RESUMO
CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, data available concerning the impact of the prognostic value of quantitative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) parameters on the CAR T-related outcomes and toxicities are limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of pre- and post-CAR T metabolic parameters on survival and toxicities following CAR T-cell therapy. Fifty-nine patients with PET/CT scans done pre-and post-CAR T infusion were retrospectively identified and analyzed in a single institution database of LBCL patients treated with commercial CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. The median follow-up was 10.7 months [interquartile range (IQR): 2.6-25.5 months]. The overall response (complete response-CR and partial response) and CR rates post-CAR T were 76% (n = 45) and 53% (n = 31), respectively. On univariate analysis, low pre-CAR T total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) predicted improved overall response post-CAR T (OR = 4.7, p = 0.01, OR = 9.5, p = 0.03, respectively) and CR post-CAR T (OR = 12.4, p = 0.0004, OR = 10.9, p = 0.0001, respectively). High TLG pre-CAR T was correlated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS, OR = 3.25, p = 0.04). High MTV pre-CAR T was correlated with developing immune effector cell neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) events (OR = 4.3, p = 0.01), and high SUV pre-CAR T was associated with grade 3-4 neurological events (OR = 12, p = 0.01). High MTV/TLG/SUVmax post-CAR T were significantly associated with inferior Overall survival (OS). On multivariate analysis, high TLG pre-CAR T (HR = 2.4, p = 0.03), age ≥60 (HR = 2.7, p = 0.03), and bulky disease (≥5 cm) at the time of apheresis (HR = 2.5, p = 0.02) were identified to be independent prognostic factors for inferior PFS. High MTV post-CAR T was identified as the most prognostic factor associated with inferior OS.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e TecidosRESUMO
Although several promising approaches for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) have been approved recently, it remains unclear which patients will ultimately achieve long-term responses. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA sequencing has emerged as a valuable tool to assess minimal residual disease (MRD). Correlations between MRD and outcomes have been shown in previously untreated DLBCL, but data on the repeated assessment of MRD in the dynamic course of rrDLBCL is limited. Here, we present an approach leveraging cost- and time-sensitivity of digital droplet (dd)PCR to repeatedly assess MRD in rrDLBCL and present proof-of-principle for its ability to predict outcomes.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Neoplasia Residual , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Humanos , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/genética , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Prognóstico , DNA Tumoral Circulante/genética , Masculino , Feminino , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) is a multisystemic neurodegenerative inborn error of immunity (IEI) characterized by DNA repair defect, chromosomal instability, and hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation. Impaired DNA double-strand break repair determines a high risk of developing hematological malignancies, especially lymphoproliferative diseases. Poor response to treatment, excessive chemotherapy toxicities, and the need for avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation make the successful clinical management of patients with AT challenging for oncologists. We describe the favorable outcome of the LBCL with IRF4 rearrangement at stage III in a 7-year-old female patient diagnosed with AT. The patient was treated according to the B-HR arm of the INTER-B-NHL-COP 2010 protocol, including the administration of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, prednisone, etc. She presented excessive treatment toxicities despite individually reduced doses of methotrexate and cyclophosphamide. However, in the MRI there was no significant reduction in pathologic lymph nodes after three immunochemotherapy courses. Therefore, a lymph node biopsy was taken. Its subsequent histopathological examination revealed tuberculosis-like changes, though tuberculosis suspicion was excluded. After two following immunochemotherapy courses, PET-CT confirmed complete remission. From March 2022 onwards, the patient has remained in remission under the care of the outpatient children's oncology clinic.
