[Some aspects of iatrogenic vessel injury]. / Nekotorye aspekty yatrogennykh povrezhdenii sosudov.

Iatrogenic events made up 1-10% of in-hospital mortality. Currently, iatrogenic vascular injuries are described for almost all surgical areas. Incidence of iatrogenic vascular injuries is gradually increased that is primarily associated with high number of percutaneous endovascular interventions. Surgical treatment of patients with iatrogenic vessel injuries is extremely difficult. This is due to sudden development of this complication, severe clinical state of the patient associated with underlying disease, acute massive blood loss, as well as insufficient experience of surgeon in urgent vascular surgery. Simple lateral or circular suturing is not always possible to restore the vessel integrity. Vascular replacement including non-standard vascular reconstructions are often required. Prevention of iatrogenic vascular injuries is also insufficiently described in the literature. Most manuscripts devoted to iatrogenic vascular injuries are usually represented by case reports or small sample. Thus, it is impossible to identify the main measures for prevention of iatrogenic injury.

Factors associated with unfavorable outcome in a multicenter audit of 100 infective endocarditis.

We aimed to identify factors associated with unfavorable outcome in patients treated for infective endocarditis (IE), with a focus on departure from European guidelines. We conducted a retrospective audit of all adult patients treated for endocarditis during a 1-year period across a regional network of nine care centers in the south-east of France. Medical records were reviewed regarding patient and infection characteristics, antibiotic therapy, outcome, and compliance to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Antibiotic treatment appropriateness was evaluated regarding molecule, dosage, and duration, according to guidelines. Primary endpoint was the assessment of factors associated with unfavorable outcome, defined as in-hospital mortality or IE relapse at 1-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints were intensive care admission, iatrogenic events, and nosocomial infections that occurred during hospital stay. One hundred patients were included. Median age was 71 years old. Twenty-two patients died and IE relapse occurred in two patients, representing 24 patients with unfavorable outcome. Overall, antibiotic treatment was deemed appropriate in 28 cases. Thirty-three patients required intensive care, 34 iatrogenic events were found, including 19 acute kidney injuries, and 13 nosocomial infections occurred during care. Using a logistic regression, factors associated with unfavorable outcome were admission in the intensive care unit (adjusted odd ratio 7.26 [1.8-29.28]; p = 0.005), new-onset nosocomial infection (adjusted odd ratio 8.83 [1.42-54.6]; p = 0.019), and age > 71 years old (adjusted odd ratio 11.2 [2.76-46.17]; p < 0.001). Departure from guidelines was frequent but not related to unfavorable outcome in our study. Only intensive care, age, and nosocomial infections were associated with mortality and relapse. Iatrogenic events were numerous, with no impact on outcome.

Splenic Rupture in an Elective Cesarean Section: A Possible Iatrogenic Event.

A rare case of an unexpected iatrogenic splenic rupture during a cesarean section is reported. The trauma was recognized early and treated conservatively without delay; thus, further complications were avoided. A 28-year-old woman with a history of previous cesarean sections was submitted for an elective cesarean section. Intra-operatively, minor bleeding from the left abdomen was noted and eventually assigned to an inferior pole splenic trauma treated conservatively without splenectomy. Although unclear, the injury was considered iatrogenic, probably due to the abdominal pressure for fetal delivery and the anatomy of the splenocolic ligament. This case highlights the clinical suspicion that is required despite routine surgical procedures for the early diagnosis of an unexpected splenic rupture when minor bleeding occurs intra-operatively from the upper abdomen. Early recognition and prompt treatment are of paramount importance for the safety of the fetus and the patient.

Amiodarone-Induced Electrical Storm: A Nightmare in the Emergency Room.

Drug-induced long QT syndrome (LQTS) is defined as prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc ≥460 ms) plus polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia fitting the description of torsades de pointes temporally associated with the administration of a drug or combination of drugs. Amiodarone therapy is a known uncommon cause of acquired QT interval prolongation that should not be underestimated. We present a case of an iatrogenic electrical storm with atrial fibrillation (AF) in which amiodarone was administered to attempt chemical cardioversion, resulting in an unnoticed prolongation of the QT interval, with subsequent repeated polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, managed with isoproterenol. Concomitant drugs and slight electrolyte disturbances potentiated this phenomenon. Given the widespread use of this drug in the emergency department, our case highlights a pertinent matter for all medical emergency practitioners. Additionally, it stresses the significance of potential precipitating factors, such as electrolyte imbalances, which are clinical conditions very frequent in the emergency context, along with the importance of recognizing drug interactions. Finally, this case also emphasizes the vital importance of closely monitoring the patient's receiving amiodarone.

