A Practical Significance Bias in Laypeople's Evaluation of Scientific Findings.

People often rely on scientific findings to help them make decisions-however, failing to report effect magnitudes might lead to a potential bias in assuming findings are practically significant. Across two online studies (Prolific; N = 800), we measured U.S. adults' endorsements of expensive interventions described in media reports that led to effects that were small, large, or of unreported magnitude between groups. Participants who viewed interventions with unreported effect magnitudes were more likely to endorse interventions compared with those who viewed interventions with small effects and were just as likely to endorse interventions as those who viewed interventions with large effects, suggesting a practical significance bias. When effect magnitudes were reported, participants on average adjusted their evaluations accordingly. However, some individuals, such as those with low numeracy skills, were more likely than others to act on small effects, even when explicitly prompted to first consider the meaningfulness of the effect.

The Impact of Additive Population(s), Intervention, Comparator(s), and Outcomes in a European Joint Clinical Health Technology Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential number of European Union (EU) population(s), intervention, comparator(s), and outcomes (PICOs) based on European Network for Health Technology Assessment 21 (EUnetHTA 21) guidance and to explore further evidence-based opportunities to produce more predictable and workable EU PICOs. METHODS: The consolidated EU PICOs of 2 future hypothetical medicines in first-line non-small cell lung cancer (1L NSCLC) and third line multiple myeloma (3L MM) were derived using published health technology assessment reports of 2 recent medicines in similar indications based on EUnetHTA 21 proposed guidance. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of additional PICO requests. The number of analyses requested was estimated. RESULTS: In 1L NSCLC and 3L MM, 6 and 9 EU Member States (MS), respectively, had published health technology assessment reports. PICO consolidation resulted in 10 PICOs for 1L NSCLC and 16 PICOs for 3L MM, increasing to 14 and 18 PICOs, respectively, when England's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence scope was included to proxy remaining MS. A minimum of 280 and 720 analyses would be requested, exponentially increasing as additional outcome measures and subgroups are requested. CONCLUSIONS: The PICO approach outlined by EUnetHTA 21 results in a significant number of analysis requests and substantial resources. Use of complementary analyses alongside evidence-based methods to derive PICOs and engaging with the health technology developer throughout the process would create a workable EU PICO that is predictable and most impactful for the EU, resulting in a timely and high-quality assessment report that is more usable at a MS level.

Letter to editor: Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: Comparative systematic review and meta­analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases.

The "Letter to the Editor" titled "Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases" provides a detailed analysis of different scalp incision techniques in decompressive hemicraniectomy procedures. While commendable for its systematic approach and valuable insights, the letter has several limitations, including a lack of transparency in the search strategy, failure to address potential sources of bias, and a narrow focus on technical aspects without considering broader outcome domains and practical considerations. Despite these limitations, the letter underscores the importance of evidence-based decision-making in neurosurgical practice and calls for further research to address these gaps.

"Research ends with publication": a qualitative study on the use of health policy and systems research in Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making about the design and implementation of health care policies should be supported by research evidence. This article reports on a qualitative study on the experiences of both research institutes and policymakers in Ethiopia in generating and using research evidence to inform health policy decision-making. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted from January through March 2020, with representatives of research institutes and with policymakers in Ethiopia. The data collected during the interviews were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Half of the institutions represented had engaged in health policy and systems research (HPSR). These institutes' capacities were limited by multiple factors, including unsupportive research environments; the limited number of researchers with extensive experience; high turnover among senior researchers; lack of staff motivation mechanisms; underdeveloped research culture; limited technical and analytical capacity among researchers; lack of core funding for HPSR; ineffective financial management; and, lack of connections with health policy platforms. Research institutes also lacked the capacity in strategic packaging of findings to influence policy decision-making, although some programs have recently improved in this area. Meanwhile, there lacked a culture of using evidence in policymaking settings. In general, we found that policymakers had poor attitudes towards the quality or value of the evidence, and had little capacity to interpret evidence and apply findings to policy options. As a result, much of the research produced by the institutes have only been relevant academically, with little impact on policy. However, respondents reported that the environment is slowly changing, and the recent creation of a Research Advisory Council at the Ministry of Health offers a promising model. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some recent changes, in Ethiopia researchers and policymakers alike often tend to consider health policy and systems research (HPSR) to be not very valuable since the findings generated are rarely used for evidence-informed policy development. Research institutes and researchers need to strengthen their technical, analytical, and administrative capacities (through, among other efforts, seeking more funding for research, and better incentives to attract, retain and build skills among qualified researchers); they also need to improve their understanding of the evidence-to-policy cycle and how to engage effectively with policymakers.

