The ovarian stimulation regimen does not affect aneuploidy or blastocyst rate.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Could the total dose (<3000 IU or ≥3000 IU) and type of exogenous gonadotrophin (i.e. recombinant FSH and/or human menopausal gonadotrophin [HMG]) influence aneuploidy and blastulation rates and produce different reproductive outcomes? DESIGN: This retrospective, observational, multicentre cohort study included a total of 8466 patients undergoing IVF using autologous oocytes and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Participants were divided according to the dosage of total gonadotrophins and stratified by maternal age. RESULTS: The aneuploidy rates, pregnancy outcomes and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) were similar among women who received total gonadotrophin dosages of <3000 or ≥3000 IU. No statistical differences were reported in the blastulation rate with lower or higher gonadotrophin dosages. Women receiving a higher amount of HMG during ovarian stimulation had a lower aneuploidy rate (P = 0.02); when stratified according to age, younger women with a higher HMG dosage had lower aneuploidy rates (P< 0.001), while no statistical differences were observed in older women with higher or lower HMG dosages. No significant differences were observed in IVF outcomes or CLBR. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of gonadotrophins were not associated with rate of aneuploidy. However, an increased fraction of HMG in younger women was associated with a lower aneuploidy rate. The study demonstrated that the total gonadotrophin dosage did not influence aneuploidy, reproductive outcomes or CLBR. The increased gonadotrophin and HMG dosages used for ovarian stimulation did not precede aneuploidy, and the use of HMG should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, according to the individual's characteristics and infertility type.

A direct healthcare cost analysis of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

PURPOSE: We have previously published a retrospective matched-case control study comparing the effect of recombinant LH (r-hLH) versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) supplementation on the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The result from that study showed that the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was significantly higher in the r-hLH group (53% vs. 64%, p = 0.02). In this study, we aim to do a cost analysis between these two groups based on our previous study. METHODS: The analysis consisted of 425 IVF and ICSI cycles in our previous study. There were 259 cycles in the r-hFSH + hMG group and 166 cycles in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group. The total cost related to the treatment of each patient was recorded. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) were performed and created. RESULTS: The total treatment cost per patient was significantly higher in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group than in the r-hFSH + hMG group ($4550 ± 798.86 vs. $4290 ± 734.6, p = 0.003). However, the mean cost per live birth in the r-hFSH + hMG group was higher at $8052, vs. $7059 in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group. The CEAC showed that treatment with hFSH + r-hLH proved to be more cost-effective than treatment with r-hFSH + hMG. Willingness-to-pay was evident when considering a hypothetical threshold of $18,513, with the r-hFSH + r-hLH group exhibiting a 99% probability of being considered cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The cost analysis showed that recombinant LH is more cost-effective than hMG supplementation on r-hFSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

Ovulation induction using sequential letrozole/gonadotrophin in infertile women with PCOS: a randomized controlled trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is sequential letrozole/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) superior to letrozole alone in ovulation induction and pregnancy promotion among infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? DESIGN: This open-label randomized controlled trial comparing sequential letrozole/HMG and letrozole alone included 174 participants enrolled from August 2019 to January 2020 at the Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Infertile women aged between 18 and 40 years who met Rotterdam criteria for PCOS and without other known causes of infertility were selected for this study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive 2.5 mg letrozole on cycle days 3-7 (n = 87) or 2.5 mg letrozole on cycle days 3-7 with a sequential injection of 75 IU HMG on cycle days 8-10 for one treatment cycle (n = 87). The pregnancy outcome was recorded after one treatment cycle. RESULTS: Women receiving sequential treatment achieved a significantly higher ovulation rate than those in the letrozole group (90.8% versus 70.1%, P = 0.001) and the live birth rate of the sequential group was significantly higher than that of the letrozole protocol (23.0% versus 10.3%, P = 0.025); there was no statistical variation with respect to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the sequential letrozole/HMG protocol may be superior to the letrozole alone protocol in terms of ovulation induction and pregnancy promotion among infertile women with PCOS.

Agonist long protocol improves outcomes of vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in repeatedly thin endometrium.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does follicular stimulation using human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) after pituitary down-regulation by a GnRH agonist improve endometrial thickness (EMT) and clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET; using vitrified-warmed embryos) in women with thin endometrium after intensified oestrogen administration (IOA)? DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. A total of 627 patients attempted 683 FET cycles with at least one previous history of thin endometrium. None of the cycles reached over 7 mm EMT after using oral and vaginal oestradiol for more than 21 days (IOA protocol). A total of 129 cycles proceeded with FET, 305 cycles were cancelled, and 249 cycles involved administration of HMG following GnRH agonist pituitary down-regulation (GnRH agonist + HMG protocol) for further endometrial preparation. RESULTS: EMT became significantly greater (7.18 ± 1.14 mm versus 6.13 ± 0.63 mm, P < 0.001) using GnRH agonist + HMG compared with previous IOA cycles, but this was not related to serum oestrogen concentrations. A total of 213 cycles after the GnRH agonist + HMG protocol proceeded with FET, showing a significantly increased clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate compared with those after IOA. CONCLUSIONS: The GnRH agonist + HMG protocol for endometrial preparation in FET cycles improves EMT in women with a thin endometrium after IOA and showed significantly better clinical outcomes than IOA. The authors suggest that the GnRH agonist + HMG protocol should be used for EMT that is less than 7 mm after there has been no optimal response to IOA.

Dosing Characteristics of Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin-Derived LH Activity in Patients Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation: A German Fertility Database Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate dosing of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG)-derived medications with LH activity in ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles for in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). DESIGN: A non-interventional study was performed to analyse data from the German RecDate database (January 2007-December 2011). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Starting/total r-hLH/hMG dose, OS duration/cycle number, r-hLH/hMG initiation day (first day of administration), and population/cycle characteristics were assessed in women (≥18 years) undergoing OS for IVF/ICSI using r-hLH or hMG-derived medications (excluding corifollitropin alfa, clomiphene citrate, letrozole, mini/micro-dose human chorionic gonadotrophin, and urofollitropin alone). Data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: 67,858 identified cycles utilized medications containing r-hLH (10,749), hMG (56,432), or both (677). Mean (standard deviation) OS duration with r-hLH and hMG was 10.1 (4.43) and 9.8 (6.16) days, respectively. Median (25th-75th percentile) r-hLH starting dose (75.0 [75.0-150.0] IU) was consistent across patients regardless of age, infertility diagnosis, or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) protocol. Median (25th-75th percentile) hMG-derived LH activity starting dose was 225.0 (150.0-300.0) IU, regardless of GnRH protocol, but was lower in women aged <35 years and those with ovulation disorders/polycystic ovary syndrome. Median (25th-75th percentile) total dose for r-hLH (750.0 [337.5-1,125.0] IU) and hMG-derived LH activity (1,575.0 [750.0-2,625.0] IU) varied according to patients' age, infertility diagnosis, cycle number, and r-hLH/hMG initiation day. GnRH antagonist use resulted in a numerically higher median total hMG-derived LH activity dose than GnRH agonist use. LIMITATIONS: The data used in this study were taken from electronic medical records relating to a specific timeframe (2007-2011) and therefore may not accurately reflect current clinical practice; however, it is likely that the differences between the two compounds would be maintained. Additionally, secondary data sources may suffer from uniformity and quality issues. CONCLUSIONS: The standard of care for OS cycles is described with respect to IVF/ICSI treatment including an LH component in Germany during the specified timeframe.

Influence of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation: an overview.

It is widely known that luteinising hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) are integral in the female reproductive lifecycle. Due to the common binding site and similarity in molecular structure, they were previously thought to have overlapping roles. However, with the development of both purified urinary-derived and recombinant gonadotrophins, the individual characteristics of these molecules have begun to be defined. There is evidence to suggest that LH and hCG preferentially activate different signalling cascades and display different receptor-binding kinetics. The data generated on the two molecules have led to an improved understanding of their distinct physiological functions, resulting in a debate among clinicians regarding the most beneficial use of LH- and hCG-containing products for ovarian stimulation (OS) in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Over the past few decades, a number of trials have generated data supporting the use of hCG for OS in ART. Indeed, the data indicated that hCG plays an important role in folliculogenesis, leads to improved endometrial receptivity and is associated with a higher quality of embryos, while presenting a favourable safety profile. These observations support the increased use of hCG as a method to provide LH bioactivity during OS. This review summarises the molecular and functional differences between hCG and LH, and provides an overview of the clinical trial data surrounding the use of products for OS that contain LH bioactivity, examining their individual effect on outcomes such as endometrial receptivity, oocyte yield and embryo quality, as well as key pregnancy outcomes.

