End-of-life practices in patients with devastating brain injury in Spain: implications for organ donation. / Prácticas clínicas al final de la vida en pacientes con daño cerebral catastrófico en España: implicaciones para la donación de órganos.

OBJECTIVE: To describe end-of-life care practices relevant to organ donation in patients with devastating brain injury in Spain. DESIGN: A multicenter prospective study of a retrospective cohort. PERIOD: 1 November 2014 to 30 April 2015. SETTING: Sixty-eight hospitals authorized for organ procurement. PATIENTS: Patients dying from devastating brain injury (possible donors). Age: 1 month-85 years. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: Type of care, donation after brain death, donation after circulatory death, intubation/ventilation, referral to the donor coordinator. RESULTS: A total of 1,970 possible donors were identified, of which half received active treatment in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) until brain death (27%), cardiac arrest (5%) or the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (19%). Of the rest, 10% were admitted to the ICU to facilitate organ donation, while 39% were not admitted to the ICU. Of those patients who evolved to a brain death condition (n=695), most transitioned to actual donation (n=446; 64%). Of those who died following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (n=537), 45 (8%) were converted into actual donation after circulatory death donors. The lack of a dedicated donation after circulatory death program was the main reason for non-donation. Thirty-seven percent of the possible donors were not intubated/ventilated at death, mainly because the professional in charge did not consider donation alter discarding therapeutic intubation. Thirty-six percent of the possible donors were never referred to the donor coordinator. CONCLUSIONS: Although deceased donation is optimized in Spain, there are still opportunities for improvement in the identification of possible donors outside the ICU and in the consideration of donation after circulatory death in patients who die following the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

SEMES' long road to specialty status for emergency medicine in Spain. / El largo camino de SEMES hacia la especialidad de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias en España.

TEXT: July 2 of this year saw the publication of Spanish Royal Decree 610/2024, which establishes emergency medicine as an official specialization. This event represents the culmination of a long-running effort to improve the care of patients in the emergency and urgent care system and throughout the national health service. This article offers a brief account of some of the legal, administrative, and political steps the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine(SEMES) took to achieve this goal over the course of nearly 40 years. The effort has involved many SEMES members, who strictly speaking had the sole obligation of knowing how to care appropriately for patients based on clinical expertise along with organizational, scientific, and other professional skills. Competences in these areas have been shown to fall short in Spain. The article provides examples of some of the bright lights and dim shadows in our rule of law. Nonetheless, the long road traveled has also shown us how skills and knowledge are developed in adverse circumstances and crises, provided there is vocation for public service.

TEXTO: La publicación del Real Decreto 610/2024, de 2 de julio, por el que se establece el título de Médica/o Especialista en Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias, supone la culminación de una larga reclamación, orientada al logro de la mejora en la atención a los pacientes en el sistema de urgencias y emergencias y, en definitiva, del propio Sistema Sanitario español. Este artículo está orientado, de manera muy resumida, hacia algunos de los aspectos jurídicos, administrativos y políticos desempeñados por la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias, SEMES durante casi 40 años. Esto implica a muchos de sus miembros, profesionales que, esencialmente, solo debían saber cómo atender adecuadamente a sus pacientes, desde su conocimiento clínico, organizativo y científico, entre otros. Estos aspectos se mostraron insuficientes en España. Se ejemplifican algunas luces y sombras del Estado de Derecho español. Pero también este camino muestra las capacidades y conocimientos que se llegan a desarrollar en situaciones adversas y crisis, siempre y únicamente desde la vocación de servicio público.

Impact of nirsevimab immunization on RSV infections attended in the pediatric emergency department: First results in a tertiary hospital in Madrid.

INTRODUCTION: Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most commonly identified virus associated with lower respiratory tract infections. The monoclonal antibody nirsevimab immunization campaign began in our country in October 2023. METHODS: This study was conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) of a tertiary care center in Madrid, Spain. The aim was to compare PED visits of patients eligible for immunization with nirsevimab who attended between weeks 40 and 52 of 2022 and 2023 and who had a confirmed diagnosis of RSV infection. RESULTS: During the study period, 264 out of 765 patients with confirmed RSV infection who attended the PED were eligible for immunization with nirsevimab and were selected for our analysis. The PED attendance was 80.3% in 2022 and 19.7% in 2023. The number of RSV-positive cases increased from week 42 in both analyzed periods, with a peak of maximum incidence between weeks 46 and 48. In 2022, the morphology of the case curve in the group of children eligible for immunization was similar to the overall curve. However, in 2023, we did not observe a similar increase in cases among patients eligible for immunization. CONCLUSION: Immunization with nirsevimab during the 2023 RSV epidemic season had a beneficial effect, reducing the number of PED consultations for RSV infection.

Utilization of abdominal radiography in the emergency department: Appropriateness, interpretation, radiation protection and costs.

INTRODUCTION: The use of abdominal radiography (AXR) apparently continues to be widespread despite its limited indications, the potential radiation and unnecessary costs associated. In addition, the interpretation and its report seem variable and not always performed by a radiologist. Our objective is to analyze the use, adequacy and usefulness of AXR in the emergency of a tertiary referral hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all the AXR performed in January 2020 in the emergency of our centre, as well as the patient's demographics and medical records, technical quality of the radiographs, indications according to the SERAM (Spanish Society of Radiology) Appropriateness Guidelines, presence of a formal radiology report, and impact on the clinical management of the patient. Of all non-appropriated AXR we calculated the radiation received by the patients and its extra costs. RESULTS: In January 2020, 429 AXR (9.1% of all radiographies) were performed in the emergency of our centre. The most frequent indication was abdominal pain (40%, n = 176), followed by low back pain (21.4%, n = 92). 12.4% of AXR requested did not include any clinical information. Most of the AXR (79.6%) had sufficient technical quality. 61.3% (n = 263) of the AXR performed were not indicated, assuming an average unjustified radiation dose per patient of 0.50 ±â€¯0.33 mSv, and a total additional cost of 6575;. Only 6% of the inadequate AXRs led to a change in the clinical management of the patient, compared to 29% of the adequate AXR (p < 0.001). Only 3% of the AXR had a formal radiology report. CONCLUSIONS: AXR is still common in the emergency setting, although most of them might be inadequate according to the SERAM Appropriateness Guidelines. Its use should be optimized to avoid unnecessary radiation and costs. Radiologists must have a more active participation in the management of AXR.

