectively) had similar demographic and baseline clinical characteristics). ERAS group patients had significantly lower blood loss (p = 0.005), blood transfusion rate (p < 0.001), and duration of the procedure (p < 0.001). Post-operative complications were comparable between groups. Nausea and bowel disorders were numerically but not statistically more frequent in the CPM group. ERAS patients had shorter mean hospital stay (5.3 ± 1.4 vs. 7.4 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001), lower daily MEDs (4.73 ± 2.63 vs. 7.04 ± 2.29, p < 0.001), and lower VAS scores on post-operative day 7 (3.89 ± 1.07 vs. 4.67 ± 1.17, p = 0.001). Post-operative pain was similar between groups on post-operative days 3 and 30. CONCLUSION: Systematic implementation of ERAS protocol after PC-RPLND improves pain management, optimizes patient recovery, and prevents over-prescription of opioid analgesics.

Achieving opioid-free discharge following robotic thoracic surgery: A single-institution experience.

Objectives: Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) protocols use a combination of analgesics for pain control and have been associated with decreased opioid requirements. We investigated the impact of continual ERATS refinement on the incidence of opioid-free discharge. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively maintained institutional database for elective, opioid-naive robotic thoracoscopic procedures. Demographics, operative outcomes, postoperative opioid dispensed (morphine milligram equivalent), and opioid discharge status were collected. Our primary outcome of interest was factors associated with opioid-free discharge; our secondary objective was to determine the incidence of new persistent opioid users. Results: In total, 466 patients from our optimized ERATS protocol were included; 309 (66%) were discharged without opioids. However, 34 (11%) of patients discharged without opioids required a prescription postdischarge. Conversely, 7 of 157 patients (11%), never filled their opioid prescriptions given at discharge. Factors associated with opioid-free discharges were nonanatomic resections, mediastinal procedures, minimal pain, and lack of opioid usage on the day of discharge. More importantly, 3.2% of opioid-free discharge patients became new persistent opioid users versus 10.8% of patients filling opioid prescriptions after discharges (P = .0013). Finally, only 2.3% of opioid-naive patients of the entire cohort became chronic opioid users; there was no difference in the incidence of chronic use by opioid discharge status. Conclusions: Optimized opioid-sparing ERATS protocols are highly effective in reducing opioid prescription on the day of discharge. We observed a very low rate of new persistent or chronic opioid use in our cohort, further highlighting the role ERATS protocols in combating the opioid epidemic.

Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols reduces opioid use in pediatric laparoscopic Heller myotomy surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are effective means of standardizing and improving the quality of surgical care in adults. Our purpose was to retrospectively compare outcomes before and after implementation of ERPs in children undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. METHODS: A pediatric-specific ERP was used for children undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy starting July 2017 at two pediatric surgery centers within a single metropolitan healthcare system. A retrospective review of 8 patients undergoing Heller myotomies between July 2014 and July 2017 was performed as a control. This cohort was compared to 14 patients managed post-ERP implementation (2017-2020). Outcomes of interest investigated included opioid use during admission, narcotics at discharge, time to regular diet, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in opioid use both while in the hospital and at time of discharge. Mean morphine equivalent use was 4.50 mg in the pre-ERP cohort and 1.97 mg in the post-ERP cohort. Furthermore, 8 out of 14 (57%) patients in the post-ERP cohort received no opioids during the admission compared with only 2 out of 8 (25%) patients in the pre-ERP cohort. Only 1 out of 14 (7.14%) patients in the post-ERP cohort was discharged with a prescription for opioid medication while 6 out of 8 (75%) in the pre-ERP cohort were discharged with an opiate prescription. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERP in children undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy surgery is safe and effective and leads to a reduction in opioid use during admission and at discharge. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Effects of Surgical Approaches and Enhanced Recovery Protocols on the Cost Effectiveness of Radical Cystectomy.

