Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiologia ; 57(1): 66-78, 2015.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25530188

RESUMO

The last decade has seen substantial progress in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to lung cancer, thus meaning that its prognosis has improved. The Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have therefore produced a national consensus statement in order to make recommendations for radiological diagnosis and assessment of treatment response in patients with lung cancer. This expert group recommends multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) as the technique of choice for investigating this disease. The radiology report should include a full assessment by the TNM staging system. Lastly, when the patient is on immunotherapy, response evaluation should employ not only Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1) but also Immune-Related Response Criteria (irRC).


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Radiologia , Registros , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rev. colomb. gastroenterol ; 28(supl.1): 16-20, jul.-set. 2013. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-700544

RESUMO

El diagnóstico del CHC por imágenes ha cobrado cada vez más relevancia, debido no solo a la escasez de síntomas y signos en los pacientes con este tumor, sino al conocimiento cada vez mayor del comportamiento biológico tumoral en estos medios diagnósticos. Esto ha llevado a las diferentes técnicas por imágenes a convertirse en el pilar fundamental del algoritmo diagnóstico en CHC.


Imaging diagnosis of HCC has become increasingly important, not only because of the scarcity of symptoms and signs in patients with this tumor, but also because of the growth of knowledge about the biological behavior of these tumors. This has led to various imaging techniques becoming mainstays of the diagnostic algorithm for HCC.


Assuntos
Humanos , Meios de Contraste , Radiologia
3.
Rev. chil. radiol ; 18(3): 111-116, 2012. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-658852

RESUMO

Introduction: The written radiology report is the most relevant component of any radiological examination. Few studies about referring clinicians opinion concerning structure and contents of radiology reports have been conducted. Objective: To investigate which radiology report issues are significant to the clinician. Methodology: One hundred and sixty-four physicians, among surgeons, internists, residents, and general practitioners were surveyed. Results: According to surveyed clinicians the most important element in any radiologic examination is the reporting radiologist (67.7 percent); 93.9 percent of them expect the radiology report to address the referral diagnosis; 95.7 percent expects the report to present a conclusion, whilst 73 percent of referring clinicians consider ultrasonography as the imaging procedure that commonly exhibits more errors. Surgeons, generally understimate radiologists recommendations for complementary studies. Conclusion: An experienced reporting radiologist is considered the most significant element of any imaging procedure. The radiology report should be problem-oriented (answering clinical question), and contain a conclusion, which should begin by answering the clinician s concerns. General practitioners, internists and residents value further studies reccommended by radiologists.


Introducción. El informe es lo más relevante de un examen radiológico. Escasas publicaciones han estudiado la opinión del clínico. Objetivo. Establecer qué aspectos del informe son relevantes para el clínico. Metodología. Se aplicó una encuesta a cirujanos, internistas, residentes y médicos generales. Resultados. Se encuestó a 164 médicos. Al pedir un examen radiológico, lo más relevante (67,7 por ciento) fue el radiólogo informante; 93,9 por ciento considera importante que se haga referencia al diagnóstico de derivación; 95,7 por ciento estima que debe haber conclusión. El 73 por ciento cree que el examen en el que se cometen más errores es la ecotomografía. Los cirujanos son los que menos valoran las recomendaciones de estudios posteriores. Conclusión. El radiólogo que informa es considerado lo más importante en un examen. El informe debe hacer referencia al diagnóstico, tener conclusión, la que debe comenzar respondiendo la inquietud del clínico. Los médicos generales, internistas y residentes valoran que se sugieran estudios complementarios.


Assuntos
Humanos , Prontuários Médicos , Relações Interprofissionais , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comunicação , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA