[Surgical treatments for endometriosis]. / Les traitements chirurgicaux de l'endométriose.

Complete resection of scattered superficial lesions can be paradoxically more complex. If the endometriosis is ovarian, priority should be given to preserving the oocyte capital, and ovarian function should be assessed in patients of childbearing age who wish to become pregnant, prior to treatment by alcoholization of the cyst, abrasion of its contents by laser or plasma energy, or even cystectomy. Laparoscopic resection is recommended in cases of deep endometriosis. After a thorough clinical examination and precise imaging, deep lesions are treated by resection and shaving in the case of digestive or ureteral localizations, or even by discoid resection or digestive anastomosis resection with or without stoma, depending on fistula risk criteria. The aim is to reduce pain and functional consequences, while preserving ovarian function to improve pregnancy rates.

2022 Recommendations of The AFU Lithiasis Committee: Open surgery and laparoscopy.

Only few hundred interventions are performed in France each year to remove upper urinary tract stones using a laparoscopic/robotic transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. These interventions are proposed to patients with large (>20mm) and complex stones, sometimes after failure of endoscopic techniques or in the presence of malformations that can be treated at the same time. The major interest of these interventions is the possibility to remove the whole stone without prior fragmentation. Some anatomical situations can increase the technical difficulty, particularly the presence of an intrarenal pelvis and the presence of pelvic and periureteral adhesions. The reported complications are essentially urinary fistula and ureteral stenosis, the risks of which are reduced by the use of double J stenting. As struvite stones are more friable, their whole removal is more difficult and may lead to dispersion of fragments, particularly during laparoscopy. Conventional open surgery has a higher stone-free rate, but comes with a greater kidney function loss. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) (EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022) and their adaptability to the French context.

Total clipless laparoscopic nephrectomy carried out with the LigaSure device: Preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: Total laparoscopic nephrectomy has become the standard method for the removal of diseased kidneys. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the LigaSure vessel closure system during laparoscopic nephrectomy. METHODS: From January 2018 to June 2018, the LigaSure device was used in 5 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy for non functional kidney. Nephrectomy was carried out without the use of clips or sutures for vessel closure. We report intraoperative findings, conversion rates, blood loss, operative time, morbidity, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Median operative time was 45minutes (range 25 to 60min). Median blood loss was 30mL (range 10 to 50mL). No conversions to open surgery were necessary. No patients experienced major bleeding intraoperatively or postoperatively. All patients left the hospital one day after the procedure. Histopathological examination of the removed kidneys was in favor of chronic non specific pyelonephritis. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of the renal pedicle during total laparoscopic nephrectomy of a destroyed kidney, the LigaSure device appears to be feasible and effective. Our experience is the first to demonstrate the advantages of LigaSure® in laparoscopic nephrectomy: reduction in operating time, blood loss, transfusions and length of stay in hospital.

[Living donor nephrectomy: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de transplantation de l'Association française d'urologie (CTAFU) : néphrectomie pour don de rein.

OBJECTIVE: To propose surgical recommendations for living donor nephrectomy. METHOD: Following a systematic approach, a review of the literature (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU regarding functional and anatomical assessment of kidney donors, including which side the kidney should be harvested from. Distinct surgical techniques and approaches were evaluated. References were considered with a predefined process to propose recommendations with the corresponding levels of evidence. RESULTS: The recommendations clarify the legal and regulatory framework for kidney donation in France. A rigorous assessment of the donor is one of the essential prerequisites for donor safety. The impact of nephrectomy on kidney function needs to be anticipated. In case of modal vascularization of both kidneys without a relative difference in function or urologic abnormality, removal of the left kidney is the preferred choice to favor a longer vein. Mini-invasive approaches for nephrectomy provide faster donor recovery, less donor pain and shorter hospital stay than open surgery. CONCLUSION: These French recommendations must contribute to improving surgical management of candidates for kidney donation.