The Value and Impacts of Academic Public Health Departments.

The academic health department (AHD) is a partnership between an academic institution and a governmental health agency. These partnerships are meant to provide mutual benefits that include opportunities for student field placements and internships, practice-informed curriculum, and practice-based research. The term academic health department dates back only to 2000, although there are several examples of academic-practice partnerships prior to that date. In addition to AHDs that have been established over the past two decades, other forms of academic-practice engagement provide similar mutual benefits, such as prevention research centers and public health training centers. Current research on AHDs explores how these partnerships matter regarding the outputs, outcomes, and impacts of the units that comprise them. This review also considers the most recent perspectives on how AHDs have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic and how they might advance public health's efforts to address structural racism and promote health equity.

Assessment of data demand for informed-decisions among health facility and department heads in public health facilities of Amhara Region, northwest Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based decision-making is a foundation of health information systems; however, routine health information is not mostly utilized by decision makers in the Amhara region. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the facility and department heads' perceptions towards the demand for and use of routine health information for decision making. METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative study was done in eight districts of the Amhara region from June 10/2019 to July 30/2019. We obtained written informed consent and recruited 22 key informants purposively. The research team prepared a codebook, assigned codes to ideas, identified salient patterns, grouped similar ideas, and developed themes from the data. Thus, data were analyzed thematically using OpenCode software. RESULTS: The study revealed that health workers collected many data, but little was demanded and utilized to inform decisions. The majority of respondents perceived that data were collected merely for reporting. Lack of skills in data management, analysis, interpretation, and use were the technical attributes. Individual attributes included low staff motivation, carelessness, and lack of value for data. Poor access to data, low support for Health Information System, limited space for archiving, and inadequate finance were related to organizational attributes. The contextual (social-political) factors also influenced the use of eHealth applications for improved data demand and use among health care providers. CONCLUSION: In this study, health workers collect routine health data merely for reporting, and they did not demand and use it mostly to inform decisions and solve problems. Technical, individual, organizational, and contextual attributes were contributors to low demand and use of routine health data. Thus, we recommend building the technical capacity of health workers, introducing motivation mechanisms and ensuring accountability systems for better data use.

Dissemination of public health research evidence and guidelines to Australian Early Childhood Education and Care staff: Views about source, content and format.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Effective dissemination of public health research and evidence-based guidelines to Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) staff is critical for promoting research transfer and uptake and achieving positive outcomes for children. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during August 2021 to March 2022, with a sub-sample of Australian ECEC services participating in a larger survey completed online and via Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview. Survey items assessed: influential source for receiving research, type of content that would influence decisions to adopt research and preferred formats for receiving research. RESULTS: Overall, 993 service managers or staff from 1984 (50.0%) invited and eligible services completed the larger survey. Of these, 463 randomly allocated services (46.7%) had staff complete the dissemination items. The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority, ECEC agencies and Government Departments were most frequently selected as influential sources of research evidence. Staff were most interested in content providing evidence-based recommendations for future actions and descriptions of health issues addressed. Workshops or conferences and webinars were the preferred format for receiving research. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the importance of tailoring dissemination strategies to meet ECEC staff needs and engaging influential sources to disseminate research evidence. SO WHAT?: Understanding dissemination preferences of ECEC staff is crucial for supporting uptake of evidence-based health promotion in this setting. By developing tailored strategies based on ECEC preferences, research transfer and evidence-based decision making can be supported more effectively. These findings contribute to bridging the evidence-practice gap and improving the quality of care and health outcomes for children in ECEC settings.