Study EDEN-12: Analysis of access to intensive care units of patients older than 65 years requiring emergency hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the age of an urgently hospitalized patient and his or her probability of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study. SETTING: 42 Emergency Departments from Spain. TIME-PERIOD: April 1-7, 2019. PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥65 years hospitalized from Spanish emergency departments. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: ICU admission, age sex, comorbidity, functional dependence and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: 6120 patients were analyzed (median age: 76 years; males: 52%. 309 (5%) were admitted to ICU (186 from ED, 123 from hospitalization). Patients admitted to the ICU were younger, male, and with less comorbidity, dependence and cognitive impairment, but there were no differences between those admitted from the ED and from hospitalization. The OR for ICU-admission adjusted by sex, comorbidity, dependence and dementia reached statistical significance >83 years (OR: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.45-0.49). In patients admitted to the ICU from ED, the OR did not begin to decrease until 79 years, and was significant >85 years (OR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.34-0.92); while in those admitted to ICU from hospitalization, the decrease began 65 years of age, and were significant from 85 years (OR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.30-0.99). Sex, comorbidity, dependency and cognitive deterioration of the patient did not modify the association between age and ICU-admission (overall, from the ED or hospitalization). CONCLUSIONS: After taking into account other factors that influence admission to the ICU (comorbidity, dependence, dementia), the chances of admission to the ICU of older patients hospitalized on an emergency basis begin to decrease significantly after 83 years of age. There may be differences in the probability of admission to the ICU from the ED or from hospitalization according to age.

Mortality risk model validation in a prospective cohort of patients from the sixth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital emergency department. / Validación del modelo de riesgo de mortalidad en una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes de la sexta ola epidémica de la COVID-19 en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario.

OBJECTIVES: To validate risk factors for mortality in patients treated for COVID-19 in a hospital emergency department during the sixth wave of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational noninterventional study. We included patients over the age of 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between December 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022. For each patient we calculated a risk score based on age 50 years or older (2 points) plus 1 point each for the presence of the following predictors: Barthel index less than 90 points, altered level of consciousness, ratio of arterial oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen less than 400, abnormal breath sounds, platelet concentration less than 100 × 109/L, C-reactive protein level of 5 mg/dL or more, and glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min. The model was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of the 1156 patients included, 790 (68%) had received at least 2 vaccine doses. The probability of 30-day survival was 96%. A risk score was calculated for 609 patients. Four hundred seventeen patients were at low risk of death, 180 were at intermediate risk, and 10 were at high risk. The probability of death within 30 days was 1%, 13%, and 50% for patients in the 3 risk groups, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of a risk score of 3 points or less were 88%, 72%, 19%, 99%, respectively.The AUC for the model was 0.87. CONCLUSION: The risk model identified low risk of mortality and allowed us to safely discharge patients treated for COVID-19 in our tertiary-care hospital emergency department.

OBJETIVO: Validación de un indicador de mortalidad derivado durante los primeros meses de la pandemia de la COVID-19 en pacientes con COVID-19 atendidos durante la sexta ola epidémica en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH). METODO: Estudio observacional prospectivo no intervencionista. Se incluyeron pacientes > 18 años diagnosticados de casos confirmados de COVID-19 (1 diciembre 2021-28 febrero 2022). Se calculó el indicador para cada paciente: edad $ 50 años (2 puntos), índice de Barthel 90 puntos (1 punto), alteración de consciencia (1 punto), índice de SaO2/FIO2 400 (1 punto), auscultación respiratoria patológica (1 punto), plaquetas 100 x 109/L (1 punto), proteína C reactiva $ 5 mg/dL (1 punto) y filtrado glomerular 45 mL/min (1 punto). El rendimiento del indicador se valoró con el análisis del área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor (ABC-COR). RESULTADOS: De los 1.156 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, 790 (68%) habían recibido como mínimo una dosis de vacuna. La probabilidad de supervivencia a los 30 días de la serie fue del 96%. El indicador de riesgo se pudo calcular en 609 pacientes. Cuatrocientos diecisiete pacientes se clasificaron como de riesgo bajo, 182 de riesgo intermedio y 10 de riesgo alto. La probabilidad de mortalidad a los 30 días fue de 1%, 13% y 50%, respectivamente. La sensibilidad, especificidad y valores predictivos positivo y negativo para un punto de corte menor o igual a 3 puntos fue 88%, 72%, 19%, 99%, respectivamente. El ABC-COR para el indicador fue de 0,87. CONCLUSIONES: Un valor del indicador de bajo riesgo permite dar de alta con seguridad a los pacientes con COVID-19 que se atienden en un SUH de un centro de tercer nivel.

Schematic approach to the diagnosis of multifocal lung opacities in the emergency department.

Radiologists in the emergency department must be prepared to deal with any type of disease in any organ at any time. Many entities involving the chest can result in patients' presenting at the emergency department. This chapter deals with entities that manifest with multifocal lung opacities and that can be mistaken for pneumonia. To facilitate their identification, this chapter approaches these entities by considering their most characteristic distribution on chest X-rays, the main diagnostic modality used for thoracic problems in the emergency department. Our schematic approach includes the key findings in patients' personal histories, clinical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies that can be available during the initial workup.

Variation in volumes and characteristics of ENT emergency visits during COVID-19 pandemic. Where are the patients?

The aim of this study is to analyze patterns and volumes of patients visiting ENT emergency departments during periods of community lockdowns given the newness of this situation and to assess the variation in numbers of visits and examine whether their reduction equally affects all categories of visit causation or whether it is limited to diseases not considered as emergencies. A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on prospectively collected registry data on patients of all age groups visited the emergency ENT department during the period of nationwide lockdown. Patients were grouped in 9 categories, according to the cause of visit the ENT emergency department. A total of 201 patients visited the ENT emergency department. The retrospective analysis of the data during the same period in the years 2013-2019 showed a reduction of 73% in total visits (mean total visits number between 2013 and 2019 was 745.29±20.0143). A statistically significant reduction in visitation was found in all categories studied with the exception of foreign body ingestion - aspiration. Patients with General ENT symptoms, mild epistaxis cases, otology cases, vertigo cases, uncomplicated infectious cases showed a statistically significant reduction in numbers and were treated empirically. Swallowing foreign body cases did not show statistically significant reduction. Limitation of movement and the lockdown itself, led to reduction of trauma cases. Surprisingly, there was also a reduction in oncology cases and an increase in numbers of these cases can be expected in the near future.

Empirical analysis of medical malpractice litigation involving urgent-care settings in the Spanish national health service. / Análisis empírico de la litigiosidad judicial por responsabilidad médica en la asistencia sanitaria pública urgente en España.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the characteristics of superior court decisions in litigation or administrative procedures for medical malpractice claims involving urgent care settings in the Spanish national health service. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of judicial rulings handed down between 2008 and 2020 in cases involving urgent care. We analyzed administrative, clinical, and judicial variables as well as the amounts of compensation awarded. RESULTS: A total of 1015 rulings were analyzed; 243 cases (23.9%) involved urgent medical care. Most cases (223 [91.8%]) involved elderly patients. The largest proportion of defendants (97 [39.9%]) were emergency physicians, and the most common setting was a hospital emergency department (211 [86.8%]). The grounds for finding against the defendant were most often diagnostic or therapeutic error (40 [46.0%] cases) and lost opportunity (35 [40.2%] cases). Damages were usually claimed for sequelae (122 [50.2%] cases) and death (112 [46.1%] cases). The median award was €46 000, the minimum was €1300, and the maximum was €974 849. CONCLUSION: In medical and other health-care malpractice cases, the majority of claims (about 64%) are dismissed. This finding, unreported until now, may help to contain the overestimation of risk of liability in urgent medical care. It also reinforces the need to provide medical practitioners with more training regarding the legal aspects of health care.

OBJETIVO: Analizar las características de las sentencias sobre responsabilidad médica en España en la asistencia sanitaria pública urgente, dictadas en la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa por los Tribunales Superiores de Justicia. METODO: Estudio observacional transversal que analizó las sentencias entre 2008 y 2020 en la asistencia urgente. Se incluyeron variables administrativas, clínicas, judiciales y de cuantía indemnizatoria. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 1.015 sentencias, de las que 243 (23,9%) se refirieron a una asistencia urgente. La mayoría se refería a pacientes mayores de edad, 223 (91,8%). La especialidad más implicada fue Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias 97 (39,9%) y el ámbito más frecuente fue el hospitalario 211 (86,8%). El 64,6% de las sentencias fueron íntegramente desestimatorias. Los motivos de sentencia condenatoria más habituales fueron la mala praxis diagnóstica o terapéutica 40 (46,0%), y la pérdida de oportunidad 35 (40,2%). Los daños más reclamados fueron secuelas 122 (50,2%) y fallecimiento 112 (46,1%). La mediana de las indemnizaciones fue 46.000 euros, intervalo: 1.300-974.849. CONCLUSIONES: La mayoría de las sentencias recaídas en la resolución de reclamaciones profesionales médico-sanitarias son íntegramente desestimatorias. Este dato, que era desconocido hasta el momento en la medicina pública, puede contribuir a enmarcar la sobrestimación del riesgo legal en la asistencia urgente. Así mismo, refuerza la idea de la necesidad de aumentar la formación de los profesionales en los aspectos médico-legales de la asistencia sanitaria.

Characteristics, content, and instructors in emergency and urgent medicine courses in the medical departments of Spanish universities. / Características, contenidos y profesionales implicados en la enseñanza de la medicina de urgencias y emergencias en las facultades de medicina de las universidades españolas.

TEXT: The teaching of emergency medicine (EM) and urgent care in Spanish universities is unregulated. This study aimed to analyze how EM is being taught in Spanish medical faculties. We visited the web pages of 46 universities that offer medical degrees. If an EM course was offered, the instructors were contacted. We noted whether the university was a public or private facility, whether a course was required or not and in what year, the duration and number of credits awarded, the distribution of instructional hours, how students were assessed, and the gender and category of the assigned instructors. EM is taught in 65% of Spanish universities. The subject is usually required (in 72.7%), lasts 4 months (87.9%), and is taught in the fifth year (57.6%). Nineteen courses cover EM exclusively, and 14 share the course syllabus with other material. The median number of credits offered is 5, and the distribution of time for theory and practice is similar across the universities. Syllabi are highly varied. Few hours of hospital training are offered, and 75% of the courses require a minimum number of hours of attendance and passing a final exam. Adjunct professors teach 62.3% of the courses, assistants teach 34.3%, and only 11 courses are taught by full professors. Women accounted for 31.9% of the instructors. That percentage decreased as professional category increased. We found that EM is taught in a majority of Spanish universities with medical schools, but not all; nor is the subject managed uniformly. Instructors are not often closely tied to the faculty, syllabi vary greatly and a low number of women teachers, suggesting considerable room for improvement in the future.

TEXTO: En España la enseñanza de la medicina de urgencias y emergencias (MUE) en las universidades no está regulada. El presente estudio analiza la situación de la enseñanza de la MUE en las facultades de medicina de España. Se accedió a la página web de las 46 universidades con facultad de medicina. En caso de existencia de asignatura se contactó con los responsables. Se valoró la titularidad de la universidad y la obligatoriedad, curso, duración, número de créditos, distribución de horas, contenido del programa y tipo de evaluación de la asignatura. Además se detalló el sexo y categoría del profesorado. La MUE está presente en el 65% de las facultades, y se identificaron 33 asignaturas. La asignatura es mayoritariamente obligatoria (72,7%), cuatrimestral (87,9%), y se imparte en quito curso (57,6%). Diecinueve asignaturas son exclusivas de urgencias y 14 comparten programa con otras asignaturas. La mediana de créditos es de 5, con una relación de horas teórico-prácticas similar. Los programas de las asignaturas son muy variados, generalmente con pocas prácticas hospitalarias, y en el 75% de los casos se requiere un mínimo de asistencia y examen para superarla. Se identificaron 385 profesores: un 62,3% de son asociados, un 34,3% colaboradores, y solo hay 11 catedráticos (3%). En cuanto al sexo, las mujeres representan un 31,9% de los docentes, con un porcentaje decreciente a medida que aumenta la categoría profesional. Se concluye que la MUE se enseña en la mayoría de las facultades, pero no es universal ni uniforme, hay poca vinculación de docentes y grandes diferencias de programa y una presencia minoritaria de mujeres docentes, lo que sugiere un gran margen de mejora en el futuro.

Impact of risk mapping as a strategy for monitoring and improving patient safety in paediatric emergency care.

OBJECTIVE: To design a risk map (RM) as a tool for identifying and managing risks in the paediatric emergency department and to assess the impact of the improvement actions developed based on the identified risks in terms of the level of risk to patient safety. METHODOLOGY: A multidisciplinary working group reviewed the entire care process by applying the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) tool. Project phases: (1) RM 2017 and planning of improvement actions; (2) Development and implementation of improvement actions; (3) RM 2019; (4) Analysis: evolution of the RM and impact of improvement actions. RESULTS: A total of 106 failure modes (FMs) were identified in the 2017 RM (54.7% high- or very high risk). We applied prioritization criteria to select the improvement actions to plan. Nineteen improvement actions were planned, with assigned responsible parties and deadlines, to address 46 priority FMs. One hundred percent were implemented. In the 2019 RM, we identified 110 FMs (48.2% high risk) and found an overall reduction of the risk level of 20%. Analysing the 46 priority FMs that had been addressed by the 19 planned improvement actions, we found that 60% had changed from high to medium risk level and that the risk level had decreased, both overall (-27.8%) and by process. CONCLUSION: The FMEA is a useful tool to identify risks, analyse the impact of improvement strategies and monitor the risk level of a complex clinical care department. The improvement actions developed succeeded in reducing the level of risk in the processes in our unit, improving patient safety.

Medical training programs: comparisons between family and community medicine, internal medicine, intensive care medicine, anesthesiology and critical care, and emergency medicine. / Análisis comparativo de los Programas de Formación Sanitaria Especializada de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Medicina Interna, Medicina Intensiva, Anestesiología y Reanimación y Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether current medical residency training programs in Spain foster the acquisition of knowledge and skills that enable specialists to provide emergency and urgent medical care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied documents related to the content of residency programs for the following 4 specialties in effect in June 2021: internal medicine, intensive care medicine, anesthesiology and critical care, and family and community medicine. Program descriptions were obtained from the website of the Spanish Ministry of Health and the professional associations for each specialty. The associations' unofficial drafts and proposed updates were also studied. For emergency and urgent medicine, we studied drafts and updates of proposals presented to the Ministry of Health by the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) in 2010 and an updated version presented in 2021. The proposals were drafted by the SEMES committee to promote specialization in emergency medicine. RESULTS: Existing residency programs treat the management of urgent events from diverse points of view related to hospital settings (internal medicine focusing on admitted patients, anesthesiology on patients in perioperative settings, and intensive care on those in their specialized units) or to primary care centers (family medicine), where they are an extension of routine care. The residents' rotations in emergency medicine vary. In anesthesiology, intensive care medicine, and family medicine, training occurs while residents are on call - in the first year for trainees in anesthesiology and intensive care medicine but throughout the 4-year residency (with time decreasing each year) for trainees in family medicine. Internal medicine offers an initial 3-month rotation in emergency medicine in the early phase and then assigns on-call shifts, without specifying a number. The proposed program submitted by SEMES includes wide-ranging contact with emergencies in various hospital settings (observation ward, trauma care, and pediatric care). Training in out-of-hospital emergencies and emergency and urgent care resource coordination centers are also included. CONCLUSION: Currently available residency training in Spain does not provide appropriate preparation for practicing emergency medicine. Emergency medicine has its own body of theory and settings for practice that differ from those of other specialties. Therefore, at present there is a training gap in Spain that should be filled by creating a specialization in emergency medicine.

OBJETIVO: Analizar si con las especialidades actuales se adquieren los conocimientos y habilidades necesarios para desempeñar las funciones propias de la Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (MUE). METODO: Mediante análisis de contenido documental, se comparan los programas formativos de Medicina Interna (MI), Medicina Intensiva (MIV), Anestesiología y Reanimación (AyR) y Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria (MFyC) vigentes a fecha de junio de 2021, accesibles tanto en el portal web de Ministerio de Sanidad (MS), como a través de las sociedades científicas de las especialidades, incluidos los borradores no oficiales y propuestas de actualización de los programas y del programa de formación elaborado por la Comisión Promotora de la Especialidad de MUE, presentado por SEMES (Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias) al MS en 2010 y actualizado en 2021. RESULTADOS: Los programas formativos de las especialidades existentes en la actualidad contemplan el manejo de las enfermedades urgentes de forma heterogénea en sus distintas áreas asistenciales (MI en las áreas de hospitalización, AyR en el perioperatorio y MIV en unidades de críticos) o como extensión de la actividad asistencial en el centro de salud (MFyC). Los periodos formativos en el área de la MUE son variables y se realizan en el caso de AyR, MIV y MFyC en un formato exclusivo de guardias (AyR y MIV únicamente durante el primer año y MFyC a lo largo de los 4 años de residencia, con porcentaje decreciente conforme avanza el tiempo de formación), y en el de MI a través de un rotatorio inicial de 3 meses durante su primera etapa formativa, y el resto del tiempo a través de guardias, sin especificar su número. La propuesta del programa de formación en MUE detalla un contacto amplio y específico tanto en los SUH, incluyendo todas sus áreas asistenciales propias (observación, urgencias traumatológicas y pediátricas) como en los dispositivos de emergencias extrahospitalarias y centros coordinadores de urgencias y emergencias. CONCLUSIONES: No es posible la adecuada preparación para desarrollar la MUE con la oferta formativa actual. La MUE presenta un cuerpo doctrinal y ámbito de actuación propios que son diferentes de los de otras especialidades. Esto provoca que en España exista un vacío formativo que se solventaría mediante la creación de una especialidad primaria en MUE.

The lung ultrasound "Rule of 7" in the prognosis of COVID-19 patients: Results from a prospective multicentric study.

PURPOSE: There is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in lung ultrasound (LUS), however the use of a combined prognostic and triage tool has yet to be explored. To determine the impact of the LUS in the prediction of the mortality of patients with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19.The secondary outcome was to calculate a score with LUS findings with other variables to predict hospital admission and emergency department (ED) discharge. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study performed in the ED of three academic hospitals. Patients with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 underwent a LUS examination and laboratory tests. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were enrolled between March and September 2020. The mean age was 61.9 years (Standard Deviation - SD 21.1). The most common findings in LUS was a right posteroinferior isolated irregular pleural line (53.9%, 123 patients). A logistic regression model was calculated, including age over 70 years, C-reactive protein (CRP) over 70mg/L and a lung score over 7 to predict mortality, hospital admission and discharge from the ED. We obtained a predictive model with a sensitivity of 56.8% and a specificity of 87.6%, with an AUC of 0.813 [p<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of LUS, clinical and laboratory findings in this easy to apply "rule of 7" showed excellent performance to predict hospital admission and mortality.

Risk score for mortality due to COVID-19: a prospective temporal validation cohort study in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. / Validación temporal de un modelo de riesgo de mortalidad por COVID-19 en una cohorte prospectiva en un servicio de urgencias de un hospital de tercer nivel.

OBJECTIVES: To validate a previously described hospital emergency department risk model to predict mortality in patients with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational noninterventional study. Patients aged over 18 years diagnosed with COVID-19 were included between December 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021. We calculated a risk score for each patient based on age 50 years (2 points) plus 1 point each for the presence of the following predictors: Barthel index 90 points, altered level of consciousness, ratio of arterial oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen 400, abnormal breath sounds, platelet concentration 100 × 109/L, C reactive protein level 5 mg/dL, and glomerular filtration rate 45 mL/min. The dependent variable was 30-day mortality. We assessed the score's performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The validation cohort included 1223 patients. After a median follow-up of 80 days, 143 patients had died; 901 patients were classified as having low risk (score, 4 points), 270 as intermediate risk (5-6 points), and 52 as high risk ( 7 points). Thirty-day mortality rates at each risk level were 2.8%, 22.5%, and 65.4%, respectively. The AUC for the score was 0.883; for risk categorization, the AUC was 0.818. CONCLUSION: The risk score described is useful for stratifying risk for mortality in patients with COVID-19 who come to a tertiary-care hospital emergency department.

OBJETIVO: Validación de un indicador de mortalidad previamente descrito en pacientes con COVID-19 en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH). METODO: Estudio observacional prospectivo no intervencionista. Se incluyeron pacientes 18 años diagnosticados de COVID-19 (1 de diciembre de 2020 hasta 28 de febrero de 2021). Se calculó el indicador para cada paciente: edad 50 años (2 puntos), índice de Barthel 90 puntos (1 punto), alteración de consciencia (1 punto), índice de SaO2/ FIO2 400 (1 punto), auscultación respiratoria patológica (1 punto), plaquetas 100 x 109/L (1 punto), proteína C reactiva 5 mg/dL (1 punto) y filtrado glomerular 45 mL/min (1 punto). La variable dependiente fue la mortalidad observada a 30 días. El rendimiento del indicador se valoró con el análisis del área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor (ABC-COR). RESULTADOS: La validación del indicador se realizó sobre una cohorte de 1.223 pacientes. Tras una mediana de seguimiento de 80 días, 143 pacientes habían fallecido. Un total de 901 pacientes fueron catalogados como riesgo bajo (indicador 4 puntos), 270 lo fueron como riesgo intermedio (5-6 puntos) y 52 como riesgo alto ( 7 puntos). La mortalidad a 30 días observada en cada categoría fue de 2,8%, 22,5% y 65,4%, respectivamente. El ABC-COR fue de 0,883 para el indicador utilizado cuantitativamente y de 0,818 cuando se usó cualitativamente en forma de categorías de riesgo. CONCLUSIONES: El indicador descrito es una herramienta útil para estratificar el riesgo de mortalidad de los pacientes con COVID-19 que consultan a un SUH de un centro de tercer nivel.

Variation in volumes and characteristics of ENT emergency visits during COVID-19 pandemic. Where are the patients?

The aim of this study is to analyze patterns and volumes of patients visiting ENT emergency departments during periods of community lockdowns given the newness of this situation and to assess the variation in numbers of visits and examine whether their reduction equally affects all categories of visit causation or whether it is limited to diseases not considered as emergencies. A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on prospectively collected registry data on patients of all age groups visited the emergency ENT department during the period of nationwide lockdown. Patients were grouped in 9 categories, according to the cause of visit the ENT emergency department. A total of 201 patients visited the ENT emergency department. The retrospective analysis of the data during the same period in the years 2013-2019 showed a reduction of 73% in total visits (mean total visits number between 2013 and 2019 was 745.29±20.0143). A statistically significant reduction in visitation was found in all categories studied with the exception of foreign body ingestion - aspiration. Patients with General ENT symptoms, mild epistaxis cases, otology cases, vertigo cases, uncomplicated infectious cases showed a statistically significant reduction in numbers and were treated empirically. Swallowing foreign body cases did not show statistically significant reduction. Limitation of movement and the lockdown itself, led to reduction of trauma cases. Surprisingly, there was also a reduction in oncology cases and an increase in numbers of these cases can be expected in the near future.

In-hospital mortality associated factors in elderly patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.

AIMS: To identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality, to estimate the intubation rate and to describe in-hospital mortality in patients over 65 years old with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients over 65 years old, who were intubated in an ED of a high complexity hospital between 2016 and 2018. Demographic data, comorbidities, and severity scores on admission were described. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed with logistic regression according to mortality and possible confounders. RESULTS: A total of 285 patients with a mean age of 80 years required IMV in the emergency department, for a median of 3 days, and with a mean APACHE II score of 20 points of severity. The IMV rate was .48% (95% CI .43-.54), and 55.44% (158) died. Mortality-associated factors after age and sex adjustment were stroke (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.21-3.76), chronic kidney failure, (OR 4.,38; 95% CI 1.91-10.04), Charlson index (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.38), APACHE II score (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12), and SOFA score (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.27). DISCUSSION: Our IMV rate was lower than that stated by Johnson et al. in the United States in 2018 (.59%). In-hospital mortality in our study exceeded that predicted by the APACHE II score (40%) and SOFA (33%). However it was consistent with that reported by Lieberman et al. in Israel and Esteban et al. in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Although the IMV rate was low in the ED, more than half the patients died during hospitalization. Pre-existing cerebrovascular and renal diseases and high results in the comorbidities index and severity scores on admission were independent factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

Point-of-care chest ultrasound to diagnose acute heart failure in emergency department patients with acute dyspnea: diagnostic performance of an ultrasound-based algorithm. / Rendimiento de un algoritmo basado en ecografía cardiopulmonar a la cabecera del paciente (POCUS) para el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en pacientes que consultan en urgencias por disnea aguda.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiopulmonary ultrasound imaging can be useful for diagnosing acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an algorithm based on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in patients coming to the emergency department with acute dyspnea. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of a convenience sample of patients with acute dyspnea in 2 hospital emergency departments. The POCUS algorithm included lung ultrasound findings and 3 echocardiographic measurements taken from an apical view of 4 chambers: mitral annular plane systolic excursion, Doppler mitral flow velocity, and tissue Doppler imaging of the lateral mitral annulus. The definitive diagnosis was made by 2 physicians blinded to the POCUS findings. RESULTS: A total of 103 adult patients with a mean (SD) age of 73 (12) years were included; about half (51 patients) were women. Forty-two patients (41%) were finally diagnosed with AHF. Interindividual agreement on the physicians' diagnoses was good (k = 0.82). The POCUS algorithm assigned an AHF diagnosis to 76 patients (74%); 56 of them (85%) were in sinus rhythm. The diagnostic performance indicators for the algorithm were as follows: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-1.00); sensitivity 96% (95% CI, 78%-100%); specificity, 93% (95% CI, 8%-98%); positive predictive value, 85% (95% CI, 67%-100%); negative predictive value, 98% (95% CI, 88%-100%). CONCLUSION: The POCUS-based algorithm for diagnosing AHF performed well in patients coming to the emergency department with acute dyspnea.

OBJETIVO: La ecografía cardiopulmonar puede ser útil para diagnosticar insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA). Se evaluó el rendimiento diagnóstico de un algoritmo basado en ecografía cardiopulmonar a la cabecera del paciente (POCUS) para el diagnóstico de ICA en pacientes que consultan en urgencias por disnea aguda. METODO: Se evaluó prospectivamente una muestra de conveniencia de pacientes con disnea aguda en dos servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH). El algoritmo POCUS incluía la ecografía pulmonar y tres mediciones ecocardiográficas realizadas en un plano apical de cuatro cámaras. Se midió el MAPSE (desplazamiento sistólico del plano del anillo mitral), doppler de flujo mitral y doppler tisular en el anillo mitral lateral. El diagnóstico final fue asignado por dos médicos ciegos entre sí y a los hallazgos ecográficos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 103 pacientes adultos, la edad media fue 73 (12) años, 51 (50%) mujeres. El diagnóstico final fue ICA en 42 (41%) pacientes. La concordancia entre asignadores fue buena para el diagnóstico de ICA (k = 0,82). El algoritmo asignó un diagnóstico en 76 (74%) pacientes, 57 (85%) estaban en ritmo sinusal. El rendimiento diagnóstico del algoritmo de los 76 pacientes categorizados mostró un área bajo la curva de 0,94 (IC 95%: 0,88-1,00), sensibilidad 96% (IC 95%: 78-100%), especificidad 93% (IC 95%: 8-98%), valor predictivo positivo 85% (IC 95%: 67-100%), valor predictivo negativo 98% (IC 95%: 88-100%). CONCLUSIONES: El rendimiento de un algoritmo basado en ecografía cardiopulmonar POCUS fue bueno para diagnosticar ICA en pacientes que consultan en urgencias por disnea aguda.

Emergency medicine questions on the entrance examination for medical internships and residency training in Spain: analysis of changes between 2010 and 2019. / Presencia de la Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias en el examen de médico interno residente (MIR) en España: análisis evolutivo durante el periodo 2010-2019.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the presence of fundamental concepts in emergency medicine on the entrance examination taken by candidates for medical internships and residency training in Spain, and to identify changes over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Longitudinal retrospective study. Three independent researchers reviewed questions on the entrance examinations of the past 10 years (2010-2019) and classified them as directly, indirectly, or not related to emergency medicine. The topics of directly related questions were also classified according to the categories listed in Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine and subject areas in the Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of the Web of Science. Changes in the number of questions and range of topics were analyzed with simple linear regression models. RESULTS: A total of 2300 questions were reviewed; 487 (22%) were directly related to emergency medicine, and 313 of them specifically referred to an emergency or urgent care setting. The proportion of directly related questions held steady over the 10-year period (P=.172). The most frequently mentioned categories listed by Tintinalli were cardiovascular (12.2%), infectious (11.1%), and gastrointestinal (10.9%) emergencies, and no significant differences were noted over time. However, proportions assigned to the SCIE categories did change over time, as follows. Questions about emergency care in general (11.9% during the period overall) increased significantly with time (P=.005) whereas cardiovascular questions (11.3%) decreased (P=.037). The proportion of infectious disease topics remained the same (10.7%). CONCLUSION: Even though emergency medicine is not a recognized specialty for medical residency training in the public health system, questions on emergencies are considered important for evaluating candidates, judging by the high percentage of questions on the examinations.

OBJETIVO: Investigar la presencia del cuerpo doctrinal de la Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (MUE) en el examen de acceso a médico interno residente (MIR) en España y su evolución en el tiempo. METODO: Estudio longitudinal retrospectivo. Tres investigadores revisaron independientemente las preguntas de los exámenes MIR de los últimos 10 años (2010-2019) y las clasificaron por acuerdo mayoritario como directamente, indirectamente o no relacionadas con la MUE. La temática de las preguntas directamente relacionadas con la MUE se clasificó según el índice del libro de texto de MUE de Tintinalli y según la clasificación de las áreas de la base Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) de la Web of Science. La evolución temporal de la presencia y la temática de la MUE se analizó mediante regresión lineal simple. RESULTADOS: Se revisaron 2.300 preguntas: 487 (22%) estaban directamente relacionadas con la MUE (313 citaban específicamente el escenario de urgencias o emergencias). La presencia de preguntas directamente relacionadas con la MUE se mantuvo constante entre 2010-2019 (p = 0,172). Siguiendo la clasificación de Tintinalli, las temáticas más frecuentes de estas preguntas fueron urgencias cardiovasculares (12,2%), infecciosas (11,1%) y gastrointestinales (10,9%), sin cambios significativos entre 2010-2019, mientras que siguiendo la clasificación del SCIE, estas temáticas fueron urgencias (11,9%, que aumentó significativamente durante el periodo, p = 0,005), cardiovascular (11,3%, que descendió, p = 0,037) y enfermedades infecciosas (10,7%, sin cambios durante el periodo). CONCLUSIONES: La MUE, a pesar de no estar reconocida como una especialidad formativa por la vía MIR, tiene una elevada relevancia para la administración sanitaria a la hora de seleccionar a los MIR, que inician su formación especializada en el sistema público de salud, a juzgar por su elevada presencia en el examen anual al que se somete a los candidatos.

Prehospital emergency services in Catalonia: the SEPHCAT analysis. / Estudio SEPHCAT: análisis de los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios en Cataluña.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the main characteristics of all prehospital emergency services (SEPHs, the Catalan acronym) in Catalonia (the SEPHCAT study). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A professional survey researcher interviewed the medical directors of all services in Catalonia, using a questionnaire prepared by the authors. Questions covered aspects related to organization, professional staffing and employment conditions, as well as the staff's training, instructional activity and research. Only closed answers were collected. The survey reflected the situation in 2015. RESULTS: We identified 13 SEPHs (11 in the public health service and 2 private companies). Together they received 2 482 627 calls (16.4% to private services) and attended 943 849 emergencies (11.8% attended by private companies). Three hundred thirty-six basic life support units and 73 advanced life support units were reported. They were mostly considered to be of sufficient size and quality. The SEPHs contracted 1374845 person-hours/y (753995 physician-hours and 620 850 nurse-hours; 23.4% in private companies). These figures correspond to 815 full-time staff positions (447 for physicians and 368 for nurses). The numbers of physicians and nurses working were relatively stable during the morning, afternoon and evening shifts but decreased during the midnight-to-early-morning shift (physicians, by 31%; nurses, by 9%). A majority of the physicians employed were trained in family and community medicine (56.8%), but 21.3% had no specialized training; 6.5% had PhD degrees. SEPH physicians (61.5%) and nurses (46.2%) also taught undergraduate medical students; 46.2% of physicians and 84.6% of nurses taught postgraduate medical courses. Both undergraduate medical and nursing students were received in the same measure for practical training by 15.4% of the SEPHs; 69.2% also offered practical training for physicians at the postgraduate level and 76.9% trained postgraduate nurses. CONCLUSION: SEPHs in Catalonia are very active, and private companies account for nearly 12% of the activity. Together the public and private sectors employ a large number of physicians and nurses. Staff members are involved in training others but are less involved in research.

OBJETIVO: Describir las principales características de todos los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios (SEPH) existentes en Cataluña. METODO: Una encuestadora profesional entrevistó a los responsables clínicos de todos los SEPH de Cataluña. La encuesta fue preparada por los autores, y abordaba diversos aspectos organizativos, profesionales, laborales, formativos, docentes y de investigación. Las preguntas contenidas en la encuesta solo permitían respuestas cerradas, y hacían referencia a la situación en 2015. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 13 SEPH (11 públicos, 2 privados), que recibieron 2.482.627 consultas (16,4% a SEPH privados) y realizaron 943.849 atenciones (11,8% por SEPH privados). Había 336 bases de soporte vital básico y 73 de avanzado, con instalaciones mayoritariamente consideradas de tamaño suficiente y calidad buena. Se contrataron 1.374.845 horas anuales (753.995 de médico y 620.850 de enfermero), el 23,4% de ellas por SEPH privados, que globalmente corresponderían a 815 puestos de trabajo a jornada completa (447 de médico, 368 de enfermero). La dotación de médicos/enfermeros era relativamente estable durante el día, pero decaía un 31%/9% de madrugada. La especialidad médica mayoritaria era medicina familiar y comunitaria (56,8%), el 21,3% no tenía formación especializada, y el 6,5% tenía título de doctor. Había médicos/enfermeros profesores universitarios de grado en el 61,5%/46,2% de los SEPH; y de postgrado en el 46,2%/84,6%. Recibían estudiantes de medicina/enfermería en prácticas de grado el 15,4%/15,4% de los SEPH, y de postgrado el 69,2%/76,9%. CONCLUSIONES: La actividad de los SEPH en Cataluña es elevada; un 12% la desarrollan SEPH privados, y globalmente implica a un número alto de médicos y enfermeros, los cuales además desarrollan un rol docente y, en menor medida, investigador.

Presentations at 29 conferences of the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) from 1988 to 2017: a descriptive analysis. / Análisis de las características de las ponencias y ponentes de los 29 congresos de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias ­SEMES­ (1988-2017).

OBJECTIVES: To gain greater understanding of the development of emergency medicine in Spain by analyzing the presentations at conferences of the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) over the past 30 years (1988-2017). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined the programs of all SEMES conferences and described the characteristics of both presentations and presenters. We also analyzed changes occurring between 1988 and 2017 of some of the characteristics observed. The Web of Science was searched to evaluate the scientific productivity of the most frequent presenters and to calculate h-indexes for those presenters to assesstheir scientific relevance. RESULTS: SEMES did not hold a conference in 1992. The total of 29 conferences included 2182 presentations (112 listing presenters from abroad) given by 1410 presenters (89 from abroad). The presenters' affiliations named 616 centers. The number of presentations and presenters increased linearly during the first period and then leveled off. The number increased exponentially in the final phase. Men gave 79.6% of the presentations; 70.6% of the presenters were physicians, 11.9% were nurses and 4.0% were ambulance staff. Specialists in emergency medicine accounted for 60.8% of the presenters who were physicians. Presenters from the Spanish autonomous community organizing the conference gave 29.8% of the presentations. The contributions of presenters from the local organizing community were nearly always more numerous than the average number of contributions from that community in all 29 conferences overall. Conference contributions from some autonomous communities (Extremadura, Andalusia, and Catalonia) were considerably fewer than would be expected given the scientific productivity of those communities. However, communities (Murcia, Balearic Islands, Asturias, Castile-Leon, Madrid), gave many more presentations than their productivity metrics would predict. Analysis of the 59 most frequent presenters (at 5 conferences or more) showed that 64.4% of them had published at least 20 articles and that 71.2% had an h-index of 5 or higher. The number of women on the program increased significantly between 1988 and 2017. Likewise, geographic diversity increased significantly (presentations from centers outside the local organizing area) as did the participation of hospitalbased emergency medicine specialists. CONCLUSION: SEMES conference programs have attracted significantly more presentations and presenters over the years. We also detected changes in descriptive characteristics. The analysis of those characteristics can help future SEMES conference planners to plan ways to correct aspects such as scarce geographic diversity, low international participation, and few women among presenters.

OBJETIVO: . Profundizar en el conocimiento y la evolución de la Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (MUE) en España a través del análisis de las ponencias presentadas en los congresos de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) celebrados los últimos 30 años (1988-2017). METODO: Se revisaron los programas de todos los Congresos SEMES y se analizaron las características de ponencias y ponentes, así como la evolución entre 1988-2017 de algunas de estas características. Se revisó en Web of Science la producción científica y el índice h de los ponentes más frecuentes para contrastar su relevancia científica. RESULTADOS: . En los 29 Congresos SEMES (en 1992 no se celebró) se han presentado 2.182 ponencias (112 internacionales) por 1.410 ponentes (89 internacionales) procedentes de 616 centros. Hubo un crecimiento lineal de ponencias y ponentes los primeros años, una posterior fase de meseta, y finalmente un crecimiento con tendencia exponencial el último lustro. El 79,6% de ponencias fue impartida por hombres, y la distribución de médicos/enfermeros/técnicos fue 70,6%/11,9%/4,0%. Los urgenciólogos realizaron el 60,8% de ponencias médicas. La comunidad autónoma organizadora del congreso aportó el 29,8% de ponencias, casi siempre por encima de lo esperable por su aportación promedio global. Hubo comunidades autónomas cuya participación estuvo muy por debajo de su productividad científica (Extremadura, Andalucía, Cataluña) y otras muy por encima (Murcia, Baleares, Asturias, Castilla-León, Madrid). El 64,4% de los 59 ponentes más asiduos ( 5 congresos) tiene publicados 20 artículos y el 71,2% tiene un índice h 5. Entre 1988-2017 hubo incremento significativo de mujeres ponentes, diversificación geográfica (ponencias de comunidades autónomas no organizadoras del congreso) y urgenciólogos hospitalarios. CONCLUSIONES: Hubo un aumento significativo de ponencias y ponentes en los Congresos SEMES, con cambios detectables en algunas de sus características. El análisis detallado puede permitir intervenciones para corregir algunos aspectos en futuros Congresos SEMES, tales como la escasa diversificación y participación internacional y de mujeres.