MDI versus CSII in Chinese adults with type 1 diabetes in a real-world situation: based on propensity score matching method.

BACKGROUND: Compared with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is significantly more expensive and has not been widely used in Chinese type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. So there are still significant knowledge gaps regarding clinical and patient-reported outcomes in China. AIMS: This study aims to compare the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), insulin therapy related quality of life (ITR-QOL), fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) of adult T1DM patients treated with MDI and CSII based on propensity score matching in real-world conditions in China. METHODS: Four hundred twenty adult T1DM patients who were treated with MDI or CSII continuously for more than 12 months in a national metabolic center from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected as the study subjects. Their QOL and FOH were evaluated with Insulin Therapy Related Quality of Life Measure Questionnaire-Chinese version (ITR-QOL-CV) and the Chinese Version Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-Worry Scale (CHFSII-WS), and their HbA1C were collected at the same time. Potential confounding variables between the two groups were matched using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of the 420 patients included in the study, 315 were in MDI group and 105 were in CSII group. 102 pairs were successfully matched. After matching, the total score of ITR-QOL-CV scale in CSII group was significantly higher than that in MDI group (87.08 ± 13.53 vs. 80.66 ± 19.25, P = 0.006). Among them, the dimensions of daily life, social life, and psychological state were all statistically different (P < 0.05). The scores of CHFSII-WS (8.33 ± 3.49 vs. 11.77 ± 5.27, P = 0.003) and HbA1C (7.19 ± 1.33% vs. 7.71 ± 1.93%, P = 0.045) in CSII group were lower than those in MDI group. CONCLUSIONS: 25.0% of T1DM adults are treated with CSII. Compared with adult T1DM patients treated with MDI, those treated with CSII have higher ITR-QOL, less FoH, and better control of HbA1C in real-world conditions in China. Therefore, regardless of economic factors, CSII is recommended for adult T1DM patients to optimize the therapeutic effect and outcomes.

Fear of hypoglycemia and illness perception in type II diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemia, a prevalent acute complication among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), manifests with varied symptoms. Those with diabetes who have previously encountered hypoglycemic episodes commonly develop a Fear of Hyperglycemia (FOH). Illness perception (IP) significantly affects self-care behaviors and health outcomes in individuals diagnosed with T2D. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the correlation between IP and FOH among T2D patients and predictors of FOH. METHODS: The present study employed a descriptive-analytical design. The target population for this investigation comprised patients diagnosed T2D who sought medical care at the clinic and endocrinology departments of a hospital affiliated with Alborz University of Medical Sciences. The data collection period spanned from August 2019 to March 2021. A total of 300 individuals were included in the sample. Questionnaires were administered to measure both IP and FOH. Statistical analysis was conducted to examine the association between IP and FOH, as well as to identify the predictors of FOH. RESULTS: The results of the study indicated a statistically significant relationship between FOH and the mean score of IP among patients with diabetes (p = 0.001, r = 0.393), suggesting a moderate positive correlation between these variables. Additionally, the duration of illness, IP, and level of education were identified as variables that predicted FOH (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The numerous factors that influence FOH in individuals diagnosed with T2D highlight the necessity for strategic planning and training initiatives aimed at enhancing IP and reducing FOH within this specific population. Healthcare providers should prioritize interventions that not only address patients' concerns but also contribute to the improvement of their overall well-being. By implementing such interventions, healthcare providers can optimize diabetes management strategies and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

The Relationship Between Parent Fear of Hypoglycemia and Youth Glycemic Control Across the Recent-Onset Period in Families of Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to examine the relationship between parents' fear of hypoglycemia (FH) over a 1-year period and child glucose metrics in 126 families of youth recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Parents completed the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey for Parents (HFS-P) and uploaded 14 days of glucose data at a baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessment. RESULTS: Parents' HFS-P total and worry scores increased to a clinically meaningful degree from baseline to 6-month assessment, while multilevel models revealed within- and between-person variability in parents' HFS-P worry and behavior scores over time associated with child glycemia. Specifically, a significant negative relationship for within-person worry scores suggested that when parents reported higher than their average worry scores, their children recorded fewer glucose values in the target range, while within-person behavior scores suggested that when parents reported lower than their average behavior scores, their children recorded more values above the target range. There was also a negative relationship for between-person behavior scores with child glycated hemoglobin and a positive relationship for between-person behavior scores with child glucose values in the target range. CONCLUSIONS: In the recent-onset period of T1D, parental FH worry and behavior associated with child glycemia possibly due to changes in parents' perceptions of their child's hypoglycemia risk. The clinically meaningful increases in parent FH in the recent-onset period and the negative association for between-person behavior scores with child glycated hemoglobin suggest that clinics should consider screening parents for FH, especially among parents of children with lower glycemic levels.