Evidence-based practice improves patient outcomes and healthcare system return on investment: Findings from a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice and decision-making have been consistently linked to improved quality of care, patient safety, and many positive clinical outcomes in isolated reports throughout the literature. However, a comprehensive summary and review of the extent and type of evidence-based practices (EBPs) and their associated outcomes across clinical settings are lacking. AIMS: The purpose of this scoping review was to provide a thorough summary of published literature on the implementation of EBPs on patient outcomes in healthcare settings. METHODS: A comprehensive librarian-assisted search was done with three databases, and two reviewers independently performed title/abstract and full-text reviews within a systematic review software system. Extraction was performed by the eight review team members. RESULTS: Of 8537 articles included in the review, 636 (7.5%) met the inclusion criteria. Most articles (63.3%) were published in the United States, and 90% took place in the acute care setting. There was substantial heterogeneity in project definitions, designs, and outcomes. Various EBPs were implemented, with just over a third including some aspect of infection prevention, and most (91.2%) linked to reimbursement. Only 19% measured return on investment (ROI); 94% showed a positive ROI, and none showed a negative ROI. The two most reported outcomes were length of stay (15%), followed by mortality (12%). LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Findings indicate that EBPs improve patient outcomes and ROI for healthcare systems. Coordinated and consistent use of established nomenclature and methods to evaluate EBP and patient outcomes are needed to effectively increase the growth and impact of EBP across care settings. Leaders, clinicians, publishers, and educators all have a professional responsibility related to improving the current state of EBP. Several key actions are needed to mitigate confusion around EBP and to help clinicians understand the differences between quality improvement, implementation science, EBP, and research.

Strengthening the Interface of Evidence-Based Decision Making Across European Regulators and Health Technology Assessment Bodies.

OBJECTIVES: Access to medicines in Europe depends on a benefit-risk decision taken by regulators and a relative effectiveness assessment performed by health technology assessment bodies (HTABs) to inform, as one element, a reimbursement decision. Although various similarities in evidence needs exist, understanding of their needs is currently suboptimal and therefore the evidence generated does not always meet their needs. Subsequently, delays in decision making can be expected, negatively affecting access. To overcome this, this study reviewed the evidentiary needs of European regulators and HTABs at European level and analyzed how their collaboration can further facilitate optimal evidence generation plans, evidence use, and evidence presentation. METHODS: Through systematic literature review, expert interviews, and pairwise comparison of assessment reports by the European Medicines Agency and European network for health technology assessment, respective clinical evidence requirements and impact of product-specific collaboration between European Medicines Agency and HTABs were established. RESULTS: Clinical evidence needs are quite similar but differences exist in comparator choice, preferred efficacy endpoints, and target population. Results of the impact of collaboration to date were mixed: preapproval joint advice procedures were successful and highly valued by all stakeholders; information exchange at the time of regulatory decision is coming together, yet the European Public Assessment Report can be further optimized; and collaboration on postlicensing evidence generation requirements shows potential but needs solidifying. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the potential to further improve the evidence utilization across stakeholders to avoid duplication and streamline decision making, to ultimately improve access to medicines for European patients.

Improving species-based area protection in Antarctica.

Area protection is a major mechanism deployed for environmental conservation in Antarctica. Yet, the Antarctic protected areas network is widely acknowledged as inadequate, in part because the criteria for area protection south of 60°S are not fully applied. The most poorly explored of these criteria is the type locality of species, which provides the primary legal means for Antarctic species-based area protection and a method for conserving species even if little is known about their habitat or distribution. The type locality criterion has not been systematically assessed since its incorporation into the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty in 1991, so the extent to which the criterion is being met or might be useful for area protection is largely unknown. To address the matter, we created and analyzed a comprehensive database of Antarctic type localities of terrestrial and lacustrine lichens, plants, and animals. We compiled the database via a literature search of key taxonomic and geographic terms and then analyzed the distance between type localities identifiable to a ≤ 25km2 resolution and current Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (ASPAs) and human infrastructure. We used a distance-clustering approach for localities outside current ASPAs to determine candidate protected areas that could contain these unprotected localities. Of the 386 type localities analyzed, 108 were within or overlapped current ASPAs. Inclusion of the remaining 278 type localities in the ASPA network would require the designation of a further 105 protected areas. Twenty-four of these areas included human infrastructure disturbance. Given the slow rate of ASPA designation, growing pace of human impacts on the continent, and the management burden associated with ASPAs, we propose ways in which the type locality criterion might best be deployed. These include a comprehensive, systematic conservation planning approach and an alternative emphasis on the habitat of species, rather than on a single locality.

