Facilitating Lung Collapse for Thoracoscopic Surgery Utilizing Endobronchial Airway Occlusion Preceded by Pleurotomy and One-minute Suspension of Two-lung Ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: To assess when and whether clamping the double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) limb of the non-ventilated lung is more conducive to a rapid and effective lung deflation than simply allowing the open limb of the DLT to communicate with the atmosphere. DESIGN: This was a single-center, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: The trial was performed in a single institutional setting. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 60 patients undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to the open-clamp airway technique (OCAT group) or control group. Patients in the control group had one-lung ventilation initiated upon being placed in the lateral decubitus position. The OCAT group had two-lung ventilation maintained until the pleural cavity was opened with the introduction of a planned thoracoscopic access port to allow the operated lung to fall away from the chest wall. Thereafter, ventilation was suspended (temporarily ceased) for 1 minute before the DLT lumen of the isolated lung was clamped. The primary outcome of the trial was the time to complete lung collapse scored as determined from video clips taken during surgery. The secondary outcomes were (1) lung collapse score at 30 minutes after pleural incision, (2) surgeon satisfaction with surgery, and (3) intraoperative hypoxemia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median time to reach complete lung collapse in the OCAT group was 10 minutes (odds ratio 10.0, 95% CI 6.3-13.7), which was much shorter than that of the control group (25 minutes [odds ratio 25.0, 95% CI 13.6-36.4]). The difference in complete lung collapse at 30 minutes between the 2 groups was significant (p < 0.001). The surgeon's satisfaction with surgery was higher in the OCAT group than in the control group (8.5 ± 0.2 vs 6.8 ± 0.2; p < 0.001). There was no difference regarding intraoperative hypoxemia. CONCLUSIONS: Suspending ventilation of both DLT limbs for 1 minute after pleural cavity opening and then clamping the DLT lumen of the isolated lung resulted in a more rapid deflation of the surgical lung. This open-clamp airway technique is an effective technique for rapid surgical lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery.

Advanced diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for anaesthetists in thoracic trauma: an evidence-based review.

Anaesthetists play an important role in the evaluation and treatment of patients with signs of thoracic trauma. Anaesthesia involvement can provide valuable input using both advanced diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Commonly performed interventions may be complicated in this setting including airway management, damage control resuscitation, and acute pain management. Anaesthetists must consider additional factors including airway injuries, vascular injuries, and coagulopathy when treating this population. This evidence-based review discusses traumatic thoracic injuries with a focus on new interventions and modern anaesthesia techniques. This review further serves to support the early involvement of anaesthetists in the emergency department and other areas where they can provide value to the trauma care pathway.

Lung isolation-a personalized and clinically adapted approach to control bronchoscopy-associated acute massive airway hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The current concept of bronchoscopy-associated massive airway hemorrhage is not accurate enough, and the amount of bleeding as the only evaluation criterion cannot comprehensively evaluate magnitude of the effects and the severity. OBJECTIVE: To propose the concept of bronchoscopy-associated acute massive airway hemorrhage, analyze its impact on patients and highlight the treatment approach of acute massive airway hemorrhage without ECMO support. DESIGNS: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Include all patients who received bronchoscopy intervention therapy at Interventional Pulmonology Center of Emergency General Hospital from 2004 to December 2021. PATIENTS: 223 patients met the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: Patients were divided into two groups: acute massive airway hemorrhage group (n = 29) and non-acute massive airway hemorrhage group (n = 194). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative adverse events between two groups were the main outcome. Secondary outcome was the impact of lung isolation on patient in group Acute. RESULTS: The incidence of acute massive airway hemorrhage was 0.11%, and the incidence of non-acute massive airway hemorrhage was 0.76% in this study. There were significant differences in the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia, lowest SpO2, hemorrhagic shock, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intraoperative mortality, and transfer to ICU between acute group and non-acute group (P<0.05, respectively). Lung isolation was used in 12 patients with acute massive airway hemorrhage, and only 2 patients died during the operation. CONCLUSION: Bronchoscopy-associated acute massive airway hemorrhage had more serious impact on patients due to rapid bleeding, blurred vision of bronchoscopy, inability to stop bleeding quickly, blood filling alveoli, and serious impact on oxygenation of the lung lobes. Polyvinyl chloride single-lumen endotracheal intubation for lung isolation, with its characteristics of low difficulty, wide applicability and available in most hospitals, may reduce the intraoperative mortality of patients with bronchoscopy-associated acute massive airway hemorrhage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 13/03/2022. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200057470.

