Safety and effectiveness of female tubal sterilisation by hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy: a register based study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of female sterilisation in the Finnish population. DESIGN: A national register-based study using record linkage. SETTING: National data from Finland. SAMPLE: A total of 16 272 female sterilisations performed in 2009-2014. METHODS: The Register of Sterilisations was linked with the Hospital Discharge Register, Termination of Pregnancy Register, and the Medical Birth Register in order to investigate the occurrence of re-sterilisations, other surgical operations, and unwanted pregnancies after sterilisation, per method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included all pregnancies after sterilisation (births, miscarriages, terminations of pregnancy, and ectopic pregnancies) and operations (repeat sterilisations, other hysteroscopic and laparoscopic procedures, hysterectomies, and re-operations for a complication). The outcomes were presented by method as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in all spontaneous pregnancies between the groups. The risk ratio for any pregnancy was 1.27 (95% Cl 0.80-2.02) for Filshie® versus Essure® and 1.35 (95% Cl 0.92-1.96) for Pomeroy versus Essure® . In total, 1394 (8.6%) selected operations were identified after primary sterilisation. Re-sterilisations and hysteroscopies were most frequent among Essure® patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilisation have a similar risk of unintended pregnancy. All sterilisations are safe, and the risk of re-operations because of complications is low. Women with Essure® have a higher risk of undergoing re-sterilisation compared with patients undergoing laparoscopic sterilisation. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Essure® , Filshie® , and Pomeroy sterilisations are equally effective and safe.

Health care and contraceptive decision-making autonomy and use of female sterilisation among married women in Malawi.

Introduction: Female sterilisation is the most common contraceptive method used globally. The use of female sterilisation is disproportionately low in sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) at just 1%. Nonetheless, the prevalence of sterilisation among married women in Malawi is quite high at about 11%. While a few recent studies in SSA have examined the relationship between women's decision-making autonomy and use of long-acting contraceptives, very few have investigated whether different dimensions of decision-making autonomy predict the use of female sterilisation differently. The objective of this study was therefore to examine the relationship between health care and contraceptive decision-making autonomy and the use of female sterilisation in Malawi. Data and methods: The study relied on secondary data from the 2015-16 Malawi Demographic and Health Survey. The sample comprised 9,164 married women in Malawi that were using a modern contraceptive. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between health care and contraceptive decision-making autonomy and the use of female sterilisation, controlling for key socio-demographic characteristics. Results: The study revealed that the percentage of married women that made health care and contraceptive decisions independently was quite low. The main finding of this study was that contraceptive decision-making autonomy increased the relative likelihood of using female sterilisation while health care autonomy was associated with a lower likelihood of being sterilized. The socio- demographic characteristics that significantly predicted the use of female sterilisation included age, place of residence, household wealth and the number of children a woman had. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that health care and contraceptive decision making have different effects on the use of female sterilisation among married women in Malawi. Specifically, women with autonomy in health care decision making had a relatively lower likelihood of using female sterilisation while those with contraceptive decision-making autonomy had a higher likelihood of using female sterilisation. This suggests that intervention aimed at increasing the uptake of female sterilisation in Malawi need to focus on empowering women in the contraceptive decision-making domain.

Understanding the role of female sterilisation in Indian family planning through qualitative analysis: perspectives from above and below.

Since the 1990s, the global approach to family planning has undergone fundamental transformations from population control to addressing reproductive health and rights. The Indian family planning programme has also transitioned from being vertical, target-oriented, and clinic-based to a supposedly target-free, choice-based programme that champions reproductive rights. Despite contraceptive choices being offered and voluntary adoption encouraged, there is a heavy reliance on female sterilisation. Community health workers, known as ASHAs, are responsible for on-ground implementation of family planning policies and are incentivised to promote sterilisation as well as other methods. This study explored perspectives to understand of the role of female sterilisation in Indian family planning and whether policy is reflected in implementation. Secondary ethnographic data from Rajasthan, which included twenty interviews and five group discussions, were used to understand the perspectives of ASHAs. Primary data included five key informant interviews to understand the perspectives of experts nationally. Data were analysed thematically with a combination of deductive and inductive coding. Themes that emerged included choice, population control and coercion, family planning targets, quality and experience of services, historical factors and social norms. Despite the official policy shift, there appears to be narrow implementation which is still target-driven, relies heavily on female sterilisation, while negotiating between achieving population stabilisation and upholding reproductive rights. There is a need to emphasise spacing methods, ensure a rights- and choice-based approach and encourage male participation in reproductive health decisions.

COSMETIC SCAR AND SCOPE OF REVERSAL AFTER PUERPERAL STERILISATION.

Female sterilisation is an important component of National Family Welfare Programme. The target group is best motivated during the puerperium for such a procedure. However laparoscopic sterilisation which has got some distinct advantages, is not technically feasible at this time. The authors have used a technique where the advantages of cosmetic appearance, reduced post operative morbidity and reversibility can be conferred on the puerperal women. After trying out the method individually in some cases, a formal case control study design has been made and an evaluation study has been performed in 122 cases. The technique has been found to be cosmetically more acceptable, both at clientele and peer evaluation levels (p<0.001). Though all the four parameters of post operative morbidity have shown better results for the technique evaluated as against the conventional technique, statistical significance has been achieved in two of the parameters (p<0.05).