Assuntos
Ataxia Telangiectasia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Rituximab/genética , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Ataxia Telangiectasia/tratamento farmacológico , Ataxia Telangiectasia/genética , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Mutação , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Mutadas de Ataxia Telangiectasia/genéticaRESUMO
Introduction: Pediatric DLBCL is considered a homogenous group and has superior outcomes compared to adults. This study investigated the clinical pathology and immunohistochemical distinction between adult and pediatric large B-cell lymphoma. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 314 NHLs with the morphology of diffuse pattern, large B-cell, and CD20 expression was investigated. Results: Of 314 cases, there were 6 cases of pleomorphic MCL (all in adults), 19 cases of Burkitt lymphoma (all in children), and 289 cases of DLBCL. Pediatric DLBCL had many striking differences: More frequency in extra-nodal sites; a higher proportion of centroblastic morphology; a predominance of GCB-type; a high proliferation rate; an infrequency of Bcl2 protein expression, and a lack of double-expresser lymphoma. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the significant biological differences between adult and pediatric DLBCL.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Adulto , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/metabolismo , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several commercial and academic autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products targeting CD19 have been approved in Europe for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Products for other diseases such as multiple myeloma and follicular lymphoma are likely to be approved by the European Medicines Agency in the near future. DESIGN: The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association collaborated to draft best practice recommendations based on the current literature to support health care professionals in delivering consistent, high-quality care in this rapidly moving field. RESULTS: Thirty-six CAR-T experts (medical, nursing, pharmacy/laboratory) assembled to draft recommendations to cover all aspects of CAR-T patient care and supply chain management, from patient selection to long-term follow-up, post-authorisation safety surveillance and regulatory issues. CONCLUSIONS: We provide practical, clinically relevant recommendations on the use of these high-cost, logistically complex therapies for haematologists/oncologists, nurses and other stakeholders including pharmacists and health sector administrators involved in the delivery of CAR-T in the clinic.
Assuntos
Hematologia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Acreditação , Adulto , Medula Óssea , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos TRESUMO
Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL), but many patients are either ineligible or unable to receive it. This retrospective study characterized outcomes in R/R LBCL, delineated by eligibility for, and receipt of, ASCT. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) for patients undergoing ASCT were 35.2 and 31.6 months (overall survival [OS] not reached). Median PFS, EFS, and OS were 4.3, 4.3, and 6.9 months for ineligible patients, and 2.7, 2.6, and 9.4 months for those eligible for but unable to receive ASCT. This highlights an unmet need for alternative therapies in patients unable to receive ASCT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is the most common form of lymphoma. Polatuzumab vedotin (polatuzumab) is an effective therapy for patients diagnosed with LBCL; however, only limited information regarding pathologic features detected by clinical laboratory assays is available to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from polatuzumab based therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data from real world patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL whose tumors underwent next generation sequencing and were treated with polatuzumab based therapy at a single large academic cancer center. Tumor and patient characteristics were analyzed to look for factors that predict response to polatuzumab based therapies. RESULTS: We identified high grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL) -NOS or MYC/BCL2 histology and presence of MYC rearrangement as factors that predict inferior response to polatuzumab based therapy. Patients with germinal center B cell of origin (GCB COO) LBCL without these factors had a high response rate (73%) to polatuzumab based therapy. CONCLUSION: In a single center real world retrospective analysis of R/R LBCL patients with available genomic data, polatuzumab based therapy may be less effective in patients with HGBL-NOS or MYC/BCL2 histology and MYC rearrangements, but not in patients with GCB COO LBCL without these features. Routine performance of more comprehensive pathologic analysis of tumors may inform the use of polatuzumab based therapy in patients with LBCL.
RESUMO
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Most patients treated with axi-cel experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and/or adverse neurologic events (NEs). To explore potential approaches for reducing CAR T-cell-related toxicities with axi-cel, several safety expansion cohorts were added to the pivotal ZUMA-1 trial. ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was an exploratory safety cohort that investigated the use of the IL-6 receptor-blocking antibody tocilizumab and anticonvulsant levetiracetam as prophylaxis against CRS and NEs in patients treated with axi-cel. Patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled in Cohort 3 and received conditioning chemotherapy on d -5 through -3 followed by a single infusion of axi-cel (2â¯×â¯106 cells/kg) on d 0. Prophylactic tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) was administered 48 h after axi-cel infusion. Primary endpoints were incidence and severity of CRS and NEs. Key secondary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and biomarker analyses (eg, circulating CAR T cells, cytokines, chemokines). Forty-two patients were enrolled in Cohort 3, 38 of whom received axi-cel. In the 24-month analysis, any-grade CRS and NEs occurred in 92% and 87% of patients, and Grade ≥3 CRS and NEs occurred in 3% and 42% of patients, respectively. One Grade 5 NE (cerebral edema) occurred. With 24-mo minimum follow-up, the ORR was 63%, and 39.5% of patients had ongoing response. With 48-month follow-up, median OS was 34.8 mo (95% CI, 5.4-not estimable). CAR T-cell expansion in ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was comparable with pivotal Cohorts 1 and 2. Consistent with tocilizumab-mediated inhibition of IL-6R, serum IL-6 levels were increased relative to Cohorts 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 NEs were associated with elevated IL-6 levels, proinflammatory cytokines, and myeloid cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Based on these findings, prophylactic tocilizumab is not recommended to prevent CAR T-cell-related adverse events, and beneficial effects of prophylactic levetiracetam remain uncertain in patients with R/R LBCL.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The prognosis for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who did not respond or relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy remains dismal, with no established consensus on the most effective salvage regimen. METHODS: We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of complete response (CR) and overall response rates (ORR) to first-line treatments for CAR-T-relapsed/refractory LBCL. We followed the predefined protocol available at PROSPERO (CRD42023473854). RESULTS: We identified 41 studies evaluating the following interventions: non-CD19 CAR-T, CD19 CAR-T, bispecific antibodies (BiTEs), lenalidomide- and polatuzumab-based regimens, radiotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Non-CD19 CAR-T cells yielded the best CR (56%, CI: 40-71%), significantly higher than other interventions except CD19 CAR-T (CR = 30%, CI: 7-58%). BiTEs, radiotherapy, lenalidomide- and polatuzumab-based regimens (CR: 28%, 26%, 19%, 24% respectively) did not differ significantly from each other. ICI and BTKi showed the lowest CR rates (12%, CI: 5-20% and 8%, CI: 0-23%, respectively), and were also significantly inferior to BiTEs. ORR was the highest for non-CD19 CAR-T (ORR = 80%, CI: 66-92%), whereas all other regimens yielded values below 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Non-CD19 CAR-T cells were associated with higher response rates and should be considered if patients are eligible. Given the heterogeneity of the estimates, the results should be interpreted cautiously. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023473854.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Terapia de Salvação , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Refractoriness and relapse after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy have emerged as major challenges for immunotherapy of aggressive large B-cell lymphoma. Thus far, there is no consensus on how to address treatment failure and whether to administer maintenance therapy following CAR-T cell therapy. METHODS: From August 2017 through November 2022, 52 patients with refractory/relapsed aggressive LBCL who had a high risk of resistance to CAR-T cell therapy were given chidamide in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor as maintenance therapy following either CAR19/22 T-cell cocktail therapy or CAR19/22 T-cell cocktail therapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Another 52 aggressive LBCL patients who had comparable baseline characteristics and received similar therapeutic regimens but did not receive any interventions following CAR-T cell therapy or CAR-T cell therapy plus ASCT were regarded as the control group to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of chidamide and a PD-1 inhibitor. RESULTS: Among the 52 patients who received chidamide and a PD-1 inhibitor as maintenance therapy, with a median follow-up of 26.5 months (range: 1.1-53.8), neither the median progression-free survival (PFS) nor overall survival (OS) was reached, and the expected 2-year OS and PFS rates were 89 % and 77 %, respectively, which were superior to those of the control group (p < 0.001). Long-term chidamide administration and a specific genetic subtype of EZB were strongly associated with a better response after chidamide plus PD-1 blockade therapy. Additionally, long-term chidamide administration was significantly associated with prolonged persistence and reactivation of CD19-directed CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood. Adverse effects (AEs) were moderate and reversible, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the combination of chidamide and PD-1 blockade as maintenance therapy could improve the outcomes of aggressive LBCL patients at high risk of failing CAR-T cell therapy.
Assuntos
Aminopiridinas , Benzamidas , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Aminopiridinas/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/mortalidade , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/imunologiaRESUMO
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), are innovative treatments for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Following initial regulatory approvals, real-world evidence (RWE) of clinical outcomes with these therapies has been accumulating rapidly. Notably, several large registry studies have been published recently. Here we comprehensively describe clinical outcomes with approved CAR-T therapies in patients with r/r LBCL using available RWE. We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, and 15 conference proceedings to identify studies published between 2017 and July 2022 that included ≥10 patients with r/r LBCL treated with commercially available CAR-T therapies. Eligible study designs were retrospective or prospective observational studies. Key outcomes of interest were objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Random-effects meta-analyses were used to compare real-world outcomes with those of pivotal clinical trials and to compare clinical outcomes associated with axi-cel and tisa-cel. Study cohort mapping was conducted to avoid including patients more than once. Of 76 cohorts we identified, 46 reported patients treated specifically with either axi-cel or tisa-cel, with 39 cohorts (nâ¯=â¯2754 patients) including axi-cel and 20 (nâ¯=â¯1649) including tisa-cel. No studies of liso-cel that met the inclusion criteria were identified during the search period. One-half of the tisa-cel cohorts were European, compared with 33% of the axi-cel cohorts. Among studies with available data, axi-cel had a significantly shorter median time from apheresis to CAR-T infusion than tisa-cel. Despite including broader patient populations, real-world effectiveness and safety of both axi-cel and tisa-cel were consistent with data from the pivotal clinical trials. Comparative meta-analysis of axi-cel versus tisa-cel demonstrated adjusted hazard ratios for OS and PFS of .60 (95% confidence interval [CI], .47 to .77) and .67 (95% CI, .57 to .78), respectively, both in favor of axi-cel. Odds ratios (ORs) for ORR and CR rate, both favoring axi-cel over tisa-cel, were 2.05 (95% CI, 1.76 to 2.40) and 1.70 (95% CI, 1.46 to 1.96), respectively. The probability of grade ≥3 CRS was comparable with axi-cel and tisa-cel, whereas axi-cel was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥3 ICANS (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 3.05 to 5.11). Our meta-analysis indicates that CAR-T therapies have manageable safety profiles and are effective in a wide range of patients with r/r LBCL, and that axi-cel is associated with improved OS and PFS and increased risk of grade ≥3 ICANS compared with tisa-cel. Limitations of this study include nonrandomized treatments, potential unknown prognostic factors, and the lack of available real-world data for liso-cel.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Resposta Patológica Completa , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/metabolismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfócitos TRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has improved the historically poor outcomes for relapsed and refractory (R/R) large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LBCL). However, nearly 60% of patients will either fail to respond or relapse after CAR T-cell therapy. Currently, PET/CT scans are used to assess response. Cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is released by tumor cells into the peripheral blood and can be measured for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. METHODS: In this retrospective, IRB approved pilot study, archived lymphoma tissue and ctDNA from peripheral blood samples on day 0, 14, 28, 56, 90, 180, and 365 after CAR T-cell infusion from 10 patients with R/R NHL were collected for next-generation sequencing (NGS) of clonal variable-diversity-joining (VDJ) rearrangements (Adaptive biotechnologies [Seattle, WA]). Response was assessed by PET/CT on days 90 and 365 and graded according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. The primary endpoint was to determine the feasibility of detecting ctDNA to monitor disease response after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. The secondary endpoint was to compare the sensitivity/specificity of MRD assessment from ctDNA to PET/CT imaging. RESULTS: Nine out of 10 patients with a trackable sequence [median age 69 (range: 56-76); 55.6% male; median LDH 224], were included in this study. Each received tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) CAR T-cell therapy after median 2 prior treatments (range: 2-4). 7/9 patients had R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and 2/9 had transformed follicular lymphoma. At a median follow up of 12.7 months (range: 1.5-30 months), 4 patients were alive. By day 90, 3 patients (33.3%) achieved a radiographic complete response (CR) whilst 6 patients (66.6%) had progressive disease (PD). Detectable MRD on day 14 or day 28 had 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity for radiographic progression at any time before 1 year. For patients with PD, the median (interquartile range) MRD at day 0, 14, and 28 were 17.31 (1.01, 96.84), 9.12 (0.30, 18.8), and 23.77 (8.01, 137.53) copies per milliliter (mL), respectively. For patients with detectable MRD at day 28, mOS and mPFS were 6.7 and 1.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Monitoring MRD was a sensitive and specific method to detect poor response to tisa-cel. Additional studies evaluating MRD more frequently and with different products are warranted.
Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Humanos , Masculino , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Linfoma de Células B/imunologia , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Neoplasia Residual , Projetos Piloto , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodosRESUMO
Historically, salvage chemoimmunotherapy with consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was the only potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Treatment options were few and outcomes poor for patients whose lymphoma failed to respond to salvage chemotherapy/ASCT and for patients not eligible for ASCT. The approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory LBCL revolutionized the treatment landscape with unprecedented response rates and durability of responses. As a result, earlier intervention with CAR T-cell therapy has been explored, and the enthusiasm for CAR T-cell therapy has overshadowed ASCT. In this article, we will review the data available for ASCT and CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed LBCL and will examine the role for ASCT in relapsed/refractory LBCL in the era of CAR T-cell therapy.
RESUMO
Purpose/objectives: Bridging radiation therapy (bRT) is increasingly being utilized prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). It is unknown how the extent of cytoreduction during bRT impacts outcomes. Materials/methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with LBCL treated with bRT followed by CAR T-cell therapy. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were extracted from F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scans acquired prior to bRT and between completion of bRT and CAR T-cell infusion. Delta radiomics based on changes of these values were then calculated. The association between delta radiomics and oncologic outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from distant progression (FFDP), and local control (LC)] were then examined. Results: Thirty-three sites across 23 patients with LBCL were irradiated. All metabolically active disease was treated in 10 patients. Following bRT, median overall decreases (including unirradiated sites) in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG were 22.2 cc (63.1%), 8.9 (36.8%), 3.4 (31.1%), and 297.9 cc (75.8%), respectively. Median decreases in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG in irradiated sites were 15.6 cc (91.1%), 17.0 (74.6%), 6.8 (55.3%), and 157.0 cc (94.6%), respectively. Median follow-up was 15.2 months. A decrease in SUVmax of at least 54% was associated with improved PFS (24-month PFS: 83.3% vs. 28.1%; p = 0.037) and FFDP (24-month FFDP: 100% vs. 62.4%; p < 0.001). A decrease in MTV of at least 90% was associated with improved FFDP (24-month FFDP: 100% vs. 62.4%; p < 0.001). LC was improved in sites with decreases in SUVmax of at least 71% (24-month LC: 100% vs. 72.7%; p < 0.001). Decreases of MTV by at least 90% (100% vs. 53.3%; p = 0.038) and TLG by at least 95% (100% vs. 56.3%; p = 0.067) were associated with an improved complete response rate. Conclusion: bRT led to substantial reductions in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG. The relative extent of these decreases correlated with improved outcomes after CAR T-cell infusion. Prospective cohorts should validate the value of interim PET following bRT for quantifying changes in disease burden and associated prognosis.
Assuntos
Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Prognóstico , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , RadiômicaRESUMO
Fluid overload-associated large B-cell lymphoma (FO-LBCL) is a new addition to the list of large B-cell lymphomas in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO-HAEM5). This report presents an unusual case of FO-LBCL with partial B cell antigen loss at relapse and reviews the characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of these patients to enhance our understanding of this disease. Immunophenotyping was performed through immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements were analyzed using BIOMED-2 multiplex primers. MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 gene rearrangements were detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from pleural effusion and peripheral blood was subjected to somatic mutation evaluation using next-generation sequencing (NGS). In 2020, the patient was initially diagnosed with tuberculous pleurisy and received anti-tuberculous drugs. Subsequent testing of the pleural effusion cell block revealed that the large cells to be positive for CD10, CD20, CD79a, PAX5, MUM1, Bcl-2, Bcl-6, and c-myc and negative for CD3, CD30, Cyclin D1, and HHV8. In situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated mRNA (EBER-ISH) was negative. Additionally, a clonal rearrangement of immunoglobulin heavy locus (IGH) FR2-JH was detected; the results of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 gene rearrangements were all negative. Following pleural drainage treatment, the patient achieved symptom remission and was diagnosed with large B-cell lymphoma (HHV8-unrelated PEL-like lymphoma). In 2022, the patient was readmitted due to the recurrence of pleural effusion. The pleural effusion cell block revealed a distinct immunophenotype compared to previous findings, positivity for PAX5 and negativity for CD20, CD10, CD3, CD5, CD30, CD38, CD138, CD79a, MUM1, Bcl-2, Bcl-6, Cyclin D1, c-myc, ALK, and HHV8. Identical IGH FR2-JH clonal rearrangement suggested the recurrence of the original clone. CfDNA analysis showed mutations in CD79B, MYD88, CCND3, and DTX1. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with FO-LBCL based on the WHO-HAEM5 classification. Diagnosis of FO-LBCL should be differentiated from primary effusion lymphoma (PEL). The features of this case align with the description of "FO-LBCL" in WHO-HAEM5 and "HHV8 and EBV-negative primary effusion-based lymphoma" in International Consensus Classification (ICC). FO-LBCL patients generally have a more favorable prognosis compared to PEL. In this case, the patient exhibited a favorable prognosis for over 22 months without additional treatment apart from pleural drainage.
Assuntos
Ácidos Nucleicos Livres , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Derrame Pleural , Humanos , Ciclina D1 , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-bcl-2 , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Doença Crônica , RecidivaRESUMO
The real-world results of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) substantially differ across countries. In the Netherlands, the CAR-T tumorboard facilitates a unique nationwide infrastructure for referral, eligibility assessment and data collection. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-world outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in the Dutch population, including the thus-far underreported effects on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). All patients with R/R LBCL after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy referred for axi-cel treatment between May 2020-May 2022 were included (N = 250). Of the 160 apheresed patients, 145 patients received an axi-cel infusion. The main reason for ineligibility was rapidly progressive disease. The outcomes are better or at least comparable to other studies (best overall response rate: 84% (complete response: 66%); 12-month progression-free-survival rate and overall survival rate: 48% and 62%, respectively). The 12-month NRM was 5%, mainly caused by infections. Clinically meaningful improvement in several HR-QoL domains was observed from Month 9 onwards. Expert-directed patient selection can support effective and sustainable application of CAR-T treatment. Matched comparisons between cohorts will help to understand the differences in outcomes across countries and select best practices. Despite the favorable results, for a considerable proportion of patients with R/R LBCL there still is an unmet medical need.
RESUMO
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) can hamper the clinical benefit of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL). To assess the risk of CRS and ICANS, the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX), the modified EASIX (m-EASIX), simplified EASIX (s-EASIX), and EASIX with CRP/ferritin (EASIX-F(C)) were proposed. This study validates these scores in a consecutive population-based cohort. Patients with r/r LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel were included (n = 154). EASIX scores were calculated at baseline, before lymphodepletion (pre-LD) and at CAR T-cell infusion. The EASIX and the s-EASIX at pre-LD were significantly associated with ICANS grade ≥ 2 (both p = 0.04), and the EASIX approached statistical significance at infusion (p = 0.05). However, the predictive performance was moderate, with area under the curves of 0.61-0.62. Validation of the EASIX-FC revealed that patients in the intermediate risk group had an increased risk of ICANS grade ≥ 2 compared to low-risk patients. No significant associations between EASIX scores and CRS/ICANS grade ≥ 3 were found. The (m-/s-) EASIX can be used to assess the risk of ICANS grade ≥ 2 in patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy. However, due to the moderate performance of the scores, further optimization needs to be performed before broad implementation as a clinical tool, directing early intervention and guiding outpatient CAR T-cell treatment.
RESUMO
It is important to consider the total cost of care (TCOC) associated with a therapy and clinical benefit for relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). We estimated the 1-year TCOC and cost per clinical outcome for patients with R/R LBCL treated with second-line lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) versus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) using data from the TRANSFORM study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03575351). A cost per clinical outcome analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation approach was conducted. Cost inputs were generated from a retrospective microcosting analysis of healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). Patient-level data from an interim analysis (March 2021) were used to derive HCRU and clinical inputs. Clinical inputs included median event-free survival (EFS), median progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and complete response (CR) rate. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean (standard deviation) TCOC per patient was $550,864 ($173,087) for liso-cel and $413,200 ($290,802) for ASCT. The cost per clinical outcome model estimated a mean cost for liso-cel versus ASCT per EFS month of $57,295 versus $186,369, per PFS month of $40,949 versus $78,797, per overall responder of $653,965 versus $881,804, and per complete responder of $828,045 versus $1,063,822. This economic model shows reductions in mean estimated TCOC per EFS month, PFS month, overall responder, and complete responder with liso-cel versus ASCT owing to the superior efficacy of liso-cel. Although liso-cel-treated patients incurred greater upfront costs, fewer required subsequent therapy, and they accumulated less downstream costs. These results underscore the importance of considering the durability of response and clinical benefit when assessing total costs.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Estudos Clínicos como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bridging therapy (BT) with systemic therapy (ST), radiation therapy (RT), or combined-modality therapy (CMT) is increasingly being utilized prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We report the long-term outcomes of the patients who received commercial CAR T-cell therapy with or without BT. METHODS: The patients with LBCL who underwent infusion of a commercial CD19 CAR T product were eligible. The radiation was stratified as comprehensive or focal. The efficacy outcomes and toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 156 patients were included and, of them, 52.5% of the patients received BT. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 0.65 years in the BT cohort compared to 1.45 years in the non-BT cohort. The median overall survival (OS) was 3.16 years in the BT cohort and was not reached in the non-BT cohort. The patients who received comprehensive radiation (versus focal) had significantly improved PFS and OS, achieving a 1-year PFS of 100% vs. 9.1% and 1-year OS of 100% vs. 45.5%. There was no difference in the severe toxicity between any of the nonbridging or BT cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: BT did not appear to compromise outcomes with respect to response rates, disease control, survival, and toxicity. The patients with limited disease treated with RT had favorable outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a highly effective therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and three CD19 CAR T-cell products (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel) are currently approved for this indication. Despite the clinical benefit of CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy, this treatment is associated with significant morbidity from treatment-emergent toxicities. AREAS COVERED: This Review discusses the safety considerations of axicabtagene ciloleucel in patients with LBCL. This includes discussion of the frequently observed immune-mediated toxicities of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Additionally, we review CAR T-cell therapy related cytopenias, infection, organ dysfunction and the more recently described hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. EXPERT OPINION: A thorough understanding of the toxicities associated with CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy will facilitate the optimal selection of patients for this therapy. Furthermore, knowledge of preventative measures of CAR T-cell related complications, and early recognition and appropriate intervention will lead to the safe administration of these therapies, and ultimately improved outcomes for our patients.