Systematic Review of Shoulder Imaging Abnormalities in Asymptomatic Adult Shoulders (SCRUTINY): Abnormalities of the glenohumeral joint.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the population prevalence of glenohumeral joint imaging abnormalities in asymptomatic adults. METHOD: We systematically reviewed studies reporting the prevalence of X-ray, ultrasound (US), computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in adults without shoulder symptoms (PROSPERO registration number CRD42018090041). This report presents the glenohumeral joint imaging findings. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science from inception to June 2023 and assessed risk of bias using a tool designed for prevalence studies. The primary analysis was planned for the general population. The certainty of evidence was assessed using a modified Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) for prognostic studies. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies (4 X-ray, 10 US, 20 MRI, 1 X-ray and MRI) reported useable prevalence data. Two studies were population-based (846 shoulders), 15 studies included miscellaneous study populations (1715 shoulders) and 18 included athletes (727 shoulders). All were judged to be at high risk of bias. Clinical diversity precluded pooling. Population prevalence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis ranged from 15% to 75% (2 studies, 846 shoulders, 1 X-ray, 1 X-ray and MRI; low certainty evidence). Prevalence of labral abnormalities, humeral head cysts and long head of biceps tendon abnormalities were 20%, 5%, 30% respectively (1 study, 20 shoulders, X-ray and MRI; very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: The population-based prevalence of glenohumeral joint imaging abnormalities in asymptomatic individuals remains uncertain, but may range between 30% and 75%. Better estimates are needed to inform best evidence-based management of people with shoulder pain.

Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Risk of Upper Extremity Injury in Overhead Athletes: Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on the efficacy of addressing glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) and risk of upper-extremity injury in overhead athletes. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted for relevant studies published in PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: The review focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTSs) and quasi-experiments conducted in English language that assessed the effectiveness of GIRD and the risk of upper-extremity injury in athletes performing overhead movements. The review included 7 RCTs and 2 quasi-experiments out of 5403, which involved a total of 360 participants. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened the articles, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data for analysis. The review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews. All studies were assessed in duplicate for risk of bias using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale for RCTs. DATA SYNTHESIS: The efficacy of different types of techniques was evaluated, including joint mobilization, sleeper stretch, cross-body stretch, myofascial release, kinesio taping, and rigid taping. These techniques showed improvement in pain score and range of motion. Furthermore, self-myofascial release tends to improve internal rotation; sleeper stretch and cross-body stretch tend to improve internal rotation with 40 percent decline in pain. However, kinesio taping and rigid taping showed positive results for internal rotation. Acute results determined that the metabolic equivalent (MET) group had significantly more horizontal adduction range of motion posttreatment compared with the control group (P=.04). No significant differences existed between MET and joint mobilizations or between joint mobilizations and the control group for horizontal adduction (P>.16). No significant between-group differences existed acutely for internal rotation (P>.28). There were no significant between-group differences for either horizontal adduction or internal rotation at the 15-minute posttests (P>.70). CONCLUSIONS: The study evaluated the efficacy of various techniques in improving pain score and range of motion in individuals with GIRD. Joint mobilization, sleeper stretch, cross-body stretch, myofascial release, kinesio taping, and rigid taping all showed improvements in pain score and range of motion. However, no significant between-group differences were found for horizontal adduction or internal rotation at the 15-minute posttests. These findings suggest that a combination of these techniques may be effective in treating individuals with GIRD.

The comparative effectiveness of combined hydrodilatation/corticosteroid procedure with two different quantities for adhesive capsulitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of injecting various amounts of fluid into the shoulder joints for capsule distension in patients with adhesive capsulitis. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four patients with adhesive capsulitis underwent a baseline (time0), 6 weeks (time1), and 12 weeks (time2) follow-up after hydrodilitation. INTERVENTION: Group 1 (n = 42) received 20 ml of lidocaine, steroid, and saline hydrodilatation via posterior glenohumeral recess, while Group 2 (n = 42) received 10 ml of lidocaine, steroid, and saline hydrodilitation. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale for pain. The secondary outcomes were shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and ROM of the shoulder. RESULTS: There was a significant reduce in VAS scores for pain, SPADI scores, and increased shoulder ROM in both groups over time; however, the group-by-time interactions for any of the outcomes between groups were not significant except VAS pain in motion. Post-hoc pairwise analysis of the marginal effect of time and group showed that the significant difference of VAS in motion is due to time effect: time1 vs time0 (95% CI -4.09 to -2.68), time2 vs time0 (-4.21 to -2.77), and time2 vs time1 (-0.83 to 0.63), without between-group difference: group 1 vs group 2 (-0.38 to 0.59). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests hydrodilatation achieved an optimal effect at time1 for patients with adhesive capsulitis in both groups, and adding more saline offers additional benefits in flexion and external roatation until time2.

Advancing glenohumeral dysplasia treatment in brachial plexus birth injury: the end-to-side spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer technique.

PURPOSE: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a common injury with the spectrum of disease prognosis ranging from spontaneous recovery to lifelong debilitating disability. A common sequela of BPBI is glenohumeral dysplasia (GHD) which, if not addressed early on, can lead to shoulder dysfunction as the child matures. However, there are no clear criteria for when to employ various surgical procedures for the correction of GHD. METHODS: We describe our approach to correcting GDH in infants with BPBIs using a reverse end-to-side (ETS) transfer from the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. This technique is employed in infants that present with GHD with poor external rotation (ER) function who would not necessitate a complete end-to-end transfer and are still too young for a tendon transfer. In this study, we present our outcomes in seven patients. RESULTS: At presentation, all patients had persistent weakness of the upper trunk and functional limitations of the shoulder. Point-of-care ultrasounds confirmed GHD in each case. Five patients were male, and two patients were female, with a mean age of 3.3 months age (4 days-7 months) at presentation. Surgery was performed on average at 5.8 months of age (3-8.6 months). All seven patients treated with a reverse ETS approach had full recovery of ER according to active movement scores at the latest follow-up. Additionally, ultrasounds at the latest follow-up showed a complete resolution of GHD. CONCLUSION: In infants with BPBI and evidence of GHD with poor ER, end-to-end nerve transfers, which initially downgrade function, or tendon transfers, that are not age-appropriate for the patient, are not recommended. Instead, we report seven successful cases of infants who underwent ETS spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for the treatment of GHD following BPBI.

Posterolateral dislocation and incarceration of the long head of the biceps tendon: a rare cause of irreducible anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation-a case report and brief review of the literature.

Failure of closed reduction of anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation is infrequent. It can be secondary to osseous (e.g., fracture fragments or Hill-Sachs lesion) or soft tissue (e.g., labrum or rotator cuff tendon) impediments. Herein, we present a case of a prolonged irreducible glenohumeral joint secondary to a posterolaterally dislocated and incarcerated long head of the biceps tendon after an episode of anterior instability, highlight the utility of MR imaging for guiding management, and review the literature of this sporadic diagnosis.

Glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs width percentage score are useful to select optimal operation for the treatment of glenohumeral instability in overhead athletes: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage versus open Latarjet.

PURPOSE: Glenohumeral instability with combined bone lesion in contact and overhead athletes with subcritical bone loss is challenging to treat with high recurrent instability. Treatment options are arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage and Latarjet operations. However, there is no consensus on their effectiveness. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and return to sports after both operations and whether evaluating the glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs width to calculate the total bone loss can help determine the appropriate operation. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative analysis, 30 athletes who underwent index arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (n = 16) or Latarjet procedure (n = 14) between 2017 and 2020 were included. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were routinely performed. The quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (qDASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), instability severity index (ISI) scores and range of motion (ROM) were recorded preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 53 months (SD = 12). Follow-up included time-to-return sports, self-perceived sports performance level and complications/recurrent dislocations. RESULTS: Preoperative qDASH, ASES, ISI scores, ages and genders were similar. The Latarjet group had significantly larger glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs width and total bone loss (p < 0.01). Both groups had significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after the operations (p < 0.01). Athletes with a total bone loss <25% underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage and total bone loss ≥25% underwent Latarjet procedure, and there were no differences between the groups in terms of postoperative PROs, ROM, time-to-return sports and performance. There were no re-dislocations. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage or Latarjet procedure can adequately address glenohumeral instability with combined bone lesions. Patients with total bone loss scores greater than or equal to 25 may particularly benefit from the Latarjet procedure, while the minimally invasive arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage can yield equally satisfying scores for total bone loss less than 25. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