Health-related quality of life in Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic and life-threatening disease. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is vital for individuals with T2DM. However, little is known about the impact of psychological stability factors on HRQoL among individuals with T2DM in mainland China. METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in five tertiary grade-A hospitals in Chongqing, China, from January to December 2019. A total of 385 individuals with T2DM were included by the convenient sample method. Fear of Progression (FOP) Questionnaire-short Form, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II, diabetes-management self-efficacy scale, and EuroQol-5 Dimensions were used for data collection. RESULTS: The mean age of the 385 individuals was 57.65 (SD = 15.15) years, three-quarters of whom had a high school or above education level. The participants in our study had moderate HRQoL and were more likely to have poor scores in the pain/discomfort dimension. The FOP level was moderate on average, and 23.1% of individuals suffered from psychological dysfunction. The participants had higher levels of fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) and self-efficacy (SE). Multiple steppage-regression analysis predicted that higher levels of FOP and FOH, reduced SE, older age, longer duration since diagnosis, lower educational attainment, higher levels of HbA1c, and living with comorbid conditions were related to lower HRQoL. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the HRQoL among Chinese T2DM patients may be impaired by increased FOP and FOH, decreased SE, and poor glycemic control. In addition, as the patient's age and duration since diagnosis increase, their HRQoL further declines. We recommend improving HRQoL by encouraging individuals to attain more health education and resilience skills to enhance SE and reduce negative emotions among individuals with T2DM.

The effect of do-it-yourself real-time continuous glucose monitoring on psychological and glycemic variables in children with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) decreases fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) and improves glycemic control among those affected by type 1 diabetes (T1D). No studies to date have examined the impact of using do-it-yourself real-time continuous glucose monitoring (DIY RT-CGM) on psychological and glycemic outcomes. METHODS: Child-parent dyads were recruited for a multicentre randomized crossover trial. Children with T1D were current intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) users and aged 2-13 years. Families received either 6 weeks of DIY RT-CGM with parental remote monitoring (intervention) or 6 weeks of isCGM plus usual diabetes care (control), followed by a 4-week washout period, then crossed over. The primary outcome was parental FOH. Secondary outcomes were glycemic control using traditional CGM metrics, as well as a range of other psychosocial measures. FINDINGS: Fifty five child-parent dyads were recruited. The child mean age was 9.1 ± 2.8 years. Although, there was no effect on parental FOH, -0.1 (95%CI: -0.3, 0.1, p = 0.4), time-in-range (TIR) (%3.9-10 mmol/L) was significantly higher with DIY RT-CGM over isCGM (54.3% ± 13.7 vs. 48.1% ± 13.6), mean difference, 5.7% (95%CI 1.8, 9.6, p <0.004). There was no difference for time spent in hypoglycemia. Parent diabetes treatment satisfaction was significantly higher following DIY RT-CGM compared to isCGM, mean difference 5.3 (95%CI: 2.3, 8.2, p <0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of DIY RT-CGM versus isCGM did not improve parental FOH; however, TIR and parental satisfaction with diabetes treatment were significantly improved. This suggests in the short term, DIY RT-CGM appears safe and may offer families some clinically important advantages over isCGM.

Related factors associated with fear of hypoglycemia in parents of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes - A systematic review.