Mejoría de la Protección Basada en Especies de Áreas en la Antártida Resumen La protección de áreas es un mecanismo importante implementado para la conservación ambiental en la Antártida. Sin embargo, generalmente se identifica como inadecuada a la red de áreas antárticas protegidas porque no se aplican totalmente los criterios para la protección de áreas al sur de los 60°S. De estos criterios, el menos explorado es el de la localidad tipo de las especies, el cual proporciona el principal medio legal para la protección basada en las especies de áreas en la Antártica y un método para la conservación de especies, incluso si se sabe poco sobre su hábitat o distribución. El criterio de la localidad tipo no ha sido evaluado sistemáticamente desde que se incorporó al Protocolo Ambiental del Tratado Antártico en 1991, por lo que se desconoce en gran parte el grado al que se cumple el criterio o cuán útil podría ser para proteger el área. Creamos y analizamos una base de datos integral de las localidades tipo de líquenes, plantas, y animales terrestres y lacustres para abordar este tema. Compilamos la base de datos a partir de la búsqueda de términos geográficos y taxonómicos relevantes en la literatura y después analizamos la distancia entre las localidades tipo identificables a una resolución ≤25km2 y las Áreas Especialmente Protegidas de la Antártida (AEPA) existentes y la infraestructura humana. Usamos una estrategia de agrupamiento de distancias para las localidades externas a las AEPA existentes para determinar áreas protegidas candidatas que podrían albergar estas localidades sin protección. De las 386 las localidades tipo analizadas, 108 estaban dentro de o se traslaparon con las AEPA existentes. La inclusión de las otras 278 localidades tipo dentro de la red AEPA requeriría de la designación de 105 áreas adicionales. En 24 de estas áreas existieron alteraciones por la infraestructura humana. Debido al ritmo lento de designación de AEPA, el avance del impacto humano en el continente y el costo de la gestión asociado con las AEPA, proponemos algunas formas en las que podría implementarse de mejor manera el criterio de la localidad tipo. Estas formas incluyen una estrategia sistemática e integral de la planeación de la conservación y un énfasis alternativo en el hábitat de la especie en lugar de en una sola localidad.

Closing the knowledge-action gap in conservation with open science.

The knowledge-action gap in conservation science and practice occurs when research outputs do not result in actions to protect or restore biodiversity. Among the diverse and complex reasons for this gap, three barriers are fundamental: knowledge is often unavailable to practitioners and challenging to interpret or difficult to use or both. Problems of availability, interpretability, and useability are solvable with open science practices. We considered the benefits and challenges of three open science practices for use by conservation scientists and practitioners. First, open access publishing makes the scientific literature available to all. Second, open materials (detailed methods, data, code, and software) increase the transparency and use of research findings. Third, open education resources allow conservation scientists and practitioners to acquire the skills needed to use research outputs. The long-term adoption of open science practices would help researchers and practitioners achieve conservation goals more quickly and efficiently and reduce inequities in information sharing. However, short-term costs for individual researchers (insufficient institutional incentives to engage in open science and knowledge mobilization) remain a challenge. We caution against a passive approach to sharing that simply involves making information available. We advocate a proactive stance toward transparency, communication, collaboration, and capacity building that involves seeking out and engaging with potential users to maximize the environmental and societal impact of conservation science.