There is high variability in quantitative measurement techniques in glenohumeral capsular measurements for shoulder instability: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Instability of the glenohumeral joint remains a complex clinical issue with high rates of surgical failure and significant morbidity. Advances in specific radiologic measurements involving the glenoid and the humerus have provided insight into glenohumeral pathology, which can be corrected surgically towards improving patient outcomes. The contributions of capsular pathology to ongoing instability remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of existing glenohumeral capsular measurement techniques published in the last 15 years. METHODS: A systematic review of multiple databases was performed following PRISMA guidelines for all primary research articles between 2008 and 2023 with quantitative measurements of the glenohumeral capsule in patients with instability, including anterior, posterior and multi-directional instability. RESULTS: There were a total of 14 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. High variability in measurement methodology across studies was observed, including variable amounts of intra-articular contrast, heterogeneity among magnetic resonance sequence acquisitions, differences in measurements performed and the specific approach taken to compute each measurement. CONCLUSION: There is a need for standardization of methods in the measurement of glenohumeral capsular pathology in the setting of glenohumeral instability to allow for cross-study analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Changes in Shoulder Rotation Based on Elevation in Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

PURPOSE: Lack of shoulder external rotation is common in children with brachial plexus birth injuries. Development of glenohumeral (GH) dysplasia is associated with progressive loss of passive external rotation. Some authors recommend measuring external rotation with the arm adducted, whereas others recommend measurement with the arm in 90° of abduction. The purpose of this study was to compare active and passive external rotation and internal rotation measured in adduction versus abduction. METHODS: Fifteen children with brachial plexus birth injuries held their affected arms in maximal external and internal rotation with the arm adducted and the arm at approximately 90° of abduction. Active and passive rotations were measured with three-dimensional motion capture. Scapulothoracic (ST) internal/external rotation and GH internal/external rotation joint angles were calculated and compared using multivariable, one-way repeated measures analyses of variance. RESULTS: There were no significant differences for active or passive ST rotation in external rotation in adduction versus abduction. Glenohumeral external rotation was significantly increased with the arm in abduction compared with adduction both actively and passively. There were no differences in ST rotation in active versus passive conditions, but all GH rotations were significantly greater passively. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder internal/external rotation in abduction and adduction is not interchangeable. Comprehensive assessment of shoulder external and internal rotation should include both adduction and abduction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For children with brachial plexus birth injuries, both active and passive GH external rotations were greater in abduction. Therefore, early GH joint dysplasia may be missed if GH external rotation is measured in abduction. Additionally, consistency in arm position is important for comparison over time. The entire ST rotation capacity was used to perform maximal internal and external rotation, but the entire passive GH range of motion was not actively used. This highlights an area for potential surgical intervention to improve motion.

Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative external rotation weakness and an intact rotator cuff: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are well-established treatments for patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact cuff. However, it is unclear whether aTSA or rTSA provides superior outcomes in patients with preoperative external rotation (ER) weakness. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2007 and 2020. Patients were excluded for preoperative diagnoses of nerve injury, infection, tumor, or fracture. The analysis included 333 aTSAs and 155 rTSAs performed for primary cuff-intact osteoarthritis with 2-year minimum follow-up. Defining preoperative ER weakness as strength <3.3 kilograms (7.2 pounds), 3 cohorts were created and matched: (1) weak aTSAs (n = 74) vs. normal aTSAs (n = 74), (2) weak rTSAs (n = 38) vs. normal rTSAs (n = 38), and (3) weak rTSAs (n = 60) vs. weak aTSAs (n = 60). We compared range of motion, outcome scores, strength, complications, and revision rates at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: Despite weak aTSAs having poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER (P < .001), neither of these deficits persisted postoperatively compared with the normal cohort. Likewise, weak rTSAs had poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER, overhead motion, and Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P < .029). However, no statistically significant differences were found between preoperatively weak and normal rTSAs. When comparing weak aTSA vs. weak rTSA, no differences were found in preoperative and postoperative outcomes, proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, and complication and rate of revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In preoperatively weak patients with cuff-intact primary osteoarthritis, aTSA leads to similar postoperative strength, range of motion, and outcome scores compared with patients with normal preoperative strength, indicating that preoperative weakness does not preclude aTSA use. Furthermore, patients who were preoperatively weak in ER demonstrated improved postoperative rotational motion after undergoing aTSA and rTSA, with both groups achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at similar rates.