PROBLEM: Fear of hypoglycemia is a significant concern for parents of children/ adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Although some studies have explained the parental fear of hypoglycemia, the related factors were yet to be determined. This systematic review aims to identify the related factors of fear of hypoglycemia in the parents of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and provide a theoretical basis for further intervention. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from 2010 to 2021. Studies evaluating the fear of hypoglycemia of parents and its associated factors were included. SAMPLE: Twenty-three observational articles met the criteria. RESULTS: Significant associations were found between fear of hypoglycemia and specific factors, including motherhood, nocturnal hypoglycemia, and the number of blood glucose monitoring. Psychological factors, including anxiety, depression, pediatric parenting stress, mindfulness, self-efficacy, quality of life, and sleep disorders, were conclusive and associations with parental fear of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding parental fear of hypoglycemia can help parents prevent potential problems in diabetes management, thus promoting children's growth. According to current evidence, effective targeted interventions based on modifiable relevant factors can be developed to reduce the fear of hypoglycemia in parents while maintaining optimal blood glucose control in children/ adolescents. IMPLICATIONS: Health professionals should pay more attention to the mental health of parents, and parents should be involved in the care plan and have the opportunity to discuss their fear of hypoglycemia in the most appropriate way to manage type 1 diabetes.

Fear of hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes and their parents: Effect of pump therapy and continuous glucose monitoring with option of low glucose suspend in the CGM TIME trial.

To determine if pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring offering low glucose suspend (LGS) decreases fear of hypoglycemia among children with type 1 diabetes and their parents. The CGM TIME trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that enrolled 144 children with type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year (mean duration 3.4 ± 3.1 years) starting pump therapy (MiniMed™ Veo™, Medtronic Canada). CGM (MiniMed™ Enlite™ sensor) offering LGS was introduced simultaneously or delayed for 6 months. Hypoglycemia Fear Scale (HFS) was completed by children ≥10 years old and all parents, at study entry and 12 months later. Simultaneous and Delayed Group participants were combined for all analyses. Subscale scores were compared with paired t-tests, and individual items with paired Wilcoxon tests. Linear regression examined association with CGM adherence. 121/140 parents and 91/99 children ≥10 years had complete data. Mean Behavior subscale score decreased from 21.1 (SD 5.9) to 17.2 (SD 6.1) (p < .001) for children, and 20.7 (SD 7.5) to 17.4 (7.4) (p < .001) for parents. Mean Worry subscale score decreased from 17.9 (SD 11.9) to 11.9 (SD 11.4) (p < .001) for children, and 23.1 (SD 13.2) to 17.6 (SD 10.4) (p < .001) for parents. Median scores for 10/25 child items and 12/25 parent items were significantly lower at 12 months (p < .001). Linear regression found no association between HFS scores and CGM adherence. Insulin pump therapy with CGM offering LGS significantly reduced fear of hypoglycemia not related to CGM adherence in children with type 1 diabetes and their parents.

Sleep and diabetes-specific psycho-behavioral outcomes of a new automated insulin delivery system in young children with type 1 diabetes and their parents.

BACKGROUND: Data on the use of Control-IQ, the latest FDA-approved automated insulin delivery (AID) system for people with T1D 6 years of age or older is still scarce, particularly regarding nonglycemic outcomes. Children with T1D and their parents are at higher risk for sleep disturbances. This study assesses sleep, psycho-behavioral and glycemic outcomes of AID compared to sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAP) therapy in young children with T1D and their parents. METHODS: Thirteen parents and their young children (ages 7-10) on insulin pump therapy were enrolled. Children completed an initial 4-week study with SAP using their own pump and a study CGM followed by a 4-week phase of AID. Sleep outcomes for parents and children were evaluated through actigraphy watches. Several questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of each study phase. CGM data were used to assess glycemic outcomes. RESULTS: Actigraphy data did not show any significant change from SAP to AID, except a reduction of number of parental awakenings during the night (p = 0.036). Parents reported statistically significant improvements in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score (p = 0.009), Hypoglycemia Fear Survey total score (p = 0.011), diabetes-related distress (p = 0.032), and depression (p = 0.023). While on AID, time in range (70-180 mg/dL) significantly increased compared to SAP (p < 0.001), accompanied by a reduction in hyperglycemia (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that use of AID has a positive impact on glycemic outcomes in young children as well as sleep and diabetes-specific quality of life outcomes in their parents.

