Long-gap esophageal atresia: gastric transposition or esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate different surgical approaches to long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review was done comparing gastric transposition versus esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis in infants with LGEA+/-TEF. The primary outcome was time to full oral feeds. Secondary outcomes were time to full enteric feeds, need for further surgery, growth, mortality, and postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: No comparative studies were found. However, the literature was re-interrogated for non-comparative studies. Four hundred thirty-eight articles were identified and screened, and 18 met the inclusion criteria. All were case series. Forty-three infants underwent gastric transposition, and 106 had esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis. One study on gastric transposition reported time to full oral feeds, and one study in each group reported growth. Time to full enteric feeds was reported in one study in each group. 30% of infants had further surgery following gastric transposition, including hiatus hernia repair (5/43, 12%) and esophageal dilation (7/43, 16%). Following esophageal lengthening, 62/106 (58%) had anti-reflux surgery, 58/106 (55%) esophageal dilatation and 11/106 (10%) esophageal stricture resection. Anastomotic complications occurred in 13/43 (30%), gastrointestinal in 16/43 (37%), respiratory in 17/43 (40%), and nerve injury in 2/43 (5%) of the gastric transposition group. In the esophageal lengthening group, anastomotic complications occurred in 68/106 (64%), gastrointestinal in 62/106 (58%), respiratory in 6/106 (6%), and none sustained nerve injury. Each group had one death due to a cause not directly related to the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the morbidity associated with both surgical procedures and the variety in reporting outcomes.

Analysis of gap length as a predictor of surgical outcomes in esophageal atresia with distal fistula: a single center experience.

PURPOSE: Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a challenge for pediatric surgery. No consensus exists as to what constitutes a long gap, and few studies have investigated the maximum gap length safely repairable by primary anastomosis. Based on surgical outcomes at a single institution, we aimed to determine the gap length in LGEA with a high risk of complications. METHODS: The medical records of 51, consecutive patients with esophageal atresia (EA) with primary repair in the early neonatal period between 2001 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Three, major complications were found in the surgical outcomes: (1) anastomotic leakage, (2) esophageal stricture requiring dilatation, and (3) GERD requiring fundoplication. The predictive power of the postsurgical complications was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the area under the curve (AUC) and the cutoff value with a specificity of > 90% were calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (31.4%) experienced a complication. The AUC of gap length was0.90 (p < 0.001), and the gap length cutoff value was ≥ 2.0 cm for predicting any complication (sensitivity: 62.5%, specificity: 91.4%). CONCLUSION: A gap length ≥ 2.0 cm was considered as defining LGEA and was associated with an extremely high complication rate after primary repair.

Endoscopic recanalization for the complete closure of long-gap esophageal atresia after reconstruction surgery.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction surgery-associated stricture frequently occurs in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). While several endoscopic dilatation methods have been applied and would be desirable, endoscopic recanalization is very difficult in cases with complete esophageal closure. Surgical treatment has been performed for a severe stricture, which causes extensive damage to the infant. No reports have described successful endoscopic recanalization for complete closure due to scarring after surgery for LGEA. We herein report the case of successful endoscopic recanalization by single endoscopist in an LGEA patient with complete closure after reconstruction surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A seven-month-old boy with LGEA who received reconstruction surgery and gastrostomy immediately after birth presented to our unit due to vomiting and malnutrition. Contrast radiography and peroral endoscopy detected complete closure of the esophagus at the anastomotic site. After confirming the length of stricture as several millimeters, we punctured the center of the lumen with a 25-G puncture needle under fluoroscopy. An endoscope was then inserted via the gastrostomy and the puncture hole was detected at the center of the lumen. After passing the guidewire, endoscopic balloon dilation was performed three times, and the hole was sufficiently dilatated. Oral ingestion was feasible, and his nutritional condition was improved. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report to propose a less invasive endoscopic approach to recanalize a site of complete esophageal closure in a LGEA patient after reconstruction surgery by single endoscopist. Our endoscopic procedure using an ultrathin endoscope and puncture needle may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with complete esophageal closure in a LGEA patient after reconstruction surgery.

Esophageal elongation by bougienage and delayed primary thoracoscopic anastomosis for pure esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula.

PURPOSE: We aim to share our experience of esophageal elongation by bougienage and delayed primary thoracoscopic anastomosis for pure esophageal atresia (EA) without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). METHODS: Fifteen patients with pure EA treated with delayed primary thoracoscopic anastomosis combined with or without esophageal elongation by bougienage were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients were managed without bougienage, and their surgical repair was performed thoracoscopically after natural esophageal growth. Among the remaining 11 patients, the average tension-free distance before elongation was 5 (4.5-6) vertebral bodies, and the mean age at the start and end of the bougienage period was 123 (63-280) days and 173 (106-350) days, respectively, with an average duration of 50 (29-82) days. The average age at the definitive operation in this series was 184 (107-385) days, with a mean operative duration of 186 (95-300) min. Neither anastomotic leakage nor TEF occurred, and oral feeding was partially or completely established in 13 patients during hospitalization. Among all patients, one was lost to follow-up, and others were followed up with an average duration of 47.7 (9.8-97.1) months. All patients had different degrees of anastomosis stricture, and 8 patients had gastroesophageal reflux. Oral feeding was completely established in 12 patients; however, tube feeding was required in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The management of pure EA is complicated and inconclusive. Esophageal elongation by bougienage and delayed primary thoracoscopic anastomosis for long-gap pure EA without TEF is safe and effective.

A Novel Technique for Prevention of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Staged Repair of Long Gap Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

AIM: The objective of the study is to report a novel technique of preventing gastroesophageal reflux and air leak from fistula to stomach in patients of tracheoesophageal fistula with long gap atresia, to buy time for the staged procedure. METHODS: Seven patients of tracheoesophageal fistula with upper pouch of esophagus at 2nd thoracic vertebra were selected for the staged procedure. Weight ranged from 1.7 to 1.8 kg. During the 1st stage surgery for gastrostomy, midline strip of linea alba attached to xiphoid process was harvested and slinged around the gastroesophageal junction, along with right cervical esophagostomy. After radio-nuclear scan, the demonstration of abolition of gastroesophageal reflux, gastrostomy feed was started. The 2nd stage surgery performed after 6 weeks, included mobilization of esophagostomy, release of sling, thoracotomy, and tension-free esophageal anastomosis. Outcome measurement includes (1) prevention of air leak from esophagus into the stomach, (2) abolition of gastroesophageal reflux, (3) ability to start gastrostomy feeds, and (4) reversal of occlusion after release of the sling. RESULTS: The placement of linea alba sling and elevation of gastroesophageal junction, abolished air leak from fistula to stomach in all. Radio nuclear scan demonstrated abolition of gastroesophageal reflux in 6 with weight gain after gastrostomy feeding. One patient expired due to sepsis. One patient underwent final repair with reversal of occlusion with release of the sling. CONCLUSION: Using a sling of the linea alba around the cardioesophageal junction, prevents gastroesophageal reflux and escape of air from esophagus into the stomach, gives time to improve the respiratory and nutritional status of the patient, for a subsequent safer delayed primary anastomosis.

A New Operative Approach for Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia.

Surgical management of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) remains challenging. Yet, there is a consensus among pediatric surgeons to preserve native esophagus. We used a new surgical technique to successfully manage three children diagnosed with LGEA. This technique consists of a combined thoracic and cervical approach to the EA repair using the patient's native esophagus. All patients initially had had gastrostomy and continuous upper pouch suction while awaiting surgery. This new technique has the potential to become the choice method in LGEA management.

Esophagoesophagopexy technique for assisted fistulization of esophageal atresia.

PURPOSE: We describe our experience using a modified suture fistula technique for addressing tension in longer gap esophageal atresia (EA). Esophagoesophagopexy (EEP) is the tacking of the proximal and distal ends of esophageal pouches without formal anastomosis. In this retrospective cohort, we review the outcomes of patients with EA after EEP. METHODS: We reviewed the operative reports of EA cases treated at our institution from 1997 to 2016 and identified all patients described as having EEP. RESULTS: Of 129 EA cases, five patients underwent EEP. Formal anastomosis was not done due to patient's instability, prematurity, or long gap. Median birth weight was 1.4 kg (0.6-2.2 kg), and median gestational age at birth was 29 weeks (25-34 weeks). Age at time of EEP ranged 0-5 months. Esophagoesophageal fistula was confirmed in three patients. All three had strictures requiring weekly dilations. One of these patients died. The two surviving patients underwent fundoplication. CONCLUSION: We describe an alternative technique for esophageal anastomosis in patients for whom a standard anastomosis is not possible. EEP can lead to a functional anastomosis through fistulization and avoid the morbidity of multiple thoracotomies and lengthening procedures. Families should be educated on the potential need for dilations and antireflux procedures.

Preservation of native esophagus in infants with pure esophageal atresia has good long-term outcomes despite significant postoperative morbidity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term outcomes of pure esophageal atresia (EA) repair with preservation of native esophagus. METHODS: Infants with pure EA treated at our institution (2000-2010) and with minimum 5-year follow-up were reviewed (REB:1000046653). Data analysed included demographics, management and outcomes and are reported as mean ± SD/median (range). RESULTS: Of 185 infants with EA, 12 (7 %) had pure EA (gestational age: 36 ± 2.4 weeks, birth weight: 2353 ± 675 g). Ten had associated anomalies, including trisomy-21 (n = 2) and duodenal atresia (n = 1). SURGERY: 1 patient (short gap) underwent primary thoracoscopic anastomosis, 11 had gastrostomy (Stamm, n = 5; image-guided, n = 6) as initial procedure. At definitive repair (age: 128 ± 91 days; weight 5.5 ± 2.3 kg): ten had primary anastomosis and 1 had Collis gastroplasty. No patient had esophageal replacement surgery. OUTCOMES: three patients had gastrostomy dehiscence requiring re-operation. At post-operative esophagram, seven had anastomotic leak successfully treated conservatively. Seven patients developed strictures requiring balloon dilatations (median two dilatations, range 1-10), six received antireflux surgery. At 7-year follow-up (range 5-15 years), all patients had the gastrostomy closed and were on full oral feeds. CONCLUSIONS: The management of pure EA continues to be challenging. The preservation of native esophagus is possible with significant morbidity. The long-term outcomes are favourable.

Quality improvement program reduces venous thromboembolism in infants and children with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA).

PURPOSE: Patients with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) treated with the Foker process are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). An institutional quality improvement program to decrease VTE risk factor exposure and utilize prophylactic anticoagulation was implemented. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a VTE risk-reduction program in patients with LGEA. METHODS: Implementation and evaluation of a VTE risk-reduction program in patients with LGEA from 2012 to 2015 was performed. Symptomatic VTE with radiographic confirmation were defined as events. Post-program characteristics were evaluated and compared to a historical cohort. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were identified. Two developed VTE (7 %) post-program implementation; compared to 13/40 (33 %) VTE incidence in the historical cohort (p = 0.018). Baseline demographics were similar, including age, esophageal atresia type and gap length. Post-protocol patients had fewer paralysis episodes (p = 0.004), paralysis days (p = 0.003), central venous catheters (p = 0.003), thoracotomies (p < 0.001), ventilator hours (p = 0.02), and decreased hospital (p < 0.001) and ICU stay (p < 0.001). All patients in the VTE risk-reduction program were exposed to prophylactic anticoagulation. No bleeding complications and/or thrombosis-related mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: VTE risk-reduction program implementation decreased symptomatic VTE incidence with associated decreases in ICU and hospital length of stay. Prophylactic anticoagulation can be utilized safely in a complicated pediatric surgical population.

Outcome of esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula in extremely low birth weight neonates (<1000 grams).

PURPOSE: To review the outcomes of extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 g) infants with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). METHODS: Health records of ELBW EA/TEF infants treated at our institution from 2000 to 2014 were reviewed (REB1000046653). Demographics, operative approach and postoperative complications were analyzed. Data are reported as median (range). RESULTS: Of 268 EA/TEF infants, 8 (3 %, five females) were ELBW (930 g, 540-995). Gestational age was 28 weeks (23-32). Seven had type-C EA/TEF and one type B. OUTCOMES: One trisomy 18 infant received no treatment and died; one initially diagnosed as type A had primary repair at 126 days of life (DOL); six underwent TEF ligation (three trans-pleural) with primary repair in one and delayed anastomosis in two (DOL 120 and 178). The remaining three died (gastrostomy dehiscence and peritonitis, liver hemorrhage during peritoneal drain insertion, severe chronic lung disease and brain hemorrhages). At a median follow-up of 3 years (range 15 months-5 years), all survivors are thriving. CONCLUSION: ELBW infants with EA/TEF are rare and result in high morbidity and mortality. Mortality is mainly related to complications not associated with EA/TEF repair. Fistula ligation followed by delayed anastomosis seems to achieve a better outcome in ELBW infants.

[Gastric tube esophagoplasty using the retroesternal route in children]. / Sustitución esofágica con estómago tubulizado retroesternal en la infancia.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal replacement is a surgical alternative once native esophagus can't be preserved. Different organs and routes for the replacement have been described, being the retroesternal route the least used. The aim is to present our results using gastric tube esophagoplasty with a retroesternal approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective and descriptive study of 11 patients operated from 2000 to 2015. Median age at surgery was 2.2 years (5 months-9 years) and median weight was 11.2 kg (7.8-21). A gastric tube esophagoplasty using the retroesternal route, forced pyloric dilatation and end-to-side esophago-gastric cervical anastomosis were performed. RESULTS: Ten esophagus replacements had long-gap esophageal atresia and one, severe esophagus caustication secondary to button battery ingestion. No intraoperatory complications were observed. Three patients developed anastomosis leak. Two cases developed anastomotic stenosis managed with endoscopic dilatation in 2 and 4 occasions, respectively. Four patients showed occasional dumping syndrome and are asymptomatic after medical treatment. With a median follow up of 6.3 years (0.2-14.8), all our patients are alive and complete oral diet has been established in all of them. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric tube esophagoplasty using the retroesternal route is a suitable technique in order to reestablish gastrointestinal continuity once native esophagus can't be preserved. In our experience is a safe option, related to few complications.

INTRODUCCION: La sustitución esofágica es una de las opciones quirúrgicas en pacientes en los que no es posible la preservación del esófago. Existen diferentes técnicas según el órgano ascendido y la vía de ascenso, siendo la vía retroesternal la menos empleada. Se describen los resultados con el uso de estómago tubulizado retroesternal. PACIENTES Y METODOS: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de una serie de 11 pacientes intervenidos entre los años 2000 y 2015, con una edad media en el momento de la intervención de 2,2 años (5 meses-9 años) y un peso de 11,2 kg (7,8-21 kg). Se realizó gastroplastia tubulizada con dilatación forzada de píloro, ascenso gástrico por vía retroesternal y anastomosis esófago-gástrica cervical término-lateral. RESULTADOS: Diez sustituciones se realizaron en pacientes con atresia de esófago long-gap y una, tras una causticación esofágica por pila de botón. No hubo ninguna complicación intraoperatoria. En tres pacientes hubo fuga anastomótica. En dos pacientes se produjo estenosis que precisó dilataciones en 2 y en 4 ocasiones, respectivamente. Cuatro pacientes presentaron síndrome dumping ocasional que se resolvió con tratamiento médico. Con un seguimiento medio de 6,3 años (0,2-14,8), ningún paciente ha fallecido y en todos se ha logrado la nutrición oral completa. CONCLUSIONES: La gastroplastia tubulizada retroesternal es una técnica eficaz para restablecer la continuidad gastrointestinal en aquellos pacientes en los que no es posible preservar el esófago. Puede ser una opción segura y con escasas complicaciones.

A new approach for the management of esophageal atresia without tracheo-esophageal fistula.

Long gap esophageal atresia (OA) is a challenging condition. While discussing the various methods of management available to us, we report the use of magnetic resonance imaging in a case of pure OA to judge the gap between two ends of the esophagus.

Paravertebral nerve block catheters using chloroprocaine in infants with prolonged mechanical ventilation for treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Infants with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) undergo repeated thoracotomies for staged surgical repair known as the Foker process (FP). Associated prolonged mechanical ventilation results in exposure to high doses of opioids and benzodiazepines, and prolonged weaning times and ICU stays. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of short-term paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) catheters in reducing opioid/benzodiazepine exposure and effects on clinical variables. METHODS: The medical records of seventeen infants were retrospectively reviewed; 11 with PVNB and six without (CG). PVNB were placed using ultrasound-guidance and chloroprocaine infusions implemented in the ICU. Opioids and benzodiazepines were administered via the protocol for 5 days following thoracotomies for Foker-I and Foker-II. RESULTS: Foker-I: Average reduction in morphine and midazolam consumption was 36% (2.18 vs 3.40 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) ; P < 0.001) and 31% (2.25 vs 3.25 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) ; P = 0.033), respectively, in the PVNB compared with CG. Foker-II: Average reduction in morphine and midazolam consumption was 39% (3.19 vs 5.27 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) ) and 38% (3.46 mg·kg(-1) ·day(-1) vs 5.62; P < 0.001), respectively in the PVNB compared with CG. 24-h prior to extubation: Average reduction in morphine and midazolam consumption was 50% (2.91 vs 5.85 mg·kg(-1) ·24 h(-1) ; p = 0.023) and 61% (2.27 vs 5.83 mg·kg(-1) ·24 h(-1) ; P = 0.004), respectively, in the PVNB compared with CG. Infusion wean time, (independence from opioid/midazolam infusions) following extubation was 5 days in the PVNB group and 15 days in CG (P = 0.005). Median ICU stay (IQR) was 40 days (34-45 days) in PVNB patients and 71 days (42-106 days) in controls (P = 0.02). PVNB catheters were left an average of 7 days and there were no complications associated with the nerve blocks. CONCLUSION: Short-term PVNB placement decreases opioid and benzodiazepine exposure, weaning days and ICU stay in infants undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation for LGEA repair in this small pilot study. Larger studies are warranted to confirm results.

Management Strategies and Outcomes of Distal Congenital Esophageal Strictures in the Setting of Long-gap Esophageal Atresia.

BACKGROUND: The management of neonates with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) combined with distal congenital esophageal strictures (CES) is challenging. We sought to review our approach for this rare set of anomalies. METHODS: We reviewed children with LGEA + CES surgically treated at two institutions (2018-2024). LGEA repair was performed using the Foker technique (traction-induced esophageal lengthening). A CES strategy was chosen based on preoperative evaluations and intraoperative findings. The configuration and length of the CES were assessed using retrograde flexible esophagoscopy via gastrostomy with contrast fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Eight patients (75% male) with LGEA + CES were treated: Four had type A and four had type B EA. Median gap length was 3.5 cm. Three underwent thoracoscopic esophageal lengthening. After a median follow-up of 18 months (IQR: 9-25), all retained their native esophagus. However, those who had CES resection concurrent with the lengthening process or at the time of EA anastomosis had more challenging perioperative courses: one required additional time on traction and another required esophageal anastomotic stricture resection. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with LGEA and distal CES emphasizes tailoring surgical approaches to each patient's unique condition, avoiding a one-size-fits-all strategy. However, if the esophageal tissue above the distal CES is in good condition, our preference has shifted towards retaining the CES during traction, performing gentle dilation at anastomosis time, and conducting definitive endoscopic management subsequently. We would caution against making the assumption that salvage of the native esophagus is not possible or that resection of the CES is always needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Our experience in repairs using the native esophagus such as the Foker and Gazi methods in the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.

This study aimed to share our experience with infants with repaired long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) using the native esophagus and Foker and Gazi methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with LGEA (six with pure esophageal atresia [EA], and four with distal trachea-esophageal fistula [TEF] + EA). The mean length between the esophageal pouches was 5.9 cm (4-9 cm). Five Foker methods, three Gazi methods, and two delayed primary repairs after a daily bougie were performed an average of 19.3 days after the first surgery and 26.4 days after the final esophageal anastomosis. For the Foker technique, it was 36.1 days. Their first oral intake was 10.2 days, and their transition to full enteral food was 26.2 days. An esophageal leak was detected in six patients. Fundoplication and dilatations were performed for three and four patients, respectively. For good results, LGEA patients should be operated on at least under the supervision of an experienced surgeon in specialized centers, and the team should be familiar with the techniques for using the native esophagus.

Botulinum Toxin Enhanced Foker Process for Long Gap Esophageal Atresia.

BACKGROUND: The traction-induced esophageal growth (Foker) process for the treatment of long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) relies on applying progressive tension to the esophagus to induce growth. Due to its anti-fibrotic and muscle-relaxing properties, we hypothesize that Botulinum Toxin A (BTX) can enhance traction-induced esophageal growth. METHODS: A retrospective two-center cohort study was conducted on children who underwent a BTX-enhanced Foker process for LGEA repair from 2021 to 2023. BTX (10 units/ml, 2 units/kg, per esophageal pouch) was applied at the time of traction initiation. Time on traction, complications, and anastomotic outcomes were compared against historical controls (Foker process without BTX) from 2014 to 2021. RESULTS: Twenty infants (LGEA type A:12, B:4, C:4; 35% reoperative; median [IQR] age 3 [2-5] months), underwent BTX-enhanced Foker process (thoracotomy with external traction: 9; minimally invasive [MIS] multi-staged internal traction: 11). Mean gap lengths were similar between BTX-enhanced external and external traction control patients (mean [SD], 50.6 mm [12.6] vs. 44.5 mm [11.9], p = 0.21). When compared to controls, the BTX-enhanced external traction process was significantly faster (mean [SD], 12.1 [1.6] days vs. 16.6 [13.2] without BTX, p = 0.04) despite similar preoperative gap lengths. There was no difference in time on traction for those undergoing a minimally invasive process. There were no significant differences in complications or anastomotic outcomes in either cohort. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin may play a role in accelerating the traction-induced esophageal growth process for LGEA repair. Minimizing time on traction can decrease sedation and paralysis burden while on external traction. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effects of BTX on the esophagus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective, Two-center, Cohort study.

Long-gap esophageal atresia: is native esophagus preservation always possible?

Introduction: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital defect that causes esophageal discontinuity, often with an associated tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF) in 70%-90% of cases. When the distance between esophageal ends precludes primary anastomosis, it results in long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), complicating the surgical management. This study retrospectively reviewed LGEA cases from the past decade, treated with the goal of preserving the native esophagus, comparing surgical techniques and outcomes with current literature. Materials and methods: The data of patients treated for LGEA between 2013 and 2024 were collected from medical charts, focusing on patients treated with the preservation of their native esophagus. Results: Ten patients were enrolled for this study. All of them had a gap between the esophageal ends equal to or greater than three vertebral bodies. Four patients (40%) underwent a delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) procedure, while the remaining six (60%) underwent a traction staged repair. All patients were treated with open surgery. The follow-up period extended from 3 months to 10 years. Conclusion: Preserving the native esophagus in patients with LGEA is a challenging but feasible goal, with delayed primary anastomosis and traction techniques playing key roles. We advocate for the preservation of the native esophagus as the preferred approach for ensuring a high quality of life for patients, as it helps to avoid severe long-term complications associated with esophageal substitution.

Long-term follow-up after retrosternal ileocolic esophagoplasty in two cases of long-gap esophageal atresia: why it is still a valid option as a rescue strategy.

Introduction: Esophageal replacement surgery in children is sometimes necessary for long-gap esophageal atresia. Ileocolic esophagoplasty in the retrosternal space can serve as a good alternative technique in case of hostile posterior mediastinum. We present two cases of successful ileocolic transposition performed at 6 months of age. Methods: Esophageal replacement was performed through a midline laparotomy incision associated with a left cervical approach. The ileocolic transplant was pediculized on the right superior colic artery after ligating the right colic and ileocolic vessels. A retrosternal tunnel was created, and the ileocolic transplant pulled through it to reach the cervical region. Proximally, esophageal-ileal anastomosis and, distally, colonic-gastric anastomosis were performed. Ileocolic continuity was repaired. Results: There were no early postoperative complications. In both cases, the patients presented oral feeding difficulties during the first 6 postoperative months. Thereafter, full oral feeding was achieved, and both patients were clinically asymptomatic during the following 18 and 20 years, respectively, with satisfactory oral radiological assessments, showing no redundancy or inappropriate growth of the graft and no anastomotic stricture. Currently, these patients do not complain of dysphagia, pathological reflux, or respiratory symptoms. Conclusion: When native esophagus preservation in long-gap esophageal atresia is estimated unfeasible, ileocolic transposition in the retrosternal space might be considered a good and safe option, particularly in those difficult cases after multiple previous surgical attempts and mediastinitis. This technique is putatively associated with a beneficial anti-reflux effect, thanks to the presence of the ileocecal valve, in preventing cervical peptic esophagitis. Long-term follow-up confirms that the transposed colon in the retrosternal space did not suffer any abnormal modification in size and growth.

Graft dilatation and Barrett's esophagus in adults after gastric pull-up and jejunal interposition for long-gap esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal replacement (ER) with gastric pull-up (GPU) or jejunal interposition (JI) used to be the standard treatment for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). Changes of the ER grafts on a macro- and microscopic level however, are unknown. AIM: To evaluate long-term clinical symptoms and anatomical and mucosal changes in adolescents and adults after ER for LGEA. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted including all LGEA patients ≥ 16 years who had undergone GPU or JI between 1985-2003 at two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. Patients underwent clinical assessment, contrast study and endoscopy with biopsy. Data was collected prospectively. Group differences between JI and GPU patients, and associations between different outcome measures were assessed using the Fisher's exact test for bivariate variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Differences with a P-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Nine GPU patients and eleven JI patients were included. Median age at follow-up was 21.5 years and 24.4 years, respectively. Reflux was reported in six GPU patients (67%) vs four JI patients (36%) (P = 0.37). Dysphagia symptoms were reported in 64% of JI patients, compared to 22% of GPU patients (P = 0.09). Contrast studies showed dilatation of the jejunal graft in six patients (55%) and graft lengthening in four of these six patients. Endoscopy revealed columnar-lined esophagus in three GPU patients (33%) and intestinal metaplasia was histologically confirmed in two patients (22%). No association was found between reflux symptoms and macroscopic anomalies or intestinal metaplasia. Three GPU patients (33%) experienced severe feeding problems vs none in the JI group. The median body mass index of JI patients was 20.9 kg/m2 vs 19.5 kg/m2 in GPU patients (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The majority of GPU patients had reflux and intestinal metaplasia in 22%. The majority of JI patients had dysphagia and a dilated graft. Follow-up after ER for LGEA is essential.

Magnamosis for long gap esophageal atresia: Minimally invasive "fatal attraction".

BACKGROUND: Aim of study is to report our preliminary experience with magnetic anastomosis (magnamosis) treating long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), the most challenging condition of esophageal atresia continuum. Magnamosis has been reported in 20 patients worldwide as an innovative and marginally invasive option. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of all LGEA patients treated with magnamosis was performed (study registration number: 2535/2021). Main outcomes considered were demographic and surgical features, postoperative complications and feeding within 6-month of follow-up. RESULTS: Between June 2020 and January 2021, 5 LGEA patients (Type A, Gross classification) were treated. Median preoperative gap was 5 vertebral bodies. Magnetic bullets were placed at an average age of 81 days of life, leading to successful magnamosis in all cases: 4 infants had primary magnetic repair (one after thoracoscopic mobilization of the pouches), 1 patient had a delayed magnamosis after Foker's procedure. Esophageal anastomosis was achieved after an average of 8 days. No anastomotic leak was found. All patients developed anastomotic stenosis at 6-month follow-up, requiring a mean of 6 dilations each. Full oral feeding was achieved in 3 patients, while 2 were still on oral-gastrostomy feeding. One patient experienced small esophageal perforation after dilation (3 months after magnamosis), distal to the anastomotic stricture and subsequently developed oral aversion. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest magnamosis a safe and effective minimally invasive option in patients with LGEA. Absence of postoperative esophageal leaks may represent a major advantage of magnamosis over conventional surgery, although possible high rate of esophageal stenosis should be further evaluated. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: IV (Case series with no comparison group).