Treatment of idiopathic oligozoospermia with combined human chorionic gonadotropin/human menopausal gonadotrophin: A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study.

To evaluate whether hCG/hMG therapy has beneficial effects on idiopathic oligozoospermia in Chinese infertility population. The patients were randomly divided into the treatment group receiving hCG/hMG for 3 months and the placebo group receiving placebo for 3 months. Semen and biochemical analysis was performed, and DNA fragmentation as well as spermatid concentration was evaluated. Administration of hCG/hMG for 3 months could significantly improve sperm concentration, rate of forward motile spermatozoa, total motile sperm count, the percentage of sperm with normal morphology and the rate of spontaneous pregnancy in medium- and higher-level inhibin B group respectively. Moreover, in medium- and higher-level inhibin B group, sperm DNA fragmentation index and spermatid concentration were significantly declined respectively at the end of treatment. However, there were no significant differences in lower-level inhibin B group before and after treatment in term of seminal parameters, DNA fragmentation and spermatid concentration. HCG/hMG therapy for 3 months has a beneficial effect on a part of male with idiopathic oligozoospermia, and the efficacy of hCG/hMG therapy is associated with the inhibin B level.

Cost-effectiveness of ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin and clomiphene citrate in an intrauterine insemination programme for subfertile couples.

Ovarian stimulation with low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) is superior to clomiphene citrate in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with respect to clinical pregnancy rate, but it is unclear whether HMG is also the more cost-effective option. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of ovarian stimulation with low-dose subcutaneously administred HMG (37.5-75 IU per day) to orally administred clomiphene citrate (50 mg/day from day 3-7) in an IUI programme for subfertile couples. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the results of a randomized trial, including 620 IUI cycles. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of using HMG versus clomiphene citrate. Results are presented from the healthcare payer perspective. The total cost per patient associated with one IUI treatment with HMG is €764, whereas it is €558 if clomiphene citrate is used, resulting in an incremental cost of €206 for HMG per treatment. The incremental clinical pregnancy rate of using HMG instead of clomiphene citrate, however, is also 5.7 percentage points higher, resulting in an ICER of HMG versus clomiphene citrate of €3615 per additional clinical pregnancy achieved. On average, HMG was found to be more cost-effective than clomiphene citrate.

The impact of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of intrauterine insemination treatment: an analysis of 8893 cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A single university-based centre. POPULATION: A total of 5109 couples with 8893 cycles. METHODS: The outcome of IUI with different protocols for ovarian stimulation was examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The live birth rate (LBR), twin pregnancy rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). RESULTS: In ovulatory women without ovarian stimulation, the LBR was 7.6%. Stimulation with clomifene citrate (CC), letrozole (LE), human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), CC or LE combined with HMG achieved LBRs of 6.1, 5, 7.9, 8 and 12.2%, respectively. LE combined with HMG achieved a significantly improved LBR compared with no stimulation. HMG stimulation was associated with a higher rate of twins (7.4%) than no stimulation (0%, P < 0.01). In ovulatory women, the LBR appeared lower in CC and LE compared with no stimulation (P > 0.05). In anovulatory women, ovarian stimulation with CC, LE, HMG, CC or LE combined with HMG achieved LBRs of 11.3, 5.1, 11.8, 12.6 and 13.6%, respectively. No significant difference was observed. There were no triplet pregnancies or OHSS in stimulated cycles. CONCLUSIONS: In ovulatory women, ovarian stimulation with LE combined with HMG achieved a significantly improved live birth rate. HMG stimulation resulted in a high risk for twins. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In ovulatory women, ovarian stimulation with letrozole and HMG resulted in a significantly improved LBR.

Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Can controlled ovarian stimulation with low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) improve the clinical pregnancy rate when compared with ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate (CC) in an intrauterine insemination (IUI) programme for subfertile couples? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian stimulation with low-dose hMG is superior to CC in IUI cycles with respect to clinical pregnancy rate. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: IUI after ovarian stimulation is an effective treatment for mild male subfertility, unexplained subfertility and minimal-mild endometriosis, but it is unclear which medication for ovarian stimulation is more effective. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 330 women scheduled for IUI during 657 cycles (September 2004-December 2011) were enrolled in an open-label randomized clinical trial to ovarian stimulation with low-dose hMG subcutaneous (n = 334, 37.5-75 IU per day) or CC per oral (n = 323, 50 mg/day from Day 3-7). Assuming a difference of 10% in 'clinical pregnancy with positive fetal heart beat', we needed 219 cycles per group (alpha-error 0.05, power 0.80). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We studied subfertile couples with mild male subfertility, unexplained subfertility or minimal-mild endometriosis. Further inclusion criteria were failure to conceive for ≥12 months, female age ≤42 years, at least one patent Fallopian tube and a total motility count (TMC) ≥5.0 million spermatozoa after capacitation. The primary end-point was clinical pregnancy. Analysis was by intention to treat and controlled for the presence of multiple measures, as one couple could have more randomizations in multiple cycles. Linear mixed models were used for continuous measures. For binary outcomes we estimated the relative risk using a Poisson model with log link and using generalized estimating equations. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: When compared with ovarian stimulation with CC, hMG stimulation was characterized by a higher clinical pregnancy rate (hMG 48/334 (14.4%) versus CC 29/323 (9.0%), relative risk (RR) 1.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.4)), higher live birth rate (hMG 46/334 (13.8%) versus CC 28/323 (8.7%), RR 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.4)), low and comparable multiple live birth rate (hMG 3/46 (6.5%) versus CC 1/28 (3.6%), P > 0.99), lower number of preovulatory follicles (hMG 1.2 versus CC 1.5, P < 0.001), increased endometrial thickness (hMG 8.5 mm versus CC 7.5 mm, P < 0.001), and a lower cancellation rate per started cycle (hMG 15/322 (4.7%) versus CC 46/298 (15.4%), P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We randomized patients at a cycle level, and not at a strategy over multiple cycles. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study showed better reproductive outcome after ovarian stimulation with low-dose gonadotrophins. A health economic analysis of our data is planned to test the hypothesis that ovarian stimulation with low-dose hMG combined with IUI is associated with increased cost-effectiveness when compared with ovarian stimulation with CC. STUDY FUNDING/ COMPETING INTERESTS: T.M.D. and K.P. were supported by the Clinical Research Foundation of UZ Leuven, Belgium. This study was also supported by the Ferring company (Copenhagen, Denmark) which provide free medication (Menopur) required for the group of patients who were randomized in the hMG COS group. The Ferring company was not involved in the study design, data analysis, writing and submission of the paper. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01569945 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Standardization of therapeutic, urinary gonadotrophins: an update on the use and availability of International Standards for Menotrophin.

The potencies of therapeutic preparations of gonadotrophins of human, urinary origin, which comprise a heterogenous mix of isoforms with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) bioactivities, are standardized by WHO International Standards (IS). We report here, the evaluation, through an international collaborative study, of a candidate preparation, coded 10/286, to replace the 4th IS, 98/704, for human, urinary FSH and LH (Menotrophin) which has been used for many years for the potency assignment of therapeutic preparations using bioassays. The mean FSH and LH bioactivities of 10/286, determined by in vivo bioassays in terms of 98/704, were 183 IU per ampoule (95% confidence limits 165-202) and 177 IU per ampoule (95% confidence limits 159-197), respectively.

Corrigendum: A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.931756.].

A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

Background: The role of luteinizing hormone (LH) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) requires more evidence for its efficacy. Several studies compared recombinant human LH (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in combination with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) but lack the results with GnRH-antagonist protocol and in Asians. Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study inspecting women receiving GnRH antagonist protocol and r-hFSH+hMG or r-hFSH+r-hLH regimen for over five days for COH in the in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle in Taiwan from 2013 to 2018. The outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed after propensity score matching between the two groups. A subgroup analysis was conducted in cycles in which women underwent their first embryo transfer (ET), including fresh ET and frozen ET (FET). Results: With a total of 503 cycles, the results revealed that the r-hFSH+r-hLH group performed better in terms of numbers of oocytes retrieved (r-hFSH+hMG vs. r-hFSH+r-hLH, 11.7 vs. 13.7, p=0.014), mature oocytes (8.7 vs. 10.9, p=0.001), and fertilized oocytes (8.3 vs. 9.8, p=0.022), while other outcomes were comparable. The analysis of first ET cycles also showed similar trends. Although the implantation rate (39% vs. 43%, p=0.37), pregnancy rate (52% vs. 53%, p=0.90), and live birth rate (39% vs. 45%, p=0.19) were not significantly different, the miscarriage rate was higher in the r-hFSH+hMG group than the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (26% vs. 15%, p<0.05) in first ET cycles. The cumulative pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (53% vs. 64%, p=0.02). No significant difference in rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was observed. Conclusion: The results support the hypothesis that the treatment of r-hLH+r-hFSH improves COH clinical outcomes in the IVF/ICSI cycle.

Comparison of modified agonist, mild-stimulation and antagonist protocols for in vitro fertilization in patients with diminished ovarian reserve.

Objective To compare the efficacy of three protocols for ovarian stimulation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Methods This prospective randomized study enrolled patients with diminished ovarian reserve who underwent cycles of IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: a modified gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol (group A); (ii) a mild stimulation protocol (group B); or (iii) an antagonist protocol (group C). Demographic characteristics, clinical variables and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups. Results A total of 116 patients were enrolled in the study: 54 in group A, 52 in group B and 60 in group C. Group B (32.69%) had a significantly higher cycle cancellation rate compared with groups A (11.11%) and C (16.67%). The early abortion rate of group C (44.44%) was significantly higher than group A (12.50%), but not significantly different from group B (16.67%). There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates among the three groups. Conclusion A modified GnRH agonist protocol achieved a comparable pregnancy rate to those of the mild stimulation protocol and antagonist protocol, whilst having lower cycle cancellation and early abortion rates.

Systematic review of hormone replacement therapy in the infertile man.

OBJECTIVES: To highlight alternative treatment options other than exogenous testosterone administration for hypogonadal men with concomitant infertility or who wish to preserve their fertility potential, as testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) inhibits spermatogenesis, representing a problem for hypogonadal men of reproductive age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review for the years 1978-2017 via PubMed. Also abstracts from major urological/surgical conferences were reviewed. Review was consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. We used Medical Subject Heading terms for the search including 'testosterone replacement therapy' or 'TRT' and 'male infertility'. RESULTS: In all, 91 manuscripts were screened and the final number used for the review was 56. All studies included were performed in adults, were written in English and had an abstract available. CONCLUSIONS: Exogenous testosterone inhibits spermatogenesis. Hypogonadal men wanting to preserve their fertility and at the same time benefiting from TRT effects can be prescribed selective oestrogen receptor modulators or testosterone plus low-dose human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). Patients treated for infertility with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism can be prescribed hCG alone at first followed by or in combination from the start with follicle-stimulating hormone preparations.

Minimal stimulation protocol: a cheap and effective method of ovulation induction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and cost of Minimal Stimulation Protocol (MSP), a new combination of human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) and clomiphene citrate (CC), for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. METHOD: The ovulation rates, pregnancy rates, abortion rates and the cost of medication were assessed in respect of 67 women who underwent MSP. RESULTS: Ovulation rate in the study group was 82%, pregnancy rate 21% and multiple pregnancies 7%. Spontaneous abortion occurred in 36% of the pregnancies. The average cost of MSP stimulation was one-third of hMG protocol. CONCLUSION: MSP protocol, while substantially cheaper than hMG, gives comparable pregnancy rates with less need for monitoring and better patient comfort. These justify further evaluation of its role in the treatment of infertility.