Fear of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To summarize and thematize fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) to provide a theoretical basis for the development of effective interventions. BACKGROUND: FOH is common in this population and can reduce quality of life(QOL) and adversely impact upon diabetes self-care management. DESIGN: a systematic review METHODS: Articles published between 2000 and 2019 were searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and three Chinese databases (CNKI, Wan-fang data and VIP). Eligible articles were selected using the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of all articles finally included was evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools. RESULTS: Eighteen studies from 8654 papers were included. The sample size of each study ranged from 48 to 3812 subjects. FOH negatively impacted QOL, particularly psychosocial functioning, daily life and sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: FOH is a common and serious problem for patients, leading to poor QOL. It has been suggested that psychological concerns, QOL and effective countermeasures in individuals with T1D and T2D should be taken seriously. Advanced technology should be evaluated for its benefits before being used by patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The review highlights that FOH negatively impacts QOL, including psychosocial factors, daily life and sleep quality. Healthcare providers should develop targeted and professional assessment tools for FOH and QOL for patients with T2D, especially for patients who are about 60 years old. Advanced technology should be evaluated for its benefits before being used by patients.

Associations Between Depressive Symptoms, Fear of Hypoglycemia, Adherence to Management Behaviors and Metabolic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.

We examined the relationship between two malleable risk factors, depressive symptoms and fear of hypoglycemia, in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes and their relationship to two important outcomes, adherence behaviors and metabolic control. To assess this relationship, we used a multidimensional measure of adherence, assessing frequency of both blood glucose monitoring and healthy behaviors including diet and exercise. We predicted that higher levels of depressive symptoms and higher levels of fear of hypoglycemia would be associated with worse metabolic control as mediated by poor adherence. Eighty-three children and adolescents ages 8 to 20 (M = 13.87, SD 3.21) were recruited from March 2014 to October 2014 at an outpatient diabetes clinic in a moderately sized Southeastern city within the USA. Nested models were evaluated using structural equation modeling. Adherence significantly mediated the relationship between depressive symptoms and metabolic control with more depressive symptoms leading to worse metabolic control. Adherence marginally mediated the relationship between fear of hypoglycemia and metabolic control; however, less fear of hypoglycemia was associated with worse metabolic control. In a combined model, adherence continued to significantly mediate the relationship between depressive symptoms and metabolic control, while also independently significantly mediating the relationship between fear of hypoglycemia and metabolic control. This finding was also contrary to the predicted relationship with less fear of hypoglycemia leading to worse metabolic control. The results indicate that youth with fewer depressive symptoms and more fear of hypoglycemia had better adherence to their treatment regimen, which was associated with better metabolic control. The results of this study highlight the importance of screening for depression and fear of hypoglycemia during routine clinic visits to optimize adherence and metabolic control.

Impact of severe and symptomatic hypoglycemia on quality of life and fear of hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Results of the Hypos-1 observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypoglycemia represents a relevant burden in people with diabetes. Consequences of hypoglycemia/fear of hypoglycemia on quality of life (QoL) and behaviors of patients with T1DM and T2DM were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: HYPOS-1 was an observational retrospective study. Fear of hypoglycemia (Fear of Hypoglycemia Questionnaire, FHQ), general health status (visual analog scale of EuroQol questionnaire, EQ5D-VAS) psychological well-being (WHO-5 well being index, WHO-5), diabetes related distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes 5, PAID-5), and corrective/preventive behaviors following hypoglycemia were compared between people with and without previous experience of severe and symptomatic hypoglycemia and by tertiles of FHQ scores. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the likelihood of being in the third tertile of FHQ score. Overall, 2229 patients were involved. Severe hypoglycemia had statistically significant and clinically relevant (measured as effect sizes) negative impact on EQ5D-VAS, WHO-5, PAID-5, and FHQ both in T1DM and T2DM. In T2DM, symptomatic episodes had similar impact of severe hypoglycemia. Moving from the first to the third FHQ tertile, lower scores of EQ-5D VAS and WHO-5, and higher levels of PAID-5 were found. Patients in the third tertile performed more frequently corrective/preventive actions that negatively impact on metabolic control. Previous hypoglycemia, insulin treatment, female gender, age, and school education were the independent factors associated with increased likelihood to be in the third tertile. CONCLUSION: Not only severe but also symptomatic hypoglycemia negatively affect patient QoL, especially in T2DM. Addressing fear of hypoglycemia should be a goal of diabetes education.

