Delayed or neglected meniscus tear repair and meniscectomy in addition to ACL reconstruction have similar clinical outcome.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair and meniscus resection with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with ACL rupture and neglected or delayed medial meniscus tears. METHODS: Thirty patients with ACL ruptures and unstable vertical longitudinal medial meniscus tears were included. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I included 15 patients who underwent meniscal repair and Group II included 15 patients who underwent meniscectomy. The knee range of motion, McMurray test, Lachman test, pivot shift test, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee score, and Tegner activity (TA) scale were used to assess all patients. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 3.6 (0.5-6.5) years. Median age was 28 (16-36) years. Fourteen patients (93.3%) in Group I and six patients (40%) in Group II returned to their preinjury sport activity level (P = .007). Median maximum knee flexion was 132° (121°-140°) in Group I and 134° (121°-139°) in Group II (n.s.). All patients had full knee extension and negative McMurray test results. Lachman and pivot shift test results were similar between groups. The median IKDC Questionnaire score was 99 (86-100) in Group I and 93 (70-100) in Group II (P = .016). The difference in Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, HSS knee, and TA scale score between groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes of patients that underwent meniscus repair were better than those that underwent meniscus resection with concurrent ACL reconstruction. The technically complicated and costly meniscus repair may achieve better clinical outcomes than meniscectomy when treating a neglected or delayed meniscal tear with a concurrent ACL tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Lateral retinacular release is not recommended in association to MPFL reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation.

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become the gold standard for the treatment of the recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD). Lateral retinacular release can be performed in association with MPFL reconstruction, but the effect on outcomes is not clear. To evaluate the effect of lateral release on outcomes following MPFL reconstruction is the aim of this study. It is hypothesized that isolated MPFL reconstruction was not inferior to MPFL reconstruction and lateral retinacular release in terms of IKDC subjective score and patellar tilt (PT). METHODS: Patients between ages 18 and 45 scheduled to undergo MPFL reconstruction without an associated bony procedure (tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty) were randomized to isolated MPFL reconstruction or MPFL reconstruction (no LRR group) and arthroscopic LRR (LRR group). Evaluation criteria were subjective IKDC score as the primary outcome and PT evaluated with a CT-scan. PT was evaluated with the quadriceps relaxed (PTQR) and contracted (PTQC). RESULTS: Of 43 patients included in the trial, 7 were lost of follow-up, 3 were not able to complete evaluation because of medical reasons, and 33 patients were evaluated with a minimum of 12 months and a median follow-up of 24 (12-60) months. The average subjective IKDC score was at 86 ± 20 (29-94) in the LRR group and 82 ± 15 (39-95) in the no LRR group (p = 0.45). The PTQR was at 22° ± 7° (13-37) in the LRR group and 21 ± 10 (4-37) in the no LRR group (n.s.). The PTQC was at 27° ± 9° (12-40) in the LRR group and 25 ± 12 (5-45) in the no LRR group (n.s.). No complications were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in subjective IKDC score or patellar tilt based on the addition of an arthroscopic LRR to an MPFL reconstruction in patients with RPD not undergoing associated bony procedures. There is no indication to a systematic lateral retinacular release in association with MPFL reconstruction in the treatment of RPD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Long-term follow up of single-stage anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and high tibial osteotomy and its relation with posterior tibial slope.

BACKGROUND: Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy is considered to be an effective treatment for medial compartmental osteoarthritis. It is generally admitted that tibial slope increases after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and decreases after closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Young patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency along with medial compartment osteoarthritis need a combined procedure of ACL reconstruction along with high tibial osteotomy to regain physiological knee kinematics and to avoid chondral damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 30 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction along with medial opening-wedge osteotomy from Jan 2004 to June 2012 with a minimum follow up of 2 years. The pre-operative and post-operative posterior tibial slopes were measured. Functional outcome was analysed using clinico-radiological criteria, IKDC scoring and Lysholm score. RESULTS: Post-operative patients improved both clinically and functionally. The patients who had posterior tibial slope >5° decrease, compared to patients who had less <5° decrease, had better functional scores (IKDC and Lysholm score), which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that decreasing the tibial slope >5° compared to pre-operative value has functionally favourable effect on the reconstructed ACL graft and outcome. It is known that increasing slope causes an anterior shift in tibial resting position that is accentuated under axial loads. This suggests that decreasing tibial slope may be protective in an ACL deficient knee. Hence by placing the tricortical graft posterior to midline in the opening wedge reduces the posterior tibial slope and thereby reduces the stress on the graft leading to better functional outcome.

Return to Sport, Re-injury and Performance After the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluating the Role of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Scoring Systems.