Anesthetic Management of Patients With Kartagener Syndrome: A Systematic Review of 99 Cases.

KARTAGENER SYNDROME (KS) is characterized by the triad of chronic sinusitis, bronchiectasis, and situs inversus. The mirrored anatomy and respiratory infections in patients with KS patients pose great challenges for anesthetic management. The aim of this review is to summarize published cases with the hope of helping anesthesiologists perform anesthesia in patients with KS more safely. A comprehensive literature search for all cases of anesthetic management of KS patients was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang Database. The extracted data included age, sex, type of surgery, preoperative treatment, type of anesthesia, anesthetic agents, airway management, central venous catheterization, transesophageal echocardiogram, reversal of neuromuscular blockade, adverse events during the surgery, and postoperative complications. The study authors included 82 single-case reports, 3 case series, and 1 case cohort, with a total number of 99 patients. The most common surgical procedures were thoracic surgery (51.5%), which was followed by ear, nose, and throat surgery (16.5%), and general surgery (14.5%). The preoperative treatment of the patients was reported in only 20 patients, and included antibiotics, bronchodilators, steroids, chest physiotherapy, and postural drainage. General anesthesia was performed for 85.4% of the surgeries, and regional anesthesia was performed in 14.6% of the cases. For nonthoracic surgery, an endotracheal tube was the most commonly used airway device. For thoracic surgery, a double-lumen tube was the most commonly used airway device. The intraoperative process was uneventful in most patients, and most patients recovered smoothly in the postoperative course.

Effectiveness of Simulation- Versus Didactic Video-Based Learning to Teach Advanced Lung Isolation Techniques.

OBJECTIVES: Mastery of lung isolation is crucial for optimal cardiothoracic anesthesia education. The authors tested the hypothesis that simulation- is more effective than didactic video-based learning (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor) to teach anesthesiology fellows advanced lung isolation techniques. DESIGN: A prospective randomized study. SETTING: At a single academic heart center, simulation laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty anesthesiology fellows with equivalent prior experience in basic lung isolation techniques. INTERVENTIONS: Randomized participants received 1 of 2 structured educational interventions of equivalent duration designed to teach advanced lung isolation skills, a simulation workshop, or a video-based didactic session. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: To assess Bloom's taxonomy domains, performance measurements included pre- and postintervention cognitive tests and affective surveys and a postintervention psychomotor task (time to complete lung isolation). Changes in test and survey scores and time to completion were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test; p values < 0.05 were considered significant. Improvements in lung isolation learning assessments were greater in the simulation group, but significant differences only existed in the affective domain. Specifically, affective survey score increases were greater in the simulation group (simulation- versus video-based didactic: +19.0 v +4.0; p ≤ 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in cognitive pre- to posttest scores (simulation- versus video-based: +28.6 v +19.1, p = 0.23), and time to achieve lung isolation (simulation- versus video-based: 32 v 36 seconds, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Although greater affective learning of advanced lung isolation skills occurred with simulation-based compared to didactic video-based education, the authors found no differences between the teaching approaches in cognitive and psychomotor learning among anesthesiology fellows.

Lung ultrasound is non-inferior to bronchoscopy for confirmation of double-lumen endotracheal tube positioning: a randomized controlled noninferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate placement of left-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes (LDLTs) is paramount for optimal visualization of the operative field during thoracic surgeries that require single lung ventilation. Appropriate placement of LDLTs is therefore confirmed with fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) rather than clinical assessment alone. Recent studies have demonstrated lung ultrasound (US) is superior to clinical assessment alone for confirming placement of LDLT, but no large trials have compared US to the gold standard of FOB. This noninferiority trial was devised to compare lung US with FOB for LDLT positioning and achievement of lung collapse for operative exposure. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, double-blind, noninferiority trial was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand from October 2017 to July 2019. The study enrolled 200 ASA classification 1-3 patients that were scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring placement of LDLT. Study patients were randomized into either the FOB group or the lung US group after initial blind placement of LDLT. Five patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. In the FOB group (n = 98), fiberoptic bronchoscopy was used to confirm lung collapse due to proper positioning of the LDLT, and to adjust the tube if necessary. In the US group (n = 97), lung ultrasonography of four pre-specified zones (upper and lower posterior and mid-axillary) was used to assess lung collapse and guide adjustment of the tube if necessary. The primary outcome was presence of adequate lung collapse as determined by visual grading by the attending surgeon on scale from 1 to 4. Secondary outcomes included the time needed to adjust and confirm lung collapse, the time from finishing LDLT positioning to the grading of lung collapse, and intraoperative parameters such has hypotension or hypertension, hypoxia, and hypercarbia. The patient, attending anesthesiologist, and attending thoracic surgeon were all blinded to the intervention arm. RESULTS: The primary outcome of lung collapse by visual grading was similar between the intervention and the control groups, with 89 patients (91.8%) in the US group compared to 83 patients (84.1%) in the FOB group (p = 0.18) experiencing adequate collapse. This met criteria for noninferiority per protocol analysis. The median time needed to confirm and adjust LDLT position in the US group was 3 min (IQR 2-5), which was significantly shorter than the median time needed to perform the task in the FOB group (6 min, IQR 4-10) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients undergoing thoracic surgery requiring LDLT, lung ultrasonography was noninferior to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in achieving adequate lung collapse and reaches the desired outcome in less time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03314519 , Principal investigator: Kasana Raksamani, Date of registration: 19/10/2017.

Non-ventilated lung deflation during one-lung ventilation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube: a randomized-controlled trial of occluding the non-ventilated endobronchial lumen before pleural opening.

PURPOSE: Lung deflation during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is thought to be faster using a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DL-ETT) than with a bronchial blocker, especially when the non-ventilated lumen is opened to allow egress of air from the operative lung. Nevertheless, ambient air can also be entrained into the non-ventilated lumen before pleural opening and subsequently delay deflation. We therefore hypothesized that occluding the non-ventilated DL-ETT lumen during OLV before pleural opening would prevent air entrainment and consequently enhance operative lung deflation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing VATS using DL-ETT to allow OLV were randomized to having the lumen of the operative lung either open (control group) or occluded (intervention group) to ambient air. The primary outcome was the time to lung collapse evaluated intraoperatively by the surgeons. The T50, an index of rate of deflation, was also determined from a probabilistic model derived from intraoperative video clips presented in random order to three observers. RESULTS: The median [interquartile range] time to lung deflation occurred faster in the intervention group than in the control group (24 [20-37] min vs 54 [48-68] min, respectively; median difference, 30 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14 to 46; P < 0.001). The estimated T50 was 32.6 min in the intervention group compared with 62.3 min in the control group (difference, - 29.7 min; 95% CI, - 51.1 to - 8.4; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Operative lung deflation during OLV with a DL-ETT is faster when the operative lumen remains closed before pleural opening thus preventing it from entraining ambient air during the closed chest phase of OLV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03508050); registered 27 September 2017.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: On pense que la déflation pulmonaire pendant la ventilation unipulmonaire (VUP) est plus rapide à l'aide d'un tube endotrachéal à double lumière (TET-DL) qu'avec un bloqueur bronchique, surtout lorsque la lumière non ventilée est ouverte pour permettre l'évacuation de l'air du poumon opéré. Néanmoins, l'air ambiant peut également être entraîné dans la lumière non ventilée avant l'ouverture pleurale et ainsi retarder la déflation. Nous avons donc émis l'hypothèse que l'occlusion de la lumière non ventilée du TET-DL pendant la VUP avant l'ouverture de la plèvre empêcherait l'entraînement d'air et accélérerait par conséquent la déflation du poumon opéré pendant une chirurgie thoracoscopique vidéo-assistée (VATS). MéTHODE: Trente patients subissant une VATS avec un TET-DL pour permettre une VUP ont été randomisés à une ouverture (groupe témoin) ou à une occlusion (groupe intervention) de la lumière du poumon opéré à l'air ambiant. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le temps jusqu'au collapsus du poumon tel qu'évalué pendant l'opération par les chirurgiens. Le T50, un indice du taux de déflation, a également été déterminé à partir d'un modèle probabiliste dérivé de clips vidéo peropératoires présentés de façon randomisée à trois observateurs. RéSULTATS: Le temps médian [écart interquartile] jusqu'à la déflation du poumon était plus court dans le groupe d'intervention que dans le groupe témoin (24 [20-37] min vs 54 [48-68] min, respectivement; différence médiane, 30 min; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 14 à 46; P < 0,001). Le T50 estimé était de 32,6 min dans le groupe d'intervention comparativement à 62,3 min dans le groupe témoin (différence, -29,7 min; IC 95 %, -51,1 à -8,4; P = 0,008). CONCLUSION: La déflation du poumon opéré pendant une VUP avec un TET-DL est plus rapide quand la lumière opératoire reste fermée avant l'ouverture pleurale, l'empêchant ainsi d'entraîner l'air ambiant pendant la phase pré ouverture pleurale de la VUP. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03508050); enregistrée le 27 septembre 2017.

A Randomized Comparison of Positional Stability: The EZ-Blocker Versus Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes in Adult Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if there is a difference in the repositioning rate of the EZ-Blocker versus a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING: Single center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-three thoracic surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to either EZ-Blocker or a DLT. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was positional stability of either the EZ-Blocker or a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube, defined as the number of repositionings per hour of surgery and one-lung ventilation. Secondary outcomes included an ordinal isolation score from 1 to 3, in which 1 was poor, up to 3, which represented excellent isolation, and a visual analog postoperative sore throat score (0-100) on postoperative days (POD) one and two. Rate of repositionings per hour during one-lung ventilation and surgical manipulation in left-sided cases was similar between the two devices: 0.08 ± 0.15 v 0.11 ± 0.3 (p = 0.72). In right-sided cases, the rate of repositioning was higher in the EZ-Blocker group compared with DLT: 0.38 ± 0.65 v 0.09 ± 0.21 (p = 0.03). Overall, mean isolation scores for the EZ-Blocker versus the DLT were 2.76 v 2.92 (p = 0.04) in left-sided cases and 2.70 v 2.83 (p = 0.22) in right-sided cases. Median sore throat scores for left sided cases were 0 v 5 (p = 0.13) POD one and 0 v 5 (p = 0.006) POD two for the EZ-Blocker and left-sided DLT, respectively. CONCLUSION: For right-sided procedures, the positional stability of the EZ-Blocker is inferior to a DLT. In left-sided cases, the rate of repositioning for the EZ-Blocker and DLT are not statistically different.

Management of the airway and lung isolation for thoracic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations for clinical practice endorsed by the Association for Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care and the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland.

Intra-operative aerosol-generating procedures are arguably unavoidable in the routine provision of thoracic anaesthesia. Airway management for such patients during the COVID-19 pandemic including tracheal intubation, lung isolation, one-lung ventilation and flexible bronchoscopy may pose a significant risk to healthcare professionals and patients. That said, there remains a need for timely thoracic surgery for patients with lung cancer or thoracic trauma. The thoracic anaesthetic community has been confronted with the need to modify existing techniques to maximise safety for patients and healthcare professionals. With appropriate modification, aerosol generation may be mitigated against in most circumstances. We developed a set of practice-based recommendations for airway management in thoracic surgical patients, which have been endorsed by the Association for Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care and the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland.

Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery without lung isolation utilizing single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of performing robotic cardiac surgery without lung isolation using single-lumen (SL) endotracheal tube intubation. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2017, 132 patients underwent robotically-assisted atrial septal defect closure. A retrospective analysis was performed of 23 patients (11 males, mean age 30.9 ± 5 years) who underwent robotic surgery with double-lumen (DL) endotracheal tube intubation (group 1) compared with 109 patients (57 males, mean age 32.4 ± 7.5 years) undergoing the same procedure with SL endotracheal intubation (group 2). The patient groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, operative data, and complications. The technical feasibility of the robotic procedure without lung isolation was evaluated. RESULTS: There were no mortality, intraoperative complication, and conversion. Mean total anesthesia time was significantly decreased in the SL intubation group (238.3 ± 22.4 vs 227.2 ± 21.2 minutes; P = .025). First-pass intubation success was significantly higher in the SL intubation group (17 [73.9%] vs 98 [89.9%] patients; P = .032). Mean ventilation time (10.9 ± 5.3 hours), intensive care unit stay (16.8 ± 10.1 hours), and the length of hospital stay (3.8 ± 1.2 days) was significantly decreased in patients with SL tube (P < .05). Unilateral reexpansion pulmonary edema was observed in five (21.7%) patients with DL tube, whereas no patient with SL tube had this complication. CONCLUSIONS: SL endotracheal tube intubation without lung isolation is a feasible and safe airway alternative in robotic cardiac procedures. This approach resulted in shorter anesthesia time, ventilation time and the length of hospital stay. Port placement and robotic set-up can be uneventfully performed without lung isolation.

An initial experience with an Extraluminal EZ-Blocker® : A new alternative for 1-lung ventilation in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: The need for 1-lung ventilation in school age, pediatric patients is uncommon and as a result there are relatively few devices available to facilitate lung isolation in this population. Furthermore, little is known about the efficacy and techniques of placement of the currently available devices. One of the newest devices available that may be appropriate in this age group is the EZ-Blocker. AIMS: We aimed to examine our initial experience with the EZ-Blocker to evaluate the performance of this device with respect to potential improvements in technique and patient selection going forward. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all pediatric patients who underwent 1-lung ventilation with an EZ-Blocker since the blocker became available at our institution. We recorded demographics, details of placement, intraoperative course, number of repositions, and any postoperative morbidity related to blocker placement or 1-lung ventilation. RESULTS: We were able to correctly place the EZ-Blocker and achieve lung isolation in 8 of 11 patients. There was a single episode of repositioning required during 1-lung ventilation with an EZ-Blocker. CONCLUSION: The EZ-Blocker was successful in providing lung isolation for a majority of our school age patients. Size constraints in children <6 years of age, excessive secretions, and distortions of tracheal anatomy seemed to be the greatest hindrances to successful placement and positioning of the device. Once correctly positioned, however, the EZ-Blocker may be more stable than the Arndt endobronchial blocker.

A Prospective Comparison of Intraluminal and Extraluminal Placement of the 9-French Arndt Bronchial Blocker in Adult Thoracic Surgery Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the standard intraluminal approach with the placement of the 9-French Arndt endobronchial blocker with an extraluminal approach by measuring the time to positioning and other relevant intraoperative and postoperative parameters. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 41 patients (20 intraluminal, 21 extraluminal) undergoing thoracic surgery. INTERVENTION: Placement of a 9-French Arndt bronchial blocker either intraluminally or extraluminally. Comparisons between the 2 groups included the following: (1) time for initial placement, (2) quality of isolation at 1-hour intervals during one-lung ventilation, (3) number of repositionings during one-lung ventilation, and (4) presence or absence of a sore throat on postoperative days 1 and 2 and, if present, its severity. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Median time to placement (min:sec) in the extraluminal group was statistically faster at 2:42 compared with 6:24 in the intraluminal group (p < 0.05). Overall quality of isolation was similar between groups, even though a significant number of blockers in both groups required repositioning (extraluminal 47%, intraluminal 40%, p > 0.05), and 1 blocker ultimately had to be replaced intraoperatively. No differences in the incidence or severity of sore throat postoperatively were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant reduction in time to placement using the extraluminal approach without any differences in the rate of postoperative sore throat was observed. Whether placed intraluminally or extraluminally, a significant percentage of Arndt endobronchial blockers required at least one intraoperative repositioning.

Incidental finding of tracheal bronchus complicating the anesthetic management of a left video-assisted thoracoscopic procedure.

Congenital abnormalities of the large airways are uncommon, but may occasionally pose significant difficulties for anesthesiologists. The tracheal bronchus is an anatomical variant in which an accessory bronchus originates directly from the trachea rather than distal to the carina, as a takeoff from the right mainstem bronchus. Anesthesiologists should be aware of this uncommon anomaly, its different variants, and its management in order to successfully establish one lung ventilation (OLV) for surgical isolation. In this article, we report the challenges encountered in establishing OLV in a patient with a previously undiagnosed aberrant right upper lobe bronchus arising directly from the trachea.

A Comparison of the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes and Bronchial Blockers in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of using bronchial blockers (BBs) and double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BBs and DLTs. SETTING: Hospital units undertaking thoracic surgery PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing thoracic surgery requiring lung isolation. INTERVENTIONS: BBs and DLTs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A systematic literature search was conducted for RCTs comparing BBs and DLTs using Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane library databases up to October 2013. Inclusion criteria were RCTs comparing BBs and DLTs, intubation carried out by qualified anesthesiologists or trainee specialists, outcome measures relating to either efficacy or adverse effects. Studies that were inaccessible in English were excluded. Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect meta-analysis of recurring outcome measures was performed using RevMan 5 software. The search produced 39 RCTs published between 1996 and 2013. DLTs were quicker to place (mean difference: 51 seconds, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 8-94 seconds; p = 0.02) and less likely to be incorrectly positioned (odds ratio [OR] 2.70; 95% CI 1.18-6.18, p = 0.02) than BBs. BBs were associated with fewer patients having a postoperative sore throat (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.23-0.68, p = 0.0009), less hoarseness (OR: 0.43,95%, CI 0.24-0.75, p = 0.003), and fewer airway injuries (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21-0.75, p = 0.005) than DLTs. CONCLUSION: While BBs are associated with a lower incidence of airway injury and a lower severity of injury, DLTs can be placed quicker and more reliably.

Novel application of rapid prototyping for simulation of bronchoscopic anatomy.

OBJECTIVE: The authors used rapid prototyping (RP) technology to create anatomically congruent models of tracheo-bronchial tree for teaching relevant bronchoscopic anatomy. DESIGN: Pilot study. SETTING: A single level tertiary academic medical center. INTERVENTIONS: Two 3 dimensional (3D) models of tracheo-bronchial tree (one showing normal anatomy and another with an early take off of right apical bronchus) were recreated from Computed Tomographic images using RP technology. These images were then attached to mannequins and examined with a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FFB). These images were then compared with the actual FFB images obtained during lung isolation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The images obtained through the 3D models were found to be congruent to actual patient anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: RP can be successfully used to create anatomically accurate models from imaging studies. There is potential for RP to become a valuable educational tool in the future.