Nighttime is the worst time: Parental fear of hypoglycemia in young children with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Fear of hypoglycemia is common in parents of young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), but little is known about the specific fears that parents most often experience. Hypoglycemia fear has been associated with poorer glycemic control in older children, though not yet studied in a large cohort of very young children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parents of 549 children <7 years (mean 5.2 ± 1.2 years [19% <3 years]) with a mean diabetes duration of 2.4 ± 1.0 years (range 1-6 years) and mean HbA1c 8.2% ± 1.1% (66 ± 12 mmol/mol) registered in the T1D Exchange completed the worry scale of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey modified for parents (HFS-P). RESULTS: Mean parental fear of hypoglycemia worry score was 36.1 ± 23.1 (possible range 0-100), with most frequent worries related to the child having a low while asleep and the child not recognizing a low. The mean worry score was not associated with the child's age, glycemic control, or recent severe hypoglycemic event. Parental worries about lows while sleeping were significantly higher in pump users than non-users (61% vs. 45%; P < .001), and tended to be higher in CGM users than non-users (62% vs 51%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The greatest worries of parents of young children with T1D were related to hypoglycemia during sleep and other times/circumstances during which it would be difficult to detect hypoglycemia. Using advanced diabetes technologies may be an effort to temper fears about hypoglycemia during sleep, though the directionality of this relationship is undetermined. Additional studies can clarify this association and leverage use of diabetes technologies to improve glycemic control.

Sexual lifestyle among young adults with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Sexual lifestyles including sexual activity, problems, satisfaction, and the formation and maintenance of relationships are greatly affected by physical health. Data are limited regarding the sexual lifestyle of adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Fear of hypoglycemic episodes during sexual intercourse and intimacy issues can impact individuals with T1DM. The aim of this study was to assess sexual lifestyles of individuals with T1DM. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with T1DM, 27 (51%) males, mean ± SD age 27.9 ± 8.3 years completed the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II and the Sex Practices and Concerns questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (70%) reported they never or almost never had concerns in their sexual lifestyles that were related to their diabetes. None experienced severe hypoglycemia during sex, but 21 (40%) reported occasional mild hypoglycemic events. More than two-thirds do not take any measures to prevent hypoglycemia before sex (decreasing insulin dose, snacks, and measuring blood glucose levels). Fear of hypoglycemia during sex was reported by 18 (35%); those who reported increased fear experienced mild hypoglycemic events during sex (61.1% vs 26.5%, P = .01), were singles (94.4% vs 64.7%, P = .02), and had higher scores on the Worries subscale of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (42.8 ± 12.8 vs 34.9 ± 10.5, P = .04) compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Among young people with T1DM, most do not have concerns regarding sex that are related to their diabetes, and most do not take specific measures before or after sex. One-third, however, fear of hypoglycemia during sex, mostly singles and those who experienced hypoglycemia in the past. Caregivers should be aware and address these concerns. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fear of Hypoglycemia, Parenting Stress, and Metabolic Control for Children with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents.

This study sets out to extend current knowledge of parenting stress and fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) in parents of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We examined if the relationship between parental and children's FoH and metabolic control, as reflected by HbA1c, is mediated by parenting stress. A total of 63 parents and children with T1DM were recruited during their routine physician's appointment. Parents completed questionnaires on parenting stress and FoH. Children eight years and older also completed a questionnaire on FoH. HbA1c values were obtained from all children. Mediation analysis revealed an indirect association between parental FoH and HbA1c values through parenting stress (Sobel's z = 2.42, p = .02), but no indirect association between children's FoH and HbA1c. We concluded that parental FOH has an indirect association with the child's metabolic control that is mediated by parenting stress. More simply, fear of hypoglycemia predicts parent stress, which in turn, predicts metabolic control.