Enhanced recovery protocols and robotic approaches to radical cystectomy are known to reduce perioperative complications; however, the most cost-effective strategy is unknown. We aim to assess the cost effectiveness of radical cystectomy with different surgical techniques and perioperative treatment protocols. We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing open radical cystectomy (ORC), robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using extracorporeal (ECUD) or intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Operative time, transfusion, complication, Ileus, length of stay and re-admission rates were extracted. US costs for surgery, treatment, hospitalization and complications were obtained from the literature. Israeli costs were obtained from hospital administrative data. Two cost effectiveness models (US and Israel) were developed. The two most cost-effective strategies in both models were ORC with ERAS and RARC with ICUD and ERAS. RARC with ERAS produced the two most effective strategies with ICUD being dominant over ECUD. All strategies implementing the ERAS protocol were more effective than their parallel non-ERAS strategies. RARC with ICUD and ERAS is cost effective compared to ORC. ERAS protocol improves treatment effectiveness and lowers overall costs. ICUD was shown to be more effective and less costly in comparison to ECUD.

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Trends in Length of Stay and Post-discharge Complications After Colon Surgery in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: With widespread adoption of enhanced recovery protocols and a push toward shorter length of stay (LOS) following colon surgery, the extent to which complications have shifted to the post-discharge setting is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize changes in LOS and post-discharge complications over time and (2) evaluate risk factors associated with post-discharge complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective colon resection from 2012 to 2018 were identified from the ACS NSQIP Colectomy-Targeted Dataset. Changes in LOS and the proportion of post-discharge complications were evaluated over time, and predictors of post-discharge complications were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 98,136 patients who underwent colon resection, median LOS decreased from 5 days in 2012 to 4 days in 2018. Overall, 30-day complication rate was 21.5%, which decreased during the study period (25.8 to 19.1%, p < 0.001). Of the 13 individual complications evaluated, 4 demonstrated a significant increase in the proportion of post-discharge events including overall SSI (55.8 to 63.3%, p = 0.002), superficial SSI (57.3 to 75.7%, p < 0.001), wound disruption (46.0 to 62.1%, p = 0.047), and UTI (41.5 to 62.7%, p < 0.001). Factors associated with the development of any post-discharge complication included female sex, ASA III/IV/V, dependent functional status, and higher BMI. Intraoperative factors included wound class, operation time, and approach. CONCLUSIONS: Although LOS and 30-day complications decreased over time, the proportion of events occurring post-discharge increased for several complications. We identified specific factors associated with post-discharge complications which emphasize the importance of a patient monitoring program to early identify and manage post-discharge complications.

Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in patients undergoing mastectomies for breast cancer: an interrupted time-series design.

Background: We reviewed internal data and the current literature to update our enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for patients undergoing a total breast mastectomy. Following implementation, the protocol was audited by chart review and compliance reminders were sent through email. Objective: Our primary research aim was to examine the protocol compliance following the update. Our secondary aims were to examine the association between the change in protocol and the rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and hematoma formation requiring reoperation. Methods: We retrospectively obtained data extracted from the electronic medical record. To test for a difference in outcomes before versus after implementation of the protocol we used multivariable logistic regression with the primary comparisons excluding a â€‹± â€‹one-month window and secondary comparisons excluding a â€‹± â€‹three-month window from the date of implementation. Results: Our cohort included 5853 unique patients. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compliance increased by 17%-52% (P â€‹< â€‹0.001) and the use of intraoperative ketorolac dropped from 44% to nearly no utilization (0.7%; P â€‹< â€‹0.001). The rate of reoperation due to bleeding decreased from 3.6% to 2.6% after implementation with the adjusted decrease being 1.0% (bootstrap 95% CI, 0.11%, 1.9%; P â€‹= â€‹0.053) excluding a â€‹± â€‹1 month window and 1.2% (bootstrap 95% CI, 0.24%, 2.0%; P â€‹= â€‹0.028) excluding a â€‹± â€‹3-month window. The rate of rescue antiemetics dropped by 6.4% (95% CI, 3.9%, 9.0%). Conclusions: We were able to improve compliance for nearly all components of the protocol which translated to a meaningful change in an important patient outcome.