Prevalence and associated factors of non-traumatic shoulder pain during spike and serve movements in male high school volleyball players: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Nontraumatic shoulder pain is a prevalent issue among male high school volleyball players, but its comprehensive assessment has been lacking in prior research, which often isolated specific aspects of shoulder function. This study aimed to identify contributing factors to shoulder pain in this population. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis posited that limited shoulder internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM), imbalance in rotator cuff muscle strength, intrinsic sensory disturbance, and joint stability are associated with shoulder pain in male high school volleyball players. Additionally, there was an anticipation that a substantial proportion of players would experience shoulder pain but refrain from reporting it to coaches. METHODS: Forty-nine male volleyball players aged 15-17 years were evaluated between February and June 2023. Questionnaires assessed the prevalence of shoulder pain during spiking and/or serving, as well as the frequency of reporting this pain to coaches. Various factors, including acromio-humeral distance, shoulder ROM, isometric strength, proprioception, joint stability (Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test), joint position sense, and upper extremity power (Seated Medicine Ball Throw Test; SMBT), were quantified. Logistic regression analyses was conducted to explore potential connections between these variables and shoulder pain. RESULTS: Shoulder pain was reported by 39% of participants, but it was rarely communicated to coaches (95%). Jump serves (odds ratio 1.84, p=0.02) and reduced shoulder IR ROM (odds ratio 0.94, p=0.03) were associated with shoulder pain. CONCLUSION: This study provides crucial insights into the prevalence, severity, and associated factors of shoulder pain among male high school volleyball players. The findings underscore the importance of improving athlete-coach communication to facilitate early intervention and preventive measures. Significant associations were observed between the use of jump serves, reduced shoulder internal rotation range of motion, and shoulder pain, highlighting the relevance of specific volleyball techniques in injury prevention. These findings offer valuable guidance to coaches and trainers in developing interventions aimed at mitigating the risk of shoulder pain and enhancing player performance.

Sling and forget it? A systematic review of operative versus nonoperative outcomes for scapula fractures.

BACKGROUND: The majority of scapula fractures have historically been treated nonoperatively. The current literature describing patient outcomes following scapula fractures is limited. Our objective was to determine differences in outcomes between operatively and nonoperatively treated scapular fractures. The goal of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review for scapula body, neck, and glenoid fractures focusing on several outcomes including union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and any recorded complication. METHODS: The PRISMA methodology was followed for this systematic review. Articles were obtained from the PubMed/Medline database using the following search terms: scapula body OR scapula neck OR intra-articular glenoid AND fracture. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of included references. Studies were included if they contained clinical data on one or more of our study objectives and contained participants with a scapular body, neck, and/or glenoid fracture who were at least 16 year old. A total of 35 papers, with 822 total cases were included. Studies chosen were assessed for level of evidence and reviewed for data pertaining to the current study objectives. All cases of scapula fractures found throughout the literature were analyzed for outcome data. Outcomes studied included union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and recorded complications. RESULTS: The overwhelming majority of scapula fractures go on to union. The majority of patients will eventually return to work. Persistent postinjury pain is unfortunately common. Shoulder range of motion and strength are decreased when compared to the contralateral shoulder. Nonoperative glenoid fractures have the lowest reported functional scores. Malunion, need for additional surgeries, and post-traumatic arthritis were the most common complications. CONCLUSION: When treating scapula fractures, orthopedic surgeons must consider the specific fracture pattern, as well as patient specific goals. Risks and benefits of both operative and nonoperative management should be discussed with the patient including the exceptionally low nonunion rate regardless of treatment option and that persistent pain following injury is unfortunately common.

Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with prior anterior shoulder instability: minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of anterior shoulder instability (ASI) commonly progress to glenohumeral arthritis or even dislocation arthropathy and often require total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purposes of this study were to (1) report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after TSA in patients with a history of ASI, (2) compare TSA outcomes of patients whose ASI was managed operatively vs. nonoperatively, and (3) report PROs of TSA in patients who previously underwent arthroscopic vs. open ASI management. METHODS: Patients were included if they had a history of ASI and had undergone TSA ≥5 years earlier, performed by a single surgeon, between October 2005 and January 2017. The exclusion criteria included prior rotator cuff repair, hemiarthroplasty, or glenohumeral joint infection before the index TSA procedure. Patients were separated into 2 groups: those whose ASI was previously operatively managed and those whose ASI was treated nonoperatively. This was a retrospective review of prospective collected data. Data collected was demographic, surgical and subjective. The PROs used were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score, QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, and 12-item Short Form physical component score. Failure was defined as revision TSA surgery, conversion to reverse TSA, or prosthetic joint infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. RESULTS: This study included 36 patients (27 men and 9 women) with a mean age of 56.4 years (range, 18.8-72.2 years). Patients in the operative ASI group were younger than those in the nonoperative ASI group (50.6 years vs. 64.0 years, P < .001). Operative ASI patients underwent 10 open and 11 arthroscopic anterior stabilization surgical procedures prior to TSA (mean, 2 procedures; range, 1-4 procedures). TSA failure occurred in 6 of 21 patients with operative ASI (28.6%), whereas no failures occurred in the nonoperative ASI group (P = .03). Follow-up was obtained in 28 of 30 eligible patients (93%) at an average of 7.45 years (range, 5.0-13.6 years). In the collective cohort, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score, QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, and 12-item Short Form physical component score significantly improved, with no differences in the postoperative PROs between the 2 groups. We found no significant differences when comparing PROs between prior open and prior arthroscopic ASI procedures or when comparing the number of prior ASI procedures. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a 79% 5-year survivorship rate in patients with prior ASI surgery and a 100% survivorship rate in nonoperatively managed ASI patients (P = .030). CONCLUSION: At mid-term follow-up, patients with a history of ASI undergoing TSA can expect continued improvement in function compared with preoperative values. However, TSA survivorship is decreased in patients with a history of ASI surgery compared with those without prior surgery.

Harms reporting in randomized controlled trials underpinning the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. As such, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has developed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to address the management of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. These CPG recommendations stem from the findings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which have been shown to influence clinical decision making and health policy. Therefore, it is essential that trial outcomes, including harms data (ie, adverse events), are adequately reported. We intend to evaluate the reporting quality of harms-related data in orthopedic literature specifically relating to AAOS CPG recommendations on the management of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS: We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) as well as guidance for reporting meta-research. The AAOS CPGs for glenohumeral osteoarthritis were obtained from orthoguidelines.org, and 2 authors independently screened the guidelines for the RCTs referenced. A total of 14 studies were identified. Data were extracted from the 14 included studies independently by the same 2 authors. Adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Extension for Harms Checklist was assessed using an 18-item scoring chart, with 1 point being awarded for meeting a checklist item and 0 points being awarded for not meeting a checklist item. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals were used to summarize RCT adherence to the CONSORT checklist. RESULTS: The average score among the studies included was 7.36/18 items (39% adherence). No study adhered to all criteria, with the highest-performing study meeting 11 of 18 items (58%) and the lowest meeting 3 of 18 items (16%). A positive correlation between checklist score and year of publication was observed, with studies published more recently receiving a higher score on the CONSORT checklist (P < .05). Studies that disclosed funding information received a higher score than those that did not (P < .05), but there was no significant difference when the different funding sources were compared. Finally, double-blinded studies scored higher on the checklist than those with lower levels of blinding (single or no blinding, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Adverse events are poorly reported amongst RCTs cited as supporting evidence for AAOS Management of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis CPGs, evidenced by a CONSORT checklist compliance rate of only 41% in this study. We recommend the development of an updated checklist with information that makes it easier for authors to recognize, evaluate, and report on harms data. Additionally, we encourage authors to include information about adverse events or negative outcomes in the abstract.

