Novel indicators to better monitor the collection and recovery of (critical) raw materials in WEEE: Focus on screens.

Currently, in the European Union (EU), e-waste chain performance is assessed by technical indicators that aim to ensure system compliance with collection and recovery targets set by the WEEE Directive. This study proposes indicators to improve WEEE flow monitoring beyond the current overall weight-based approach, including complementary flows and treatment performance. A case study focused on the screen category in France is presented. In 2017, the collection rate of cathode-ray tube screens (CRT) was 68%, while for flat panel display (FPD) generated only 14% was collected. CRT screens have less precious and critical materials than FDP. Thus, elements like cobalt and gold highly concentrated in FPD, have a collection rate two to four times lower than elements such as copper (37%) which represents a high proportion in CRTs. Recycling is the main treatment in France. Nevertheless, the recycling rate per element varies significantly due to the low collection, and also the lack of technology and/or secondary raw materials market. The elements with higher recycling rates are base metals such as copper (28%), followed by precious metals like silver (23%), and gold (13%). Except for palladium, the recycling rate of the critical raw materials targeted in the study ranged from 6% (cobalt) to 0% (e.g. neodymium and indium). The results stress the need for indicators to support the development of WEEE chain from waste management to secondary (critical) raw materials suppliers.

Development of a CDC-certified total testosterone assay for adult and pediatric samples using LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Highly accurate and sensitive method to measure testosterone in hypogonadal male, female and children is vital for proper diagnosis of hormone-related conditions and their treatment. OBJECTIVE: To develop an accurate and robust total testosterone ESI-LC-MS/MS quantification method with a simple sample preparation workflow and sufficient sensitivity for serum or plasma samples of all gender and age groups, via ketone functional group derivatization (using Amplifex™ Keto Reagent). METHOD: A simple sample preparation method to accommodate both low and high numbers of samples was developed using simultaneous protein precipitation and derivatization with Amplifex™ Keto reagent, followed by centrifugation and direct injection of supernatant into an LC-MS/MS system (SCIEX Topaz™ IVD LC-MS/MS, in which MS is equivalent to a SCIEX 4500MD Mass Spectrometer). Total testosterone in human serum or plasma samples was quantified using an external calibration curve generated by calibrators spanning a broad concentration range of ∼1-2000 ng/dL (10-20,000 pg/mL), traceable to NIST 971 SRM. 13C3-enriched testosterone was used as an internal standard to correct for both analyte loss during sample preparation and matrix effect during analysis (Supplementary Information: SI Fig. 4C). Two methods, one using a 96-well filter plate and another using Eppendorf tubes, were developed. Both methods were certified by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) hormone standardization (HoSt) program for total serum testosterone. The feasibility of implementing the method for plasma and serum samples was tested via a small-scale method comparison study between matched pediatric serum and plasma samples derived from the same donor. In addition, plasma samples originating from the same donor collected in two different anticoagulant tube types (Li-heparin and K2EDTA) were compared. RESULTS: Using in-house formulated NIST 971-traceable calibrators, the method was linear (r2 > 0.999) between 1 and 2000 ng/dL (10 and 20,000 pg/mL) with a limit of detection of approximately 1 ng/dL (10 pg/mL). The testosterone concentration bias against 40 reference samples from the HoSt certification program was absolute <3% with an average %CV of ∼3-4%. More than 78% of samples passed the CDC bias criterion of ±6.4%. Comparison between pediatric matched serum and plasma samples resulted in high correlation (r2 = 0.997) and bias of <5%. The calculated % difference between matched adult serum and plasma samples was ∼1%. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility for an accurate and streamlined method suitable for measuring total testosterone in all human samples was demonstrated with a choice of sample preparation workflow to suit low or high number of samples. The method can potentially be used for plasma matrix from different blood collection tubes (Li-Heparin and K2EDTA).