Cierre de la Brecha entre el Conocimiento y la Acción en la Conservación con Ciencia Abierta 21-311 Resumen La brecha entre el conocimiento y la acción en las ciencias de la conservación y en su práctica ocurre cuando los resultados de las investigaciones no derivan en acciones para proteger o restaurar la biodiversidad. Entre las razones complejas y diversas de esta brecha, existen tres barreras que son fundamentales: con frecuencia el conocimiento no está disponible para los practicantes, es difícil de interpretar o difícil de usar, o ambas. Los problemas con la disponibilidad, interpretabilidad y utilidad son solucionables mediante las prácticas de ciencia abierta. Consideramos los beneficios y los obstáculos de tres prácticas de ciencia abierta para su uso por parte de los científicos y practicantes de la conservación. Primero, las publicaciones de acceso abierto hacen que la literatura científica esté disponible para todos. Segundo, los materiales abiertos (métodos detallados, datos, códigos y software) incrementan la transparencia y el uso de los hallazgos de las investigaciones. Tercero, los recursos educativos abiertos permiten que los científicos y practicantes de la conservación adquieran las habilidades necesarias para utilizar los productos de las investigaciones. La adopción a largo plazo de las prácticas de ciencia abierta ayudaría a los investigadores y a los practicantes a lograr los objetivos de conservación mucho más rápido y de manera eficiente y a reducir las desigualdades que existen en la divulgación de información. Sin embargo, los costos a corto plazo para los investigadores individuales (incentivos institucionales insuficientes para participar en la ciencia abierta y en la movilización del conocimiento) todavía son un reto. Advertimos sobre las estrategias pasivas de divulgación que simplemente hacen que la información esté disponible. Abogamos por una postura proactiva hacia la transparencia, la comunicación, la colaboración y la construcción de las capacidades que incluyen la búsqueda de y la interacción con los usuarios potenciales para maximizar el impacto ambiental y social de las ciencias de la conservación.

Comparison of various heat waves definitions and the burden of heat-related mortality in France: Implications for existing early warning systems.

INTRODUCTION: In France, a heat warning system (HWS) has been implemented almost two decades ago and rely on some official heat wave (HW) definitions. However, no study has compared the burden associated with a large set of alternative HW definitions to the official definitions. Such comparison could be particularly helpful to identify HW conditions for which effective HWS would minimize the health burden across various geographical contexts and possibly update thresholds to trigger HWS. The aim of this study is to identify (and rank) definitions that drive the highest health burden in terms of mortality to inform future HWS across multiple cities in France. METHODS: Based on weather data for 16 French cities, we compared the two official definitions used in France to: i) the Excess Heat Factor (EHF) used in Australia, and ii) 18 alternative hypothetical HW definitions based on various combinations of temperature metrics, intensity, and duration. Propensity score matching and Poisson regressions were used to estimate the effect of each HW exposure on non-accidental mortality for the May-September period from 2000 to 2015. RESULTS: The associations between HW and mortality differed greatly depending on the definition. The greatest burden of heat was 1,055 (95% confidence interval "CI": [856; 1,302]) deaths per summer and was obtained with the EHF. The EHF identified HW with 2.46 (95% CI: [1.92; 3.58]) or 8.18 (95% CI: [6.63; 10.61]) times the global burden at the national level obtained with the climatological indicator of the French national weather service and the HW indicator of the French national HWS, respectively and was the most impactful definition pattern for both temperate oceanic and Mediterranean climate types. CONCLUSION: Identifying the set of extreme heat conditions that drive the highest health burden in a given geographical context is particularly helpful when designing or updating heat early warning systems.

Assessment of extreme heat and hospitalizations to inform early warning systems.

Heat early warning systems and action plans use temperature thresholds to trigger warnings and risk communication. In this study, we conduct multistate analyses, exploring associations between heat and all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations, to inform the design and development of heat-health early warning systems. We used a two-stage analysis to estimate heat-health risk relationships between heat index and hospitalizations in 1,617 counties in the United States for 2003-2012. The first stage involved a county-level time series quasi-Poisson regression, using a distributed lag nonlinear model, to estimate heat-health associations. The second stage involved a multivariate random-effects meta-analysis to pool county-specific exposure-response associations across larger geographic scales, such as by state or climate region. Using results from this two-stage analysis, we identified heat index ranges that correspond with significant heat-attributable burden. We then compared those with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service (NWS) heat alert criteria used during the same time period. Associations between heat index and cause-specific hospitalizations vary widely by geography and health outcome. Heat-attributable burden starts to occur at moderately hot heat index values, which in some regions are below the alert ranges used by the NWS during the study time period. Locally specific health evidence can beneficially inform and calibrate heat alert criteria. A synchronization of health findings with traditional weather forecasting efforts could be critical in the development of effective heat-health early warning systems.

Leveraging Research Synthesis Methods to Support Evidence-Based Policy- and Decision-Making.