Utilization of a stepwise model to assess pivotal information for patient decision-making regarding open vs. arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of arthroscopic Latarjet has increased significantly in recent years due to its perceived advantages. The latter include a smaller surgical incision, faster recovery, quicker return to sports, and ability to treat concomitant intra-articular pathology. Nevertheless, the arthroscopic technique is more technically challenging, has a more significant learning curve, longer operating time, and is less cost-effective. The study aimed to identify the various factors influencing patient decision-making between undergoing arthroscopic or open Latarjet using a stepwise questionnaire model. METHODS: All patients with a primary, whether arthroscopic or open Latarjet procedure were subjected to a stepwise interviewing process and were asked to select between arthroscopic and open approaches at each step. RESULTS: Fifty patients with a mean age of 28.8 ± 8.8 year old participated in the study. Twenty (40%) consistently selected an arthroscopic approach after analysis of the incision's aspect, whereas 34 (68%) had a final decision different from their initial choice. In addition, out of the 15 patients who chose arthroscopy or were undetermined after presentation of the incisional aspect, 9 (60%) changed their decision to open surgery after presentation of the pros and cons of each approach. Twenty-three (46%) patients were unable to choose and left the choice to their surgeon. The faith in their surgeon and recovery were identified as the 2 most important factors influencing patients' final decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive nature of arthroscopic incisions was not considered to be more cosmetically appealing than that of a single open incision. The advantages of the arthroscopic procedure may not be as valued by patients as by surgeons. Patients were more interested in the equivalent short- and mid-term outcomes of both approaches and the shorter surgical duration of the open option. It is crucial to adequately inform patients during preoperative counseling to achieve the best consensus.

Comparing postoperative proprioception of the glenohumeral joint between the open and the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder proprioception, in which the anterior glenohumeral capsule plays a major role, is critical to the functioning of the shoulder. Consequently, most surgeons either do not resect or reinsert the anterior capsule in shoulder stabilization surgery. In the original open Latarjet procedure (OLP), the anterior capsule is preserved. However, in the all-arthroscopic Latarjet procedure (ALP), complete anterior capsule resection is recommended for better view and access to the coracoid. This raises the question if there is a postoperative difference in proprioception between these 2 procedures. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to assess the difference in postoperative proprioception between the operated and healthy sides after the OLP and ALP and (2) to compare the difference in postoperative proprioception on the operated side between the OLP and ALP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis including all patients who underwent a proprioception test after an OLP or ALP at our center. Collected baseline characteristics included sex, age at surgery, operated side, hand dominance, presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion, and time between surgery and the proprioception test. For the test, patients were positioned 1 meter from a wall. They were blindfolded and had to point at a target with a laser pointer taped to their index finger. The laser point was marked and the errors were measured horizontally and vertically and categorized as <4 cm, 4-8 cm, 8-16 cm, and >16 cm. RESULTS: Between April 2022 and April 2024, a total of 91 cases were identified, of which 24 underwent an OLP and 67 underwent an ALP. No significant difference was found in error distribution between the healthy and operated side after both the OLP (P = .30 horizontally, P = .67 vertically) and ALP (P = .20 horizontally, P = .34 vertically). Moreover, there was no significant difference in error distribution between the operated sides after the OLP vs. ALP (P = .52 horizontally; P = .61 vertically). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that postoperative proprioception is not significantly different between the operated and healthy sides after both the OLP and ALP, nor between the operated sides after the OLP vs. after the ALP. This might imply that completely resecting the anterior glenohumeral capsule does not have a detrimental effect on shoulder proprioception. However, these results are multifactorial and prospective studies are needed to better understand the regeneration potential of glenohumeral capsule mechanoreceptors and the importance of the anterior capsule for shoulder proprioception.

Latarjet procedure: biomechanical evaluation of 2-screw coracoid fixation.

BACKGROUND: Coracoid nonunion is a relevant complication following the Latarjet procedure and is influenced by multiple factors, including the method of graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and characterize the biomechanical properties of various two-screw fixation constructs used for coracoid graft fixation in the Latarjet procedure. METHODS: Forty model scapulae (Sawbones Inc., Vashon, WA, USA) were used for this study. A 15% anterior inferior glenoid bone defect was created. The coracoid was osteotomized at the juncture of the vertical and horizontal aspects, transferred to the anterior-inferior edge of the glenoid, and fixed with either two 3.5 mm fully threaded cannulated cortical screws, two 3.5 mm fully threaded solid cortical screws, two 3.5 mm partially threaded cannulated screws, or two 4.5 mm partially threaded malleolar screws (MS). Biomechanical testing was performed with an Instron material testing machine (Instron Corp., Norwood, MA, USA) by applying loads to the lateral aspect of the transferred coracoid graft. The constructs were preconditioned with nondestructive cyclical loading (0N-20N) to determine construct stiffness. After 100 cycles of dynamic loading, the construct was loaded to failure to determine ultimate failure load, yield displacement, and mode of failure. RESULTS: All failures were associated with plastic deformation of the screws and coracoid graft fracture. There was a significantly lower initial stiffness for partially threaded cannulated screws compared to MS (186 ± 49.3 N/mm vs. 280 ± 65.5 N/mm, P = .01) but no significant differences among the other constructs. There was no difference in ultimate failure load (P = .18) or yield displacement (P = .05) among constructs. CONCLUSION: Two screw coracoid fixation of the coracoid in a simulated classic Latarjet procedure with 3.5 mm fully threaded cortical and cannulated screws is comparable to 4.5 mm MS in strength, stiffness, and displacement at failure. On the other hand, partially threaded 3.5 mm cannulated screws provide inferior fixation stiffness and could potentially affect clinical outcomes.

