The Clinical Relevance of Fractional Curettage in the Diagnostic Management of Primary Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Hysteroscopy and fractional curettage are commonly utilized techniques for the diagnosis of postmenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding and histopathological verification of primary endometrial cancer (EC). This study delves into the clinical significance of procuring preoperative endocervical tissue in conjunction with corpus fractions through fractional curettage. DESIGN: This retrospective study encompassed a cohort of 84 patients diagnosed with T1 stage EC and 55 patients diagnosed with T2 stage EC, who underwent primary treatment between the years 2011 and 2021 at the University Hospital Frankfurt or Jung-Stilling Hospital Siegen. MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Among the postoperative T2 stage EC patients, a stratification was performed based on preoperative endocervical curettage (ECC) results obtained through fractional curettage. Categorical and continuous variables were compared utilizing the Pearson χ2 test, while for multivariate analyses and regression modeling, the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were respectively employed. RESULTS: The median age of patients with pT2 stage EC was 64 years (range: 38-85). A predominant majority of these patients exhibited the endometrioid subtype of EC (90.9%). Upon conducting comparative analysis between groups, a notably higher frequency of laparotomies was observed (p = 0.002) among patients in whom preoperatively detected positive ECC was evident. The detection performance of fractional curettage in identifying positive ECC yielded a sensitivity of 70.9% and a specificity of 73.8%. In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis (p = 0.022), positive ECC observed during fractional curettage (p = 0.036), and the FIGO stage (p = 0.036) emerged as prognostic determinant for progression-free survival. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were age at diagnosis (p = 0.003), positive ECC (p = 0.008), histological grading (p = 0.016), and the FIGO stage (p = 0.022). A significant difference in OS was evident between patients characterized by preoperative negative ECC and those displaying positive ECC (81.8 vs. 59.5 months, p = 0.019). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the retrospective design of the study as well as a small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative determination of endocervical involvement of primary T2 stage EC could be a prognostic indicator in decision-making to treat EC. The conduct of prospective trials is necessary to definitively establish the routine application and associated benefits of fractional curettage in the context of primary EC.

The effect of online video-assisted teaching program on medical students learning procedure of fractional curettage.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2020, with the entire world in crisis over the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), medical students have adapted to hybrid and distance learning. This study aims to compare the learning outcomes of students learning the procedure of fractional curettage in an online video-assisted teaching program to those of students learning the procedure in a traditional class. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted among fourth-year medical students who rotated to Obstetrics and Gynecology courses between April 2021 and October 2021. Participants in the first two rotations were enrolled in traditional classes, and the online video-assisted teaching program was introduced in the subsequent two rotations. Both study groups took OSCEs (objective structured clinical examinations), a pre-test and post-test with MCQs (multiple choice questions), and a confidence and satisfaction level questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 106 fourth-year medical students, 54 in the traditional group and 52 in the online video-assisted teaching program, were recruited. The online video-assisted group showed a statistically better mean OSCE score (85.67 ± 11.29 vs. 73.87 ± 13.01, p < 0.001) and mean post-test MCQ score than the traditional group (4.21 ± 0.87 vs. 3.80 ± 0.98, p = 0.0232). Moreover, the mean difference between the two groups' pre and post-test MCQ scores was significantly different (0.96 ± 1.37 vs. 1.79 ± 1.50 in traditional and online video-assisted teaching program groups, respectively, P = 0.0038). The participants in the experimental group reported significantly greater confidence (P < 0.001) in performing the fractional curettage procedure. However, the mean satisfaction score was significantly higher in the control group (p = 0.0053). CONCLUSION: The online video-assisted teaching program on the fractional curettage procedure, a necessary and skill-demanding procedure, is an effective and advantageous education tool that improves skills, knowledge, and confidence in fourth-year medical students. We recommend that the video-assisted teaching program is another effectively procedural teaching method for medical students.

Histological Sampling of Endometrial Tissue: Comparison between the MedGyn® Endosampler and Formal Fractional Curettage in Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used for evaluation of the endometrial pathology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial biopsy is one of the primary methods used for diagnostic evaluation, which is a minimally invasive approach. The aim of this study was to compare the adequacy yield of samples obtained by MedGyn® Endosampler with Formal Fractional Curettage. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the endometrial tissue quality and diagnostic accuracy between MedGyn® Endosampler and Formal Fractional Curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. METHODS: A total of 85 endometrial tissue samples were tested by the MedGyn® Endosampler, followed by Formal Fractional Curettage, from patients at Phrapokklao Hospital who were eligible for the study and met the inclusion criteria for uterine curettage. Samples were collected between August, 2018 and April, 2019. Both operations were performed by the same investigator. The samples were submitted separately and sent to the same pathologist. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 46.92 ± 6.94 years. 91.76% (78/85) of the samples obtained by Formal Fractional Curettage and 89.41% (76/85) of the samples obtained by MedGyn® Endosampler device were adequate for histopathological examination. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.317). The pathological results of endometrial tissue from both techniques were the same in 67 patients (78.82%) and different in 14 patients (16.47%). MedGyn® Endosampler was six times more cost effective when compared to Formal Fractional Curettage. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial sampling using MedGyn® Endosampler is a safe, adequate, accurate, cost effective outpatient procedure which precludes general anesthesia. Therefore, it could be an alternative method for endometrial sampling.