This commentary discusses the potential utility of research syntheses for evidence-based policy- and decision-making, examining the papers that comprise the special issue on modern meta-analytic methods. Evidence and data have the potential to play a critical role in the development of policies and in the administration of programs that meet the social and economic needs of children and families. Novel, innovative, and methodologically rigorous methods that allow for comprehensive and systematic research synthesis, such as those disseminated in this special issue, can help inform the work of the federal government and the prevention science field at large. Overall, the papers hold promise for strengthening the rigor of existing approaches, illustrate novel approaches, and demonstrate the utility of information that research syntheses can produce. Collectively, the studies in this special issue advance the available toolbox of methods that can be used to support evidence-based policy- and decision-making.

Implementation of an evidence-based medicine curriculum in a fellowship program: Can it influence clinical practice?

While evidence-based medicine (EBM) curricula improves knowledge scores, correlation with physician behavior, and patient outcomes are not clear. We established an EBM curriculum for Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine fellows that included didactic teaching, opportunity for deliberate practice and presentation, and coaching and feedback from faculty experts, to determine the impact on self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM, Practice-Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI) competency rating and patient care decisions. Seventeen fellows at a New York City academic medical center participated during 2014-2015 academic year. We analyzed pre-/posttest surveys for self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM concepts, EBM worksheets for content of clinical questions and impact on patient care, and PBLI competency ratings for overall impact. Posttest survey indicated that fellows' self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM increased significantly. While most found Journal Club discussions and EBM case conferences valuable, only 36% of fellows found EBM worksheets completion to be good use of time (average completion time 89 minutes). EBM worksheets helped reinforce or change plan of care in 32 out of 50 cases. There was no impact on end-of-the-year PBLI ratings. This curriculum, integrating didactic, self-directed and peer learning with objective feedback, increased self-assessed confidence in teaching EBM, and influenced patient care plans.

[Scoping review of domestic and overseas hospital-based health technology assessment].

This paper systematically sorted out the related research on hospital-based health technology assessment(HB-HTA) and clarified the research status of this field to provide a basis for the future research direction and focus of HTA in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) hospitals. Based on the scoping review, relevant research papers were retrieved from Chinese databases(including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed) and PubMed and analyzed. Among the included 99 papers, the earliest one was published in 2005 in China, and the number of papers has been increasing since 2016. In terms of journals, the included papers were published in 39 journals, including 24 core ones and 2 SCI ones. In terms of the number of publications, the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine accounted for the majority(n=6). Among the 175 authors involved, three of them published 15 papers, respectively, accounting for 20.83% and ranking the top, and they came from Renmin University of China and the National Health Commission of China. There were 38 first units dominated by hospitals. Hebei General Hospital published the most papers(n=10), followed by Renmin University of China(n=9) and the National Health Commission of China(n=7). In terms of research type, the research papers were dominated by evaluation and practice ones(n=29), followed by reviews(n=20). In terms of research topic, the research was mainly carried out from devices(n=26) and macro-perspective scope(n=24). Half of the research in China was funded. For 27 research papers published abroad, the number of publications in the past five years was small, with 16 countries involved. Developed countries paid more attention to this field than developing countries. Especially in Europe and the US, the publishing institutions were mainly universities, and the types of research were mainly interviews and evaluation or practice. In recent years, the attention of HB-HTA in China has been increasing year by year, and the development of related projects has provided a scientific decision-making basis for the admission and management of new technologies in hospitals in China. However, there are few researchers and institutions in this field, and the research scope is small. In the future, more investment is needed to encourage more hospitals, especially TCM hospitals, to carry out HB-HTA, explore the HB-HTA system suitable for Chinese conditions, and improve the scientific decision-making of hospitals.

[Scoping review of rapid health technology assessment].