Humeral rotation osteotomy is not associated with glenohumeral and scapulohumeral decentering at long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Weber rotational osteotomy that increases humeral retrotorsion in patients with anterior shoulder instability has become unpopular because of recurrence of instability and high rates of early-onset osteoarthritis (OA). However, the wear pattern in patients after rotational osteotomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of surgically increased humerus retrotorsion on glenohumeral and scapulohumeral centering in a long-term follow-up. METHODS: The data of 18 shoulders in 18 patients diagnosed with a unilateral chronic recurrent anterior shoulder instability treated with an internal rotation subcapital humerus osteotomy between 1984 and 1990 were drawn from a previously published cohort and enrolled in the study. All patients had available bilateral computed tomography (CT) scans performed after a mean follow-up of 14 (12-18) years. On these CT scans a comparison of the operated and the contralateral healthy side with regard to humerus torsion, glenoid version, glenoid offset, glenohumeral and scapulohumeral subluxation indices, rotator cuff action lines, and osteoarthritic changes was performed. RESULTS: The analysis of follow-up CT scans revealed a significantly higher mean humeral retrotorsion in the operated side compared with the healthy side (41.6° ± 14.0° vs. 20.7° ± 8.2°, P < .001). No differences were found in terms of glenohumeral subluxation index (0.50 ± 0.08 vs. 0.51 ± 0.03, P = .259), scapulohumeral subluxation index (0.53 ± 0.09 vs. 0.54 ± 0.03, P = .283), glenoid version (-3.9° ± 4.6° vs. -4.1° ± 3.7°, P = .424), glenoid offset (4.0 ± 2.8 mm vs. 4.0 ± 1.3 mm, P = .484), infraspinatus action lines (102.5° ± 4.7° vs. 101.2° ± 2.1°, P = .116), subscapularis action lines (74.0° ± 6.0° vs. 73.1° ± 2.3°, P = .260), and resultant rotator cuff action lines (87.8° ± 4.9° vs. 87.0° ± 1.8°, P = .231) between operated and healthy shoulders. Osteoarthritic changes were observed in all operated shoulders and in 13 of 18 healthy shoulders. The OA grade was mild in 5 patients, moderate in 11, and severe in 2 cases for operated shoulders and mild in 13 healthy shoulders at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The surgical increase of humeral retrotorsion by 20°-30° did not affect glenohumeral and scapulohumeral centering in patients with a Weber rotational osteotomy after a long-term follow-up compared to the healthy side. Although a high degree of early-onset OA was observed it remains unclear whether the cause is the surgical interventions performed or the joint instability itself.

Evaluation of the scapulohumeral distraction technique for anterior shoulder dislocation: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder dislocation is a common injury presenting in the emergency department. Numerous methods have been described in the literature for glenohumeral reduction. These methods can be divided into 2 groups: traction maneuvers and the combination of traction with scapula manipulation techniques. In this article, we introduced a new maneuver for shoulder reduction, namely, the combination of traction with handling the scapula (scapulohumeral distraction [SHD]), and compare it to the Hippocratic technique (HT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 patients with acute anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled from November 2021 to September 2023. Eighty-seven patients, who met all inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups (SHD or HT). We evaluated each method for success rate, time to relocation, complications over a follow-up of 1 month, and patients' satisfaction and pain level during the procedure. RESULTS: Both methods had comparable success rates (SHD 95.3% vs. HT 93.2%, P = .833) while no complications where observed. However, SHD method required significantly less procedure time (P = .001). Moreover, patients in SHD group reported significantly less pain (P = .012) and greater satisfaction (P = .003) levels. Furthermore, when we assessed relocation time, pain, and patient satisfaction as a function of recurrence, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 techniques. Similarly, the evaluation of relocation time for both techniques as a function of body mass index and age did not indicate statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: The SHD technique represents a safe, anatomically based and simple method for shoulder reduction. It showed a statistically significant decrease in relocation time and pain, with patients reporting higher satisfaction rates compared with the classical Hippocratic technique. Nonetheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 techniques in regard to their success rates.

Long-term (minimum 10 years) survival and outcomes of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There are some major controversies surrounding the use and longevity of pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty (PISA). The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term survival and outcomes (minimum 10-year) following PISA for osteoarthritis (OA) in young and active patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent PISA (InSpyre; Tornier-Stryker) for OA between 2009 and 2012. Arthroplasty survival was known for 71 patients followed longitudinally for a minimum of 10 years. The clinical and radiologic outcomes were assessed in 62 patients (62 shoulders) reviewed with radiographs. The mean age at surgery was 60 years (range, 23-72 years), and 31 shoulders (50%) underwent prior surgery before PISA. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis (POA = 29), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA = 23), and postinstability osterarthritis (PIOA = 10). Clinical failure was defined as repeat surgical intervention involving prosthesis revision. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). The mean duration of follow-up was 11 ± 0.6 years (range, 10-14 years). RESULTS: Overall, the survival rate was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.8-96.8) at 5 years and 87% (95% CI 79-94.8) at a 10-year follow-up. Survival was 100% in PTOA (type 1 fracture sequelae) and in PIOA as well as 95% in primary OA with type A glenoid. Revision surgery was significantly higher in biconcave (type B2) glenoid (44%) compared with concentric (type A) glenoid (2%), respectively (P = .002). Among the 7 patients who were revised to reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 5 had painful glenoid erosion and 2 had bipolar (glenoid and humeral) erosion with thinning and finally fracture of the greater tuberosity. Two shoulders with glenohumeral erosion were associated with secondary rotator cuff tears (1 supraspinatus and 1 subscapularis tear). The mean time to revision and revision was 4 ± 1.7 years. Glenoid wear was more often superior (81%) than central (19%), P < .001. For those shoulders not revised, the mean CS and SSV significantly increased from 39 ± 14 to 70 ± 14 points and 34% ± 15% to 75% ± 17%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION: PISA is an efficient and durable surgical procedure for the treatment of young and active patients with post-traumatic OA, postinstability OA, and primary OA with concentric (type A) glenoid erosion, but not for those with biconcave (type B2) glenoid. Biconcave (type B2) glenoid and subscapularis tear or insufficiency are risk factors for failure and revision.

Decreased prevalence of new-onset adhesive capsulitis in patients prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents that have well-known antifibrotic properties. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between ARB use and the rates of new-onset adhesive capsulitis as well as adhesive capsulitis requiring operative treatment. METHODS: Using a large national insurance database, a randomly generated cohort of patients with at least 3 continuous months of ARB use between January 2010 and December 2019 (n = 1,000,000) was compared to a separate randomly generated cohort without ARB use (n = 3,000,000). Rates of newly diagnosed adhesive capsulitis and associated manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and/or arthroscopic capsulotomy were calculated over a 1- and 2-year period following the completion of at least 3 continuous months of ARB therapy. Rates were compared using multivariable logistic regression to control for demographics and comorbidities. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and reported for each comparison. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. RESULTS: The mean age in the ARB cohort was 61.8 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.0), whereas in the control cohort, it was 54.8 years (SD = 12.3) (P < .001). The ARB cohort had significantly lower rates of newly diagnosed adhesive capsulitis compared with the control cohort at both 1 year (0.15% vs. 0.55%, P < .001) and 2 years (0.3% vs. 0.78%, P < .001). Similar findings were observed for the arthroscopic capsular release/MUA cohort associated with adhesive capsulitis. After adjusting for confounding factors, the lower rates of adhesive capsulitis and arthroscopic capsular release/MUA associated with adhesive capsulitis in the ARB cohort remained statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients prescribed ARBs experienced a decreased rate of newly diagnosed adhesive capsulitis, as well as adhesive capsulitis requiring surgical intervention when compared to a control cohort. These findings suggest a potential protective effect of ARBs against the development of adhesive capsulitis. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and establish a causal relationship.