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common injuries that can considerably impact an individual's quality of life and athletic performance. In these cases, surgical reconstruction of the ligament can be considered to restore stability to the knee. This study aims to investigate the time taken for individuals to return to sport post-ACL reconstruction, assess the rate of re-injury and evaluate the reliability of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scoring systems in predicting a return to sport at the pre-injury level. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 104 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2022 by one surgical team at Mater Dei Hospital, Malta were evaluated using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was based on different components including the sport practised at the time of injury, sport engagement classification, return to sport, the ability to return to pre-injury levels of performance and re-injury. The participants then had to fill in IKDC and KOOS evaluation forms. Results In this study, 73% (n=76) of individuals successfully returned to sport after ACL reconstruction, with no significant difference being found between professional and recreational athletes (Chi-squared=0.00455, p=0.95). After reconstruction, 31.7% (n=33) of participants experienced an ipsilateral or contralateral ACL tear, with those returning to sport within six months showing a fivefold increase in re-injury risk compared to individuals who returned at eight or 12 months, suggesting a significant association between return duration and re-injury. The relationship between scoring systems and return to sport at the pre-injury level of performance was analysed using binary logistic regression, revealing that achieving scores of 85.6 or higher in IKDC or 89 or higher in KOOS meant having a 95% probability of returning to sport at the pre-injury level. Conclusions By considering these scoring systems with other post-operative criteria, clinicians can offer a more customised rehabilitation plan tailored to each patient who undergoes ACL reconstruction.

Modified Implant Fixation Technique Is an Alternative for Patients with an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Limited Resource Settings: A Comparison Functional Outcome Study with Polyether Ether Ketone and Bioabsorbable Screws.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most prevalent factors contributing to knee instability worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate modified metal fixation techniques for ACL reconstruction compared to factory-made implants, such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) screws, bioabsorbable screws, and modified metal implants. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted to assess the functional outcomes of ACL using various fixation methods. Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction at several healthcare facilities were included in the study. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score questionnaire at 6- and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analyses, including the Shapiro-Wilk test and analysis of variance, were performed to compare outcomes among the fixation groups. Results: Thirty-three patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery with varying distributions across the three fixation groups (modified metal implants, PEEK screws, and bioabsorbable screws) were included in the study. As measured by the Lysholm and IKDC scores at 6- and 12 months post-surgery, the PEEK group demonstrated the highest average scores. Nevertheless, these functional outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.140, 0.770, 0.150, and 0.200). These findings align with those of meta-analyses comparing different fixation methods for ACL reconstruction. Conclusions: While acknowledging the small sample size as a limitation, this study suggests that modified metal implants represent viable options for ACL reconstruction. The selection of fixation methods should consider patient characteristics and preferences, emphasizing biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore their biomechanical properties and cost-effectiveness.

A Single-Centre, Retrospective, Observational Study to Assess Safety and Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair Using Surestitch All Inside Implant.

Introduction The meniscus plays a vital role in maintaining knee stability. It acts as a shock absorber and knee filler. The incidence of meniscal tears is estimated to be 60 per 100,000 people. Due to lack of awareness among patients, only 10% of the meniscus tears were treated through partial or total meniscectomy. Recently, the concept of meniscus preservation surgery has emerged to preserve early degeneration of the knee joint. In the current retrospective study, safety and functional outcomes of arthroscopic meniscal repair surgery using Surestitch All inside implants (Sironix Arthroscopy Solutions, Healthium Medtech Limited, Bengalaru, India) were assessed. Methods Fifty-two patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair surgery between January 2019 to July 2022 at Epic Hospital in Gujarat, India, were enrolled in the study. Retrospective data including demographics, injury details, surgery details, and post-surgery complications were collected from the medical records of the patients. Then, the patients were followed up telephonically to document safety and functional outcomes using patient-reported instruments such as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Tegner activity level, and Lysholm knee score. Results The recruited patients had the mean age, height, and weight of 37.56 ± 12.52 years, 167.61 ± 7.28 cm, and 75.87 ± 10.7 kgs, respectively. Seventy-one percent of patients were male and 29% were female. Majority of the patients had the routine of doing mild exercise. During pre-surgery representations, medial meniscal tear was observed in majority of patients. The mean length of the tear was 1.32 ± 0.84 cm. In addition, patients were also diagnosed with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL) tears, and osteochondral defects. Surgeries for meniscal repair were performed using Surestitch All inside implant. In patient-reported outcomes, the mean IKDC, SANE, and Lysholm scores were 81.72 ± 14.23, 94.02 ± 13.79, and 93.32 ± 14.63, respectively. When the mean Tegner scores of pre-injury and post-surgery periods were compared, this resulted in no significant difference (p>0.05) in the activity levels of the patients. Conclusion Based on our findings, arthroscopic meniscal repair with Surestitch All inside meniscal repair implant provides satisfactory and favorable functional outcomes with no remarkable adverse events.