Predicting Glucose Values: A New Era for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

The last 25 years of CGM have been characterized above all by providing better and more accurate glucose values in real time and analyzing the measured glucose values. Trend arrows are the only way to look into the future, but they are often too imprecise for therapy adjustment. While AID systems provide algorithms to use glucose values for glucose control, this has not been possible with stand-alone CGM systems, which are most used by people with diabetes. By analyzing the measured values with algorithms, often supported by AI, this should be possible in the future. This provides the user with important information about the further course of the glucose level, such as during the night. Predictive approaches can be used by next-generation CGM systems. These systems can proactively prevent glucose events such as hypo- or hyperglycemia. With the Accu-Chek® SmartGuide Predict app, an integral part of a novel CGM system, and the Glucose Predict (GP) feature, people with diabetes have the first commercially available CGM system with predictive algorithms. It characterizes the CGM systems of the future, which not only analyze past values and current glucose values in the future, but also use these values to predict future glucose progression.

Evaluation of the possible impact of the fear of hypoglycemia on diabetes management in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Hypoglycemia represents a significant source of anxiety for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and their caretakers. Fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) was measured in children and adolescents with T1DM as well as in their parents using an established research instrument, the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS). METHODS: This is a two-center, cross-sectional study involving 100 children and adolescents aged 6-18 years old diagnosed with T1DM. One parent of each child also participated in the study. The participants, who were recruited from two different pediatric endocrine outpatient clinics, were asked to complete the translated Greek version of the HFS, which includes one version for children (C-HFS) and one for parents (P-HFS). The association of the questionnaire responses with subjects' characteristics, such as current age, age at diagnosis, duration of diabetes, HbA1c levels, and mode of diabetes treatment were assessed. RESULTS: Parents exhibited significantly higher mean HFS scores than their children. No significant correlation was found between the P-HFS or the C-HFS scores and the age of the children, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, or mode of treatment. CONCLUSION: The finding that parents experience higher levels of FoH compared to their children emphasizes the importance of healthcare providers to screen parental FoH and focus on approaches to support them in order to reduce their psychological burden, thus optimizing children's diabetes management.

Fear of hypoglycemia in parents of children with type 1 diabetes trained for intranasal glucagon use.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) in parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) before and after undergoing training to learn intranasal (IN) glucagon administration. METHOD: In this pre-test/post-test uncontrolled study 364 caregivers of patients with T1D (6-18 years) completed questionnaires measuring sociodemographic characteristics, diabetes-related factors (e.g., type of insulin therapy, glycemic control), and parents' trait anxiety. Parents' FoH was assessed at baseline (T0, training) and after nine months (T1). Two repeated-measure mixed analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) compared the FoH at T0 and at T1 and analyzed the moderating roles of anxiety proneness and type of insulin therapy, as well as of anxiety proneness and use of sensor. Age, T1D duration, HbA1c values, and SES were included as covariates. RESULTS: Parental FoH at T1 (M = 1.72; SE = 0.06/M = 1.57; SE = 0.09) was significantly lower than parental FoH at T0 (M = 1.89; SE = 0.06/M = 1.77; SE = 0.09). The group with high trait-anxiety had a higher level of FoH (M = 2.05; SE = 0.08/M = 1.89; SE = 0.12) than the group with low trait-anxiety (M = 1.57; SE = 0.08/M = 1.46; SE = 0.09) at both time points. SES was negatively associated with FoH at T0 (t = -2.87; p = .004/t = -2.87; p = .005). No other significant effects were found. CONCLUSIONS: Training and educating parents on IN glucagon use can help them effectively manage hypoglycemic episodes and alleviate the fear that generally accompany such events.

Fear of Hypoglycemia and Diabetes Distress: Expected Reduction by Glucose Prediction.