Benzodiazepines and frail elderly people: how prescribing can be optimized?

In France, benzodiazepine (BZD) is frequently prescribed in elderly people (EP). Long-term efficacy is often questioned, and treatment has to be regularly re-examined, especially in EP. In our Geriatric day-hospital for assessment of frailty, a multidisciplinary team evaluates the patients and gives them preventative measures against the loss of autonomy. Medication evaluation is part of these measures. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of a standardized intervention on the optimization of BZD treatment. Setting and method: After a short interview and the delivery of an information booklet about BZD, patients were proposed an optimization of their BZD treatment (dosage reduction, occasional medication, switch to a short half-life BZD, or total discontinuation). Patients were followed up monthly by a phone-interview over a 6-months period. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of BZD optimized treatments after a 6 months follow-up. Results: 18 patients were included. Among them, 50% have been taking a BZD for more than 10 years, and 39% were prescribed a long half-life BZD, which can be qualified as inappropriate in EP. 50% of the subjects were frail and 44% pre-frail, according to the Fried criteria. At the end of the study, 33% of the patients had their BZD treatments optimized, including 17% of total discontinuation. Conclusion: In the frail elderly population, a standardized intervention can be useful to improve BZD treatment. An extension to this intervention would be the creation of an organization tasked with routinely monitoring the patients' withdrawal over a six month period.

Preventable Iatrogenic Disability in Elderly Patients During Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: In older patients, hospitalization is often associated with new or worsening disability. This hospitalization-associated disability may be explained in part by the cumulative effect of aging, frailty, comorbidities, and illnesses that led to hospitalization but may also result from health care management issues and the hospital environment. Our objective was to determine the frequency, causes, and the preventability of disability induced by the processes of care or "iatrogenic disability." METHODS: A total of 503 patients, aged 75 years and older, hospitalized in the 105 medical and surgical units of Toulouse University Hospital between October 2011 and March 2012, with a minimal length of stay of 2 days, were included. Hospitalization-associated disability was defined as a loss of 0.5 points or more in the Katz Activity of Daily Living Score between the time of hospital admission and discharge. To determine the iatrogenic component of hospitalization-associated disability, an expert panel in geriatric medicine reviewed each medical chart using a standardized record review and identified precipitating iatrogenic adverse events resulting in functional decline. RESULTS: Incidence of iatrogenic disability was 11.9% (95% confidence interval, 9.2%-15.1%). Of the 60 cases of iatrogenic disability, 49 (81.7%, 95% confidence interval, 69.6%-90.5%) were judged to be potentially preventable. The most common health management issues identified in patients with preventable iatrogenic disability were low mobilization [by excessive bed rest (26.5%) and lack of physical therapist intervention (55.1%)], overuse of diapers (49.0%), and transurethral urinary catheterization (30.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that a significant proportion of hospitalization-associated disability may be induced by iatrogenic events, and that most of them are potentially preventable. Health care professionals need to be educated on the specific needs of elderly hospitalized patients and should consider hospitalization-associated disability as an outcome of care.

[Iatrogenic events: a significant cause of admission in intensive care units]. / L'événement indésirable grave: un motif d'admission fréquent en réanimation.

OBJECTIVE: Identification and analysis of iatrogenic events leading to admission in intensive care units. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational monocentric study. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients hospitalized in adult medical intensive care unit of a general hospital over a twelve-month period. METHODS: We recorded for each patient the following characteristics: origin, demographic datas, cause of admission, medical background, severity, diagnosis, ICU length of stay and provided treatments. Two medical investigators identified the iatrogenic character of events and determined their potential preventability. Univariate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 603 patients were admitted and 71 (12%) due to iatrogenic events. In comparison to patients hospitalized for other causes, these patients were older (66 years vs. 60, P 0.009) and often previously treated in a hospital (82% vs. 54%, P<0.0001). They had increased need for transfusions (39% vs. 26%, P 0.02) but less frequent indications for mechanical ventilation (67% vs. 77%, P 0.07). They had similar ICU mortality (20% vs. 19%). Among them, 27 iatrogenic events were considered as preventable. CONCLUSIONS: Iatrogenic event is a significant cause of ICU admission, involved in 12% of all the hospitalizations in our unit. It has an impact on the patient's profile (significantly older) and their ICU stay (increased need for transfusion). More than a third of events could be preventable and potentially accessible to corrective actions.