This study aims to summarize the research on rapid health technology assessment(RHTA) based on scoping review, which is expected to serve as a reference for future research on RHTA. First, articles on RHTA were retrieved from both Chinese and English databases. After data screening and extraction by two personnel independently, descriptive analysis was conducted on the results, and evidence distribution was analyzed based on tables, bar charts, line charts, radar charts, and pie charts. Finally, a total of 82 eligible articles were included and the characteristics were as follows.(1) Articles on RHTA were mainly published from 2011 to 2022. The number of articles showed an obvious increase from 2014 and surged in 2019.(2) Among the journals with the above RHTA papers published, Chinese Journal of New Drugs(21.5%), Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospitals of China(16.9%), and Chinese Pharmacy(15.4%) topped the Chinese journals in the number of the papers, while International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care(23.5%), Reviews in Medical Virology(11.8%), and Value in Health(11.8%) came out on top in the English journals.(3)The RHTA of drugs(especially western medicine)(68.7%) dominated the eligible articles, followed by the RHTA of therapy technology(13.1%), detection technology(5.1%), and diagnosis technology(1.0%). There was a significant gap in the number of studies among different health technology categories and an imbalance in the types of health technologies involved in the overall RHTA studies.(4) RHTA of tumors has been the research focus in recent years. In summary, RHTA plays a positive role in rapid health decision-making, but there is a lack of primary data sources at present. Compared with the systematic review, Meta-analysis, and pharmacoeconomic studies, a few reports on health technology assessment(HTA) were included. In the future, research on the evaluation of the safety, efficacy, cost effectiveness and social applicability of health technologies should be further strengthened.

[Multi-criteria decision analysis in clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine].

Multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA), a comprehensive analysis method that can help decision-makers consider multiple criteria systematically, has been used for clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs, such as chemicals and Chinese patent medicines. The present study summarized the theoretical basis of MCDA and its application in the clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs and put forward suggestions. MCDA includes problem identification, structuring problem, model building, and using the model to inform and challenge thinking to develop an action plan. The modeling methods include value measurement models, outranking models, and reference-level models. The value measurement model is the most commonly used method in healthcare. The implementation steps of MCDA consist of defining the decision problem, selecting and structuring criteria, measuring performance, scoring alternatives, weighting criteria, calculating aggregate scores, dealing with uncertainty, and reporting and examination of findings. It is urgent to carry out the clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine, the important part of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), to promote its scientization, homogenization, and standardization. It is of great significance to carry out the clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine with MCDA, which should be demand-oriented, coordinated by many parties, and learn from international experience and successful practice to establish the corresponding technical guidelines, specifications, and evaluation tools, so as to provide technical support for Chinese patent medicine supply and policy formulation.

[Enlightenment of WHO guideline on institutionalizing health technology assessment mechanism for traditional Chinese medicine].

To promote the institutionalization of the health technology assessment(HTA) mechanism in various countries, World Health Organization(WHO) has published the Institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment Mechanisms: a How to Guide to introduce five steps of institutionalizing the HTA mechanism systematically, specifically, "establishing a mandate; establishing the legal framework; reviewing or establishing the legal framework; establishing institutional and governance arrangements; processes and evidence required for assessment and appraisal; and monitoring and evaluation". Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) HTA can provide scientific information and decision-making evidence for decision-makers at all levels to select TCM health technology reasonably, and promote the high-quality development of the TCM healthcare system. However, TCM HTA is in its infancy, and it is imperative to carry out relevant work under the guidance of global standard documents to ensure standardization, transparency, and fairness. In light of the WHO guidance, this research group put forward the necessity and logical framework for the institutionalizing HTA mechanism of TCM, which is helpful to establish the institutionalizing HTA mechanism in line with national conditions and suitable for TCM, provide scientific guidance for the research of TCM HTA, and contribute to TCM healthcare decision-making.

REAL-LIFE APPROACHES EMPLOYED BY RECOGNIZED GOVERNMENTS TO ENSURE HEALTH COVERAGE OF CITIZENS IN FRAGILE SETTINGS, INCLUDING THE POPULATION OF THE DISPUTED TERRITORIES, STRUGGLING FOR INDEPENDENCE.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To review real-life approaches employed by recognized governments to ensure health coverage of citizens in fragile settings, including the population of the disputed territories, struggling for independence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Content analysis of documents, the peer-reviewed articles, open-access databases, policy documents and original sources were utilized in order to archive the study aim. Multidimensional approach to source selection was chosen for objective assessment of the current policy- and decision-making practices. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Protracted nature of conflict leads to health system fragility resulting in adverse effects on conflict-affected population health coverage. Health policy in such settings is often externally-driven due to lack of capacities of recognized government and reliance on external funding. Safety and political concerns impede imposition of the context-specific durable solutions for the universal health coverage. Recognized governments lack access to real data to perform evidence-based decision-making.Conventional decision-making based on external demand leads to permanent underperformance of health governance.