Targets for Intervention? Preoperative Predictors of Postoperative Ileus After Colorectal Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus occurs in up to 30% of colorectal surgery patients and is associated with increased length of stay, costs, and morbidity. While Enhanced Recovery Protocols seek to accelerate postoperative recovery, data on modifiable preoperative factors associated with postoperative ileus in this setting are limited. We aimed to identify preoperative predictors of postoperative ileus following colorectal surgery in Enhanced Recovery Protocols, to determine new intervention targets. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years old who underwent colorectal surgery via Enhanced Recovery Protocols (7/2015-7/2017). Postoperative ileus was defined as nasogastric tube insertion postoperatively or nil-per-os by postoperative day 4. Preoperative risk factors including comorbidities and medication use were identified using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 530 patients, 14.9% developed postoperative ileus. On univariate analysis of perioperative and postoperative factors, postoperative ileus patients had increased psychiatric illness, antidepressant and antipsychotic use, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, ileostomy creation, postoperative opioid use, complications, surgery duration, and length of stay (p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression model for preoperative factors identified psychiatric illness, preoperative antipsychotic use, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥ 3 as significant predictors of postoperative ileus (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Postoperative ileus remains a common complication following colorectal surgery under Enhanced Recovery Protocols. Patients with pre-existing psychiatric comorbidities and preoperative antipsychotic use may be a previously overlooked cohort at increased risk for postoperative ileus. Additional research and preoperative interventions within Enhanced Recovery Protocols to reduce postoperative ileus for this higher-risk population are needed.

Bariatric Enhanced Recovery Protocol: a Community Quality Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric enhanced recovery protocols can decrease length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs without compromising patient safety. Increased data is needed to compare patient outcomes before and after application of enhanced recovery pathways. We present a bariatric enhanced recovery protocol (BERP) at a community hospital. The objectives were to decrease hospital LOS and reduce schedule II substance use (medications with a high potential for abuse, potentially resulting in psychological or physical dependence), without compromising patient safety. METHODS: This was a combined retrospective and prospective analysis of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery by two surgeons from September 2016 to April 2018. Mann-Whitney U, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were evaluated. Overall median (interquartile range) age was 43.0 (36.0-54.0) years and body mass index (BMI) was 45.0 (40.6-50.3) kg/m2. Pre-protocol mean hospital LOS was 2.3 days while enhanced recovery protocol patients mean LOS was 1.4 days (p < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of BERP patients were discharged on hospital day 1, while no patients prior to the protocol were discharged before hospital day 2. Only 9% of BERP patients were discharged with schedule II medications, compared to 100% of the pre-protocol patients (p < 0.001). Intraoperative, in-hospital, and 30-day complication rates were not statistically significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Community hospitals can reduce length of stay and narcotic prescribing without compromising safety-related outcomes. Significant reductions in the amount of schedule II medications can be achieved when using multimodal enhanced recovery protocol approaches.

Comparative effectiveness of surgeon-performed transversus abdominis plane blocks and epidural catheters following open hernia repair with transversus abdominis release.

PURPOSE: Recovery protocols aim to limit narcotic administration following ventral hernia repair (VHR). However, little is known about the contribution of a protocol's individual components on patient outcomes. We previously reported that surgeon-performed transversus abdominis plane block (TAP-block) is more effective than ultrasound-guided TAP-block following VHR. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two postoperative analgesia modalities: epidural catheter and surgeon-performed TAP-block following VHR performed with transversus abdominis release (TAR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on data prospectively collected between 2012 and 2019. All patients undergoing open VHR with TAR performed by a single surgeon were identified. Parastomal hernia repairs and any patients receiving ultrasound-guided TAP blocks or paraspinal blocks were excluded. Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS) with secondary outcomes including pain scores, opioid requirements, and 30-day morbidity. Linear regression was used to model LOS. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria (63 epidural, 72 TAP-block). The majority (67.4%) of patients were modified ventral hernia working group grade 2. The only statistically significant difference in postoperative pain scores between the groups was on postoperative day 2 (TAP block 3.19 versus epidural 4.11, p = 0.0126). LOS was significantly shorter in the TAP block group (4.7 versus 6.2 days, p = 0.0023) as was time to regular diet (3.2 versus 4.7 days, p < 0.0001). After controlling for confounders, epidural was associated with increased LOS by 1.3 days (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: Epidural use following VHR with TAR is associated with increased LOS and increased time to regular diet without reducing pain or opioid use when compared to surgeon-performed TAP block.