BACKGROUND: Extended glucose predictions are novel in diabetes management. Currently, there is no solution widely available. People with diabetes mellitus (DM) are offered features like trend arrows and limited predictions linked to predefined situations. Thus, the impact of extended glucose predictions on the burden of diabetes and person-reported outcomes (PROs) is unclear. METHODS: In this online survey, 206 people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1D and T2D), 70.9% and 29.1%, respectively, who participated in the dia·link online panel and were current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) users, were presented with different scenarios of hypothetical extended glucose predictions. They were asked to imagine how low glucose predictions of 30 minutes and overnight as well as glucose predictions up to 2 hours would influence their diabetes management. Subsequently, they completed the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II (HFS-II) and the T1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1-DDS) by rating each item on a 5-point scale (-2: strong deterioration to +2: strong improvement) according to the potential change due to using glucose predictions. RESULTS: For all glucose prediction periods, 30 minutes, up to 2 hours, and at nighttime, the surveyed participants expected moderate improvements in both fear of hypoglycemia (HFS-II: 0.57 ± 0.49) and overall diabetes distress (T1-DDS = 0.44 ± 0.49). The T1-DDS did not differ for type of therapy or diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: People with T1D and T2D would see glucose predictions as a potential improvement regarding reduced fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes distress. Therefore, glucose predictions represent a value for them in lowering the burden of diabetes and its management.

Delayed prandial insulin boluses are an important determinant of blood glucose control and relate to fear of hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes on advanced technologies.

AIMS: Automated insulin delivery systems improve blood glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, optimizing their performance requires patient's proper compliance to meal insulin bolus administration. We explored real-life prevalence of delayed prandial boluses (DBs) in adults with T1D on advanced technologies, and their association with glycemic control and fear of hypoglycemia (FH). METHODS: In the last two-week web-based reports of 152 adults with T1D on Hybrid Closed Loop Systems (HCLS) or Sensor Augmented Pump (SAP), DBs were identified when a steep increase in blood glucose occurred at CGM before the prandial bolus, and CGM metrics were evaluated. All participants completed an online questionnaire on FH. RESULTS: Mean DBs over two weeks were 10.2 ± 4.7 (M ± SD, range 1-23) and more frequent in women than men (11.0 ± 4.6 vs. 9.4 ± 4.7, p = 0.036). Participants with more DBs (>12) showed significantly lower Time-In-Range (62.4 ± 13.8 vs. 76.6 ± 9.0 %) than those with less DBs (<7.7), along with higher Time-Above-Range, GMI, and Coefficient-of-Variation (ANOVA, p < 0.001 for all). Participants with higher FH score showed more DBs (11.6 ± 5.0) than those in lower tertiles (9.57 ± 4.59 and 9.47 ± 4.45, ANOVA p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In patients on advanced technologies, delayed boluses are extremely common, and associate with significantly worse glycemic control. Utmost attention is needed to bolus timing, mainly tackling fear of hypoglycemia.

Impact of Flash Glucose Monitoring on the Fear of Hypoglycemia Phenomenon in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Objective: To assess the clinical impact of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems on fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) and quality of life in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: Prospective quasi-experimental study with a 12-month follow-up. People with T1DM (18-80 years old) and self-monitoring by blood capillary glycemia controls were included. The FH15 questionnaire, a survey validated in Spanish in a comparable study population, was used to diagnose FoH with a cutoff point of 28 points. Results: A total of 181 participants were included, with a FoH prevalence of 69% (n = 123). A mean reduction in FH15 score of -4 points (95% confidence interval [-5.5 to -3]; P < 0.001) was observed, along with an improvement in quality of life (EsDQOL-test (Diabetes Quality of Life, Spanish version), -7 points [-10; -4], P < 0.001) and satisfaction with treatment (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire, self-reported version [DTSQ-s] test, +4.5 points [4; 5.5], P < 0.001). At the end of the follow-up, 64.2% of the participants saw an improved FoH intensity, compared to 35.8% who scored the same or higher. This improvement in FoH status was associated with a higher time-in-range at the end of the follow-up (P = 0.003), as well as a lower time spent in hyperglycemia (P = 0.005). In addition, it was linked to participants with a high baseline FoH levels (P < 0.001) and those who were university degree holders (P = 0.07). Conclusions: FGM is associated with an overall reduction of FoH in adults with T1DM and with an increase in their quality of life. Nevertheless, a significant percentage of patients may experience an increase of this phenomenon leading to clinical repercussions and a profound impact on quality of life.