Evaluation and comparison of basic gestures in ex vivo laparoscopic surgery using a robotic instrument and traditional laparoscopic instruments.

BACKGROUND: The robotic Dextérité Surgical™ arm (DEX) is an instrument used in laparoscopy that provides 6 degrees of freedom and 360 degrees of rotation with a needle holder and scissors. To evaluate the benefits this instrument offers, we asked novice surgeons to use DEX and a conventional laparoscopic instrument on a pelvitrainer and compared the results. METHODS: The participants were asked to perform two exercises with DEX and then with a conventional laparoscopic instrument on a pelvitrainer that contained a synthetic reproduction of a male pelvis. For the stitching exercise, the distance from the marked points and any tears caused were analyzed. For the cutting, the participants were judged by how well they respected the marked extremities, the form and the amount of "hacking" observed on a multi-criteria scale. The amount of time required to carry out the exercises was recorded. RESULTS: All twelve urology interns all succeeded in using DEX. Of the 36 stitches, seven were giving a failing grade (19.4%) when using the conventional laparoscopic needle holder and one (0.3%) was recorded when using DEX. All of the criteria (entry and exit points, tears and duration) for the results obtained were better when using DEX compared to the classic laparoscopic tool. This difference was statistically significant for horizontal stitches and tearing. Concerning the cuts made, the global score obtained, following a multi-criteria scale, favored the use of DEX for 10 out of 12 candidates (83.3%) with an average score of +2.6 (±2.1). No significant difference was recorded for the duration of each exercise. CONCLUSION: It does not take novice operators long to understand how to use DEX. It enables precise stitching and reduces tearing while improving the quality of cuts compared to conventional laparoscopic instruments, all without slowing the user down. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Oncological results of a series of 93 laparoscopic radical cystectomies: 5 years of follow-up]. / Résultats oncologiques d'une série de 93 cystectomies totales laparoscopiques : 5 ans de suivi.

OBJECTIVE: To report oncological results at 5 years after laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) with lymph node dissection for bladder cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study of all patients who underwent LRC for BC by the same surgeon from February 2007 to March 2016. Demographic, perioperative and oncologic data were collected. We reported overall survival rate (OS), cancer specific (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (SSR), as primary indicators of oncologycal outcomes. These survival rates were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests were used to explore overall survival according tumor stage, lymph node involvement and surgical margins status. RESULTS: In all, 93 patients (82 men and 11 women) underwent LRC. Mean age was 59 years. Minor complications (Clavien I-II) occurred in 24.7%. Major complications (Clavien IIIa-V) were observed in 8.6%. No patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median lymph node (LN) yield was 15 and 26.5% patients had positive LN. The positive surgical margins (SMs) rate was 5.3%. Median follow-up for the entire patients was 50 months (19-84 months). Forty-three patients (46.2%) were followed for at least 71 months. Five year RFS, CSS and OS were 67%, 85% and 79%, respectively. Non organ confined desease, positive LN and positive SMs were associated with poorer OS (P<0.039, P<0.016 and P<0.001). CONCLUSION: LRC was associated with acceptable long-term oncologic outcomes, similar to those currently reported after open cystectomy for BC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Evaluation of the learning curve of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for cancer: Morbidity and oncological results]. / Évaluation de la courbe d'apprentissage de la cystectomie radicale laparoscopique pour cancer : morbidité et résultats oncologiques.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this work was to evaluate the impact of the laparoscopic radical cystectomy learning curve on perioperative and oncological outcomes. PATIENT AND METHODS: This is a retrospective and single-center study of all patients who underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer from February 2007 to March 2016, (93 patients) Perioperative and oncological data were collected. We used mixed statistical models to predict the number of patients needed in the learning phase. We compared the perioperative parameters of the patients in the learning phase with those of the rest of the patients. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients are required for the learning phase (P1). The expertise phase begins after the 36th LRC (P2). In both phases, there was no significant difference in age, ASA score, and tumor stage (P=0.237, P=0.577, P=0.998). Mean operative time was 328.3min and 262.4min in P1 and P2 (P=0.0001), mean blood loss was 333.7mL and 194.3mL in P1 and P2 respectively (P=0.0003). The rate of major complications was high in the learning phase (P=0.042). There was no significant difference in lymph node yield, positive surgical margins and overall survival (P=0.068, P=0.194, P=0.703). CONCLUSION: This learning experience was evaluated without compromising oncological results, but with a significantly higher rate of major complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction for bladder cancer: robotic-assisted versus open-radical cystectomy for perioperative outcomes, functional results and quality of life]. / Morbidité, résultat fonctionnel, et qualité de vie des néovessies après cystectomie pour cancer : comparaison de la voie ouverte vs robotique.

INTRODUCTION: Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the gold standard technique for carcinologic cystectomies. Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was introduced in 2003 and its development is booming. OBJECTIVE: To compare ORC and RARC with totally intracorporal (IC) orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction, in terms of perioperative outcomes, morbidity, functional results and quality of life (Qol). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2010 to February 2017, a French multicentric, prospective study on patients who had a RC and ONB reconstruction for bladder cancer was performed. All patients completed the following questionnaires: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30) and the bladder cancer specific instruments (QLQ-BLM30). To assess urinary symptoms, patients also completed the Urinary Symptom Profile questionnaire (USP) and a three-day voiding diary. Patients were divided in two groups: ORC and RARC. RESULTS: We included 72 patients: 55 in the ORC group (76,4%) and 17 (33,6%) in the RARC group. Operative time was longer in RARC group (median 360 vs 300min; P<0.001) but length of stay was 5 days shorter (median 12 vs 17 days; P<0,05). Patients in RARC group had less blood transfusion (0 vs 23.6%; P<0.05), but a higher rate of uretero-ileal anastomosis stenosis and eventration at long term (respectively 25.5 vs 3.6% et 23 vs 2%; P<0.05). No statistical differences were found concerning quality of life items and functional results between the groups. CONCLUSION: RARC with totally IC ONB reconstruction lead to less perioperative morbidity with a reduced rate of blood transfusion and a reduced hospital length of stay. At long term, RARC could provide higher rates of uretero-ileal stenosis and eventration. RARC and ORC do not have any differences in terms of functional outcomes and Qol at long term after ONB reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Laparoscopic robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter in women: First approach]. / Sphincter urinaire artificiel robot chez la femme : début d'expérience.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: To analyze the medium-term results and complications of the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) AMS 800 implanted using laparoscopic robot surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a prospective cohort study, which included all procedures done in the CHU of Nîmes from July 2015 to January 2017. Patients with SUI by ISD needing an AUS or patients with a malfunctioning AUS needing to be changed were included. We collected data on intraoperative complications, length of hospitalization, postoperative complications, continence rate at twelve months and satisfaction of patients. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included, 10 for primo-implantation and 9 for AUS revision. There were 4 postoperative bladder injuries, of which 2 led to laparoconversions. The mean length of hospitalization was 4.1days. Three patients had postoperative complications, which needed an intervention without AUS removal. One patient with persisting SUI due to bladder weakness preferred AUS ablation rather than having a cuff change. There was a median follow-up of 22months (12 to 33months). Sixteen patients out of 19 were completely continent and were satisfied of their intervention and the improvement of their quality of life. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic robot surgery for AUS implantation is safe and reproducible with good medium-term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Autologous breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric free flap: Classic and minimally invasive extraperitoneal approaches]. / Reconstruction mammaire autologue microchirurgicale par lambeau libre perforant aux dépens de l'artère epigastrique inférieure profonde (DIEP) : techniques classique et mini-invasive extra-péritonéale par laparoscopie.

Perforator free flaps allow breast reconstructions « like with like ¼ with skin and fat, excluding mammary gland, with a low morbidity. Those autologous reconstructions prevent material associated infections, capsular contracture and implant replacements, associated to breast reconstructions including implants. DIEP flap was described in 1994 to reduce the morbidity faced with TRAM flaps harvest. It only includes sub-umbilical skin and deep epigastric vessels. Deep inferior epigastric vessels harvest requires rectus abdominis muscle sheet opening and traction on rectus muscles, both associated with increased risks of abdominal bulges. Since 2014, we developed a minimally invasive DIEP harvest by totally extra-peritoneal laparoscopic dissection of epigastric vessels with a 70% reduction of aponeurosis opening and avoiding traction on rectus' motor nerves. We report both classic and minimally invasive DIEP harvest techniques. Bresat reconstructions by DIEP require that the ombilicus can be transposed and are indicated for all patients with need for skin inset, particularly secondary breast reconstructions. The reconstructed breast as a volume that follows patients weight variations and allows for improved quality of life on a long term. Its minimally invasive totally extra peritoneal harvest by laparoscopy, with or without robotic assistance, offers a reduced morbidity and might allows for reduced risks of abdominal wall weakness on a long-term.

Robot-assisted renal transplantation using the retroperitoneal approach (RART) with more than one year follow up: Description of the technique and results.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the technique and report our first experience of robotic-assisted renal transplantation (RART) with more than one year follow up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our center the first case of RART was realized in October 2013 with a cadaveric graft. We used the combined extra- and intraperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic route with extraperitoneal positioning of the graft and intraperitoneal transplantation. The patient was placed in the supine position with arms along the body; the robot came from the right inferior part of the patient. Access to the retroperitoneal space was obtained using an Alexis trocar that permitted the insertion of the kidney with ice without losing the pneumoperitoneum. Ports included a 12-mm camera port (placed under the ombilicus), two 8-mm robotic ports (placed 6cms laterally from the previous port) and a 12-mm assistant port (placed between the upper port and the ombilic). All the pre-, per- and postoperative data were prospectively included in a database. We report the results of the initial experience of RART, performed with more than one year follow-up. RESULTS: This technique is the first described using the retroperitoneal approach that is the routine approach for conventional open renal transplantation. This approach permitted to perform excellent arterial, veinous and ureteral anastomosis. Eight cases of RART were conducted between October 2013 and November 2015 (five men and three women). The average age was 58 years (range 39-75years). The average body mass index was 28 (range 22-38). Five patients had history of abdominal surgery and were dialyzed for 30 months on average (range 3-63months). Three left and five right cadavers kidneys were transplanted in the right iliac fossa. The mean graft size was 109mm (range 90-130). The mean length of the incision for insertion of the graft was 60 mms (40-100mms). Mean warm ischemia time was 63minutes (range 46-84). The total operative time was 200minutes (149-245). No patient was transfused during surgery and two were transfused postoperatively. Median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range 10-30 days). Only one patient needed postoperative morphine, the pain visual analogic scale 12hours postoperatively was 2 (0-5). Mean serum creatinine at seven days, at three months and at one year was 400 (98-639micromol/L), 151 (80-235micromol/L) and 129 (86-194micromol/L) respectively. At one year follow-up, no patient had a wound infection or incisional hernia. One patient was re-operated for ureteral anastomosis stricture. CONCLUSION: The retroperitoneal approach for RART permits the kidney to be cooled and a direct access to the iliac vessels and bladder. This initial series with more than a year of post-monitoring RART shows promising results despite some initial technical difficulties. The procedure can still be improved and hoped to see an improvement in the results. A comparison to the results of the conventional route is necessary before diffusing the robot-assisted technique. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[Is transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with increase of surgical procedures for urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction?] / L'introduction de la chirurgie robot-assistée pour la prostatectomie totale s'accompagne-t-elle d'une modification du nombre d'interventions secondaires pour troubles fonctionnels génito-urinaires ?

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of changing the technique of radical prostatectomy [pure laparoscopic radical (PR-Lap) to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP-Rob)] on the rate of secondary procedures for urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIAL: Retrospective study evaluating the number and type of surgical procedures for post-RP UI and DE between 2008 and 2015, according to the technique of (RP-Lap or RP-Rob). RESULTS: Between 2008 et 2015, 2046 RP were performed in our department including 372 RP-Lap and 1674 RP-Rob. Among these patients, 84 (4%) had a surgical procedure for post-RP UI (18 AMS800, 9 balloons Pro-Act, and 57 male slings) and 15 (0.7%) had implantation of penile prosthesis for post-RP ED; 16 (0.7%) patients had both procedures. The mean delay between RP and UI surgery decrease from 3.2 years in 2008 to 1 year in 2015 and remain stable for penile prosthesis implantation (mean delay: 3.4 years). The overall rates of secondary procedures for UI and DE remained stable and below 5% and 1.7%, respectively, even during the transition period. For each year of PR studied, the rates of secondary procedure were higher in the RP-Lap group. CONCLUSION: Changing the technique of RP from RP-Lap to PR-Rob has a favorable impact on the rate of secondary procedures for UI and ED from the outset.

Hybrid laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty: Initial experience in children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Mini-invasive surgery is still evolving to get better surgical conditions for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We used technical modifications (hybrid pyeloplasty) that simplify surgical steps of laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty in children. Our aim was to compare hybrid pyeloplasty to laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty and to open pyeloplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction aged<14years undergoing pyeloplasty at our institute from January 2011 to December 2015. Demographic data, laterality, operative time, length of hospital stay, drainage tubes, and postoperative complications were recorded. Surgical outcomes were evaluated based on renal sonography and Lasix diuretic renography. RESULTS: Among 38 patients, 17 underwent open pyeloplasty (group I), 10 had laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty (group II) and 11 had hybrid pyeloplasty (group III). The mean age at the time of operation was 55 months. The operative time in group III was significantly shorter than that in group I and group II (P<0.001). The shortest median hospital stay was noted in the group III. The mean follow-up period was 26 months (range: 6-52 months). CONCLUSION: The hybrid pyeloplasty using LESS combine the successful outcomes of open surgery and advantages of minimally invasive surgery. It offers small incision surgery, good working space, short operation time, secure anastomosis and good cosmetic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Surgical approach and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy]. / Voie d'abord chirurgicale et fonction sexuelle post-prostatectomie totale.

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy is curative surgical treatment of choice for localized prostate cancer. The objectives are cancer control, preservation of continence and preservation of sexuality, the combination of the three constituting the Trifecta. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess, through the analysis of the literature, the sexual outcomes according to surgical approach: radical prostatectomy by laparotomy (PRL), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (PRLa) and laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (PRLaRA), when nerve sparing was practiced. METHODS: An exhaustive and retrospective review of literature was conducted using the Pubmed search with the following keywords: "Prostatic Neoplasms" [Mesh], "Prostatectomy" [Mesh], "Erectile Dysfunction" [Mesh], "Robotics" [Mesh], "Laparoscopy" [Mesh], Nerve sparing. SELECTION CRITERIA: The selected articles were prospective or retrospective series including more than 200 patients, randomized trials and meta-analyses published between 1990 and 2014. RESULTS: A total of 21 prospective studies (6 on PRL, 4 on PRLa and 11 on PRLaRA), 12 retrospective studies (6 on PRL, 1 on PRLa and 5 on PRLaRA), 2 randomized controlled trial and 3 meta-analyses were selected from 1992 to 2013. There was no evidence of the superiority of one surgical approach compared to others in terms of sexuality. LIMITS: Articles with level 1 of scientific evidence have discordant results, due to heterogeneity in the assessment criteria of postoperative sexual function. CONCLUSION: According to our knowledge, there is currently no difference in terms of sexual outcomes between PRL, PRLA and PRLaRA approaches.

A new strategy for prophylactic surgery in BRCA women: Combined mastectomy and laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy with immediate reconstruction by double DIEP flap.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic surgery remains the most effective modality for reducing both breast and ovarian cancer rate in woman at high risk, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2. Autologous breast reconstruction with bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap allows predictable and durable results. However, existing two-step approach separating salpingo-oophorectomy and reconstruction could even make DIEP flap impossible, or make insufflation more difficult during laparoscopy. Other authors described one-step procedure but with open laparotomy. The goal of this study was to verify the feasibility of a simultaneous procedure, including laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy. METHODS: We included BRCA mutation careers scheduled for simultaneous laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy, and bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. The first step of the procedure was laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy and ports had to be strategically placed to avoid interference with the following procedure. The second step was bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. We reviewed medical charts. Surgical procedure was analyzed for duration, revisions and surgical complications. RESULTS: During 1-year period, eight patients agreed to a simultaneous procedure. All of them were BRCA positive, mean age was 38.3years (range, 39-50), and mean BMI was 28.3kg/m(2) (range, 21-33). The mean duration of the entire procedure was 524minutes (range, 405-630) and the mean hospital stay 9.2 days (range, 8-14). There was 100% flap survival. No abdominal wall dehiscence occurred. CONCLUSION: One-step procedure for prophylactic surgery of ovarian and breast hereditary malignancies is feasible. First salpingo-oophorectomy with open laparoscopy then bilateral immediate or delayed breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps can be performed.

[French resident's performance on laparoscopic surgery box trainer: 7-year results of pelvitrainer contests]. / Performance des internes français sur simulateur de chirurgie laparoscopique : les résultats de 7 ans d'olympiades du pelvitrainer.

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to analyze the resident's laparoscopic surgery performance in order to build a self-assessment data set, to identify discriminatory exercises and to investigate the suturing time changes. METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, the French Association of Urologist in Training (AFUF) organized 7 pelvitrainer contests. Participant scores on 11 laparoscopic surgery exercises were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-six residents participated to these contests and performed 11 exercises each. Twenty-two (33.3 %) participants were beginners, 26 (39.4 %) intermediates et 18 (27.3 %) experienced. The participant scores were gathered into a data set including the average time per exercise. We found a time scoring improvement related to the resident experience for all exercises. A significant decline in time was noted for exercise 8 and 9 between beginners and intermediates (139s [±71]), (173.9s [±118.3]) and between beginners and experienced (80.6s [±26.7]), (94,1s [±42.7]) with a P<0.05. The correlation coefficient for the exercise 11 duration (vesico-uretral anastomosis) was 0.04 over a 7-year period (P=0.44). CONCLUSION: The study provided a data set on 11 laparoscopic surgery tasks which can be consulted by all residents as a reference in a self-assessment process. Two exercises (8 and 9) discriminated beginners from intermediates and experienced groups and could be used as a benchmark ahead of an operating room procedure. The vesico-uretral anastomosis duration (exercise 11) did not improve significantly between 2006 and 2014. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Polycystic kidney disease and kidney transplantation]. / Prise en charge de la polykystose rénale autosomique dominante avant transplantation rénale.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a state of the art about autosomal dominant polykystic kidney disease (ADPKD), management of its urological complications and end stage renal disease treatment modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An exhaustive systematic review of the scientific literature was performed in the Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of the following keywords (MESH): "autosomal dominant polykystic kidney disease", "complications", "native nephrectomy", "kidney transplantation". Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language, date of publication (last 10 years) and relevance. Prospective and retrospective studies, in English or French, review articles; meta-analysis and guidelines were selected and analyzed. This search found 3779 articles. After reading titles and abstracts, 52 were included in the text, based on their relevance. RESULTS: ADPKD is the most inherited renal disease, leading to end stage renal disease requiring dialysis or renal transplantation in about 50% of the patients. Many urological complications (gross hematuria, cysts infection, renal pain, lithiasis) of ADPKD required urological management. The pretransplant evaluation will ask the challenging question of native nephrectomy only in case of recurrent kidney complications or large kidney not allowing graft implantation. The optimum timing for native nephrectomy will depend on many factors (dialysis or preemptive transplantation, complication severity, anuria, easy access to transplantation, potential living donor). CONCLUSION: Pretransplant management of ADPKD is challenging. A conservative strategy should be promoted to avoid anuria (and its metabolic complications) and to preserve a functioning low urinary tract and quality of life. When native nephrectomy should be performed, surgery remains the gold standard but renal arterial embolization may be a safe option due to its low morbidity.

[Functional outcomes obtained after vesicoureteral reimplantation surgery in adults: A review]. / Étiologies et résultats fonctionnels après réimplantation urétéro-vésicale chez l'adulte : revue de la littérature.

OBJECTIVES: Vesico-ureteral reimplantations (VUR) for adults are complex procedures, often practicing for distal ureteral lesions. Our goal was to synthesis the main indications for VUR, different techniques and their functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature review in English by Medline, Embase and Google scholar was performed using the following keywords: ureter; laparoscopy; robotics, reimplantation; surgery; obstruction; morbidity; complications; psoas hitch; Boari flap; ureteroneocystostomy. RESULTS: In more than half of the cases, aetiology was a iatrogenic ureteral lesion. When the ureteral defect was less than 2 cm, direct or non-refluxing VUR was the technique of choice. If defect was superior than 2 cm the Boari flap or vesicopsoas hitch were preferred. Several surgical approaches were feasible: open, laparoscopic only, robot assisted laparoscopic. Estimated blood loss, pain and mean hospital stay seemed better with conventional or robotic coelioscopy. Nevertheless, complications, pre-/post-operative renal function and mean operative time seemed similar. The most frequent major complication was the anastomotic urine leakage. CONCLUSIONS: The VUR techniques are well codified now even if it's a rare procedure. Functional outcomes are satisfied according to literature and morbidity is more and more decreasing but the level of evidence of the studies is low.

[Laparoscopic transposition of lower polar vessels for pyelo-ureteral junction obstruction: preliminary experience]. / Transposition des vaisseaux polaires pour syndrome de la jonction pyélo-urétérale : expérience préliminaire.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Lower pole vessels are a classical cause of PUJO even in children. The "gold standard" in the management of PUJ obstructions remains a dismembered pyeloplasty as described by Anderson and Hynes. However, some authors have developed an alternative procedure to this approach with encouraging results. The aim of our study was to evaluate our preliminary results concerning laparoscopic vascular hitch for crossing vessels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, monocentric study of all patients managed by this technique from January 2010 to December 2012. RESULTS: Eleven patients (7 boys, 4 girls) were managed by laparoscopy at a mean age of 10.7 years (5.4-17). They were referred to our center for clinical symptoms (intermittent pain 7, high blood pressure 1, UTI 1), antenatal diagnosis or accidental discovery. Obstruction was confirmed by MAG3 nephrogram and the presence of obstructive vessels by tomodensitometry or MRI. Mean operative time was 90.2minutes (48-184). Seven patients over 11 were strictly managed by laparoscopic transposition of lower pole vessels. Four required a classical video-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty due to a potential intraluminal stenosis. The latter were suspected by a distension test with furosemid in all four cases. Mean follow-up was 12.9±3 months. Nine patients over 11 were totally non symptomatic, whereas 2 still present mild intermittent pain. In all cases, ultrasound scans show an improvement of the pelvic dilatation. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic transposition of lower pole vessels is a suitable and feasible alternative for the management of obstructive PUJ. Our preliminary experience emphasizes the need for a precise preoperative selection of patients along with a per operative evaluation of the obstruction. Further experience seems required to improve our criteria in this indication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.