Comparison between the effect of immersive virtual reality training versus conventional rehabilitation on limb loading and functional outcomes in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) commonly occurs during sporting events. It causes pain, instability and reduction in range of movement of the knee which results in altered balance, reduced strength as well as loading to the involved knee. The challenge to get the patient back to competitive sports level much depends on the rehabilitation process. Post ACLR rehabilitation is challenging due to the long rehabilitation time as well as boring repetitive exercises. The aim of this study is to compare between the effectiveness of using immersive virtual reality (PlayStation VR) in addition to the conventional rehabilitation as an aid in rehabilitation of patients after ACLR in terms of objective functional assessment and pain and subjective knee function scoring. Methods: This randomised controlled trial was undertaken in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from July 2019 until July 2020. Thirty patients were randomised into a group undergoing purely conventional rehabilitation (Group 1) and a group undergoing both conventional rehabilitation and immersive virtual reality assisted rehabilitation (Group 2). The immersive virtual reality assisted rehabilitation was started at 3 months post operatively for 3 months duration. Limb loading, balance, range of motion, functional hop tests of the knee, pain and subjective scoring of the knee with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Scores were measured preoperatively and at 6 months. Results: There were significant differences in terms of improvement of pain scores (p = 0.012) as well as IKDC Scores (p = 0.024) in Group 2 as compared to Group 1. However, there were no significant differences with regards to limb loading, balance, range of motion and functional hop tests of the knee (p > 0.05). No adverse events were observed during the study period. Conclusion: Immersive virtual reality can be used as an adjunct in rehabilitation of patients after ACL reconstruction in terms of improving their pain as well as their subjective knee evaluation. Large randomised control trial is recommended to further investigate the efficacy.

Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee with or without reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament: A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To systematically analyze the effectiveness between combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ACL+ALLR) and isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for treatment of patients with injured ACL. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, and Wanfang Data for all relevant studies. All statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3. RESULTS: A total of six articles with 460 study subjects were included, with 193 patients in ACL+ALL reconstruction group and 267 patients in ACL reconstruction group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the ACL+ALL reconstruction group had significantly lower KT measured value (P < 0.00001), Lachman test positive-rate (P = 0.02), Pivot-shift test positive-rate (P < 0.00001) and graft rupture rate (P = 0.02) compared with the ACL reconstruction group. Higher IKDC score (P < 0.00001) and Lysholm score (P < 0.00001) were measured in ACL+ALL reconstruction group, while infection rate (P = 0.86) and other complications rate (P = 0.29) showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic reconstruction of the ACL of the knee with reconstruction of the ALL indicates better postoperative knee function and clinical outcomes compared with isolated ACL reconstruction. The infection rate and other complications rate showed no significant difference between two groups.

Role of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of osteoarthritis remains controversial. In this paper, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of PRP in the treatment of osteoarthritis using meta-analysis, providing evidence for the selection of clinical treatment options. METHODS: We performed a computer-based search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to retrieve articles using the search terms "platelet-rich plasma", "osteoarthrosis", and "knee joint". Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed. The combined effect was assessed using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials, involving 320 patients, were included in this study. No significant differences were observed in the International Knee Documentation Committee score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, or the absolute value of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between the experimental and control groups. The absolute value of the VAS score and change in the WOMAC score were significantly decreased and patient satisfaction was increased in the experimental group, as compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that intra-articular injection of PRP is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis that can reduce post-operative pain, improve locomotor function, and increase patient satisfaction.

Prevalence and influence of tibial tunnel widening after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patella-bone-tendon-bone-graft: long-term follow-up.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate incidence, degree and impact of tibial tunnel widening (TW) on patient-reported long-term clinical outcome, knee joint stability and prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) after isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. On average, 13.5 years after ACL reconstruction via patella-bone-tendon-bone autograft, 73 patients have been re-evaluated. Inclusion criteria consisted of an isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction, a minimum of 10-year follow-up and no previous anterior cruciate ligament repair or associated intra-articular lesions. Clinical evaluation was performed via the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Tegner and Lysholm scores. Instrumental anterior laxity testing was carried out with the KT-1000™ arthrometer. The degree of degenerative changes and the prevalence of osteoarthritis were assessed with the Kellgren-Lawrence score. Tibial tunnel enlargement was radiographically evaluated on both antero-posterior and lateral views under establishment of 4 degrees of tibial tunnel widening by measuring the actual tunnel diameters in mm on the sclerotic margins of the inserted tunnels on 3 different points (T1-T3). Afterwards, a conversion of the absolute values in mm into a 4 staged ratio, based on the comparison to the results of the initial drill-width, should provide a better quantification and statistical analysis. Evaluation was performed postoperatively as well as on 2 year follow-up and 13 years after ACL reconstruction. Minimum follow-up was 10 years. 75% of patients were graded A or B according to IKDC score. The mean Lysholm score was 90.2±4.8 (25-100). Radiological assessment on long-term follow-up showed in 45% a grade I, in 24% a grade II, in 17% a grade III and in additional 12% a grade IV enlargement of the tibial tunnel. No evident progression of TW was found in comparison to the 2 year results. Radiological evaluation revealed degenerative changes in sense of a grade II OA in 54% of patients. Prevalence of a grade III or grade IV OA was found in 20%. Correlation analysis showed no significant relationship between the amount of tibial tunnel enlargement (P>0.05), long-term clinical results, anterior joint laxity or prevalence of osteoarthritis. Tunnel widening remains a radiological phenomenon which is most commonly observed within the short to midterm intervals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequently stabilises on mid and long- term follow-up. It does not adversely affect long-term clinical outcome and stability. Furthermore, tunnel widening doesn't constitute an increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis.