Growth hormone deficit: Influence of puberty on the response to treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Short stature is the most frequent reason for consultation in Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. The aim of the study was to analyze the response to treatment based on its onset in pubertal or prepubertal stages and to analyze the possible benefit of an early onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Longitudinal, retrospective and observational study in 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: (a) genetic background: maternal, paternal and genetic height; (b) perinatal history; (c) anthropometry during follow-up and at pubertal onset: weight, height, body mass index; (d) variables during follow-up and at pubertal onset: growth rate, bone age and growth prognosis. Final response variables: adult height, adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction, adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment and adult height with respect to height at pubertal onset. RESULTS: Total pubertal gain was 0.84 ± 0.6 SD. 61.9% of the patients started treatment with rhGH in prepuberty. The initiation of treatment in the prepubertal stage and a higher total pubertal gain are correlated with a better final height (P = 0.001 and r = 0.507, P = 0.00, respectively). Furthermore, a longer duration of treatment in pre-puberty is correlated with a better final response (r = 0.328, P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: The start of treatment in the prepubertal stage and its longer duration during this period are determining factors to achieve a good long-term response. Total pubertal gain was greater in patients who started treatment in the pubertal stage.

Growth hormone deficit. Does the first year of treatment influence adult height?

INTRODUCTION: Short stature is the most frequent reason for Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. OBJECTIVE: The possible correlation of a good response to any early response factor with a better final response was studied, and also whether there was a difference in response to treatment according to the type of deficit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a longitudinal, retrospective and observational study of 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. There were good response criteria in the first year of treatment: a) an increase in growth rate ≥3 cm/year, b) a growth rate ≥1 standard deviation (SD), c) an increase in height ≥0.5 SD, d) an increase in height ≥0.3 SD. Study of the Index of Responsiveness to treatment in the first and second year. Final response variables: adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction and adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment. The possible correlation of a good response to any of the early response factors with a better final response to treatment was studied, and also whether there was a difference in the response to treatment according to the type of deficit. RESULTS: The treatment produced a gain in adult height with respect to genetic height of 0.06 ±â€¯0.7 SD. Patients considered good responders in the first year of treatment presented a better final response (growth rate ≥3 cm: p = 0.000, growth rate ≥1 SD: p = 0.008, height gain ≥0.5 SD: p = 0.007, height gain ≥0.3 SD: p = 0.006), as well as patients with a severe deficit (p = 0.04). The index of responsiveness to treatment during the first year was associated with a better final response (r = 0.249, p = 0.003), with this correlation being maintained in the second year (r = 0.294, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone treatment increased height in the genetic target. The percentage of good responders varied depending on the criteria used. The response in the first year of treatment and a severe deficit were determining factors for achieving a good long-term response.

Growth hormone deficit. Does the first year of treatment influence adult height? / Déficit de hormona de crecimiento, ¿influye el primer año de tratamiento en la talla final?

INTRODUCTION: Short stature is the most frequent reason for Pediatric Endocrinology consultations and sometimes requires treatment with growth hormone. OBJECTIVE: The possible correlation of a good response to any early response factor with a better final response was studied, and also whether there was a difference in response to treatment according to the type of deficit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a longitudinal, retrospective and observational study of 139 patients treated for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency up to adult height. There were good response criteria in the first year of treatment: a) an increase in growth rate≥3cm / year, b) a growth rate≥1 standard deviation (SD), c) an increase in height≥0.5 SD, d) an increase in height≥0.3 SD. Study of the Index of Responsiveness to treatment in the first and second year. Final response variables: adult height with respect to target height, adult height with respect to initial growth prediction and adult height with respect to initial height at the start of treatment. The possible correlation of a good response to any of the early response factors with a better final response to treatment was studied, and also whether there was a difference in the response to treatment according to the type of deficit. RESULTS: The treatment produced a gain in adult height with respect to genetic height of 0.06±0.7 SD. Patients considered good responders in the first year of treatment presented a better final response (growth rate≥3cm: p=0.000, growth rate≥1 SD: p=0.008, height gain≥0.5 SD: P=0.007, height gain≥0.3 SD: P=0.006), as well as patients with a severe deficit (P=0.04). The index of responsiveness to treatment during the first year was associated with a better final response (r=0.249, P=0.003), with this correlation being maintained in the second year (r=0.294, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone treatment increased height in the genetic target. The percentage of good responders varied depending on the criteria used. The response in the first year of treatment and a severe deficit were determining factors for achieving a good long-term response.